scholarly journals Specific features of using the principle of falsification in economic science

KANT ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-111
Author(s):  
Rashid Ramazanovich Dagaev

The article is an introduction to the use of the principle of falsification in economic science. It is shown what difficulties the named criterion of demarcation encounters when trying to introduce it into humanitarian knowledge. The specificity of economic knowledge itself, which makes it difficult to use the principle of falsification, is explicated.

Author(s):  
Svetlana L. Sazanova

The article is devoted to the analysis of the content and results of the First International Lvov Forum, dedicated to the 90th anniversary of the birth of Academician D. S. Lvov (1930–2007). The forum was held on October 20–21, 2020 at the State University of Management with the support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), project No. 20-010-22058. Major Russian and foreign scientists, academicians and corresponding members of the Russian Academy of Sciences, leading Russian universities, universities of the Czech Republic, France, Bulgaria and other countries took part in the First Lvov Forum. The Forum discussed fundamental problems of modern Russian and world economic science, including: the problem of the crisis of the paradigm of economic theory; the problem of the relationship between philosophical and economic knowledge; the need to form a new paradigm of economic science; the problem of interaction between society, state and business at the micro, meso and macro levels in the face of modern challenges; place and role of Russia in the world socio-economic system; development strategy of the Russian socio-economic system in the context of the new paradigm of economic science in the context of modern challenges. The discussion of the above fundamental problems was on the basis of a synthesis of the principle of dichotomy and a systematic approach. The First Lvov Forum took a significant place among such major Russian scientific events as the Gaidar Economic Forum, the Krasnoyarsk Economic Forum, the Moscow Economic Forum, etc. due to the relevance of the problems considered at the Forum, the novelty of the methods proposed for their solution. The ideas of Russian and foreign scientists presented at the Forum can be used for the further development of modern economic theory, as well as for the development of programs for the development of the Russian economy at the micro, meso and macro levels.


Author(s):  
Василий Владимирович Чекмарев ◽  
Владимир Васильевич Чекмарев ◽  
Александр Федорович Швец

Целью настоящей статьи является исследование внутренней логики развития экономической науки как причины формирования парадигмального взгляда на развитие современной экономики. Факторов-причин, влияющих на формирование нового парадигмального взгляда на фундаментальное основание экономической науки, достаточно много [2, с. 58-64]. Среди них можно назвать, например, такие, как критерии научной достоверности в их историко-диалектическом жизненном цикле, новые стандарты научной аргументации с учетом резкого падения качества статистических данных и возможности использования фактов, шумонаполняемость понятийного аппарата науки (например - бургерэкономика, билингвальность, иммерсивный сторителлинг). Авторами обосновано, что одним из направлений перестройки научного мышления является становление полицентрического образа фундаментальной экономической науки. Научная новизна полученных результатов заключается в формулировании принципов и критериев классификации экономических знаний, а также в доказательстве продуктивности определения названия фундаментальной основы экономической науки, как общей экономической теории. The purpose of this article is to study the internal logic of the development of economic science, as the reason for the formation of a paradigmatic view of the development of modern economics. There are a lot of factors-reasons influencing the formation of a new paradigmatic view of the fundamental basis of economic science [2, p. 58-64]. Among them, one can name, for example, criteria of scientific reliability in their historical-dialectical life cycle, new standards of scientific argumentation, taking into account a sharp drop in the quality of statistical data and the possibility of using facts, noise filling of the conceptual apparatus of science (for example, burger economics, bilingualism, immersive storytelling). The authors substantiated that one of the directions of the restructuring of scientific thinking is the formation of a polycentric image of fundamental economic science. The scientific novelty of the results obtained lies in the formulation of principles and criteria for the classification of economic knowledge, as well as in the proof of the productivity of determining the name of the fundamental basis of economic science as a general economic theory.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 3-15
Author(s):  
Kostyantyn BEZGIN ◽  
◽  
Volodymyr USHKALYOV ◽  

The purpose of the article is to formulate a hypothesis regarding the relationship and dynamic balance between normative and descriptive epistemology, which is established in the process of interpreting rational human behavior to create and accumulate congruent economic knowledge. In the face of growing complexity and uncertainty of the external environment, the role of critical thinking skills is increasing, which intensify the cognitive co-evolution of a person and environment by neutralizing evolutionarily formed cognitive dysfunctions. As an axiological nucleus it is proposed to use the theory of rational choice – the standard of human behavior, which contributes to the diffusion of complexity and uncertainty of the external environment. However, the presence of an axiological nucleus is a necessary but not sufficient condition, which allows it to be adequately integrated with the subject substrate. For this, one requires the relevant knowledge of those behavioral features that are presented by the epistemic periphery that dynamically changes and also permanently detects and fixes the properties and characteristics of the neural substrate, its phenomenology and behavioral characteristics. The knowledge being accumulated on the epistemic periphery of economic science allows adequately reloading the programs of the human mind to bring them into line with modern requirements for the cognitive abilities of economic agents, and also to create an internally holistic and consistent system of economic knowledge, which will take into account the complexity and multidimensional development of human-sized systems. The epistemic balance of normative and descriptive epistemology in the context of the interpretation of rational behavior may lie in a hypothesis that eliminates the dichotomy of normative and positive economic knowledge and is based on taking into account the structure of human cognitive processes, as well as the growing complexity and uncertainty of the external environment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 262-286
Author(s):  
Tamara Tkach ◽  
Anatoliy Tkach ◽  
Ivan Rekun

Introduction. The article is devoted to the issues of multidisciplinary interaction in new scientific fields, which involve a wide variety of convergences, no matter how strange at first glance they may seem. One of these phenomena is the interaction of psycholinguistics and neuroeconomics. The goal. The article examines the transition of modern science to multidisciplinary discourse, which makes it necessary to conceptualize and possibly operationalize methods of psycholinguistics. The conceptualization of new areas of neuroeconomics, in a psycholinguistic context, presupposes a certain mental experience that includes, in addition to the processes of creating new concepts and contextual economic knowledge, also defining the role of interests, intentions, emotions in human economic activity. Methods. Multivariate analysis, comparative analysis, extrapolation. Results. It is proved that in recent decades the development of new areas of economic science, namely those related to the development of neuroeconomics, has significantly expanded the field of psycholinguistics. The production of new paradigms of economic theory, the formation of the corresponding definitions, objects requires the design and definition of them both in form and in content. It considers the need for a theoretical and orderly definition of the functional meaning of the psycholinguistic context of new definitions, the result of which can be a conceptual system for communication between specialists in various fields of science at the level of their professional understanding. It seems that the central issues in the psycholinguistic discourse of neuroeconomics have become the relationship between economics, psychology, linguistics and psycholinguistics. Such connection is undoubtedly of a multidisciplinary nature, which contributes to the deepening of the relationship between scientific thought, culture and language and became the impetus for understanding the nature of human cognition at a higher, multidisciplinary level of development of science. This is a necessary component for understanding the meanings and structure of concepts, terms and definitions, as well as communications at a higher scientific level. Conclusions. It is concluded that new areas of neuroeconomics such as behavioral economics, behavioral finance, emotional economics, psychological economics, have become areas of economic theory that, explicitly or implicitly, take into account the psychological characteristics of human perception and behavior in the process of economic activity. These definitions catalyze the theoretical integration of various scientific fields, and, above all, psycholinguistic science.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (10) ◽  
pp. 88-100
Author(s):  
Viktor TARASEVYCH ◽  

The actual problematique of the truth, its content and types in the context of the evolution of classical, non-classical and post-non-classical science are considered in the article. The critical characteristic of the correspondent, pragmatic, coherent, conventional and consensus concepts of the truth is given. The concept of holistic truth is proposed and substantiated. Emphasis is placed on its universumic character, complex organization and structure. The holistic truth is defined as the n-dimensional conformity of the economic- universumic knowledge to the super-complex human-dimensional economic temporal space (object) in its (conformity) interrelationship with human activity, its spheres and elements. The “inner world”, the construction of a holistic truth, which is precisely understood in this way, in the first approximation can be represented by three interrelated components: scientific, non-scientific and synthetic. The scientific component of the holistic truth is a complex system of interrelationships: on the one hand, the relation of scientific economic knowledge to the object, and, on the other hand, the relations of knowledge to the subject, conditions, process, result, etc., to scientific and practical economic activity, as well as the relations of economic knowledge to itself. Elements of the non-scientific component of the holistic truth can be interrelationship of relations of: (i) non-scientific economic knowledge to various phenomena of the corresponding type of comprehension and reflected reality in a universumic context; (ii) non-scientific knowledge to itself and to knowledge – the results of other types of knowledge. Synthetic component of the holistic truth is the combination and synergy of the scientific and non-scientific components. The number of such combinations cannot be described briefly, since various relationships of many types of comprehension and cognition must be considered both among themselves and with their attitudes to numerous phenomena of human activity. Thus, in modern science, along with the increasing complexity of scientific truth and the process of its comprehension, there is a ripening understanding of the impossibility of the latter without addressing the holistic truth and its comprehension. It is necessary to learn how to determine the extent and conformity of the holistic truth, the rigid conditions, preconditions and boundaries in which the economic-universumic knowledge corresponds to one or another sphere of an intricate human-dimensional object.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (8) ◽  
pp. 170-182
Author(s):  
M. V. MEL’NIK ◽  

The article shows the importance of economic analysis in the system of economic knowledge, its formation as an independent area of ​​research. The main stages of the formation of theoretical and methodological principles of analysis and the development of practice in leading economic entities are analyzed. The preconditions for the formation and development of complex economic analysis, its role and significance in improving management in the activities of economic entities are considered; shows the possibilities of using modern methods and approaches to the development of complex economic analysis and the expansion of its use in the practice of economic entities of different levels. The article is based on the disclosure of the role of the leading Russian scientist, Doctor of Economics, Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation Anatoly Danilovich Sheremet, in the development of economic science and economic analysis, as an independent area of ​​knowledge, who for many decades headed the Russian scientific school of economic analysis.


2003 ◽  
pp. 81-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kaz

Mechanisms of transformation of knowledge in economic science are considered in the article. The author analyses the sphere of labor motivation in the Soviet political economy. He demonstrates the possibilities of statistical distribution analysis in studying discourse practices, reveals stages of development and mechanisms of discourse formation in the Soviet political economy. The question about the limits of the normative ethic approach in economic research is also risen in the article.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-106
Author(s):  
Viktor Shishkin

The present work deals with development of new post-industrial knowledge economy, as the higher level of development of economic matter. Economic science is gaining a new cognitive form in connection with intensive development and humanization of economic knowledge, complement and expand it at the expense of biology, physiology, psychology, physics, mathematics and other Sciences. Cognitive economy, as one of the areas of existence of the new knowledge economy, based on the discoveries and achievements of science and cognitive abilities of the person directly involved in identifying, obtaining and registration of new economic knowledge necessary to further its (knowledge) reproduction. Identified new creative area economic whom knowledge — nanobioeconomy, combining progressive reproduction biotechnology wealth of biomass of plant and animal origin with the analysis of the behavior of the human person in the process of production and economic activity. Identified key economic structure of the new economy — nanobiocluster as regional meso-economic functional system, described his organization, principles of operation, characterized by its economic efficiency; on this basis, developed a new innovative antirecessionary entrepreneurship strategy.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Станислав Борзых ◽  
Stanislav Borzykh

The monograph addresses the theoretical and methodological foundations of economic science. The author of the monograph sharply criticizes the basic postulates of Economics and the prerequisites of the findings. The subjects of critical analysis in the monograph are the system of criteria for assessing economic knowledge and deductive statements of economic science. All of the above, from the point of view of the author of the monograph, requires a speedy revision of the place of modern Economics in the system of social Sciences, as well as the methodological Arsenal of this scientific discipline. For a wide range of readers interested in the development of the economy from the point of view of philosophical issues.


Author(s):  
Nataliya S. Plaskova

The article is devoted to the systematization of the historical stages of financial controlling, its development and transformation into an independent field of economic knowledge, the disclosure of modern directions for improving its theory and practice for the purposes of managing the activities of economic entities. The author reveals the functions of financial controlling and its future-oriented concept, which contributes to the solution of current and strategic management tasks to ensure high efficiency of economic activity of a modern organization. The article presents Russian and foreign innovations in the field of financial controlling organization, substantiation of its methodological tools, updating of the content, the nature of the dynamics of its structural components and monitoring parameters in retrospective and forecast aspects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document