scholarly journals ANALISIS TERHADAP KETERBUKAAN INFORMASI PUBLIK PADA PERSEROAN TERBATAS YANG MELAKUKAN PENGUMPULAN DANA DONASI YANG DIDUGA DIGUNAKAN UNTUK PELAKSANAAN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 366
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rizqi ◽  
Chandra Yusuf

Public Institution is a legal person under the Indonesian act number 14 year of 2008 about Public Information Openness. Under that act, Public Institution have an obligation to publish all the information on that regulation. Public Institution, under the Indonesian act of Public Information Openness means legislative, executive, judicative and any other institution who obtain operational funds from state income (ABPN) or regional income (APBD), public funds or foreign income. There’s an issue among Private Company and Public Information Commission, where the Private Company appointed as a Public Institution by the Judge from Indonesian Information Public Commission. There’s a gap on that dispute, because Private Company obeyed under the Indonesian act of Private Company number 40 year of 2007. The judge had consideration when decided Private Company to become a Public Institution, it’s because of that Private Company managed public donation and distribute that donation into several foundation. The other problem is the private company refused to be named as a Public Institution, so there’s no obligation for the private company to publish any information about the corporation.

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
Frank Ochsendorf

This article discusses the impact of investments by foreign firms in healthcare and hygienic measures on indigenous society in late-colonial Indonesia (1910-1940), focusing on three principal centers of foreign investment activity: Java, East Sumatra and the island of Belitung. Such facilities, although primarily intended for workers and their families, were sometimes accessible for members of indigenous society without contractual or family connection to the private company furnishing them. In rare cases, private companies invested directly in the welfare of local communities. The article concludes that the impact of the social investments on the state of health of indigenous communities was generally positive and a much-needed addition to scarcely available public healthcare. While such social investments can be regarded as examples of proto-corporate social responsibility strategies, the improvement of welfare was always a means through which the ultimate goal could be achieved: survival of the company and maximization of profits.


2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 379-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paresh Mishra ◽  
Gordon B. Schmidt

The idea of embedded versus peripheral corporate social responsibility (CSR) proposed by Aguinis and Glavas (2013) appears to be very intuitive and functional. After all, who can on face deny the argument that CSR will have the maximum positive outcomes when it is not just an add-on but is thoroughly integrated into the strategies, routines, and operations of the business? However, on closer inspection, there appear to be several problems with the embedded–peripheral dichotomy. Three major ambiguities of the embedded–peripheral dichotomy are focused on in this commentary. The first lies in the potential for significant ambiguity in whether a company falls in one category or the other based on how the totality of the organization's operations and functions are categorized. A company can have CSR built into their operations and strategies for part of their business (embedded) while have them not be built into their operations for different aspects of the operations or product strategies. The second ambiguity area is how CSR actions get defined as peripheral or embedded that does fit well with the actual importance level of the action to the organization. We look at an organization example (TOM Shoes) where peripheral CSR actions have significant impact on organizational success.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 2329
Author(s):  
Edita Olaizola ◽  
Rafael Morales-Sánchez ◽  
Marcos Eguiguren Huerta

Since the end of the last century, different approaches for corporate management have been appearing that try to incorporate the social advances that are being produced and disseminated thanks to the greater capacity of communication available through social networks and other traditional avenues. Among the best known are Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability, the Circular Economy, and Collaborative Economics. All of them add value to organisations, and all of them have a common characteristic: they are anthropocentric approaches. Our proposal goes a step further: we need a worldview that is capable of placing organisations in a position of continuous learning looking at nature, because it is the best way to integrate into it as a more ecosystem and thus achieve its flowering respecting the once to all the other subsystems that make up the planet: Organizational Biomimicry. This work compares the anthropocentric vision with the worldview at the same time that it offers a guide of the essential steps so that Organizational Biomimicry is the new model of corporate management.


2019 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
pp. 08004
Author(s):  
Elena Vorobey ◽  
Liudmila Belosluttceva ◽  
Olesya Fesenko

The need of corporate social responsibility development is mostly explained with the fact that the states do not cope with the solution of problems of a social assistance of the population. But as the state undertakes all social burden of the population, the need for corporate social responsibility disappears. So, it is substantiate to adopt the other approach -the importance to proceed from essence of society as certain social system -system of people, their certain communities connected with each other by the public relations, and their interests. Stable, steady existence of this system is possible only at mutual adjustment of all its structural parts -adjustment of mutual interests.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul F. Skilton ◽  
Jill M. Purdy

ABSTRACT:We explore the essential contestedness of corporate social responsibility (CSR) by framing the interplay between CSR activities and stakeholder evaluations as a contest for jurisdiction over what it means to be socially responsible. This contest arises because firms and stakeholders are often guided by incompatible sensemaking systems. To show why context matters we show how stakeholders evaluate the authenticity of CSR activities on the basis of schemas for responsible behavior on one hand and their perceptions of firm identity on the other. This process can generate complex evaluations whose meaning depends on the distribution of power in fields and the extent to which pluralistic sensemaking systems are compatible. By positioning authenticity evaluations within a framework that describes the state of power and pluralism within which they are produced, we are able to present a systematic explanation of how and why stakeholder responses to CSR vary over a range of settings.


PERSPEKTIF ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-179
Author(s):  
Rizka Rahmah Hidayati ◽  
Badaruddin Badaruddin ◽  
R. Hamdani Harahap

This research aims to analyze the supporting & barrier factors of the implementation of corporate social responsibility program of PT. PP London Sumatra Indonesia, Tbk in helping the lives of the people around Bagerpang Plantation, Deli Serdang Regency - North Sumatra Province. Research methods are carried out with a qualitative approach using data collection techniques through interviews and field observations. The informants in this study consisted of CSR program recipients, corporate management who handle CSR departments and local village government apparatus. The research site covers Bagerpang estate which consists of 7 divisions / villages in 3 sub-districts namely Galang, Bangun Purba and STM Hilir. The results showed that PT. PP London Sumatra Indonesia, Tbk as a private company in the field of agro industry participated in assisting the government in development through the implementation of CSR programs as a form of social responsibility to the community and the environment for the impact sparked by its operational activities. PT. PT. PP London Sumatra Indonesia, Tbk has implemented CSR practices in several areas of work, namely education, health, infrastructure maintenance, social and religious and populist economic efforts. Researcher also introduced several supporting and barrier factors of the success and effectiveness of CSR implementation. The conclusion of this research is that the company is still focusing its CSR implementation goals and objectives on improving the quality of life of employees and their families not yet on the level of community empowerment._________________________________________________________________________


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-343
Author(s):  
David Amrulloh ◽  
Sulastri Sulastri

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a business commitment to act ethically, operate legally, contribute to economic improvement and improve the quality of life of stakeholders. In the modern era, the priority is no longer the property of shareholders, but the welfare of the stakeholders is a responsibility prioritized by the company. The emergence of Law No. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Company (UUPT) and Law No.25 of 2007 concerning Investment (UUPM) marked the commencement of CSR arrangements in Indonesia. The concept of CSR contained in the UUPM and UUPT will be seen in PT. Sejahtera Usaha Bersama Jombang. As a private company that engaged in industry, especially plywood. This study aims to uncover the meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) from the point of view of the management of PT.SUB in- depth and comprehensively. This type of research is qualitative with phenomenology method and uses Husserl's data analysis techniques, with epoche stages, phenomenological reduction, imagination variations, synthesis of meaning and essence. Data collection in this study uses the method of observation, interviews, and documentation. Interviews are conducted in depth to explore individual awareness with semi-structured questions. The results of this study found two perspectives on the meaning of CSR at PT. SUB Jombang. First, CSR is defined as an obligation that is in the form of compliance with regulations. Second, CSR is interpreted as awareness, namely in the form of awareness of the company growing and developing in the midst of the community environment, and the realization that CSR is a charity and shodaqoh. Corporate Social Responsibility (Tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan/CSR) merupakan sebuah komitmen bisnis untuk selalu bertindak sesuai etika, beroperasi mematuhi hukum, serta berkontribusi terhadap perkembangan ekonomi dan perbaikan kualitas hidup para aktor terkait. Di era modern, perusahaan tidak lagi memprioritaskan kekayaan dari para pemegang saham, tetapi perusahaan lebih bertanggung jawab atas kesejahteraan para pemilik saham. Diterbitkannya Undang-Undang No. 40 tahun 2007 tentang Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas (UUPT) dan Undang-Undang No. 25 Tahun 2007 tentang Undang-Undang Penanaman Modal telah menjadi awal tatanan CSR di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menyelidiki praktik pelaksanaan konsep CSR yang dijelaskan di dalam UUPM dan UUPT pada PT. Sejahtera Usaha Bersama (SUB) Jombang, sebuah perusahaan swasta di bidang kayu lapis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui makna CSR, dari sudut pandang pihak pengelola PT SUB secara mendalam dan menyeluruh. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan metode fenomenologi dan metode analisa data Husserl’s, yang terdiri dari tahap epoche, reduksi fenomenologis, variasi imajinasi, serta sintesis makna dan esensi. DI dalam proses pengumpulan data, penelitian ini menggunakan metode observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Wawancara dilaksanakan secara mendalam untuk mengetahui kesadaran individu dengan pertanyaan semi terstruktur. Hasil dari penelitian menunjukkan adanya dua sudut pandang mengenai arti dari CSR dari PT. SUB Jombang. Sudut pandang pertama mengartikan CSR sebagai keharusan untuk patuh terhadap peraturan. Sedangkan sudut pandang kedua mengartikan Csr sebagai kesadaran dari perusahaan untuk tumbuh dan berkembang di tengah komunitas yang peduli akan lingkungan dan diwujudkan dalam bentuk amal dan sedekah.


Author(s):  
Nitesh Raj

<p><em>These days when the Central Government is interested in Make in India campaign the scale of management or evaluation of business is not as if used to be about fifty years ago. At that time only that business organization was considered good which was earning profit for its owner but today the situation is absolutely changed. Today business has to look to the interest of many other stakeholders along with the interest of the owner. The employees- line and top management, consumers, suppliers, competitors, government, community, environment and even the world happen to be the other stakeholders. This responsibility of business, which includes the satisfaction of these parties along with the owner, is called the social responsibility of business or corporate sectors.</em></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document