scholarly journals Effect of Problem Based Learning Model on Mathematical Learning Outcomes of 6th Grade Students of Elementary School Accredited B in Kendari City

Author(s):  
Andi Kaharuddin

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of problem-based learning models towards the mathematics learning outcomes of 6th-grade students of an Elementary School accredited B in Kendari City. This study is quantitative experimental research. The population in this were all 6th-grade students of an Elementary School accredited B in Kendari City. The technique of determining the sample was done by cluster random sampling. Data analysis used is descriptive statistics and inferential statistics where the hypothesis test used is the t-test. The results showed the effect of problem-based learning models better than direct instruction and problem-based learning model positive effect on mathematics learning outcomes of 6th-grade students of an Elementary School Accredited B in Kendari City.

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
Usmadi Usmadi ◽  
Ergusni Ergusni

This research is based on the emergence of the 2013 curriculum which expects a learnng process that can make students actively construct their knowledge. The effectiveness of ARCSI learning models with a scientific approach can be seen from student learning outcomes, through 1) Student Worksheets (LKPD), 2) Test of learning outcomes. The results of the study show that the learning model developed is effective when viewed from students' mathematics learning outcomes. The level of effectiveness of the ARCSI learning model with a scientific approach obtained the results of LKIPD grades VII1 SMP N 7 and class VII1 SMP N 1 Ampek Angkek is categorized as effective with a mean of 75.017. The level of effectiveness of ARCSI learning models with a scientific approach obtained from the value of test questions on cognitive learning outcomes is categorized as effective with a mean of 61.38. Based on the hypothesis test for mathematics learning outcomes data can be drawn conclusions, namely: 1) Mathematics learning outcomes of class VII1 students (experimental class) is better than the mathematics learning outcomes of class VII4 students (control class) SMP N 7 Bukittinggi city; 2) Mathematics learning outcomes of class VII1 students (experimental class) are better than mathematics learning outcomes of class VII2 students (control class) Ampek Angkek N 1 junior high school in Agam district


Author(s):  
Ek Ajeng Rahmi Pinahayu ◽  
Aulia Ar Rakhman Awaludin ◽  
Purni Munah Hartuti

The study aims to determine the effectiveness of mathematics learning achievement for students who are subject to the Problem Based Learning model assisted by CD Learning and CD Interactive as well as Conventional learning models on flat-build material. The population in this study were seventh grade students of SMP Negeri 223 Jakarta Timur in the academic year 2017/2018. By using selected cluster random sampling techniques VII 3 as the control class, VII 6 and VII 7 respectively as the experimental class PBL models assisted CD learning and assisted PBL models CD Interactive. Data were obtained by documentation and tests, then analyzed by Normality, Homogeneity, One-way Variant Analysis (ANOVA), Two-party and One-party Similarity Test. The results showed that there were significant differences between mathematics learning achievement of students who were taught by learning using PBL models assisted by CD Interactive, PBL models assisted by CD learning and conventional learning. Learning achievement of students who get learning using CD Interactive media is better than students who get conventional learning. Likewise, the learning achievements of students who get learning using CD Learning, media are better than students who get conventional learning. In addition, there were no significant differences between the mathematics learning outcomes of students who were taught using PBL models assisted by CD Interactive and students using PBL models assisted by CD Learning.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Arie Purwa Kusuma ◽  
Maskuroh Maskuroh

The low learning outcomes of mathematics are not appropriate thought of learning models in the classroom. Therefore, the NHT and TPS learning models can be applied to improve the learning of outcomes of the student. This study aims to determine the differences in learning outcomes using the NHT learning model with the TPS learning model. The sampling technique is used as a random sampling cluster with 2 groups of experiments for the first experimental group  (classroom view of TPS model) and the second experimental group (classes of NHT modeling). The instrument of this research uses the test of mathematics learning result. The hypothesis test is used  T-Test. The conclusion of research that are differences in the outcomes of the two learning models (NHT and TPS) on learning outcomes, based on the marginal mean of the TPS learning model is better learning outcomes than the NHT learning model. 


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dewi Mutia Anggraeni ◽  
Paridjo . ◽  
Eleonora Dwi W

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan : (1) Untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dan model pembelajaran Ekspositori.(2) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik dari pada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi.(3) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembeljaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah peserta didik kelas VII SMP Negeri 3 Brebes tahun pelajaran 2016/2017. Pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling. Sampel yang diambil sebanyak 2 kelas eksperimen, 2 kelas kontrol, dan 1 kelas ujicoba. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes, angket, dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dengan menetapkan taraf signifikansi 5% adalah uji Anava dengan Rancangan Acak Kelompok, uji-t satu pihak kanan, dan uji-t satu pihak kiri, yang sebelumnya telah dilakukan uji prasyarat yaitu uji normalitas dan uji homogenitas. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa: (1) Ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dengan model pembelajaran Ekspositori. (2) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi. (3) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik atau sama dengan yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out whether there are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students taught by using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach and Expository learning models. (2) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievements of students taught by the model Think Pair and Share learning through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is not better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learning independence. The population in this study were students of class VII of SMP Negeri 3 Brebes academic year 2016/2017. Sampling uses cluster random sampling technique. Samples taken were 2 experimental classes, 2 control classes, and 1 trial class. Data collection techniques used were tests, questionnaires, and documentation. The data analysis technique used by setting the 5% significance level is the Anova test with the Randomized Group Design, the right-hand t-test, and the left-hand t-test, which has previously been carried out prerequisite tests namely normality test and homogeneity test. From the results of the study it can be concluded that: (1) There are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students who are taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach with the Expository learning model. (2) Mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) Mathematics learning achievements of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach are not better or the same as those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learningindependence. Keywords: ThinkPairandShare, InquiryApproach, Learning Independence, Mathematics Learning Achievement.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 323
Author(s):  
Elly Sukmanasa ◽  
Yanti Suryanti ◽  
Lina Novita ◽  
Teti Rostikawati

This study aims to improve the learning outcomes of mathematics through the Discovery Learning model. The 32 students of the fifth grade Papandayan State Elementary School became the subjects under study. The result showed that the learning implementation score in the first cycle was 72.2 and in the second cycle is 85.4. There are behavioral changes in students’ discipline, cooperation, confidence and enthusiasm in the first cycle with the acquisition of scores was 69.4, and in the second cycle increases to 81.13; meanwhile the average scores of students learning outcomes in the first cycle was 67.54 with the learning completion of 59.37%, and an average value in the second cycle is 80.86 with the learning completion 87.5%. The results of all aspects have increased: the implementation of learning increases to 13.2%, changes in student behavior with 11.73%, and completeness of mathematics learning outcomes increases to 28.13%. It can be concluded that the application of the Discovery Learning model improves the students’  students’ activities in each cycle.AbstrakMatematika merupakan mata pelajaran yang sering dikatakan sebagai mata pelajaran yang sulit. Kenyataan ini didukung dengan rendahnya tingkat keberhasilan belajar yang didapat peserta didik. Oleh sebab itu penelitian dilakukan untuk mencari model yang tepat dalam peningkatan hasil belajar. Mengacu pada permasalahan tersebut, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar matematika melalui model Discovery Learning. 32 siswa dari kelas lima Sekolah Dasar Negeri Papandayan menjadi mata pelajaran yang diteliti. Penelitian tindakan kelas diberikan pada kelas dengan nilai rendah. Penelitian dilakukan menerapkan model pembelajaran dengan dua siklus. Hal ini bertujuan guna mendapatkan hasil yang sesuai dengan indikator.  Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa skor implementasi pembelajaran pada siklus pertama adalah 72,2 dan pada siklus kedua adalah 85,4. Ada perubahan perilaku dalam disiplin siswa, kerja sama, kepercayaan diri dan antusiasme pada siklus pertama dengan perolehan skor adalah 69,4, dan pada siklus kedua meningkat menjadi 81,13; Sementara itu skor rata-rata hasil belajar siswa pada siklus I adalah 67,54 dengan ketuntasan belajar 59,37%, dan nilai rata-rata pada siklus II adalah 80,86 dengan ketuntasan belajar 87,5%. Hasil semua aspek telah meningkat: pelaksanaan pembelajaran meningkat menjadi 13,2%, perubahan perilaku siswa dengan 11,73%, dan kelengkapan hasil belajar matematika meningkat menjadi 28,13%. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa penerapan model Discovery Learning meningkatkan aktivitas siswa siswa dalam setiap siklus.Kata kunci: Hasil belajar, Matematika, Discovery Learning


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-158
Author(s):  
VALEN ANASTASYA SITUMORANG

This study aims to determine the effect of using Problem Based Learning models on students’ learning outcomes. This research was conducted at SDN 068003 P.Simalingkar Medan in July 2018. The subjects of research were 33 students’. The research method is a One Shot Case Study that is carried out in one class. The instrument used to collecting the data is a multiple choice test. Hypothesis testing is done using the "t-test".The results of statistical calculations showed that the students' mathematics learning outcomes using conventional learning models included in the sufficient category with the students’ mean score is 64.24, while the learning outcomes through the Problem Based Learning model in the excellent category with the mean score is 80.90. Furthermore, hypothesis testing shows that t count is 83.3 and then consulted with table t at the significant α = 0.05 with dk = 64 is 1.67. Therefore, the tcount obtained is greater than t table that is 83.3> 1.67 so it is proven that the null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is accepted. So it can be concluded that the Problem Based Learning model influences for the students’ learning outcomes in Mathematics subjects at the fifth grade students’ of SDN 068003 P.Simalingkar Medan in academic year 2018/2019. Thus, this learning model is appropriate for use in the learning process.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 317
Author(s):  
Aqsyari Pujianti Syam ◽  
Irwan Akib ◽  
Agustan Syamsuddin

This study aims to describe the application of the cooperative learning model of the Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) type assisted by manipulative learning media to improve student learning outcomes in shape material. This study involved 29 elementary grade VI students as a research sample and used a pre-experimental research type with a one-group pretest-posttest design. Student mathematics learning outcomes data obtained from student learning outcomes tests consisting of 10 breakdown questions and analyzed using descriptive and inferential analysis. To see an increase in student mathematics learning outcomes can be interpreted using normalized gain (N-gain). From the results of data analysis, it is obtained that: (1) the average value of student learning outcomes before applying the TAI learning model assisted by manipulative media is 42.21 with a low category; (2) the average value of learning outcomes after applying the TAI learning model assisted by manipulative media is 74.76 with a high category; (3) hypothesis test results obtained tcount> t table (13,589> 2,048) and the significance value is 0,000 <0.05 so that Ha (Ha: µ1 <µ2) is accepted; (4) increase in the value of pretest and posttest with gain index (d) of 0.56 with the medium category. Thus, it can be concluded that the application of the cooperative learning model of the TAI type can improve the learning outcomes of elementary school students in grade VI in shape material. Therefore, this type of TAI cooperative learning model can be used as an alternative learning model that can be used in order to improve student learning outcomes


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-76
Author(s):  
Chrisnaji Banindra Yudha ◽  
Evayenny Evayenny ◽  
Dyah Anungrat Herzamzam

This study aims to prove the effect of the  PAIKEM GEMBROT  model on mathematics learning outcomes in fractions material, between students who are given learning with the  PAIKEM GEMBROT  model compared to students taught with the Jigsaw cooperative learning model. This research was conducted for two months to be precise, namely January to March 2019, with a total sample of 60 students, to be precise 30 VD class students who were given using the  PAIKEM GEMBROT  model and 30 students in VA class using the Jigsaw cooperative learning model. . Based on the calculation, it was found that the average learning outcomes of students through the  PAIKEM GEMBROT  model had an average of 73.5. Furthermore, the learning outcomes using the average model are 60.1. Based on the hypothesis test, the value of tcount = 5.101> t table = 2.00172 is obtained. So it can be concluded that H1 is accepted and Ho is rejected. The conclusion of this study is that there is a significant difference between the mathematics learning outcomes of students who are taught using the  PAIKEM GEMBROT  model and the Mathematics learning outcomes using the Jigsaw cooperative learning model on fraction material in class V Jatirangga 03 Bekasi elementary school.


Author(s):  
Isnaeni Isnaeni

<em>The purpose of this study was to improve mathematics learning outcomes for students in grade II elementary schools with the Project Based Learning (PjBL) learning model by making projects in the form of nail boards in groups. The research conducted was a Classroom Action Research (CAR) in three cycles, with each cycle consisting of one meeting. The stages of each cycle are planning, implementing, observing and reflecting. In the first cycle, the students who completed the evaluation were 37,5%. In the second cycle, students who completed the evaluation were 81,25%. In cycle III, students who completed after evaluating were 93,75%. These results indicate that the Project Based Learning (PjBL) learning model by making projects in the form of nailed boards in groups can improve mathematics learning outcomes for Class II students at SDN 1 Randegan.</em>


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-278
Author(s):  
Mutiara Nofa Nst ◽  
Rahmi Rahmi

AbstrakPenelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh hasil belajar siswa masih rendah dan masih banyak yang belum mencapai Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal (KKM). Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah hasil belajar matematika siswa dengan menerapkan model pembelajaran berbasis masalah disertai teknik berikan uangnya lebih baik daripada hasil belajar matematika siswa dengan pembelajaran konvensional pada siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 16 Padang. Jenis penelitan adalah penelitian eksperimen dengan rancangan random terhadap subjek. Terpilih kelas VIII 6 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas VIII 5 sebagai kelas kontrol. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan adalah tes akhir berbentuk esai dengan reliabilitas tes adalah〖 r〗_11=0,7062. Statistik uji yang digunakan untuk pengujian hipotesis adalah uji t satu pihak. Hasil uji hipotesis diperoleh t_hitung=1,78 dan t_tabel=1,67 dengan α=0,05, maka t_hitung>t_tabel dengan demikian hipotesis penelitian diterima. Jadi dapat disimpulkan bahwa hasil belajar matematika siswa dengan menerapkan model pembelajaran berbasis masalah disertai teknik berikan uangnya lebih baik daripada hasil belajar matematika siswa dengan menerapkan pembelajaran konvensional pada kelas VIII SMP Negeri 16 Padang.Kata Kunci: Hasil Belajar Matematika, Model Pembelajaran Berbais Masalah, Teknik Berikan Uangnya.AbstractThe background of this research by outcomes of student study still low and still many students of yet reached the minimum completeness criteria (KKM). The purpose of this research to know what the outcomes of study mathematics students with apply the problem based learning model with techniques give the money better than aplly the conventional learning of study at eighth grade in SMPN 16 Padang. The kind of this research is experimental research with design is random by the subject. Selected class VIII 6 as experimental class and VIII 5 as control class. The instruments of this research is test like essay with use reliability r_11= 0,7062. Statistic test used for hypothesis testing is t-test of the parties. Hypothesis test result obtain t_count= 1,78 and t_table= 1,67 with α=0,05, then t_count > t_table so the hypothesis of this research is accepted. So, it can conclude that result of study in mathematics with apply the problem based learning model with techniques give the money better than aplly the conventional learning of study at eighth grade in SMPN 16 Padang.Keyword: Mathematics Learning Outcomes, Problem Based Learning Model, Techniques Give The Money.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document