scholarly journals PENERAPAN PEMBELAJARAN MODEL KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM-ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION DI SMP

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wardah Wardah

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of TAI type cooperative learning models on student learning outcomes in the material of curved side space in class VIII SMP Negeri 2 Sungai Pinyuh. The form of research used in this study is a real experimental research design with Randomized control group pretest posstest design. Based on data analysis, it can be concluded that: 1) the average student learning outcomes before being taught with conventional learning is 53.5 whereas with TeamAssisted Individualization (TAI) cooperative learning type is 45.73. So, before being taught conventional learning and cooperative learning the type of TAI is classified as moderate; 2) the average student learning outcomes after being taught with conventional learning is 69.25 while with cooperative learning the Team-Assisted Individualization (TAI) type is 78.28. So, after being taught conventional learning and TAI type cooperative learning it turns out that the average student learning outcomes are relatively high; 3) from calculations using the Mann-Whitney U test it was concluded that the 95% confidence level turned out to be that the learning outcomes of students who were given Team-Assisted Individualization (TAI) cooperative learning were better than those of students who were given conventional learning. The effect of the application of the Team-Assisted Individualization (TAI) type of cooperative learning to student learning outcomes in the Curved Side Space Building material in class VIII of SMP Negeri 2 Sungai Pinyuh is classified as moderate with an effect size value of 0.58.

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Rajo Hasim Lubis

This study aims to determine: learning outcomes physics students with cooperative learning model GI and conventional learning, learning outcomes physics students who have Adversity Quotient (AQ) high and medium AQ and interaction cooperative learning model GI and AQ in affecting learning physics students.  This quasi-experimental study using pretest-posttest control group design. The sample in this research is class X IPA.4 as an experimental class and class X IPA.3 as the control class is selected by simple random sampling. The instrument used is the achievement test and which AQ questionnaire form. Data was analyzed using two ways  ANOVA. The results shows that: learning outcomes physics students with cooperative learning model GI better than conventional learning, learning outcomes physics students who have a high AQ better than students who have a medium AQ and there is interaction between cooperative learning model GI and AQ in influencing physics student learning outcomes.


Author(s):  
Jona Wisye Ririmasse ◽  
F Leiwakabessy

Background: Education is one of the important factors in efforts to improve human resources in Indonesia. The latest methods and methods of learning are used to streamline the conventional learning process. Cooperative learning model with TAPPS (Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving) method in improving problem solving skills and student learning outcomes in the concept of class VIII excretion system at SMPN 1 Ambon. Method: This study is a descriptive study that is by giving treatment in the form of learning by using cooperative learning models with the TAPPS method for class VIII students of SMP 1 Ambon, amounting to 21 people. Results: In the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor aspects all students are said to be complete, with an average value of each aspect namely for cognitive 86.1 for affective 84.43 and psychomotor 83.1. While for problem solving skills obtained an average of 86.1. From the average value obtained by students, cooperative learning models with the TAPPS (Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving) method can improve problem solving skills and student learning outcomes. Conclusion: The application of the cooperative learning model with the TAPPS (thinking aloud pair problem solving) method to increasing the results of learning excretion system concepts in class VIII2 of SMPN 1 Ambon showed a significant success rate


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Fitria Silviana

This study aims: 1) to determine differences in science process skills of students with This study aims to determine: teamwork ability of students with cooperative learning model of type of group investigation and the ability to work with students with conventional learning, the effect  of cooperative learning model of group investigation on learning outcomes of students in learning physics., correlation  between the ability of teamwork and learning outcomes students. This research uses type of quasi-experimental with two group pretest-posttest  design. The study population was standard X SMA.Negeri 1 Langsa.The sample of this research were the students of X.10 as experiment group and X.9 as control group that established by purpossive sampling. The instruments used consist of observation sheets of teamwork and essay test of learning outcomes. The data were analyzed using parametric t-test analysis. The results showed that: The teamwork ability of  students who are taught by cooperative learning model type group investigation better than students taught by conventional teaching in physics learning, cooperative learning model of type of group investigation has effect on student learning outcomes. Learning outcomes of students taught by cooperative learning model of type of group investigation better than on learning outcomes for students who taught by conventional learning, and there is a correlation between the teamwork ability  with student learning outcomes.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 187
Author(s):  
Siti Arbi

The fundamental problem of science teacher while teaching in class VIII 2 SMP Negeri 1 Bukit Batu are students less skilled think to learn, afraid to ask and argue and difficulties in solving the story, learning outcomes IPA quite low, and the props are still enough / less attractive and others. The achievement of value UH in the pre-cycle to all who completed 4 people (17.4%) and incomplete 19 (82.6%) and in the first cycle students completed 14 (60.8%) and 9 are not complete 39.2% while in the second cycle students who completed 21 (91.3%) and incomplete is 8.7%. Through the implementation of this model seen an increase in the activities of teachers and students as well as student learning outcomes. The implications of this research and can be used as a basis for the development of the next class research and can be used as an alternative learning models and improve cognitive, effective and psychomotor.Keywords: CIRC, learning outcomes


2022 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 290-298
Author(s):  
Jety Deisye Lempas

This study aims to determine the differences between student learning outcomes taught by applying the STAD learning model and the NHT learning model in social science subjects, Class VIII. This research was conducted at SMP Negeri 1 Tompaso using an experimental method with two treatments and two experimental classes, one class using the STAD learning model and one class using the NHT learning model which was taken randomly. The variables in this study are: (i) student learning outcomes obtained using the STAD learning model (X1) and (ii) student learning outcomes obtained using the NHT learning model (X2). Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics followed by t-test mean difference. The results showed that the STAD and NHT learning models can (i) increase the average student learning outcomes, namely 84.46 for STAD and 85.00 for NHT and (ii) increase the percentage of students who have scored to meet the MCC, namely 96.4 % for STAD and 92.90% for NHT. The average student learning outcomes are not significantly different between the STAD and NHT learning models. Both of these learning models are suitable for use in social science subjects of class VIII


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 299-310
Author(s):  
Yoga Setiawan ◽  
Erlina Prihatnani

AbstrakSetiap model pembelajaran kooperatif memiliki karakteristik dalam menerapkan enam prinsip pembelajaran kooperatif termasuk model Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) dan Numbered Heads Together (NHT). Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui manakah yang menghasilkan hasil belajar yang lebih baik diantara (1) model TAI dan NHT, (2) tingkat kecerdasan interpersonal, dan (3) interaksi model pembelajaran TAI dan NHT dengan kecerdasan interpersonal. Populasi penelitian adalah seluruh siswa kelas X SMA N 1 Salatiga Tahun Ajaran 2018/2019 (384 siswa). Melalui teknik cluster random sampling diperoleh 30 siswa kelas X IPS 1 sebagai kelas eksperimen 1 dan 34 siswa kelas X IPS 2 sebagai kelas eksperimen 2 dengan perbedaan perlakuan dalam pembelajaran trigonometri. Penelitian eksperimen semu ini menggunakan randomized control group pretest-postest design. Uji hipotesis menyimpulkan (1) hasil belajar siswa dengan model TAI secara signifikan lebih baik daripada NHT, (2) tidak ada perbedaan hasil belajar yang signifikan dari tingkat kecerdasan interpersonal yang berbeda, (3) tidak terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dengan kecerdasan interpersonal terhadap hasil belajar. AbstractEach type of cooperative learning model has different characteristics in applying 6 principles of cooperative learning, including TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) and NHT (Numbered Head Together) type models. This study aimed to find out: (1) which learning outcomes are better between students using the TAI or NHT models, (2) which learning outcomes are better between students with high, medium and low interpersonal intelligence levels, (3) is there any correlation between TAI and NHT learning models with interpersonal intelligence on student learning outcomes. The population in this study were all students of X grade at SMA N 1 Salatiga in the Academic Year 2018/2019 (384 students). Through assembling random sampling techniques obtained students of class X IPS 1 (30 students) as experimental class I and students of class X IPS 2 (34 students) as experimental class II with different treatment in learning mathematics on trigonometry material. This quasi-experimental research used a randomized control group pretest-posttest design. Hypothesis test results concluded that (1) student learning outcomes with the TAI model were significantly better than student learning outcomes with the NHT model, (2) there was no significant difference between student learning outcomes of different levels of interpersonal intelligence, (3) there were no interactions between models learning with interpersonal intelligence on student learning outcomes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 789
Author(s):  
Maria Yulianti

The background of this study was the low student learning outcomes of PPKn, from 28 students who achievedthe completeness criteria at least only 11 students (39.29%). The low student learning outcomes are caused bythe high level of individuality between students so that the achievement of competence among studentsexperiences a very distant difference. Based on this, the researchers made improvements to student learningoutcomes through the application of STAD cooperative learning models. This research is a classroom actionresearch, with the subject of class VII of SMP Negeri 3 Teluk Kuantan. The data used in this study is PPKnlearning outcomes data. The results stated that after applying the STAD type cooperative learning model studentlearning outcomes had increased in the initial data the number of students who completed were 11 students, incycle I had an increase with the number of 18 students, and in cycle II the number of students who completedcontinued to increase by the number 22 student.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 744
Author(s):  
Zainur Zainur

This research was motivated by the low learning outcomes of grade IX SMP Muhammadiyah Padang LuasKecamatan Tambang Kabupaten Kampar. This study aims to improve learning outcomes in mathematicslearning through STAD type cooperative learning with the RME approach in class IX SMP MuhammadiyahPadang Luas Kecamatan Tambang Kabupaten Kampar. The subjects of this study were all classes IX in SMPMuhammadiyah Padang Luas Kecamatan Tambang Kabupaten Kampar totaling 26 people. The form ofresearch is classroom action research. This research instrument consists of performance instruments and datacollection instruments in the form of teacher activity observation sheets and activities. The results of the studystated that there were significant differences between students' mathematics learning outcomes before applyingthe STAD type cooperative learning model with the RME approach with after applying the STAD typecooperative learning model with the RME approach. The difference shows student learning outcomes after theaction is better than before the action with completeness reaching 80.77% or 21 completed. Based on the resultsof the study and discussion it can be concluded that the application of STAD type learning model with RealisticMathematic Education (RME) approach can improve the learning outcomes of grade IX students of SMPMuhammadiyah Padang Luas Kecamatan Tambang Kabupaten Kampar on statistical material.


JURNAL RANDAI ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 62-78
Author(s):  
Paridamiwati

The phenomenon of low student learning outcomes from observations of researchers in the field is caused by several factors, such as: (1) The learning carried out by the teacher still uses conventional learning, namely the teacher lectures in delivering material, questions and answers and assignments, so it does not provide encouragement for students to study seriously ; (2) In delivering learning, the teacher still places students as recipients so that students are passive and only wait for information from the teacher without trying to find it. This can be seen when the teacher asks for students' opinions, only a few students give opinions and ask questions about things that are not understood; (3) This is also due to the lack of teacher knowledge about learning strategies that can activate students; (4) Teachers do not provide opportunities for students to work together in doing their assignments with their friends. This makes researchers feel the need to improve the learning process with efforts made to apply an appropriate learning model, namely the Think Pair Share Type cooperative learning model. This type gives students time to think and respond and help each other. Cooperative learning Think Pair Share is a cooperative learning model that allows students to help each other and cooperate with one another. Through this model students are more enthusiastic in learning so that they can increase the achievement of optimal learning outcomes. The formulation of the problem is as follows: "Does the student learning outcomes increase through the application of the Think Pair Share type of cooperative learning model for fourth grade students of SD Negeri 6 Sukajadi, Pekanbaru City?". The purpose of this study was to determine the improvement of social studies learning outcomes through the application of the Think Pair Share Type Cooperative learning model for class IV SDN 6 Sukajadi, Pekanbaru City. Based on the data that has been presented above, it is concluded that the application of the Think Pair Share (TPS) cooperative learning model can improve social studies learning outcomes for fourth grade students of SD Negeri 6 Sukajadi (the average student learning outcomes through cycle I is 62.25, while in the second cycle the average student learning outcomes of 76.25)


Author(s):  
Nahdatul Hazmi

This study aims to determine the positive effect of the application of the think pair share model on student learning outcomes in history learning in class X SMAN 1 Lareh Sago Halaban.This paper in collecting data using quasi-experimental techniques and also with descriptive, where in addition to the figures obtained also from observations and strengthened by interviews. From the analysis obtained t count = 18.43 and t-table = 1.73 where 1.73 <18.43> 1.73 which means the hypothesis is accepted at the 95% confidence level (α = 0.05). Thus it can be concluded that, there is a positive effect of the model of cooperative learning in the type of think pair share on student learning outcomes in history learning at X SMAN 1 Lareh Sago Halaban. Keywords: Problems, Think Pair Share Learning Models, Learning Outcomes


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document