scholarly journals KLAUSULA ARBITRASE DAN ITIKAD BAIK PARA PIHAK SEBAGAI DASAR PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA BISNIS INTERNASIONAL

LITIGASI ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Junior Willem John Latumeten
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
International Business ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
District Court ◽  
Arbitration Clause ◽  
Good Intention ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
Case Number

When the parties have agreed to choose arbitration as the dispute resolution agency, the district court must refuse to examine and adjudicate on the dispute, if one party brings the dispute resolution to the district court. However, in practice there are those who still choose to use the path of the judiciary. Among them is the case of Decision Number 410 / Pdt.G / 2011 / PN.Jak.Pst. and 534 / Pdt.G / 2011 / PN.Jkt.Sel although with different decision results. Based on the reality of this practice, this paper intends to examine whether the decision number 410 / Pdt.G / 2011 / PN.Jak.Pst can be deemed as International Civil Law and whether the action as the object of disputes in the Case Number 410 / Pdt.G / 2011 / PN.Jak.Pst is an unlawful action. Cases that are settled in a district court regardless the clause that states that in the case of dispute, it will be settled arbitrarily by the parties, then the decision produced by the District Court is not an international civil law. Actions which are subject to dispute in the Case Number 410 / Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jak.Pst are not unlawful acts. The absolute competence of arbitration is that a case arising from the agreement itself is not an act that is regulated outside the agreement even though there is a clause stating that if there is a dispute it will be settled arbitrarily. When the parties no longer have a good intention to settle the dispute through arbitration, then this becomes the authority of the district court. Keywords: International Business Dispute Arbitration Clause.

scholarly journals JURIDIS ANALYSIS OF CONFLICT COMPETENCY OF BUSINESS DISPUTE SETTLEMENT THROUGH ARBITRATION AND GENERAL JUSTICE IN STOCK OWNERSHIP

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edi Prayitno ◽  
Martin Roestamy
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
District Court ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Actual Case ◽  
Arbitration Clause ◽  
Investment Agreement

This Thesis was written based on the result of legal research that analyzes conflict of business dispute resolution between arbitration and litigation in accordance with the applicable regulation and court decisions which have acquired permanent legal force. The method used in this legal research is normative legal methods. The study of literature as a basis of the research and according to Law Number 30 Years 1999 about Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, in Article 3 and Article 11 of the Law have expressively stated that District Court does not have the authority to adjudicate disputes between the parties that bound by the arbitration agreement. The result of this legal research is that arbitration clause as stated in business investment agreement that should be absolute competencies to resolve the dispute, but the Decision of District Court Judges which have been strengthened by Supreme Court of Indonesia expressively stated that the court has the authority to check and adjudicate the dispute even it has arbitration clause or arbitration agreement with the reason that the dispute is a tort and there are another parties beside the party who sign the Investment Agreement, in the suit. The court attitude that adjudicate the dispute with arbitration clause lead to conflict of competency and never ending adjudication process of business dispute. From the actual case that researcher has been analyzes, researcher suggest that Supreme Court of Indonesia as the highest judicial body must respect arbitration body by rejecting all of the civil cases that have arbitration clause on its agreement. Law Number 48 Years 2009 about Judicial Power stated that non-litigation dispute resolution is conducted through arbitration or alternative dispute resolution. Based on pacta sun servanda and choice of forum principles on the agreement binding to the parties and must be obeyed by the parties.KeyWord : : Arbitration Clause, Pacta Sun Servanda Principle, Business.

scholarly journals Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan (Analisis Putusan Nomor. 52/PDT.G/2015/PN.RAP)

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-201
Author(s):  
Nur Hikmah ◽  
Darwinsyah Minin ◽  
Isnaini Isnaini
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
District Court ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Case Number ◽  
Selection Of

Peace is the most gentle answer as well as a win-win solutin, the existence of the basic law of mediation in Indonesia as an alternative to the dispute resolution outside the court can be seen in Article 130 HIR and Article 154 RBG which has set up a peace institution which then judges shall first reconcile the parties before the case is reviewed, as described in Article 130 HIR / 154 RBG and PERMA Number. 01 of 2008 on Mediation Procedures in Courts. The formulation of the problem is how the rules of mediation law as an alternative to the settlement of civil disputes in the Court, how the implementation and mechanism in the selection of Mediators at the District Court Rantauprapat and how the results of mediation on civil cases Number.52 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Rap generated from the mediation process, the aim is to know and simultaneously find the law of mediation as an alternative to civil disputes settlement in the Court and to know the implementation and mechanism of the selection of Mediator in Rantauprapat District Court and meganalisis the decision of civil case Number.52 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Rap resulting from the mediation process

scholarly journals PERAN PENGADILAN NEGERI INDONESIA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK INTERNASIONAL

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Isdiyana Kusuma Ayu
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
International Business ◽  
District Court ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Private Law ◽  
District Courts ◽  
Business Transactions ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
International Private Law ◽  
Sense Of Justice

Electronic transactions or E-commerce are buying and selling transactions carried out through the internet. As a result of over the internet, the nature of e-commerce can be done without knowing the borders. When a default or fraud occurs in e-commerce conducted by one of the parties who are abroad, it must pay attention to the principle of International Private Law related to the Court forum, Arbitration, or other dispute resolution institutions. That means that it is necessary to pay attention to the basic arrangements for dispute resolution of international business transactions that have been regulated in Indonesia and the authority of the Indonesian District Court in resolving international electronic transaction disputes. In the juridical perspective as the basis for solving electronic transaction cases to be legal strengthening takes a sense of justice so that it can be seen that the basis of international e-commerce arrangements in accordance with Article 18 Paragraph (4) of the ITE Law. District Courts has a role to be the main and complementary institution in dispute resolution international electronic transactions.

scholarly journals Analysis of the FIDIC arbitration clause in the light of international jurisprudence

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-30
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Dąbrowska
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
International Federation ◽  
Full Term ◽  
Arbitration Clause ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Right ◽  
Comparative Nature

The aim of the paper is to present the subject matter related to the procedure of resolving disputes arising in connection with implementation of agreements concluded on the basis of contract models published by the international federation FIDIC in 1999 Red and Yellow Book. The intention of the authors of the FIDIC templates was to apply an autonomous multistage procedure (the so-called multi-step clause) for resolving disputes based on arbitration without taking the matter to court. However, the application of the procedure proposed by FIDIC raises controversies of legal and factual nature. The problems concern, in particular: the nature, immediate enforceability, contestability of decisions issued by the Dispute Adjudication Board (DAB) and methods of their reinforcement. Other issues concern the absence of ‘standing’ or ‘full-term’ Adjudication Board and the right to arbitration in case when a party violates the internal dispute resolution procedure described in the contract, both for reasons dependent on and beyond its control. The publication is of legal and comparative nature and contains the analysis of related jurisprudence of civil law systems of selected countries.

ASAS TERBUKA UNTUK UMUM DAN KEHADIRAN FISIK PARA PIHAK DALAM SIDANG DI PENGADILAN NEGERI PASCA PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 237-250
Author(s):  
Bernadette M Waluyo
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Basic Principle ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
The Other ◽  
District Court ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Administration Of Justice ◽  
Law Courts ◽  
Court Proceedings

The Indonesian Supreme Court, in response to the information era, modernizes the civil procedural rules at the district court level.  This is done by issuing Supreme Court Regulation no. 1 of 2019 re. Administration of Justice at Civil Law Courts and Electronic-Court Proceedings. Undoubtedly, modernization of existing rules on the administration of justice is much needed.  On the other hand, these changes may violate a number of procedural civil law principles.  The author argues, from a civil procedural law perspective, that the above Supreme Court regulation violates the basic principle of transparency of court proceedings and physical attendance at court proceedings. 

An Undergraduate Course in Psychology and the Law

1987 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 238-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edith Greene ◽  
Edith Greene
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Plea Bargaining ◽  
Jury Decision Making ◽  
Teaching Aids ◽  
The Law ◽  
Jury Decision

This article describes a course that bridged the disciplines of clinical and experimental psychology and the law. The course included discussion of issues in criminal law, such as the psychology of policing, the reliability of confessions, victimization, plea bargaining, jury decision making, and alternative dispute resolution, and in civil law, such as civil commitment, predicting dangerousness, and child custody. Course objectives, requirements, and teaching aids are outlined, and some thoughts on integrating these diverse topics are included.

KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN DALAM PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL DI INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Yuanita Permatasari ◽  
Pranoto ,
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
District Court ◽  
International Arbitration ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Recognition And Enforcement ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Legal Substances ◽  
Arbitration Award

<p>Abstract<br />This article aims to find out the recognition and enforcement of international arbitration award in Indonesia, as well as the authority of the courts in annulment the international arbitration award in Indonesia. This research is a normative and prescriptive legal research. The type and source of materials used is the source of secondary legal material. The legal substances used in this study are of two kinds, namely primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The method of collecting legal materials in this study is obtained through assessment of existing libraries, books, law journals, and court awards. Based on the result of the discussion, it can be concluded: Firstly, the international arbitration award can be recognized and enforced if the award is registered and obtain an execution from the Central Jakarta District Court. International arbitration rulings can only be recognized and enforced if they full fil the conditions in Article 66 of Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution law. Second, the international arbitration award is final and binding. However, in reality many international arbitration awards are requested for annulment to the Court in Indonesia.</p><p>Keywords: international arbitration award, annulment of international arbitration award, enforcement of international arbitration award</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengakuan dan pelaksanaan putusan arbitrase internasional di Indonesia, serta kewenangan pengadilan dalam membatalkan putusan arbitrase internasional di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif bersifat preskriptif. Pendekatan yang digunakan penulis adalah pendekatan kasus. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder, dengan teknik analisis bahan hukum menggunakan metode silogisme dan interpretasi dengan menggunakan pola berpikir deduktif. Berdasarkan hasil pembahasan dapat disimpulkan: Pertama, agar putusan arbitrase internasional dapat diakui dan dilaksanakan, maka putusan tersebut harus terlebih dahulu didaftarkan dan memperoleh exequatur dari Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat. Putusan arbitrase internasional hanya dapat diakui dan dilaksanakan apabila memenuhi syarat-syarat yang ditentukan dalam Pasal 66 Undang-Undang Nomor. 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Kedua, putusan arbitrase internasional bersifat final and binding. Sehingga, putusan arbitrase internasional tidak dapat diajukan upaya pembatalan putusan arbitrase. Namun, dalam realitanya banyak putusan arbitrase internasional yang dimintakan pembatalannya kepada Pengadilan di Indonesia.</p><p>Kata Kunci: putusan arbitrase internasional, pembatalan putusan arbitrase internasional, pelaksanaan putusan arbitrase internasional</p>

scholarly journals ARBITRASE SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARIAH MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 1999

Asy-Syari ah ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhibuthabary Muhibuthabary
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Civil Religion ◽  
Arbitration Process ◽  
Islamic Jurisprudence ◽  
New Knowledge ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
The Law ◽  
Islamic Economic ◽  
Religious Courts

This paper describes the arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution in Shariah economy. Dispute resolution in general civil religion has resolved through litigation in the religious courts that refer to Article 49 of Law Number 7 of 1989 Jo. Law Number 3 of 2006 Jo. Law Number 50 of 2009 on the Religious Courts. However, there are some interesting cases, one of which is the Islamic economic disputes could be resolved through non-litigation or arbitration process, which refers to the Law No. 30 Year 1999. Now, the Shari'ah economic dispute resolution becomes the object of this study which interesting to study both theoretically and practically, not only because the case is to be part of the absolute authority of religious courts, but also becomes a new knowledge in the field of Islamic Jurisprudence

scholarly journals PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATION OF RELIGIOUS COURT COMPETENCE TOWARDS ENCUMBRANCE RIGHT EXECUTION

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 222
Author(s):  
Abd. Shomad ◽  
Rahadi Wasi Bintoro
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Philosophical Foundation ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Historical Approach ◽  
Legal Relationship

Religious court as forefront in economic sharia dispute resolution in litigation has not ideal place to perform their duty since there are still regulation conflicts such as implementation of encumbrance right execution which still becomes a domain in district court. As explained, this article discusses phi-losophical foundation of Religious Court competence to resolve economic sharia issues. In regard to this, conceptual approach, law approach and historical approach are respectively used. Based on the analysis, basic competence of religious court is Islamic personality principle which carries the use of Islamic law elements (sharia principle) in its legal relationship. From the analysis the implication is drawn that as long as a dispute belongs to economic sharia, then it is Religious Court which is com-petent to handle including court decision.Keywords: law enforcement, economic sharia dispute, absolute competence, court decision implementation

scholarly journals First Travel Fraud Case and the Legal Protection for the Victims

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-280
Author(s):  
Hafizh Siraji
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
The State ◽  
District Court ◽  
Material Loss ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Case Number

Fraud committed by PT. First Travel has at least harmed prospective Hajj and Umrah pilgrims as many as 35,000 people, of which the material loss in this case is 500 billion. This is also suspected by the lack of strict regulations made by the state through Law No. 13 of 2008 concerning the implementation of Hajj and Umrah. However, until now the protection for the loss of first travel victims has not been completed, the decision of the Depok District Court with case number 83/Pid.B/2018/PN.Dpk which led to an appeal with case number 3096/K/PID.SUS/2018 decided on January 31, 2019. All assets seized were in accordance with the Decree of the Minister of Justice of the Republic of Indonesia Number M.04.PR.07.03 of 1985 concerning the organization and working procedures of RUTAN and RUPBASAN. This paper is indented to analyze the protection for the victims on the fraud case on PT First Travel Fraud case.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document