scholarly journals O AKTUALNOSTI CASUUM COMMORIENTIUM U RIMSKOM I SUVREMENOM EUROPSKOM PRIVATNOM PRAVU

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 171-200
Author(s):  
Mirza Hebib

In the Roman legal tradition, but also in modern civil law systems, the term commorientes (lat. commorientes) refers to persons who died in the same accident or other danger, standing in a legal position relevant to inheritance law. In connection with the resolution of such situations in the theory of private law, various legal presumptions have been developed since the period of classical Roman law. All these presumptions can be systematized within two basic concepts - the first based on the presumption of survival of subjects and the second based on the presumption of the simultaneous death of subjects. Comparatively, in the development of European private law, there has been a reception of both concepts, with the proviso that over time the concept of simultaneity will almost completely suppress the concept of survival. The paper analyzes the reasons for this. In establishing a link between Roman roots and European private law, special attention is given to the possibility of applying presumptions in cases where there is a certain spatial or temporal distance between the deaths of persons or if a different cause has led to fatal consequences. Ultimately, the paper clearly points to the importance of Roman rules, which can sometimes be fundamental in understanding the institutes of contemporary private law.

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 73-102
Author(s):  
Juan Palao-Uceda

This article tries to return to the essence of civil law which, with a little more than ten key contractual institutions, allows all disputes created from newly founded institutions to be examined and interpreted. If law is science it must be ableto be reduced to a set of basic concepts that have been coined and concluded from daily contractual practice and, almost in their entirety, have been in force over time. Hence the study of Roman law and Roman legal tradition remain a constantreference to our continental law. However, this does not prevent them from being open to gradual enrichment.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sławomir Godek

The influence of Byzantine law on tutelage in the Russkaya Pravda and th e First Lithuanian StatuteThe article is dedicated to the influence that Byzantine law had on Russian law (with a particular focus on the Russkaya Pravda) and on the First Lithuanian Statute of 1529.The paper analyses the main channels of influence that Byzantine law had on the ancient Russian law. It happened primarily through intensive trading and political contacts between Kiev and the Byzantine Empire. Such contacts, without any doubt, were established as early as the first half of the 10th century. An important factor in the influence Byzantine law exerted on Russian law was constituted by treaties (known as „dogovory”) concluded between these states in the years 907, 911, 944, and 971. The influence of Byzantine law in Rus intensified especially after the Kievan princes adopted Christianity in its Greek tradition in 988. At that time, Byzantine law codes spread across Rus; an important role in their spreading was played by the so-called Kormchie Knigi, which contained the norms of church and secular law. The codes were bound to influence legal practice, especially in the field of family, guardianship and inheritance law, which traditionally lay within the jurisdiction of ecclesiastical courts. At the same time, princes significantly intensified their legislative activity. The acts of the Kievan and Novgorod princes are inspired by the solutions adopted in Greek law, and contain many references to this law. The influence also spread onto the Russkaya Pravda (Russian Justice), especially in its later version. All in all, the influence of Byzantine law in Rus was quite significant, which fostered the development of Russian law. It mostly affected private law and procedural law, but also, to a limited extent, criminal law. In the field of private law, the strongest influence of Greek law was felt in marriage, guardianship and family law.The provisions o f the Russkaya Pravda with respect to guardianship were modeled on the respective regulations of the codes of Byzantine law - the Ecloga and the Procheiron. The Russian code defined the position of the widow in a way reminiscent of Byzantine law - after the husband's death she was the  continuer of the previous family arrangement; her rights to family property (of which she could freely dispose) and relations with children were also defined in a similar manner. Similarities can also be discerned in the regulations on the remarriage of widows, in particular, the legal consequences of this act: remarriage resulted in the loss of the right of custody over children in favor of the husband’s relatives.These provisions of the Russkaya Pravda in the field of guardianship law certainly exerted some influence on the development of the legal institution of guardianship at the time when Russian lands were included into the Lithuanian state. This was reflected in privileges granted to the Lithuanian szlachta (gentry), which reiterated the principles known from the Russkaya Pravda. This, in particular, applies to the privileges that defined the legal position of a widow (privilege of 1447). The same principles also constituted the grounds of verdicts adopted by Grand Duke’s court in cases from the field of guardianship law. With the passage of time, a significant body of experience was gathered, which laid the foundations for the respective provisions of the First Lithuanian Statute. The provisions of the Statute that regulated widows’ guardianship over children (Statute I, VI, 6) show a kinship with the provisions of the Russkaya Pravda and, through it, with the Ecloga and the Procheiron.It seems, therefore, that there was a substantial flow of ideas and readymade legal structures between Byzantine law, based on the principles of the ancient Roman law, and Russian law, whose output was, in its turn, used by the Lithuanian legislature.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-31
Author(s):  
Anwar Hidayat

Abstrak Hukum merupakan suatu sistem terpenting di dalam masyarakat untuk mengatur kehidupan yang berkaitan dengan sebuat tatanan yang selalu bergerak baik secara evolutif maupun revolusioner. Tatanan diatur dalam hukum itu sendiri meliputi tatanan transendetal, tatanan sosial/masyarakat dan tatanan politik. Hukum perdata yang merupakan ketentuan atau peraturan yang berkaitan dengan pribadi seseorang dengan orang lain, atau juga hukum sipil memiliki ruang lingkup yang luas dalam pengaturannya. Salah satu bidang hukum yang mengatur hubungan-hubungan antara individu-individu dalam masayrakat dengan sarana tertentu. Penggolongan dari hukum perdata yang ada saat ini antara lain meliputi: Hukum keluarga, Hukum harta kekayaan, Hukum kebendaan, Hukum perikatan, dan Hukum waris. Kajian kritis terhadap hukum perdata yang telah berlaku di Indonesia dengan menggunakan metode filsafat (filosofis), maka seharusya yang dijadikan dasar pemikirannya ialah falsafah Pancasila. Sebagaimana diketahui bahwa Pancasila merupakan sumber dari segala sumber hukum negara Indonesia. Hal yang demikian ini dirasa sesuai mengingat falsafah Pancasila adalah merupakan ruh perjuangan dari para pejuang bangsa, sebagai alat pemersatu, dari yang sebelumnya terkotak-kotak oleh suatu daerah/wilayah, ras, suku, golongan dan agama. Kata Kunci: Hukum Perdata, Filosofis, Pancasila   Abstract The law is the most important system in society to regulate life in relation to an order that is always moving both evolutionarily and revolutionarily. Order is regulated in the law itself including transcendental order, social/community order and political order. Private law which is a provision or regulation relating to someone's personal with others, or also civil law has a broad scope in its regulation. One area of ​​law that regulates the relationships between individuals in society with certain means. The current classification of private law includes: Family law, Property law, Material law, Engagement law, and inheritance law. Critical study of private law that has prevailed in Indonesia using philoshopy (philosophical) methods, then the basis for thinking should be the philosophy of Pancasila. As is known that Pancasila is the source of all sources of Indonesian state law. This is considered appropriate given the philosophy of Pancasila is the spirit of the struggle of the nation's fighters, as a unifying tool, from previously divided by a region / region, race, ethnicity, class and religion. Keyword: Private Law, Philosophical, Pancasila.


2019 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-39
Author(s):  
Iryna Izarova ◽  
Bartosz Szolc-Nartowski ◽  
Anastasiia Kovtun

Abstract This article describes the meaning of amicus curiae according to modern legislation and doctrine, as well as its origin from Roman law and English law. One part of the article is devoted to the current legal position of international institutions regarding amicus curiae and its place in different legal systems worldwide. Furthermore, the last part of the article related to the analysis of the new amicus curiae concept in Ukraine legislation, combined with the new principles of judicial case management and cooperation of the judge and parties in civil procedure. The article concludes with some thoughts about the need and viability of its implementation in the civil law countries using examples of current reforms of Civil Procedure in Ukraine, and other states of Eastern Europe.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Lotmar

For decades, Philipp Lotmar has repeatedly and insistently focussed on the subject of error. In a monumental work, Lotmar set out to examine the countless relevant Roman sources in every area of law inside as well as outside the Corpus Juris Civilis, thus providing the material basis for his criticism of Karl Friedrich von Savigny's leading doctrine of errors in contract law. However, Lotmar could not complete the work he considered the crowning achievement of his research in the field of Roman law, nor did he succeed in publishing the first, almost finished volume. The entire first volume and the introduction to the second volume, i.e. those parts of the intended opus which Lotmar left behind in a form already fit for publication, will now be presented to the public. In this way, the scientific work of a formative civil law teacher, who today is perceived primarily as the creator of modern labor law, is thus finally being made available in his proper field of research, i.e. Roman law and general private law dogmatics, almost a hundred years after his death.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 47-60
Author(s):  
Nataliya M. Оnishchenko ◽  
Tatyana I. Tarakhonych ◽  
Oleh L. Bohinich

Abstract The purpose of the study is to cover the analysis of the legal position of the state in private law relations. Particular attention is paid to the dualistic nature of the state – as a sovereign and as a horizontal participant in civil law relations. The study employs the following methods: dialectical, technical and comparative law. Results of the systematic interpretation suggest that the state does not have the status of a person, which complicates the application of some legal structures. It is concluded that the state is a multi-stage entity that includes the state of Ukraine, the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and territorial communities. This paper will be useful for advocates, judges, academics whose area of expertise is the problematics of the liability law, as well as the issue of harmonisation of the civil legislation of Ukraine with the civil legislation of the EU countries.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2/2020) ◽  
pp. 9-37
Author(s):  
Đorđe Stepić

Dušan’s Code continues the earlier regulation of legal relations following the local legal tradition, paying a lot of attention to the legalization of social stratification: determining the legal position of different categories of the population in different ways. In addition to their social status, their sex also had a great influence on their position: through the regulation of the general position of the „poor spinner” and the procedural one of the „poor woman”, as well as through other provisions on the legal position of women. At the opposite end of the social spectrum are female members of the ruling class – the noblewomen. They are found especially in the matter of inheritance law, less so in criminal and other branches of law. In addition to the analysis of the rules that apply to them, the paper will also address the specifics of the application of other, „neutral” rules to the status of women in Dušan’s empire, as well as those concerning the „Lady Empress”, to which certain issues of public law are related. Finally, conclusions will be drawn on the legal status of (noble)women in the Serbian Empire, as well as their placement in the context of the rights of the Nemanjić Serbia.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hernan Collado Urieta

In the first decade of the XXI century, Catalonia has successfully received Land Stewardship as a strategy for nature conservation. As a result, many efforts have been taken to regulate Land Stewardship agreements in the Catalan civil law given the great opportunity of the Catalan private law codification that has taken place in Catalonia during the present and previous decade. For this purposes, all features of these agreements, such as duration, effects and nature have been thoroughly studied giving place to specific provisions in the Civil Code of Catalonia. This unique experience is studied in this article, extracting the key elements, learning and suggestions leading to some guidelines for a European common roadmap to the regulation of land Stewardship agreements.


Author(s):  
Randall Lesaffer

The chapter explores the emergence of European legal history in the years after the Second World War through an analysis of Paul Koschaker’s seminal work, Europa und das römisches Recht. Whereas the rise of a European discourse of legal history gels with European integration, the chapter argues that its roots are rather to be found in Koschaker’s attempt to salvage the study of Roman private law from the crisis it had fallen into at German law schools during the interbellum. By highlighting the enduring role of the Roman legal experience for the formation of the European legal tradition, he hoped to give Roman law a new relevance for law students. The chapter further surveys the gradual widening of European legal history towards other subjects than Roman private law, in particular during the 1970s and 1980s.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 55-62
Author(s):  
E.M. Senotrusova ◽  
◽  

The article considers the essence of the category of guilt as one of the grounds for prohibiting (suspending) activities under Russian civil law. The article analyzes the shortcomings ofthe legal definition of guilt stipulated in article 401 of the civil code of the Russian Federation due to the mixing of objectivist and subjectivist concepts. Based on the analysis of the judicial practice of the application of Article 1065 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, a conclusion was made about the unsatisfactory state of law enforcement in establishing guilt in a person’s behavior. Monuments of Roman law are studied for the purpose of revealing the category of guilt. A brief overview of approaches to the concept of guilt in the civil legislation of a number of foreign countries and in the Model rules of European Private Law is given. The positions of the Supreme Court of Austria and the countries of the Anglo-Saxon legal family are given on this issue. The article briefly covers the integral theory developed By E. A. Kramer for the objective assessment of individuals ‘ discretion in conducting any activity that may entail adverse consequences for third parties. In connection with the special functions and purpose of the Institute of responsibility in private law and institute for the prevention of harm, the conclusion is defended that it is unacceptable to directly borrow the category of guilt from criminal law to civil law. The article substantiates the need to apply the objectivist concept of guilt in civil law as a deviation from the standard of behavior of an ordinary reasonable participant in the turnover, taking into account individual characteristics of a person. Taking into account the provisions of the current civil legislation on liability, a conclusion was made about the possibility of applying a simplified scheme of forms and types of guilt, including when deciding on the establishment of an injunction. The question of the ratio of guilt, considered from the point of view of the objectivist approach, and wrongfulness is touched upon.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document