scholarly journals Differences between Learning Outcomes Using Guided Inquiry and Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) Types of Learning Models on Redox Reaction Concept Material in Grade X at SMA Negeri 2 Sigi

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 209-213
Author(s):  
Mildha Y. Charin ◽  
Ratman Ratman ◽  
Vanny M. A. Tiwow

This study aimed to determine the differences between students’ learning outcomes using guided inquiry-type learning model and team assisted individualization (TAI)-type learning model on redox reaction concept in grade X at SMA Negeri 2 Sigi. This study was a quasi-experiment method. The sample was class X MIA5 as an experiment class I (n = 24 students), and class X MIA1 (n = 24 students) as an experiment class II. The data analysis showed that the average score of experiment class I was 73.79, and the experimental class II was 71.45. The results of the hypothesis test with t-test two-party statistics obtained tcount = 0.86. The value was in the reception area of H0 that was between -1.68 and 1.68. The result from the statistical test showed that there was no difference between the students' learning outcomes using guided inquiry-type and team assisted individualization type learning models on redox reaction concept material in grade X at SMA Negeri 2 Sigi

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Idham Kamil ◽  
Kashardi Kashardi

This study aims to find out the significant differences between students' mathematical understanding abilities that are taught using the Cooperative Learning Model type Auditory Intellectualy Receptition (AIR), Numbered Heads Together (NHT), and conventional learning models, and which learning model gives better results to improve students' mathematical understanding abilities. This type of research is quasi-experimental. The population in this study was class VIII 27 of Seluma State Junior High School consisting of 4 classes. The sample of this study was chosen 3 classes randomly, namely class VIII A as the experimental class I using the Cooperative learning model type Auditory Intellectualy Receptition (AIR), class VIII B as the experimental class II using the cooperative learning model type Numbered Heads Together (NHT), and Class VIII C as a control class using conventional learning models. Data collection on student mathematics learning outcomes in the form of tests consisting of pre-test and post-test. Data were analyzed using ANAVA and BNT. Based on ANAVA results, there are differences between students' mathematics learning outcomes in experimental class I, experimental class II, and control class. Based on the LSD test it was found that the treatment between the experimental class I with the experimental class II, the experimental class I with the control class, and the experimental class II with the control class there were differences. Auditory IntellectualyReceptition (AIR) cooperative learning model provides better results than the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) type of cooperative learning model and Conventional learning model.Keywords: mathematical understanding ability,  AIR,  NHT, learning model


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.Pd. ANDI TRISNOWALI MS

ABSTRACT This research aims to obtain information on whether there are differences in mathematics learning outcomes of students who were taught with MMP learning model and Direct Teaching, the population of seventh grade students SMP Negeri 5 Takalar, which consists of three classes. The sampling technique used is purposive random sampling cluster to determine experiment class I and experiment class II. Selected two classes of research samples. Class VIIA consists 27 students as experiment class I and class VIIB consists 26 students as experimental class II. Data were collected through essay-based learning test given in both experimental classes. The data of research were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis technique and inferential statistic. The result of descriptive analysis shows the result of learning student mathematics with MMP learning model has average score equal 74,37 which is categorized "high", While the results of learning with direct instruction model has average score 61.81 are categorized "high. From result of data analysis for inferential statistic obtained value 1/2 p-value <α (significance level 0,05) that is equal to 0.0005 <0,05 so that H_0 rejected. Thus, there are differences in learning outcomes taught with the MMP learning model and Direct instruction, in this case it is known that the MMP learning model is better than the Direct teaching model.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusmaneti Yusmaneti

This research is based on the low learning outcomes of Citizenship Education for fourth grade students of State Primary School 010, Pulau Aro, Kuantan Tengah Subdistrict, Kuantan Singingi Regency, from 12 students only 5 (41.66%) who achieved the minimum completeness criteria determined by the school at 70 with an average score amounting to 65.4. The research aims to improve the learning outcomes of Citizenship Education through the application of problem based intruction models. The results of the study show, during the learning process before using the problem-based learning model, the average score was 65.4 with incomplete categories and after using the learning model based on the average problem of student learning outcomes in the first cycle to 79.7 with complete categories while in the cycle II has increased again to 87.6 with complete categories. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that through the application of problem-based learning models (Problem Based Intruction) can improve Student Grade 4 Citizenship Education Learning Outcomes of State Primary School 010, Pulau Aro, Kuantan Tengah Subdistrict, Kuantan Singingi Regency.


Author(s):  
Wulan Triaheviana

This study aims to (1) describe the application of the picture and picture learning model on science subjects in grade IV of Swadaya Talang Pinang Elementary School in Musi Banyuasin Regency, (2) describe the activities of fourth grade students at Swadaya Talang Pinang Elementary School when applied to learning models picture and picture on learning Science, (3) describes the science learning outcomes of fourth grade students of Swadaya Talang Pinang Elementary School after the application of the picture and picture learning model. This study uses qualitative research with a class action research design (CAR). The results of the pre-action research obtained an average of 54.29 with 29% grade learning completeness, the first cycle obtained an average score of 64.99 with 42.86% grade learning completeness. While in the cycle, the average grade reached 74.29 with the completeness of learning class 85.71%. Based on the results of these studies it can be concluded that through the learning model picture and picture of the science learning outcomes of grade IV SD Swadaya Talang Pinang can be improved


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Arie Purwa Kusuma ◽  
Maskuroh Maskuroh

The low learning outcomes of mathematics are not appropriate thought of learning models in the classroom. Therefore, the NHT and TPS learning models can be applied to improve the learning of outcomes of the student. This study aims to determine the differences in learning outcomes using the NHT learning model with the TPS learning model. The sampling technique is used as a random sampling cluster with 2 groups of experiments for the first experimental group  (classroom view of TPS model) and the second experimental group (classes of NHT modeling). The instrument of this research uses the test of mathematics learning result. The hypothesis test is used  T-Test. The conclusion of research that are differences in the outcomes of the two learning models (NHT and TPS) on learning outcomes, based on the marginal mean of the TPS learning model is better learning outcomes than the NHT learning model. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-201
Author(s):  
Adha Siagian ◽  
◽  
Kartika Manalu ◽  
Khairuddin Khairuddin

This study aims to determine the differences between NHT) and STAD learning outcomes of clas VII Biology MTs Madinatussalam. The sample of this research is class VII-1 with 32 student as NHT class and 32 student in VII-2 as STAD class. The instrument used in this study was a multiple choice test concisting of 20 questions. The results of analysis showed that the average post-test score for the experimental class I NHT was 82 very high category. Meanwhile, the experimental class II STAD the average post-test score was 67,2 high category. The hypothesis test of the difference in learning outcomes of students in expremental class I NHT and expremental class II STAD, obtained tcount = 6,036>ttable = 1.999, then Ho is rejected and Ha is acepted. This shows that there is a difference in the biology lerning out comes of student who are thought using NHT learning method and those taught using the STAD learning method.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-43
Author(s):  
Muhammad Isnaini ◽  
Nadiroh Nadiroh ◽  
Moch. Sukardjo

This study aimed to determine the differences in learning outcomes of media development courses and learning material between groups of students who are taught using guided inquiry learning models compared to groups of students who are taught using discovery learning models. Research approaches conducted by researchers using quantitative descriptive methods. The object of research conducted on students in the media development and learning material subject in the one of Study Program at UIN Raden Fatah Palembang. Analysis of the data and formulas used to test hypotheses using t-test which first performed an analysis of the normality of the data, a homogeneity. Based on the measurement results of the Islamic Education student learning outcomes, the researcher can conclude that the discovery learning and guided inquiry learning model influences of learning outcomes. The data analysis and formula used were normality test, homogeneity test and then hypothesis testing. Based on the results of the measurement of learning outcomes, the researcher can conclude that there are differences in learning outcomes using the discovery learning model and the inquiry learning model in the course of media development and learning resources. This is shown from the calculation results, namely the significance value which is below 0.05, which is equal to 0.000. It is hoped that other researchers can develop other studies that focus on other thinking skills such as critical thinking.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yenny Puspita Sari ◽  
Masri Masri

In this research aims to see the difference of mathematical problem solving students with Guided Inquiry learning model and Means Ends Analysis (MEA) learning model. This research was a quasi-experimental research in SMPN 14 Kota Bengkulu. The population of this research is all of VIII class students, with the sample of research is VIII I class as the experimental class I that given using guided inquiry model treatment, students of class VIII 3 as the experimental class II that given Means Ends Analysis model treatment, students of class VIII 2 as the control class that given conventional model treatment. The data collection of students result study using mathematical problem solving skills test consists of pre-test and post-test. The data obtained were analyzed using one path ANAVA and continued with BNT test. Based on the ANAVA result there is a difference between students' mathematical problem solving abilities in experimental class I, experimental class II and control class. From the BNT test that the treatment between experimental class I given the Guided Inquiry, Experimental class II treatment given the Means Ends Analysis  treatment no difference in mathematical problem solving ability, while experimental class I (Guided Inquiry) with control and experimental class II Means Ends Analysis with the control there is a difference in problem solving abilities mathematically and the highest average score was obtained in the students treated with the Guided Inquiry model.  Keywords : Ability of Mathematical Problem Solving Students, Guided Inquiry Model, Means Ends Analysis Model


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 225
Author(s):  
Anasril Anasril

The background of this research is the low learning outcomes of science subjects. Of 36 students, only 36.11% or 13 students whose learning outcomes were completed, besides that the average score of students was 54.60. Based on this, researchers conducted classroom action research by applying problem-based learning models. This research was conducted in SD Negeri 006 Kelawat Kecamatan Sungai Lala, with research subjects of class II students with 36 students. The results of the study stated that the learning outcomes experienced a marked increase in the number of students who completed were 13 people on the basic score to 25 people on the daily test I and increased to 30 people on the daily test II. This means that the sample class has finished classically. There was an increase in the average learning outcomes from basic scores, namely 36.00 to 64.00 in the first cycle and 84.00 in the second cycle.


Author(s):  
Andi Kaharuddin

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of problem-based learning models towards the mathematics learning outcomes of 6th-grade students of an Elementary School accredited B in Kendari City. This study is quantitative experimental research. The population in this were all 6th-grade students of an Elementary School accredited B in Kendari City. The technique of determining the sample was done by cluster random sampling. Data analysis used is descriptive statistics and inferential statistics where the hypothesis test used is the t-test. The results showed the effect of problem-based learning models better than direct instruction and problem-based learning model positive effect on mathematics learning outcomes of 6th-grade students of an Elementary School Accredited B in Kendari City.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document