scholarly journals The Concept of Heat Transfer measured by Cognitive Domain Assessment Instruments

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 140
Author(s):  
Ni Kadek Yuniasih ◽  
Kadek Yudiana ◽  
I Gusti Ngurah Japa

The lack of availability in assessment instruments used and unmet cognitive levels of C3-C6 resulted in poor quality assessments. This study aims to develop cognitive domain assessment instruments on the concept of heat transfer material in grade V elementary school. This research was development research that used 4D models (Four-D models) to define, design, develop, and disseminate. The subject of study was the assessment instrument of the cognitive realm with the object of research, that was the instrument quality. Measurement of the validity of the content was done on two experts/judges using the non-test method and instruments of the expert validity sheet. Instrument quality measurement was conducted with field trials of 106 students using multiple-choice objective test instruments. The content validity data obtained were analyzed with the Gregory formula, while the field test result data analyzed the validity of the grain, reliability, different power, and difficulty level.  The results showed that the validity of the content obtained by 0.97 (very high) with the test results of the item's validity got 30 points of the question was declared valid. The instrument reliability index was developed by 0.85 (very high). The average coefficient of different power obtained is 0.51 (good) with a test device difficulty of 0.52 (medium). The result demonstrated cognitive domain assessment instruments that were developed feasible and can be used in conducting learning assessments in the cognitive realm.

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Septian Triadi Syahputra

The aim of this study was to develop the psychomotor assessment instruments on experiment of factors that influence the rate of reaction which is feasible to be used. The development model used in this research was the modification model of 4P development into 3P which is recommended by Thiagarajan that is defining, designing and developing. Data collection techniques used were structured observation and questionnaire. The research instruments used were observation sheet and questionnaire. Initial field trials conducted on six students of class XII IPA 1, involving four observers while the main field trial conducted on 36 students of class XI IPA 1. The researcher involved four observers and one chemistry teacher. The feasibility of the developed psychomotor aspects assessment instrument is based on validity and practical aspects. The results obtained in this study were: (1) the average value of the validity of the psychomotor aspects assessment instrument was 1.00 with very high criteria and (2) the practicality of the psychomotor aspects assessment instrument based on the observers' response of 94.44 with very high criteria and teachers' response 90.27 with very high criteria. Based on the validity and practicality of the psychomotor aspect appraisal instrument the factors affecting the reaction rate are feasible to use


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 231
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Sri Diah Anggraeni ◽  
Gede Wira Bayu ◽  
I Gde Wawan Sudatha

This study aimed to develop an instrument for assessing science learning outcomes based on HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills). This research was development research that uses a 4D model (four-D model) with development stages consisting of define, design, develop, and distribute. This development research was only carried out until the development stage. The subject of this research was the HOTS-based science learning outcome assessment instrument in the form of grids and multiple-choice test sheets. Data were obtained by using interviews, observation, and test methods. The validation of the assessment instrument was carried out by two material experts using a validation sheet and 78 students for a limited trial using multiple-choice objective test instruments. The results obtained will be analyzed for validity, reliability, discriminatory power, level of difficulty, and quality of distractors. The results of the analysis of the HOTS-based science learning outcome assessment instrument had a validity of 0.90 which was in the very high category, reliability of 0.81 which was in the very high category. Distinguishing analysis obtained 2 items with very good criteria, 14 items with good criteria, and 9 items with sufficient criteria. In the difficulty level test, 12 questions were obtained in the easy category and 13 questions in the medium category. Analysis of the distractor quality test found 63 distractors were at the >5% level, which means the distractors are functioning well and 12 distractors were at the 5% level, which means the distractors were not functioning properly. These results indicated that the HOTS-based science learning outcome test assessment instrument developed was valid and reliable and is suitable for use as an assessment instrument in various styles of material.


2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (10) ◽  
pp. 3225-3244 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Y. M. van Esch ◽  
A. D. Denzel ◽  
E. J. A. Scherder ◽  
E. D. M. Masthoff

Detection of intellectual disability (ID) in the penitentiary system is important for the following reasons: (a) to provide assistance to people with ID in understanding their legal rights and court proceedings; (b) to facilitate rehabilitation programs tailored to ID patients, which improves the enhancement of their quality of life and reduces their risk of reoffending; and (c) to provide a reliable estimate of the risk of offence recidivism. It requires a short assessment instrument that provides a reliable estimation of a person’s intellectual functioning at the earliest possible stage of this process. The aim of this systematic review is (a) to provide an overview of recent short assessment instruments that provide a full-scale IQ score in adult prison populations and (b) to achieve a quality measurement of the validation studies regarding these instruments to determine which tests are most feasible in this target population. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement is used to ensure reliability. The Satz-Mögel, an item-reduction short form of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, shows the highest correlation with the golden standard and is described to be most reliable. Nevertheless, when it comes to applicability in prison populations, the shorter and less verbal Quick Test can be preferred over others. Without affecting these conclusions, major limitations emerge from the present systematic review, which give rise to several important recommendations for further research.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-100
Author(s):  
Nurhayati Nurhayati ◽  
◽  
Wahyudi Wahyudi ◽  
Syarif Lukman Hakim ◽  
◽  
...  

This study aims to 1) produce a HOTS assessment instrument; 2) knowing the quality of the test instrument in terms of the feasibility of construction, material feasibility, and language feasibility according to the expert; and 3) knowing the quality of the test items in terms of validity, reliability, difficulty level and distinguishing power based on the test results. Research and Development ware used as a research method with 4D procedural development model consists of four stages, namely: the define stage, the design stage, the development stage, and the dissemination stage. The questionnaire was used for expert judgment validation. The characteristics measurement of the HOTS items instrument including the validity, reliability, difficulty level and distinguishing power of the questions. The HOTS assessment instrument developed was in the form of multiple-choice options with a reason based on HOTS in aspects of analyzing, evaluating and creating. The results of expert validation show that the average item with criteria is very good in terms of content, construct and language aspects. Instruments that have been validated and revised were tested on students who had studied vibration and wave material and the test results showed that 77% of the questions developed were of good quality with valid criteria, good distinguishing criteria, level of difficulty at moderate and easy levels and very strong reliability so that feasible and ready to be used to measure students' higher order thinking skills in vibrations and waves material. Keywords: HOTS, Instruments test, Vibrations and waves


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 258
Author(s):  
Anang Triyoso ◽  
Muslimin Ibrahim ◽  
Raharjo Raharjo

This  research  aims  was  to develop  a competency-based  assessment  instruments  in subject  of  Science/Biology.  This research was carried out through the development of the following 4-D design models of Thiagarajan (1974) and then continued the implementation the classroom using One Shot Case Study Design. The data were obtained as follows: the results of the validation instruments decent role in the category; legibility of instruments indicates that the content, appearance, difficulty sentences and interesting pictures and easy to understand students; enforceability of good category; effectiveness of the instrument showed that cognitive assessment to have a reliability tes objective 0.39, the level of difficulty of items were easily as many as 11 items (36.7%), medium as many as 16 items (53.3%), and difficult as many as 3 items (10%), sensitive items as many as 27 items (90%) and less sensitive as many as 3 items (10%), while the essay test has a reliability of 0.45, an easy difficulty level items as many as 2 items (20%), medium as many as 4 items (40%), and difficult as many as 4 items (40%), sensitive items as many as 6 items (60%) and less sensitive as many as 4 items (40%); assessment of the affective domain has a reliability 0.81; assessment of psychomotor domains I has a reliability  of 0.52 and psychomotor  II has a reliability  of 0.62.  Student  field  constraints  are not  accustomed  to using competency-based assessment instrument. Based on the analysis of data, it can be concluded that a Competency-Based Assessment Instruments in subject of Science/Biology that have been developed are valid, practical, and effective.Penelitian  ini  bertujuan  untuk  mengembangkan  instrumen  asesmen  komprehensif  berbasis  kompetensi  pada  mata pelajaran IPA/Biologi. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan melalui pengembangan instrumen mengikuti rancangan 4-D model dari Thiagarajan  (1974)  kemudian  dilanjutkan  implementasi  di  kelas  menggunakan  rancangan  One  Shot  Case  Study.  Data  hasil penelitian yang diperoleh sebagai berikut: hasil validasi instrumen dalam kategori layak; keterbacaan instrumen  menunjukkan bahwa isi, penampilan, kesulitan kalimat dan gambar menarik dan mudah dipahami siswa; keterlaksanaan instrumen berkategori sangat baik; keefektifan instrumen menunjukkan bahwa asesmen ranah kognitif untuk tes objektif memiliki reliabilitas 0,39, tingkat kesukaran butir soal mudah sebanyak 11 butir soal (36,7%), sedang sebanyak 16 butir soal (53,3%), dan sukar sebanyak 3 butir soal (10%), butir soal sensitif sebanyak 27 butir soal (90%) dan kurang sensitif sebanyak 3 butir soal (10%), sedangkan tes uraian memiliki reliabilitas 0,45, tingkat kesukaran butir soal mudah sebanyak 2 butir soal (20%), sedang sebanyak 4 butir soal (40%), dan sukar sebanyak 4 butir soal (40%), butir soal sensitif sebanyak 6 butir soal (60%) dan kurang sensitif sebanyak 4 butir soal (40%); asesmen ranah afektif memiliki reliabilitas 0,81; asesmen ranah psikomotor I memiliki reliabilitas 0,52 dan psikomotor II memiliki reliabilitas  0,62.  Kendala  lapangan  adalah  siswa  belum  terbiasa  menggunakan  instrumen  asesmen  komprehensif  berbasis kompetensi. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, dapat disimpulkan bahwa instrumen asesmen komprehensif berbasis kompetensi pada mata pelajaran IPA/Biologi yang dikembangkan valid, praktis, dan efektif.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-124
Author(s):  
Miske Hayunia Hamidah ◽  
Siti Sri Wulandari

Abstrak: Pengembangan instrumen penilaian berbasis HOTS menggunakan aplikasi “quizizz”. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mengembangkan alat evaluasi berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) menggunakan aplikasi Quizizz, menguji tingkat kelayakan instrumen penilaian HOTS yang telah dikembangkan, menganalisis kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa, dan menganalisis respon siswa terhadap penggunaan aplikasi Quizizz. Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian pengembangan  dengan model pengembangan Sugiyono sepuluh langkah namun dibatasi dengan tujuh langkah pengembangan. Subjek pada penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XII produktif Otomatisasi Tata Kelola Perkantoran (OTKP)  sebanyak 34 siswa. Hasil validasi produk pengembangan kepada tiga validator ahli diperoleh rata-rata validasi sebesar 94% (sangat kuat). Adapun hasil pengembangan, menunjukkan dari 30 butir soal yang dikembangkan 25 soal dikatakan valid dengan perhitungan r hitung > r tabel (0,3291). Reliabilitas soal sebesar 0,77 > 0,60 sehingga soal dapat dikatakan reliable. Tingkat kesukaran soal memiliki rata-rata “Sedang”. Terdapat 2 soal dengan daya pembeda “Kurang” sehingga soal harus dibuang. Secara keseluruhan pengecoh soal sudah berfungsi dengan baik ditunjukkan dengan pemilihan option jawaban melebihi 5% dari jumlah siswa. Hasil uji coba pada penelitian ini menunjukkan siswa memiliki rata-rata kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi pada kriteria “Cukup”. Rata-rata respon siswa sebesar 89,5% artinya siswa memberikan respon sangat positif dalam penggunaan Quizizz saat penerapan instrumen penilaian HOTS. Abstract: Development of HOTS-based assessment instruments using the "quizizz" application. The purpose of this research is to develop an evaluation tool based on Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) using the Quizizz application, to test the feasibility of the HOTS assessment instrument that has been developed, to analyze students 'higher order thinking skills, and to analyze students' responses to the use of the Quizizz application. The method used in this study is a development research method with the Sugiyono ten-step development model but is limited to seven development steps. The subjects in this study were all students of class XII productive Office Governance Automation (OTKP) as many as 34 students. The results of the validation of development products to three expert validators obtained an average validation of 94% (very strong). As for the development results, it shows that of the 30 items developed, 25 questions are said to be valid with the calculation of r count> r table (0.3291). The reliability of the questions is 0.77> 0.60 so that the questions can be said to be reliable. The difficulty level of the item has a "Medium" average. There are 2 questions with "Less" distinguishing power, so the questions must be discarded. Overall, the question fraudsters are functioning properly, indicated by the selection of answer options exceeding 5% of the total number of students. The test results in this study showed students had an average high-order thinking ability on the "Enough" criterion. The average student response was 89.5%, meaning that students gave a very positive response in using Quizizz when implementing HOTS assessment instruments 


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Annisa Duma Sari

Science as one of the subject in the 2013 curiculum demands the development of students’ scientific literacy. The measurement of scientific literacy of Indonesian students conducted by PISA (Program for International Student Assessment) is still relatively low. This can be caused by the process and the assessment instruments used today are dominated by low cognitive demands so that they have not been able to develop students’ high level order thingking. This research aims to develop assessment instruments based on scientific literacy of the motion of living things, structure and function of plant tissues for class VIII SMP. This development research using the Plomp model which consists of preliminary research phase, development or prototyping phase, and assessment phase. The subjects were 39 students of class IX SMP Negeri 8 Padang. The results showed that validity was logically stated to be very valid with an average 86.55% and valid according to empirical validity of 76.78%. Based on practicalities are very high with value of 88.75%  from teachear and of 88.94% from students. The reability shows a very high category with 0.81 for multiple choice question and a moderate category of 0.59 for true-false questions. The level of difficulty is varies and has a good distinguishing. Based on this, it can be concluded that assessment instruments based on scientific literacy of the motion of living things, structure and function of plant tissues for class VIII SMP can be declared very valid, very practical, and reliability in the medium to very high categories. Keywords:  scientific literacy, assessment


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
Ikrima Maulida ◽  
I Ketut Dibia ◽  
I Gede Astawan

The purpose of this study was to determine the quality of the results of the development of social attitude assessment instrument and social studies learning outcomes of grade IV on theme of Indahnya Keragaman di Negeriku. The development model used in this study is the 4D model. The 4D model consists of four stages: define, design, develop and disseminate. These four stages of the development model are used as a reference in producing and validating developed assessment instruments. The validation of the assessment instrument was carried out by two subject matter experts and 113 students for field trials. Data collected by questionnaire and test methods. The test instrument used was an objective test to assess student learning outcomes and the non-test instrument used was a questionnaire to assess students' social attitudes. The results of this study were the content validity test of 1.00 including the very high category, the item validity test produced 36 valid test items, the reliability test of 0.820 included very high criteria, the analysis of different power problems obtained 3 very good questions, 15 good enough questions, 11 questions good, and 7 questions are not good, the difficulty level analysis shows that there are 22 questions with easy criteria and 14 questions with moderate criteria.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 145
Author(s):  
Nurhayati Nurhayati ◽  
Dwi Fajar Saputri ◽  
Syarif Lukman Hakim Assegaf

<p class="StyleAuthorBold"><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Penelitian bertujuan untuk menghasilkan perangkat instrumen penilaian untuk mengukur keterampilan proses sains pada materi optika, tekanan, dan getaran gelombang. Penelitian merupakan penelitian <em>research and development</em> dengan tahapan 4D yang dibatasi hanya menggunakan tiga tahapan yaitu tahap <em>define</em>, <em>design</em>, dan <em>development</em>. Instrumen penelitian berupa angket uji kelayakan soal yang ditujukan kepada validator dan angket respons siswa. Subjek  penelitian adalah siswa kelas IX SMP Negeri yang ada di Kecamatan Sungai Kakap yang berjumlah 20 orang. Tes yang dikembangkan berbentuk pilihan ganda beralasan dan <em>essay</em>. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) Validitas atau kelayakan instrumen KPS yang dikembangkan berdasarkan pakar adalah valid dan layak digunakan; (2) Validitas butir soal instrumen penilaian KPS yang dikembangkan dengan kriteria valid; (3) Reliabilitas soal dari instrumen KPS sangat kuat untuk soal pilihan ganda materi optika dan getaran gelombang; reliabilitas kuat untuk soal materi tekanan; dan reliabilitas sedang untuk soal <em>essay</em> materi optika, tekanan, dan getaran gelombang; dan (4) Soal-soal yang dikembangkan dalam instrumen penilaian KPS didominasi soal dengan tingkat kesukaran kategori sedang.</p><p> </p><p class="abstrak" align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>The research aims to produce an instrument of assessment to measure science process skills in optical material, pressure and vibration waves. This research is a research and development study with 4D stages that are limited to only using three stages, namely the define, design, and development stages. The research instrument was in the form of questionnaire due diligence questions addressed to students' validators and questionnaires. The subjects were grade IX students of one of the 20 state junior high schools in Sungai Kakap. The developed test is in the form of multiple-choice reasoning and essay. The results of the study show that: (1) The validity or feasibility of the developed KPS instrument is valid and suitable for use; (2) The validity of items from the KPS assessment instruments developed with valid criteria; (3) The reliability of the questions from the KPS instrument is very strong for the matter of multiple-choice optical material and wave vibrations; strong reliability for matter of pressure material; and moderate reliability for optical material, pressure, and wave vibration essays; and (4) Questions developed in the KPS assessment instrument are dominated by problems with difficulty level medium category.</em></p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Kusuma Wardany

This study on Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) assessment employed Borg and Gall (1983)’s modified Research and Development (R&D). The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of HOTS assessment instruments on ecosystem material. The sample of development included 4 validating experts, 40 students in limited test, 140 students in field test using Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) assessment. Data analysis was carried out using Quest program. The result of research showed that (1) the characteristics of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) assessment was developed based on, among others, Anderson and Krathwohl’s indicator of higher-order thinking skill in ecosystwith validity and reliability interpreting as having very high mean, at least low in ecosystem material.The results of the validation of the instrument of assessment instrument in each expert validator are having a good content and concept validation to be applied in school, of course after the revision.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document