scholarly journals PENGARUH PENDEKATAN PEMBELAJARAN DAN MOTIVASI BERPRESTASI TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA DI SMP NEGERI MEDAN

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zulkarnaen Arafat Simatupang ◽  
Mukhtar .

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui: (1) perbedaan antara hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diajar dengan pendekatan pembelajaran matematika realistik (PMR) dan hasil belajar matematika siswa dengan pendekatan pembelajaran ekspositori; (2) perbedaan hasil belajar matematika yang mempunyai motivasi berprestasi tinggi dengan siswa yang mempunyai motivasi berprestasi rendah; (3) interaksi antara pendekatan pembelajaran dengan motivasi berprestasi terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode Quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifika = 0,05. Hasil analisis penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diajar dengan pendekatan pembelajaran matematika realistik (PMR) lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diajar dengan pendekatan pembelajaran ekspositori terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara hasil belajar matematika siswa yang mempunyai motivasi berprestasi tinggi dengan siswa yang mempunyai motivasi berprestasi rendah, terdapat interaksi antara pendekatan pembelajaran dan motivasi berprestasi terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa. Kata Kunci: pendekatan pembelajaran, motivasi berprestasi terhadap hasil belajar matematika Abstract: The purpose of this study to determine: (1) the difference between the results of students' mathematics learning taught by realistic mathematics learning approach (PMR) and mathematics learning outcomes of students with expository approach; (2) differences in mathematics learning outcomes that have high achievement motivation in students with low achievement motivation; (3) the interaction between learning approach to achievement motivation on students' mathematics learning outcomes. The research method using Quasi experimental design with 2 x 2 factorial study data were analyzed using ANOVA two paths at the level signifika = 0.05. Results of the analysis showed that: (1) the results of students' mathematics learning taught by learning approach realistic mathematics (PMR) is higher than on learning outcomes for mathematics students who are taught to approach expository there are significant differences between the results of learning mathematics students with achievement motivation high students with low achievement motivation, there is interaction between learning approach and achievement motivation on students' mathematics learning outcomes. Keywords: approach to learning, achievement motivation on learning outcomes mathematics

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Halidayana Nasution ◽  
Mukhtar .

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) Perbedaan hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran problem posing dengan hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran  ekspositori, (2) Perbedaan hasil belajar matematika  siswa yang memiliki kreativitas tinggi dengan hasil belajar matematika siswa yang memiliki kreativitas rendah, (3) interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan kreativitas terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikan a = 0,05. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa : (1) hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran problem posing lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar matematika siswa yang memiliki kreativitas tinggi lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki kreativitas rendah, (3) terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan kreativitas terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, kreativitas terhadap hasil  belajar  matematika   Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) The difference in the results of students' mathematics learning taught by learning strategy problem posing with the results of students' mathematics learning taught by instructional strategies expository, (2) The difference in the results of students' mathematics learning which have high creativity with learning outcomes math students who have low creativity, (3) the interaction between learning strategy and creativity to mathematics learning outcomes. The research method using quasi-experimental research design 2 x 2 factorial ANOVA Analysis using two lines at significant level a = 0.05. The results showed that: (1) the results of students' mathematics learning taught by learning strategy problem posing higher than the learning outcomes of students who are taught by instructional strategies expository, (2) the results of learning mathematics students who have high creativity is higher than student learning outcomes have low creativity, (3) there is interaction between learning strategy and creativity to mathematics learning outcomes. Keywords: learning strategy, creativity towards mathematics learning outcomes


Author(s):  
Sadono Sadono

Using the real things and engaging the envoiroment in mathematics learning will assist the learners in understanding the concept greatly. The support of learning approaches and assessment model will give a positive impact on learning outcomes of students. Through the experimental research with 2 x 2 design found the results that learning apprroaches and assessment models are dependent each other in affecting the student’s mathematics outcomes. Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach is more appropriate to use performance assessment model because it can provide a better impact on mathematics learning outcomes after controlling the early numerical ability of students. While the thematic approach is more appropriate to use the paper tests in mathematics learning.


Author(s):  
Yudhi Hanggara ◽  
Irwan Juniman Zendato

Abstrak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) Perbedaan hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diberikan perlakuan model pembelajaran ARCS dengan model pembelajaran Active Learning. (2) Perbedaan hasil belajar matematika siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar tinggi, sedang dan rendah. (3) Interaksi antara model pembelajaran (ARCS dan Active Learning) dengan motivasi belajar siswa. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian quasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2 x 3. Populasi pada penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X SMKN 2 Batam tahun pelajaran 2016/2017. Sampel diperoleh kelas X Akutansi-2 sebagai kelas eksperimen-1 dan kelas X Akutansi-4 sebagai kelas eksperimen-2. Instrumen pada penelitian ini adalah tes dan angket Uji prasyarat meliputi uji normalitas dengan metode Lilliefors dan uji Homogenitas dengan metode Bartlett. Pengujian hipotesis pada penelitian ini menggunakan analisis variansi dua jalan dengan sel tak sama. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa: (1) tidak terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar matematika antara siswa yang diberikan perlakuan model pembelajaran ARCS dengan model pembelajaran Active Learning. (2) terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar metematika antara siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar tinggi dan rendah. (3) tidak terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dengan motivasi belajar siswa.Kata Kunci: ARCS, Active Learning, motivasi belajar, hasil belajar matematika Abstract. This study aims to determine: (1) The difference in learning outcomes of student who study mathematics using ARCS learning model with Active learning model. (2) The difference in mathematics learning outcomes in student who have hight, medium and low motivation. (3) Interaction between learning model (ARCS and Active Learning) with student learning motivation. This research is quasi-experimental study with factorial design 2 x 3. The population in this research is all of students class X SMKN 2 Batam with academic year 2016/2017. The Sample in this research from class X accountant-2 is used as sampling for 1st experiment and class X accountant-4 for 2nd experiment. Instrument of research are mathematics achievement test and questionnaire student motivation. The test requirement is normality test using Lilliefors method and homogeneity test using Bartlett method. Hypothesis testing in this study uses two-way analisis of variance with defferent cells. Conclusion in this study: (1) there is no difference between student math result between ARCS learning model with Active learning model. (2) there is difference between result of student math between learning high motivation with low motivation. (3) there is no interaction between the learning model with student motivation.Keywords: ARCS, Active Learning, Motivation learning, Study of Math


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurdalilah Nurdalilah

This study aims to find out (1) students 'learning outcomes of mathematics taught with different strategies, (2) students' mathematics learning outcomes taught by traditional algorithms, (3) Are there different effects of counting strategies on results learn mathematics students on integer operation material. This research is a quantitative research with kind of quasi-experimental research. The population in this study were all third grade students of Public Elementary School 114349. The sample in this study was class III-1 as an experimental class with a total of 30 students and class III-2 as a control class with a total of 30 students. The findings in this study indicate that classes taught by using different strategies have an average value of 31.970 and the classes taught by algorithm have an average value of 28,5758. The results of hypothesis testing show that t count> t table is 2.925> 2.0018 with the conclusion that students' mathematics learning outcomes are taught with different strategies better than those taught with traditional algorithms on integer operation material in Public Elementary School No. 114349 Academic Year 2016/2017


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-109
Author(s):  
Ida Trisnadati

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pendekatan matematika realistik dengan model Problem-Based Learning (PBL) dan Project-Based Learning (PjBL) serta mendes­kripsikan manakah yang lebih efektif antara pendekatan matematika realistikdengan model PBL dan PjBL ditinjau dari kemampuan interpersonal, berpikir kritis dan prestasi belajar matematika pada sis­wa SMP Negeri 1 Samigaluh, Kabupaten Kulon Progo, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain pretest-posttest non-equivalent group design. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data adalah angket kemampuan interpersonal, tes kemampuan berpikir kritis dan tes prestasi belajar. Pengujian keefektifan pendekatan pembelajaran matematika realistik dengan model PBL dan model PjBL dilakukan dengan uji one sample t-test. Pengujian untuk menentukan manakah yang lebih efektif antara pendekatan matematika realistik dengan model PBL dan PjBL dilakukan dengan uji analisis varians multivariat (MANOVA). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan pembelajaran matematika realistik dengan model PBL dan PjBL efektif ditinjau dari kemampuan interpersonal, berpikir kritis dan prestasi belajar serta tidak terdapat perbedaan keefektifan antara pendekatan pembelajaran matematika realistik dengan model PBL dengan pendekatan pembelajaran matematika realistik dengan model PjBL ditinjau dari kemampuan interpersonal, berpikir kritis dan prestasi. Realistic mathematics approach with PBL and PjBL model in terms of interpersonal ability, critical thinking, and students’ achievement AbstractThis study aimed to describe the effectiveness of the realistic mathematics approach with Pro­blem-Based Learning (PBL) and Project-Based Learning (PjBL) and describe which one was more effective between realistic mathematics approach with PBL and PjBL model in terms of interpersonal ability, critical thinking and students’ mathematics achievements in SMP Negeri 1 Samigaluh, Kulon Progo Regency, Special Region of Yogyakarta. This study was a quasi-experimental research with non-equivalent pretest-posttest group design. The instruments used to collect data were an inter­per­sonal skills questionnaire, a test to examine the ability of critical thinking, and a learning achieve­ment test. One sample t-test was conducted to examine the effectiveness of realistic mathe­matics approach with PBL and PjBL models. Meanwhile multivariate test (MANOVA) was carried out in order to determine which one was more effective between realistic mathematics approach with PBL and PjBL model. The results showed that realistic mathematics approach with PBL and PjBL was effective in terms of interpersonal ability, critical thinking and learning achievement, and there was no difference in effectiveness between realistic mathematics learning approach with PBL model and realistic mathematics learning approach with PjBL model in terms of interpersonal ability, critical thinking and students’ achievement.


Kappa Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-87
Author(s):  
Tsamarul Hizbi ◽  
◽  
Sapiruddin Sapiruddin ◽  
Badrul Wajdi ◽  
◽  
...  

This study aims to determine; (1) The difference between the physics learning outcomes of high school students who were taught using inquiry strategies and those taught with group investigation, (2) The effect of the interaction between learning strategies and achievement motivation on learning outcomes of high school students, (3) Differences in learning outcomes of high school students who have motivation High achievers were taught with inquiry strategy with students who were taught by group investigation., (4) Differences in physics learning outcomes of high school students with low achievement motivation were taught using inquiry strategy with students who were taught with group investigation (1) There were differences in physics learning outcomes for high school students those who were taught with inquiry strategies with students who were taught with group investigation., (2) There was an interaction effect between learning strategies and achievement motivation on the learning outcomes of high school students., (3) There were differences in physics learning outcomes for high school students with high achievement motivation to be studied. show with the Inquiry strategy with students who were taught with group investigation., (4) There was no difference in the results of studying physics for high school students who had low achievement motivation learned by inquiry strategy with students who were taught with group investigation.


Author(s):  
Maria Melfa Simanjuntak ◽  
Hasratuddin ◽  
Zulkifli Matondang

Mathematics learning outcomes obtained by students at least describe the achievement of learning objectives to be achieved. But the learning outcomes of students at SD Negeri 102119 Nagaraja are still relatively low with a low level of student motivation so that it influences the teaching and learning process. With one alternative that can help using the Realistic Mathematical Approach (PMR) can improve student learning outcomes and motivation to learn mathematics. Therefore, this study aims to examine the Effect of Realistic Mathematical Approaches on Learning Outcomes of Mathematics; Effect of Realistic Mathematical Approaches on Student Learning Motivation; and Great influence of learning approaches on student learning outcomes in mathematics and student motivation. This research is a quasi-experimental research. The population in this study were all fourth grade students of SD Negeri 102119 Nagaraja Serdang Bedagai, totaling 54 students. The instrument used consisted of a test of learning outcomes and a motivation questionnaire. Data were analyzed with the Simple Regression Analysis Test. Based on the results of the analysis the results of the study are obtained that the Realistic Mathematics Approach gives an effect on the mathematics learning outcomes of fourth grade students of SD Negeri 102119 Nagaraja Serdang Bedagai because the value of Sig. equal to 0,00 <0,05 with t count 7,158> t table 2,064; The Realistic Mathematics Approach does not have an effect on student motivation because the value of Sig. of 0.84> 0.05 with t count 0.193 <t table 2.064; and The magnitude of the effect of the learning approach on mathematics learning outcomes 68.1% and the effect of the learning approach on learning motivation 0.2% while the remaining 31.7% is influenced by factors other than the learning approach.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Weni Ariyanti Lubis ◽  
Suwarno Ariswoyo ◽  
Edi Syahputra

This study aims to examine the difference in Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) increase with students who obtain Autograph assisted discovery leaning, 2.The interaction between learning models and students initial mathematical abilities to students’ mathematical problem solving abilities. This type of research is quasi-experimental. The population in this study were all the students of class IX SMA Alwashliyah 3 Medan totaling 90 students. The sample selection is determined by randomly selecting two classes. Instrument used in data collection consisted of tests of problem solving abilities, students’ initial mathematical abilities and self- efficacy questionnaries. The results of the study indicate there are diffrences in the improvement of problem solving abilities provided by mathematics learning with the RME approach and Autograph Assisted Guided Discovery learning.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
Nurdia Nurdia

Abstract. This study aims to determine the improvement of mathematics learning outcomes on the subject of fractions through a realistic mathematical approach to fourth grade students of SD Negeri 151 Kadeppe, Enrekang Regency and increase the activeness of students in the learning process through realistic mathematical approaches. The method used is classroom action research with two cycles. The results showed that the results of learning mathematics in the Principles of Fractions of Students in Grade IV of SD Negeri 151 Kadeppe, Enrekang Regency after using a realistic mathematics learning approach had increased. Based on the results of this study the authors recommend to classroom teachers that a realistic mathematical approach can be used as an alternative in implementing mathematics learning in schools and the application of realistic mathematics is needed good planning in order to run effectively.


2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahara . ◽  
Abdul Hamid K

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan: (1) mengetahui apakah hasil belajar matematika siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan  strategi pembelajaran matematika realistik lebih tinggi dari strategi pembelajaran langsung; (2) mengetahui  apakah hasil belajar matematika siswa yang mempunyai sikap matematika tinggi lebih tinggi dari sikap matematika rendah; dan (3) mengetahui  apakah terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan sikap matematika siswa terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2x2, sedangkan teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi a = 0.05. Hasil penelitian diperoleh: (1) hasil belajar matematika siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan strategi pembelajaran matematika realistik lebih tinggi dari hasil belajar matematika siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan strategi pembelajaran langsung, (2) hasil   belajar  matematika  siswa yang memiliki sikap matematika tinggi  lebih tinggi dari hasil belajar matematika siswa yang memiliki sikap matematika rendah; dan (3) terdapat  interaksi  antara  strategi  pembelajaran dan sikap  matematika  siswa  terhadap hasil belajar matematika.   Kata Kunci: Strategi Pembelajaran matematika realistik dan Strategi Pembelajaran langsung, sikap matematika, matematika   Abstract: This research was aimed to:  (1) determine whether the outcomes of learning mathematics students who learned with realistic mathematics learning strategies is higher than direct instructional strategies, (2) determine whether the results of students' mathematics learning attitudes that have high math higher than attitude lower mathematics, and (3) determine whether there is an interaction between learning strategies and student attitudes toward mathematics student math learning outcomes . Method using a quasi-experimental study with a 2x2 factorial design study , while data analysis techniques using ANOVA two lanes at a significance level of a = 0.05 level . Results were obtained: (1) mathematics learning outcomes of students who learned with the learning strategies of realistic mathematics higher mathematics learning outcomes of students who learned with direct instructional strategies, (2) mathematics learning outcomes of students who have high math attitude is higher than the results of learning mathematics students who have low math attitude, and (3) there is an interaction between learning strategies and student attitudes toward mathematics math learning outcomes . Keywords : Learning Strategies and Learning Strategies realistic mathematics directly, mathematics attitude,, mathematics


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document