scholarly journals PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN TES KETERAMPILAN PROSES SAINS PADA MATERI FISIKA UNTUK SISWA SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 145
Author(s):  
Nurhayati Nurhayati ◽  
Dwi Fajar Saputri ◽  
Syarif Lukman Hakim Assegaf

<p class="StyleAuthorBold"><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Penelitian bertujuan untuk menghasilkan perangkat instrumen penilaian untuk mengukur keterampilan proses sains pada materi optika, tekanan, dan getaran gelombang. Penelitian merupakan penelitian <em>research and development</em> dengan tahapan 4D yang dibatasi hanya menggunakan tiga tahapan yaitu tahap <em>define</em>, <em>design</em>, dan <em>development</em>. Instrumen penelitian berupa angket uji kelayakan soal yang ditujukan kepada validator dan angket respons siswa. Subjek  penelitian adalah siswa kelas IX SMP Negeri yang ada di Kecamatan Sungai Kakap yang berjumlah 20 orang. Tes yang dikembangkan berbentuk pilihan ganda beralasan dan <em>essay</em>. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) Validitas atau kelayakan instrumen KPS yang dikembangkan berdasarkan pakar adalah valid dan layak digunakan; (2) Validitas butir soal instrumen penilaian KPS yang dikembangkan dengan kriteria valid; (3) Reliabilitas soal dari instrumen KPS sangat kuat untuk soal pilihan ganda materi optika dan getaran gelombang; reliabilitas kuat untuk soal materi tekanan; dan reliabilitas sedang untuk soal <em>essay</em> materi optika, tekanan, dan getaran gelombang; dan (4) Soal-soal yang dikembangkan dalam instrumen penilaian KPS didominasi soal dengan tingkat kesukaran kategori sedang.</p><p> </p><p class="abstrak" align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>The research aims to produce an instrument of assessment to measure science process skills in optical material, pressure and vibration waves. This research is a research and development study with 4D stages that are limited to only using three stages, namely the define, design, and development stages. The research instrument was in the form of questionnaire due diligence questions addressed to students' validators and questionnaires. The subjects were grade IX students of one of the 20 state junior high schools in Sungai Kakap. The developed test is in the form of multiple-choice reasoning and essay. The results of the study show that: (1) The validity or feasibility of the developed KPS instrument is valid and suitable for use; (2) The validity of items from the KPS assessment instruments developed with valid criteria; (3) The reliability of the questions from the KPS instrument is very strong for the matter of multiple-choice optical material and wave vibrations; strong reliability for matter of pressure material; and moderate reliability for optical material, pressure, and wave vibration essays; and (4) Questions developed in the KPS assessment instrument are dominated by problems with difficulty level medium category.</em></p>

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 231
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Sri Diah Anggraeni ◽  
Gede Wira Bayu ◽  
I Gde Wawan Sudatha

This study aimed to develop an instrument for assessing science learning outcomes based on HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills). This research was development research that uses a 4D model (four-D model) with development stages consisting of define, design, develop, and distribute. This development research was only carried out until the development stage. The subject of this research was the HOTS-based science learning outcome assessment instrument in the form of grids and multiple-choice test sheets. Data were obtained by using interviews, observation, and test methods. The validation of the assessment instrument was carried out by two material experts using a validation sheet and 78 students for a limited trial using multiple-choice objective test instruments. The results obtained will be analyzed for validity, reliability, discriminatory power, level of difficulty, and quality of distractors. The results of the analysis of the HOTS-based science learning outcome assessment instrument had a validity of 0.90 which was in the very high category, reliability of 0.81 which was in the very high category. Distinguishing analysis obtained 2 items with very good criteria, 14 items with good criteria, and 9 items with sufficient criteria. In the difficulty level test, 12 questions were obtained in the easy category and 13 questions in the medium category. Analysis of the distractor quality test found 63 distractors were at the >5% level, which means the distractors are functioning well and 12 distractors were at the 5% level, which means the distractors were not functioning properly. These results indicated that the HOTS-based science learning outcome test assessment instrument developed was valid and reliable and is suitable for use as an assessment instrument in various styles of material.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 140
Author(s):  
Ni Kadek Yuniasih ◽  
Kadek Yudiana ◽  
I Gusti Ngurah Japa

The lack of availability in assessment instruments used and unmet cognitive levels of C3-C6 resulted in poor quality assessments. This study aims to develop cognitive domain assessment instruments on the concept of heat transfer material in grade V elementary school. This research was development research that used 4D models (Four-D models) to define, design, develop, and disseminate. The subject of study was the assessment instrument of the cognitive realm with the object of research, that was the instrument quality. Measurement of the validity of the content was done on two experts/judges using the non-test method and instruments of the expert validity sheet. Instrument quality measurement was conducted with field trials of 106 students using multiple-choice objective test instruments. The content validity data obtained were analyzed with the Gregory formula, while the field test result data analyzed the validity of the grain, reliability, different power, and difficulty level.  The results showed that the validity of the content obtained by 0.97 (very high) with the test results of the item's validity got 30 points of the question was declared valid. The instrument reliability index was developed by 0.85 (very high). The average coefficient of different power obtained is 0.51 (good) with a test device difficulty of 0.52 (medium). The result demonstrated cognitive domain assessment instruments that were developed feasible and can be used in conducting learning assessments in the cognitive realm.


EduKimia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 128-133
Author(s):  
Apri Yolla Mulya Sartika ◽  
Eka Yusmaita

This chemistry literacy assessment instrument developed because of recent challenge toward student learning achievement evaluation so it could not only grade student’s cognitive ability in term of understanding and memorizing, but also will grade the application of students’ concept to face any problems. The availability of the chemistry literacy assessment instrument consists of various aspects, such as content, context, High Order Learning Skills (HOLS), and attitude. These aspects are expected to answer those challenges. This study aims to produce a proper and right chemistry literacy assessment toward fundamental law of chemistry and stoichiometry topic based on content validity value and questions numbers, reliability grade, difficulty level and chemistry literacy question differentiator level. This study is the development type, which is Model of Educational Reconstruction (MER) design. MER consists of three stages, (1) analysis of content structure, (2) empirical study, (3) development of instruction evaluation. The clarification of a test instrument on empirical study was done toward three chemistry and education experts (lecturer and teacher). The instrument used was chemistry literacy question which consists of seven discourse question, then expanded into 15 questions. The result showed that content validity value of the designed chemistry literacy assessment could be categorized as valid with 1,11 mark. From 15 questions, there are three questions in “very significant” category, nine in “significant” category and three other in “insignificant” category. The reliability test is 0,88. In difficulty level, there are eight questions in “medium” category, six in “difficult” and one in “very difficult”. The differentiator level, there are nine questions in “medium” category, four in “proper” and two other in “not proper”. Question in “insignificant” and “not proper” category is rejected. In conclusion, from 15 designed questions, there are 12 questions in “proper” and “right” category.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-100
Author(s):  
Nurhayati Nurhayati ◽  
◽  
Wahyudi Wahyudi ◽  
Syarif Lukman Hakim ◽  
◽  
...  

This study aims to 1) produce a HOTS assessment instrument; 2) knowing the quality of the test instrument in terms of the feasibility of construction, material feasibility, and language feasibility according to the expert; and 3) knowing the quality of the test items in terms of validity, reliability, difficulty level and distinguishing power based on the test results. Research and Development ware used as a research method with 4D procedural development model consists of four stages, namely: the define stage, the design stage, the development stage, and the dissemination stage. The questionnaire was used for expert judgment validation. The characteristics measurement of the HOTS items instrument including the validity, reliability, difficulty level and distinguishing power of the questions. The HOTS assessment instrument developed was in the form of multiple-choice options with a reason based on HOTS in aspects of analyzing, evaluating and creating. The results of expert validation show that the average item with criteria is very good in terms of content, construct and language aspects. Instruments that have been validated and revised were tested on students who had studied vibration and wave material and the test results showed that 77% of the questions developed were of good quality with valid criteria, good distinguishing criteria, level of difficulty at moderate and easy levels and very strong reliability so that feasible and ready to be used to measure students' higher order thinking skills in vibrations and waves material. Keywords: HOTS, Instruments test, Vibrations and waves


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 258
Author(s):  
Anang Triyoso ◽  
Muslimin Ibrahim ◽  
Raharjo Raharjo

This  research  aims  was  to develop  a competency-based  assessment  instruments  in subject  of  Science/Biology.  This research was carried out through the development of the following 4-D design models of Thiagarajan (1974) and then continued the implementation the classroom using One Shot Case Study Design. The data were obtained as follows: the results of the validation instruments decent role in the category; legibility of instruments indicates that the content, appearance, difficulty sentences and interesting pictures and easy to understand students; enforceability of good category; effectiveness of the instrument showed that cognitive assessment to have a reliability tes objective 0.39, the level of difficulty of items were easily as many as 11 items (36.7%), medium as many as 16 items (53.3%), and difficult as many as 3 items (10%), sensitive items as many as 27 items (90%) and less sensitive as many as 3 items (10%), while the essay test has a reliability of 0.45, an easy difficulty level items as many as 2 items (20%), medium as many as 4 items (40%), and difficult as many as 4 items (40%), sensitive items as many as 6 items (60%) and less sensitive as many as 4 items (40%); assessment of the affective domain has a reliability 0.81; assessment of psychomotor domains I has a reliability  of 0.52 and psychomotor  II has a reliability  of 0.62.  Student  field  constraints  are not  accustomed  to using competency-based assessment instrument. Based on the analysis of data, it can be concluded that a Competency-Based Assessment Instruments in subject of Science/Biology that have been developed are valid, practical, and effective.Penelitian  ini  bertujuan  untuk  mengembangkan  instrumen  asesmen  komprehensif  berbasis  kompetensi  pada  mata pelajaran IPA/Biologi. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan melalui pengembangan instrumen mengikuti rancangan 4-D model dari Thiagarajan  (1974)  kemudian  dilanjutkan  implementasi  di  kelas  menggunakan  rancangan  One  Shot  Case  Study.  Data  hasil penelitian yang diperoleh sebagai berikut: hasil validasi instrumen dalam kategori layak; keterbacaan instrumen  menunjukkan bahwa isi, penampilan, kesulitan kalimat dan gambar menarik dan mudah dipahami siswa; keterlaksanaan instrumen berkategori sangat baik; keefektifan instrumen menunjukkan bahwa asesmen ranah kognitif untuk tes objektif memiliki reliabilitas 0,39, tingkat kesukaran butir soal mudah sebanyak 11 butir soal (36,7%), sedang sebanyak 16 butir soal (53,3%), dan sukar sebanyak 3 butir soal (10%), butir soal sensitif sebanyak 27 butir soal (90%) dan kurang sensitif sebanyak 3 butir soal (10%), sedangkan tes uraian memiliki reliabilitas 0,45, tingkat kesukaran butir soal mudah sebanyak 2 butir soal (20%), sedang sebanyak 4 butir soal (40%), dan sukar sebanyak 4 butir soal (40%), butir soal sensitif sebanyak 6 butir soal (60%) dan kurang sensitif sebanyak 4 butir soal (40%); asesmen ranah afektif memiliki reliabilitas 0,81; asesmen ranah psikomotor I memiliki reliabilitas 0,52 dan psikomotor II memiliki reliabilitas  0,62.  Kendala  lapangan  adalah  siswa  belum  terbiasa  menggunakan  instrumen  asesmen  komprehensif  berbasis kompetensi. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, dapat disimpulkan bahwa instrumen asesmen komprehensif berbasis kompetensi pada mata pelajaran IPA/Biologi yang dikembangkan valid, praktis, dan efektif.


Author(s):  
Sri Lestari Siregar ◽  
M. Oky F. Gafari ◽  
Malan Lubis

This research produces a portfolio-based short story writing assessment instrument. The research method used is the Research and Development method which refers to the development of Borg and Gall (in Tegeh et al, 2014: 7-13). The module development process is carried out with three stages: a preliminary study stage, initial product development and product trials. The results showed that the feasibility assessment by material experts consisted of 4 aspects namely content feasibility aspects obtained an average of 77 with effective criteria, aspects of the feasibility of the presentation obtained an average of 92.5 with very effective criteria, aspects of language eligibility obtained on average 77 with effective criteria, and aspects of contextual assessment obtained an average of 79.9 with effective criteria, evaluation of eligibility by instrument evaluation experts obtained an average of 85 with very effective criteria. The assessment interprets the meaning of the short story text, both verbally and in writing fulfilling the reliable criteria with a reliability of 0.7, the Assessment identifies the abstract, orientation, complications, resolution, evaluation, and koda meets the reliable criteria with a reliability of 0.7 and the assessment of writing the story text short meet the reliable criteria with a reliability of 0.97. This research impacts on the use of portfolio-based short story writing assessment instruments.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-124
Author(s):  
Miske Hayunia Hamidah ◽  
Siti Sri Wulandari

Abstrak: Pengembangan instrumen penilaian berbasis HOTS menggunakan aplikasi “quizizz”. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mengembangkan alat evaluasi berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) menggunakan aplikasi Quizizz, menguji tingkat kelayakan instrumen penilaian HOTS yang telah dikembangkan, menganalisis kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa, dan menganalisis respon siswa terhadap penggunaan aplikasi Quizizz. Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian pengembangan  dengan model pengembangan Sugiyono sepuluh langkah namun dibatasi dengan tujuh langkah pengembangan. Subjek pada penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XII produktif Otomatisasi Tata Kelola Perkantoran (OTKP)  sebanyak 34 siswa. Hasil validasi produk pengembangan kepada tiga validator ahli diperoleh rata-rata validasi sebesar 94% (sangat kuat). Adapun hasil pengembangan, menunjukkan dari 30 butir soal yang dikembangkan 25 soal dikatakan valid dengan perhitungan r hitung > r tabel (0,3291). Reliabilitas soal sebesar 0,77 > 0,60 sehingga soal dapat dikatakan reliable. Tingkat kesukaran soal memiliki rata-rata “Sedang”. Terdapat 2 soal dengan daya pembeda “Kurang” sehingga soal harus dibuang. Secara keseluruhan pengecoh soal sudah berfungsi dengan baik ditunjukkan dengan pemilihan option jawaban melebihi 5% dari jumlah siswa. Hasil uji coba pada penelitian ini menunjukkan siswa memiliki rata-rata kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi pada kriteria “Cukup”. Rata-rata respon siswa sebesar 89,5% artinya siswa memberikan respon sangat positif dalam penggunaan Quizizz saat penerapan instrumen penilaian HOTS. Abstract: Development of HOTS-based assessment instruments using the "quizizz" application. The purpose of this research is to develop an evaluation tool based on Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) using the Quizizz application, to test the feasibility of the HOTS assessment instrument that has been developed, to analyze students 'higher order thinking skills, and to analyze students' responses to the use of the Quizizz application. The method used in this study is a development research method with the Sugiyono ten-step development model but is limited to seven development steps. The subjects in this study were all students of class XII productive Office Governance Automation (OTKP) as many as 34 students. The results of the validation of development products to three expert validators obtained an average validation of 94% (very strong). As for the development results, it shows that of the 30 items developed, 25 questions are said to be valid with the calculation of r count> r table (0.3291). The reliability of the questions is 0.77> 0.60 so that the questions can be said to be reliable. The difficulty level of the item has a "Medium" average. There are 2 questions with "Less" distinguishing power, so the questions must be discarded. Overall, the question fraudsters are functioning properly, indicated by the selection of answer options exceeding 5% of the total number of students. The test results in this study showed students had an average high-order thinking ability on the "Enough" criterion. The average student response was 89.5%, meaning that students gave a very positive response in using Quizizz when implementing HOTS assessment instruments 


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 185
Author(s):  
Sri Wahyuni Hasan ◽  
Army Auliah ◽  
Netti Herawati

The type of this study is Research and Development (R&D) which aims at examining the development procedure and quality of assessment instruments to measure critical thinking skills of students on Stoichiometry material. The study employed Plomp’s research and development model design that consisted of 5 stages, namely: (1) initial investigation stage, consisted of field study and review literature (2) design stage, consisted of planning and organizing assessment instruments for critical thinking skills on Stoichiometry material (3) realization/ construction stage, (4) test, evaluation and revision stage, consisted of two main activities, namely validation by experts and small grub test, and (5)  implementation stage is the field test. The assessment instruments which was developed was in a form of essays format. The research subjects were students of grade XI MIPA 6 SMAN at SMA N 1 Makassar with 34 students. Data on the results of the instrument’s validation by Experts was declared to be very feasible/ valid with an average percentage of 91.66%. The results of the validity analysis of the items indicate that the items support the validity of the test so that it is said to be feasible or valid, while the item reliability was stated reliable with a reliability value of 0.897 with a high interpretation. Analysis of the difficulty level of the instrument obtained an average score of 0.64 with the medium category. The distinguishing power of the instrument shows good category with an average value of 0.49. The practicality of the instruments assessed by the teacher obtained a percentage of 92.5% with a very practical category. The results of the analysis of students' critical thinking skills obtained that the average critical thinking skills of students are in medium category.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-61
Author(s):  
Yuni Fatisa ◽  
Endang Astuti Br Galingging

This research aims to produce and determine the feasibility of Predict, Observe, Explain (POE) based student electronic smart worksheet. The method used is research and development design. The development stages of this model consist of three stages: defining, designing, and developing. The research respondences were media design experts, learning material experts, chemistry teachers, and ten students. Instruments that used to validate and practical tests are questionnaires. Electronic smart worksheets are created using the articulate storyline application to develop the stages of POE learning. The validity of the worksheet in terms of media, material, practical, and student response results are 80% (valid), 97.14% (very valid), 96.81% (very practical), 89.61% (very practical), respectively. Based on these results, it could be concluded that POE based student electronic smart worksheet is suitable for use as an acid-base learning media.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adib Rifqi Setiawan ◽  
Mita Puspaningrum ◽  
Khoirul Umam

This research goals to gain the design for a learning program that is aligning fiqh mu’āmalāt and financial literacy. We used research and development approach four-D model that reduced into three stages: define, design, and develop. It was gained a syllabus that completed by lesson plan, student worksheets, nor assessment instrument as well, that validated by experts and practitioners and reliability counted based on test.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document