scholarly journals PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA SALAH TANGKAP (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NO. 2161K/PID/2012)

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabungan Sibarani
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
State Government ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Main Trial ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Analysis Error

AbstractThe number of cases of wrongful catches of late shows police negligence in performing their duties. For example in the case of Hasan Basri. The purpose of this research is to know the function of the Police in law enforcement in Indonesia, to know the accountability of Police investigators and the victim's legal efforts in the case of wrongful catch or error in persona. The research method used in this research is the normative juridical approach  The function of the Police in law enforcement in Indonesia is one of the functions of state government  The accountability of Police investigators refers to the provisions Law No. 2 of 2002 on the Police of the Republic of Indonesia and the code of ethics of the police. The legal efforts that need to be done by the victim who experienced the wrong of catching them is pre-trial, if the case has not been entered the main trial of the case. If the case has reached the principal trial of the case, the victim may claim damages and rehabilitation .Keywords: Law Analysis, Error in Persona, Court Decision. AbstrakBanyaknya kasus salah tangkap akhir-akhir ini menunjukkan kelalaian polisi dalam menjalankan tugasnya. Misalnya dalam kasus Hasan Basri. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui fungsi Polisi dalam penegakan hukum di Indonesia, untuk mengetahui akuntabilitas penyidik Kepolisian dan upaya hukum korban dalam kasus salah tangkap atau salah orang. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif. Fungsi Kepolisian dalam penegakan hukum di Indonesia adalah salah satu fungsi pemerintah negara. Akuntabilitas penyidik Kepolisian mengacu pada ketentuan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia dan kode etik kepolisian. Upaya hukum yang perlu dilakukan oleh korban yang mengalami kesalahan dalam menangkapnya adalah pra-persidangan, jika kasusnya belum masuk persidangan utama kasus tersebut. Jika kasus tersebut telah mencapai persidangan utama dari kasus tersebut, korban dapat mengklaim ganti rugi dan rehabilitasi.Kata kunci: Analisis Hukum, Kesalahan Tangkap, Putusan Pengadilan.

scholarly journals Peranan Advokat Dalam Pembelaan Hukum terhadap Terdakwa Korupsi di Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi pada Pengadilan Negeri Samarinda (Tinjauan Etika Profesi Hukum)

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 188
Author(s):  
Jaidun Jaidun
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Legal Profession ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Public ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
The Republic

Smart and faithful people will never argue, that the State of the Republic of Indonesia is falling apart, debts mounting, to the point of reaching Rp. 4,000 (Four Thousand) Trillion is due to the crime of corruption that has taken root, curbed, thrived as if allowed to happen continuously. While law enforcement in this country does not provide a judicial verdict that has a deterrent effect for corruptors. It is difficult to understand in general, whether the legal verdict for corruption perpetrators by the Panel of Judges who hear and decide the case of corruption is influenced by the interference of fellow law enforcers ..., in this case, Advocates and Public Prosecutors (Prosecutors). Decisions of Corruption Courts often cause disparity in decisions, resulting in speculation from the public and assessing such decisions as being disproportionate and giving rise to public assumptions of a conspiracy between law enforcers, namely with several categories of interests, including: (1) The interests of the Prosecutor and Judges are in the interest of getting bribes (2) Advocates as law enforcers who accompany the defendant in defence of the interests of the accused by dirty and disgusting bribes. The role of advocates is very important in creating and maintaining a clean, authoritative and civilized justice system for the realization of the legal authority in this country.Thus, legal advocates must have faith and devotion to God strong and sturdy table and must dare to appear clean and first cleanse themselves from dirty thoughts in the midst of carrying out the legal profession, so that the noble profession is not polluted into contempt resulting from violation of legal norms and professional code of ethics by advocates. Based on the outputs achieved in this research program, namely the willingness and bottomlessness of the Advocates in defending the interests of the defendant must comply with the provisions of the applicable laws and regulations and uphold the Code of Ethics Procession.The analysis of this paper shows that lawyers have made a legal defence of corruption defendants in a professional manner in accordance with applicable legal provisions and upholds the code of ethics of the legal profession, even though there is also information about an advocate who is trying to bribe one of the Corruption Crimes judges in a case. which is being handled by the Advocate concerned. The description of the results of this survey is expected to be used as input and advice that can help realize the Court's decision which has a deterrent effect on corruptors and potential corruptors in the future.  

scholarly journals BATASAN TERHADAP IMUNITAS ADVOKAT YANG DIPERLUAS BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 26/PUU-XI/2013

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-48
Author(s):  
Oey Valentino Winata ◽  
Wisnu Aryo Dewanto
Keyword(s):  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Equal Treatment ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Professional Code ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

The basis for granting immunity to advocates is in Article 16 of Law No. 18 of 2003, that advocates cannot be prosecuted both civil and criminal in carrying out their professional duties in good faith in the interests of the Client's defense in court proceedings. The immunity obtained by advocates is not only within the scope of the court, but also protects it outside the court. The immunity has been expanded based on the Constitutional Court Decision Number 26 / PUU-XI / 2013. The granting of immunity to such advocates is considered as an act that violates the provisions of Article 28 D of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, that everyone has the right to recognition, guarantee protection and fair legal certainty and equal treatment before the law. However, the right to immunity from lawsuits (immunity) to advocates does not conflict with Article 28D of the 1945 Constitution if given with limitations to advocates who are one of law enforcers in Indonesia, these restrictions apply both outside and in court proceedings. The limitation is in the form of a professional code of ethics and legislation, as well as good faith. Any action that goes beyond or beyond these three limits cannot be protected by immunity, so that if one of the three limits is exceeded, advocates can be legally processed and sentenced based on applicable regulations.Dasar pemberian imunitas kepada advokat ada pada Pasal 16 UU No. 18 Tahun 2003, bahwa advokat tidak dapat dituntut baik secara perdata maupun pidana dalam menjalankan tugas profesinya dengan iktikad baik untuk kepentingan pembelaan Klien dalam sidang pengadilan. Imunitas yang didapatkan advokat ternyata tidak hanya dalam lingkup pengadilan, tetapi juga melindunginya diluar pengadilan. Imunitas tersebut telah diperluas berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 26/PUU-XI/2013. Pemberian imunitas kepada advokat tersebut dianggap sebagai suatu perbuatan yang melanggar ketentuan Pasal 28D Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945, bahwa setiap orang berhak atas pengakuan, jaminan perlindungan dan kepastian hukum yang adil serta perlakuan yang sama dihadapan hukum. Tetapi hak atas kekebalan dari tuntutan hukum (imunitas) kepada advokat tersebut menjadi tidak bertentangan dengan Pasal 28D UUD 1945 apabila diberikan dengan batasan-batasan kepada advokat yang merupakan salah satu penegak hukum di Indonesia, batasan tersebut berlaku baik di luar maupun di dalam sidang pengadilan. Batasan tersebut berupa kode etik profesi dan peraturan perundang-undangan, serta iktikad baik. Setiap tindakan yang melampaui atau diluar ketiga batasan tersebut, tidak bisa dilindungi oleh imunitas, sehingga atas dilampauinya salah satu dari ketiga batasan tersebut maka advokat dapat diproses secara hukum dan dijatuhi hukuman berdasarkan peraturan yang berlaku.

scholarly journals PENYELESAIAN PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK PROFESI BAGI ANGGOTA KEPOLISIAN YANG MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Syamsiar Arief
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Police Force ◽  
Security Sector ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
The Republic ◽  
National Police ◽  
Article 5

 AbstractThe basis for investigating members of the National Police who are suspected of committing criminal offenses is the existence of reports or complaints from the public. The report or complaint is submitted through the Head of the Complaints Service Section for the Professional and Security Sector, and then proposes to the Head of Sub-Division through the Head of the Investigation Unit to call and examine members as witnesses to victims and other witnesses. The Police Investigator in addition to carrying out the duties and functions of the Police also has authority in the investigation and law enforcement of members or persons who commit criminal acts. Apart from the foregoing, investigators must pay attention to and settle as well as possible reports or complaints from the public in accordance with their duties and functions as investigators. Investigations of members of the Indonesian National Police who commit criminal acts are carried out by investigators as stipulated in the criminal procedure applicable to the general court environment, which is confirmed in Article 2 of Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3 of 2003 concerning the Technical Implementation of General Judicial Institutions for members of the Police Force. Republic of Indonesia. The examination of members of the Indonesian National Police is carried out in accordance with the rank, namely according to the provisions of Article 5 of Government Regulation where the examination of members of the Indonesian National Police in the course of an investigation is carried out with regard to rank. Keywords: Code of Ethics, Criminal Acts, Police , Violations.AbstrakDasar penyidikan terhadap Anggota Polri yang disangka melakukan tindak pidana adalah adanya laporan atau pengaduan dari masyarakat. Laporan atau pengaduan tersebut disampaikan melalui Kepala Bagian Pelayanan Pengaduan Bidang Profesi dan Pengamanan, selanjutnya mendisposisikan kepada Kepala Sub Bagian Provos melalui Kepala Unit Penyidik untuk melakukan pemanggilan dan pemeriksaan terhadap anggota sebagai saksi korban dan saksi lainnya. Penyidik Polri selain sebagai pengemban tugas dan fungsi Kepolisian juga memiliki kewenangan dalam penyidikan dan penegakan hukum terhadap anggota atau oknum yang melakukan tindak pidana. Selain dari hal tersebut diatas, aparat penyidik wajib memperhatikan dan menyelesaikan dengan sebaik-baiknya laporan dan atau pengaduan dari masyarakat sesuai tugas dan fungsinya selaku penyidik. Penyidikan terhadap anggota Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia yang melakukan tindak pidana, dilakukan oleh penyidik sebagaimana diatur dalam hukum acara pidana yang berlaku di lingkungan peradilan umum, yang dipertegas dalam Pasal 2 Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 tahun 2003 tentang Pelaksanaan Teknis Institusional Peradilan Umum bagi anggota Kepolisian. Negara Republik Indonesia. Pemeriksaan terhadap anggota Polri dilaksanakan sesuai jenjang kepangkatan yakni sesuai ketentuan Pasal 5 Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 3 Tahun 2003 tentang pelaksanaan teknis institusional peradilan umum bagi anggota Polri dimana pemeriksaan terhadap anggota Polri dalam rangka penyidikan dilakukan dengan memperhatikan kepangkatan. Pemeriksaan dalam rangka penyidikan dilakukan sesuai dengan Pasal 5 Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 3 Tahun 2003 berdasarkan kepangkatannya.Kata Kunci : Kode Etik, Pelanggaran, Polisi, Tindak Pidana.

scholarly journals THE IMPLEMENTATION OF MATERIAL CRIMINAL LAW TOWARD THE CRIME OF TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-113
Author(s):  
Warsifah Warsifah ◽  
Julian Mangatur
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Trafficking In Persons ◽  
Campus Environment ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The One ◽  
Economic Capacity

The unbalanced and unequal economic growth in society often creates social and social jealousy in the community. On the one hand, there is a group of people who have sufficient capacity economically, but on the other hand there is a group of people who have no economic capacity in their lives, so that the latter group is often a social problem that even commits the crime of theft, for example. The criminal act of theft according to the Criminal Code, there is an element of "burdensome" as regulated in Article 363 paragraph (1) of the 5th Criminal Code, namely: "It is punished with a maximum imprisonment of seven: Theft committed by a wrongdoer by entering the place. the crime or it can reach the goods to be taken, such as the example of the case presented by the author in this thesis research, namely the theft of a helmet which was committed by the defendant, preceded by the defendant entering the campus environment, the case of which was decided by the Sukabumi District Court with a decision Number: 17 / Pid. B / 2010 / PN. Skh. The formulation of the problem that will be discussed by the author are: 1) How is the application of material law to the perpetrator of the crime of theft with weighting? and 2) How is the law enforcement against the perpetrators of the crime of theft of a helmet with a weight as in Court Decision Number 17 / Pid.B / 2010 / PN. Skh? The research method that the author uses is the normative juridical method, meaning that the data used comes from library research, carried out by searching, quoting, taking notes, inventorying, analyzing, and studying data in the form of library materials needed and related to law enforcement against perpetrators. theft by weight. Finally, based on the results of the research, the authors conclude that law enforcement against the perpetrators of the crime of theft of a helmet with a weight as in Court Decision Number 17 / Pid.B / 2010 / PN. Skh, the defendant was threatened with article 363 paragraph (1) to 5 of the Criminal Code, so that the defendant Agus Hery Santoso Bin Diyono was found legally and convincingly guilty of committing a criminal act. for 2 (two) months and 15 (fifteen) days.

scholarly journals PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK DAN PEDOMAN PERILAKU HAKIM

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Imran Imran
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Code Of Conduct ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research

ABSTRAKDalam sistem peradilan pidana penanganan suatu kasus dimulai sejak kasus itu muncul, kemudian ditangani oleh polisi, hingga proses akhir dari penegakan hukum terletak pada putusan hakim. Putusan hakim dapat berupa menjatuhkan hukuman ataupun membebaskan seorang terdakwa. Dalam putusan hakim akan terlihat kemampuan hakim dalam mengonstruksi kasus sejak dakwaan dibacakan hingga pledoi diucapkan. Semua konstruksi hakim tersebut akan tergambar dalam pertimbangan-pertimbangan. Dalam pertimbangan tersebut akan terlihat apakah suatu putusan tersebut melanggar kode etik atau tidak. Apa yang terlihat dalam dua putusan hakim yang dikeluarkan oleh Pengadilan Negeri Tobelo, mencerminkan adanya persoalan ketika seorang terdakwa dua kali dihukum oleh majelis hakim yang sama untuk perbuatan yang sama pula. Hal inilah yang kemudian menjadi rumusan masalah, apakah putusan tersebut melanggar Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim atau tidak? Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang memfokuskan kajian pada data sekunder, maka akan terlihat bagaimana sesungguhnya dua putusan tersebut. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan telah terjadi pelanggaran Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim yang dilakukan oleh majelis hakim.Kata kunci: kode etik dan pedoman perilaku hakim; sistem peradilan pidana; profesionalisme.  ABSTRACT In the criminal justice system, the handling of a case starts since the claim arises, then is handled by the police, until the final process of law enforcement, which lies in the judge's decision. Judges' decisions can be in the form of sentencing or acquitting a defendant. The ability of a judge to construct a case will appear in the decision from the time the indictment is read until the plea is pronounced. In these considerations, it will be seen whether the judge's decision violates the code of ethics or not. Two judges' decisions issued by the Tobelo District Court reflect the problem in which a defendant was twice sentenced by the same panel of judges for violating the same law. This is what then becomes the formula of the problem, whether the decision violates the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct of Judges or not. By using normative legal research method focusing on secondary data construing, it will expose the fact of these two decisions. The results of this analysis indicate that there are violations of the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct of Judges been committed by the panel of judges examining the case. Keywords: code of ethics and code of conduct of judges; criminal justice system; professionalism. 

scholarly journals PENERAPAN PIDANA TERHADAP PENyALAH GUNA NARKOTIKA UNTUK DIRINyA SENDIRI

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Dahlan Dahlan
Keyword(s):  
Drug Abuse ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
The State ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Narcotic Drug ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Sense Of Justice ◽  
Common Perception

Article 2 of Law Number 35 Year 2009 on Narcotics mentioned Narcotics Act based on Pancasila and the Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945. Subsequently Article 3 letter a mentioned Narcotics Act held based on keadilah. But in his enforcement does not describe the sense of justice. This research is normative juridical, that is method whichdescribes or exposes a fact systematically then its analysis is conducted by juridical by linking between data and facts obtained by analyzing court decision related to criminal sanction to perpetrator of narcotic crime and related with regulation of law applicable. In order to achieve a common perception in the application of narcotic drug abuse for himself by law enforcement officials, it is necessary to reconstruct Law Number 35 Year 2009 on Article 132 Paragraph (1) to be: Experiment or conspiracy to commit narcotic crime and narcotics precursor as referred to in Article 111, Article 115, Article 119, Article 120, Article 121, Article 122, Article 123, Article 124, Article 125, Articles 126, 127, And Article 129, the perpetrator shall be subject to the same imprisonment in accordance with the provisions referred to in those Articles

scholarly journals Law Enforcement Against Policies Who Breached The Code Of Conduct

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 313
Author(s):  
Alvi Syahri
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Police Officers ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Public Awareness ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Central Java ◽  
The Republic

The purpose of this research to find out and analyze law enforcement against police officers who violate the code of ethics in carrying out their duties at Central Java Police, obstacles and solving obstacles. This study uses a sociological juridical approach with descriptive analysis research specifications. The data used are primary data and secondary data obtained through interviews and literature study. The data analysis method used is qualitative analysis. Furthermore, based on the research results it can be concluded: Law enforcement against police officers who violate the code of ethics in carrying out their duties at the Central Java Regional Police refers to Act No. 2 of 2002 concerning the Police, Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2003 concerning Disciplinary Regulations for Members of the National Police and Regulation of the Chief of Police No. Pol. 14 of 2011 concerning the Professional Code of Ethics for the State Police of the Republic of Indonesia. Several factors that hinder law enforcement against unscrupulous police officers who violate the code of ethics are divided into internal factors: Leaders who have not fully paid attention to the implementation of disciplinary law enforcement duties for Polri members, level of discipline, awareness and compliance of Polri members with binding disciplinary regulations and applies to him is still relatively low so that disciplinary violations keep happening, Polri's disciplinary law enforcement often appears to lack transparency. External factors: Lack of public awareness in conducting supervision and complaints when there are people who violate them.Keywords: Law Enforcement; Police Officers; Offenses; Code of Ethics.

scholarly journals DINAMISASI KABINET DAN UPAYA KONSISTENSI SISTEM PRESIDENSIAL DI INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 327
Author(s):  
Muh. Cendekiawan Ainul Haq ◽  
Mohamad Rifan ◽  
Resa Yuniarsa Hasan
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
State Government ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Minimum Point ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Work Space ◽  
Presidential System ◽  
The Republic

 Dinamisasi kabinet kerja yang merupakan hak prereogratif presiden tidak hanya memperhatikan resistensi antara presiden dengan kepentingan partai politik, namun juga pertimbangan antara eksistensi Pemerintah Daerah sebagai konsekuensi dari sistem Presidensil dalam bentuk Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia. Tulisan ini berusaha menelaah topik pembahasan Dinamisasi Kabinet dan Upaya Konsistensi Sistem Presidensial di Indonesia. Metode penelitiаn ini аdаlаh yuridis normаtif dengan pendekatan historis, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan. Hasil dalam pembahasan ini menyimpulkan bahwa postur kabinet harus dibarengi dengan sinkornisasi hukum hingga pada titik minimum postur pemerintahan (Pemerintah Daerah) dengan Pemerintah Pusat yang direpresentasikan oleh kementerian melalui UU Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintah Daerah dengan UU Nomor 39 tahun 2008 tentang Kementerian. Bentuk sinkornisasi tersebut dapat dilakukan melalui: Penambahan unsur profesionalisme dalam UU, Penambahan peraturan terkait komposisi, dan/atau syarat, dalam penambahan/ pengubahan/ penghapusan kementerian, dan penambahan pengaturan terkait harmonisasi kewenangan dan ruang kerja antara pusat dan daerah.Kata kunci: Dinamisasi, Kabinet, Pemerintah. The dynamism of the working cabinet, which is the president's prerequisite, not only takes into account the resistance between the president and the interests of political parties, but also the consideration between the existence of the Regional Government as a consequence of the Presidency system in the form of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. This paper attempts to examine Cabinet Dynamics and Efforts to Consistency in the Presidential System in Indonesia. This research method is juridical normative with a historical approach, a conceptual approach, and a statutory approach. The results of this discussion conclude that the cabinet posture must be accompanied by legal syncornization to the minimum point of government posture (Regional Government) with the Central Government represented by the ministry through Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government with Law Number 39 of 2008 concerning Ministries. This form of syncornization can be carried out through: Adding elements of professionalism in laws, adding regulations related to composition, and/or requirements, adding/ changing/ deleting ministries, and adding regulations related to harmonization of authority and work space between the central and regional governments.Keywords: Cabinet, Dynamism, State Government

scholarly journals The Role and Function of Supervision from the Notary Supervisory Board in Dealing with Violations of Ethics and Notary Position in Mataram City

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 331
Author(s):  
Fahrul Rizki Hidayat ◽  
Lalu Sabardi ◽  
Kurniawan Kurniawan
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Preventive Measures ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Supervisory Board ◽  
The Right ◽  
And Function ◽  
The City ◽  
Role And Function

This study discusses the role and function of the Notary Supervisory Board against the notary who violates the code of ethics and notary position. It applies the empirical legal juridical research method that is carried out by examining the conditions in the field related to the implementation of supervision and guidance of notaries by the Supervisory Board in Mataram City. Based on Article 1 paragraph (6) Law on Notary Position, the Notary Supervisory Board is an institution that has the authority and obligation to carry out guidance and supervision of the notary. In carrying out supervision and guidance, the Minister forms a Supervisory Board consisting of 3 (three) levels which include the Regional Supervisory Board in the city/regency, the Provincial Supervisory Board in the province and the Central Supervisory Board in the capital. Each level consists of 9 (nine) different people; each of 3 (three) people came from government, notary, expert/academic elements. The Supervisory Board has very important roles and functions in law enforcement against notaries in their territories in holding hearings to check for suspected violations of the code of ethics and notary position. Law enforcement can be in the form of preventive measures (supervision) and curative steps (implementation of sanctions). Thus, if the notary commits a violation, the Supervisory Board has the right to examine and sanction him/her. Sanctions can be in the form of written warning, temporary dismissal, respectful dismissal and/or disrespectful dismissal.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 14/PUU-XI/2013

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-80
Author(s):  
Liberthin Palullungan ◽  
Trifonia Sartin Ribo
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Party System ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Presidential System ◽  
General Elections ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Impact

Indonesia is a country that implements a presidential system and a multi-party system jointly. The implementation of general elections has been regulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The presidential threshold is a concept used in proposing candidates for President and Vice President. Proposals are made by political parties or joining political parties by general election participants. This article analyzes the application of the presidential threshold after the Constitutional Court decision Number 114 / PUU-XI / 2013. The purpose of this writing is to determine the application of the Presidensitial threshold after the Constitutional Court decision Number 14 / PUU-XI / 013, and to determine the impact of the Constitutional Court decision number 14 / PUU-XI / 2013 on political parties. The research method used is qualitative and conceptual normative research methods. Based on this article, it is known that the application of the presidential threshold in which political parties must obtain seats 20% of the number of seats in the DPR or 25% of the valid votes nationally in the previous DPR elections, so that making new or small parties will not be able to nominate the President and Vice President themselves, but parties can form a coalition.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document