scholarly journals PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI ISLAM BERBASISKAN NILAI KEPASTIAN HUKUM

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 205
Author(s):  
Misbahul Huda
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
National Economy ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Economic Instruments ◽  
Business Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Islamic Economic ◽  
Religious Courts

<p align="center"><strong>PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI ISLAM BERBASISKAN NILAI KEPASTIAN HUKUM</strong></p><p align="center"> </p><p align="center"> </p><p align="center"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Misbahul Huda</span></p><p align="center">Dosen Institute of Business Law and Legal Management</p><p align="center">ABSRAK</p><p>Ekonomi islam sebagai salah satu instrumen ekonomi indonesia telah menwarkan sebuah sistem yang tepat bagi keberlangsungan ekonomi nasional. Namun dalam praktiknya, sistem ekonomi islam mestinya masih perlu dilakukan perbaikan yang salah satunya dalam sistem penyelesaian sengket. Selama ini dalam praktinya sesuai dengan perundang-undangan penyelesaian sengketa dilakukan oleh pengadilan agama, akan tetap masih terbukanya peluang dalam penyelesaian segketa melalui pengadilan negeri telah membuka peluang besar bagi terciptanya ketidakpastian hukum. Disinilah perlunya mahkamah agung memberikan penegasan yang berkaitan hal-hal masalah sengketa ekonomi islam diselesaikan melalui pengadilan agam dan secara khusus kewenangan tersebut bersifat mutlak sehingga nilai penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi islam nantinya dapat berbasiskan nilai kepastian hukum.</p><p> </p><p align="left">Keyword : <em>sengketa, ekonomi islam dan kepastian hukum.</em></p><p align="left"><em> </em></p><p align="center"><strong>ISLAMIC ECONOMIC DISPUTE SETTLEMENT </strong></p><p align="center"><strong>BASED ON THE VALUE OF LEGAL DEFINITION</strong></p><p align="center"> </p><p align="center"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Misbahul Huda</span></p><p align="center">Lecture Institute of Business Law and Legal Management</p><p align="center">Abstract</p><p>Islamic economics as one of the economic instruments in Indonesia has offered a system that is right for the sustainability of national economy. But in practice, the Islamic economic system should still need to be repaired, one of them is in the system of settlement of clutch. So far, in practice in accordance with the dispute resolution legislation carried out by religious courts, there is open opportunities in the dispute settlement through the district court. It has opened up great opportunities for the creation of legal uncertainty. This is where the necessity of the Supreme Court to provide affirmations related to issues of economic disputes of Islam. It is resolved through religious courts and specifically the authority is absolute, so that the value of Islamic economic dispute resolution will be based on the value of legal certainty.</p><p>Keyword: dispute, Islamic economy and legal certainty.</p>

scholarly journals REFORMULATION OF MEDIATION IN DISPUTE SETTLEMENT ON ISLAMIC BANKING

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 184-194
Author(s):  
Dewi Nurul Musjtari ◽  
Benny Riyanto ◽  
Ro’fah Setyowati
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Islamic Banking ◽  
Legal Studies ◽  
Economic Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Islamic Economic ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
Scr No

Purpose of the study: The general objective of this study was to explore the potential of the mediation process as a reformulation of Islamic banking dispute settlement after the Supreme Court Regulation (SCR) on mediation procedure in the court. On the one hand, this study tries to find a repositioning of mediation procedures in resolving disputes over Islamic Banking in religious courts. Methodology: This research was normative and empirical. The data collection techniques of this literature would be done utilizing literature study and field research. Primary data was obtained through field research with interviews. The participants from Judges of Religious Court, Abdul Manan as a Judge of in the Supreme Court Institution, Islamic banking legal unit. Data were processed by a qualitative descriptive analysis technique. Secondary data used consisted of primary legal material sourced from SCR No. 1 of 2016 and the contract. Principal Findings: The mediation process as a reformulation of Islamic banking dispute settlement especially in the Religious Court is according to Article 2 Paragraph (1) SCR No. 1 of 2016. The repositioning of mediation procedures in resolving Islamic banking disputes in the Religious Courts applied by making changes as part of the case registration process implemented through honesty, fidelity, and justice. Applications of this study: This paper is essential for the parties to get the legal certainty in maintaining the continuing development of Islamic banking business, product development, risk management and efficiency of the bank. The study may be instrumental in helping to improve the development of the legal studies programs, notably the Islamic Economic Law. The results of this study will provide benefits for the religious court to improve its performance effectively and efficiently in dispute settlement through mediation. Novelty/Originality of this study: Determination of the mediation as reformulation of dispute settlement on Islamic banking post-enactment or issuance of the SCR No. 1 of 2016 and to find out about repositioning of the mediation procedure and proposing changes in the position (repositioning) of the mediation process and reaffirming the roles, duties and accountability of professional mediators or non-judge mediators so that it is expected that the role of non-judge mediators can active in resolving Islamic banking disputes both in procedures in the court or outside the courts applied at the Indonesian Religious Court. The contribution of this paper will be the revision of the curriculum of legal studies and Islamic Economic Law. The importance for researchers of the study is to develop and improve the capability of researchers for developing the law study program called Islamic Economic Law.

EKONOMI SYARIAH DAN PENYELESAIANNYA DI PENGADILAN AGAMA

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Wildana Arsyad ◽  
Edi Gunawan
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Qualitative Method ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Education And Training ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
And Training

This study aims to provide information about procedure of dispute settlement of sharia economy in the Religious Courts. This research uses qualitative method with juridical approach. The dispute procedure of sharia economic in religious court runs in accordance with the mandate of the Law contained in article 49 to article 53 Act no. 7 years 1989, Law No. 3 year 2006, Law No. 50 of 2009 about Religious Courts. Sharia economic dispute is basically due to three things, namely because one of the parties to break the promise (wanprestasi), due to unlawful acts against the agreements agreed upon and because of coercive circumstances. Settlement of disputes is held with the aim of enforcing the law which contains the value of legal justice, the value of legal certainty, and the value of legal benefit. The settlement of the sharia economic dispute in the Religious Courts is very new, so the Supreme Court up to now still conducts education and training of sharia economic certification for all Religious Court judges.Penelitian ini  bertujuan   untuk memberikan informasi mengenai prosedur penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Pengadilan Agama. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis Prosedur penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di pengadilan agama berjalan sesuai dengan amanat Undang-Undang yang tertera dalam pasal 49 sampai pasal 53 Undang-Undang No. 7 tahun 1989 jo. Undang-Undang No. 3 tahun 2006 jo.Undang-Undang No.50 tahun 2009 tentang Peradilan Agama.Sengketa ekonomi syariah pada dasarnya disebabkan karena tiga hal, yaitu karena salah satu pihak melakukan ingkar janji (wanprestasi), karena perbuatan melawan hukum terhadap perjanjian yang disepakati dan karena keadaan memaksa. Penyelesaian sengketa diadakan dengan tujuan untuk menegakan hukum yang di dalamnya mengandung nilai keadilan hukum, nilai kepastian hukum, dan nilai kemanfaatan hukum.Penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Pengadilan Agama merupakan hal yang sangat baru, sehingga Mahkamah Agung sampai saat ini masih melaksanakan pendidikan dan latihan sertifikasi ekonomi syariah bagi seluruh hakim Pengadilan Agama.

scholarly journals PERMASALAHAN DAN KENDALA PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN MELALUI BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN (BPSK)

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurniawan Kurniawan
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Protection System ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Voluntary Choice ◽  
Settlement Of Dispute

Consumer dispute can be resolved through on courts or outside the court based on voluntary choice of the parties. Settlement of dispute through the court provisions on the article 45. Dispute of the settlement can be solved out the court by using Consumer Dispute Settlement Body (BPSK).The purpose of establshing BPSK is to protec consumer and producer by designing consumer protection system that contain legal certainty and transparency the information. The existence of BPSK expected equality of justice especially to consumer that aggrieved by consumer. It because the dispute between consumer and producer generally involved in small value so that the consumer hesitate to registered his case to judicial process. There is no adequate between the court fee and indemnification perceived. The problems that the decision of BPSK has characteristic final and binding however it can be carried out to the district court and the decision cannot be executed directly or realized.  Keywords: consumers right, consumer’s protection, dispute resolution. 

scholarly journals MODEL PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN PARTAI POLITIK SECARA INTERNAL MAUPUN EKSTERNAL (The Model of Political Party Dispute Settlement Internally and Externally)

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Tri Cahya Indra Permana
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Political Party ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
The Other ◽  
District Court ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Sense Of Justice

Undang-Undang Parpol mengatur bahwa perselisihan Parpol diselesaikan secara internal oleh Mahkamah Partai atau sebutan lain daripada itu dan secara eksternal oleh Pengadilan Negeri dan Mahkamah Agung. Substansi perselisihan yang final dan mengikat di Mahkamah Partai adalah perselisihan kepengurusan, selebihnya dapat diajukan upaya hukum ke Pengadilan Negeri dan Mahkamah Agung. Di dalam praktek, pengaturan tersebut telah menjauhkan dari rasa keadilan, kepastian hukum dan kemanfaatan, oleh karenanya sebaiknya direvisi yang mana perselisihan PAW, pelanggaran terhadap hak anggota partai politik, penyalahgunaan wewenang,  pertanggungjawaban keuangan, dan atau keberatan terhadap keputusan partai politik (termasuk keputusan untuk tidak memutuskan terhadap sesuatu hal) final dan mengikat dengan Putusan MPP. Sedangkan perselisihan kepengurusan dapat diajukan upaya hukum ke Mahkamah Konstitusi. Political parties act stipulates that a political party dispute resolved internally by the Mahkamah Partai or other designation of that and externally resolved by the District Court and the Supreme Court. The dispute substance in Mahkamah Partai which is final and binding is about organization dispute, the other can be settled in District Court and the Supreme Court. In practice, that arrangement makes the decision apart from the sense of justice, legal certainty and utility. Therefore, these rules should be revised so that the regulation of PAW, violations of the rights of members of political parties, abuse of authority, financial liability, or an objection to the decision of political parties (including the decision not to decide on something) is final and binding through Mahkamah Partai decision. While the organization disputes can be submitted to the Constitutional Court for legal action.

scholarly journals Kepastian Hukum Eksekusi dan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Syariah Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 861
Author(s):  
Ainun Najib
Keyword(s):  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Historical Approach ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Islamic Economic ◽  
Religious Courts

Perkembangan pertumbuhan sistem ekonomi syariah, menuntut terhadap adanya penyesuaian-penyesuaian aturan hukum yang diberlakukan, khususnya terkait dengan penyelesaian sengketa yang terjadi. Baik secara litigasi maupun secara non litigasi. Termasuk bagian upaya penyelesaian ekonomi syariah, adalah melalui badan arbitrase syariah. Namun dalam perspektif yuridis, aturan mengenai kewenangan memberikan putusan eksekusi dan pembatalan terhadap putusan arbitrase syariah masih terjadi dualisme antara Peradilan Umum dan Peradilan Agama. Hal ini mencerminkan adanya ketidakpastian hukum dalam masalah tersebut. Melalui penelitian hukum normatif atau penelitian hukum doktrinal ini, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menemukan jawaban-jawaban yang benar dengan melakukan pembuktian kebenaran yang dicari dari preskripsi-preskipsi hukum yang tertulis dalam kitab Undang-Undang serta sumber hukum lainnya. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan historis (historical approach). Penelitian ini difokuskan untuk mengkaji penerapan kaidah-kaidah atau norma norma dalam hukum positif tentang kepastian hukum pelaksanaan eksekusi dan pembatalan putusan arbitrase syariah, khususnya pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012. Pertentangan norma hukum tentang kewenangan pelaksanaan eksekusi dan pembatalan putusan arbitrase tersebut, meskipun secara yuridis terdapat pertentangan, namun  Mahkamah Agung telah melakukan langkah politik hukum untuk menyelesaikan dualisme kewenangan tersebut yang dapat menyelesaikan dalam jangka waktu pendek. Namun untuk penyelesaian jangka panjang, perlu adanya pembenahan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada, guna menjamin kepastian hukum bagi para pencari keadilan.The development of the growth Islamic economic system requires the adjustments to the rule of law applied, particularly related to the settlements of disputes that occur, both litigation and non-litigation. One of the parts of  efforts to solve sharia economics is through Islamic arbitration bodies. But in a juridical perspective, the rules regarding the authority to give execution decisions and cancellation of sharia arbitration decisions still occur between the General Justice and the Religious Courts. This reflects the legal uncertainty for the case. Through normative legal research or doctrinal legal research, this study aims to find the correct answers by carrying out the verification of the truth sought from the legal prescriptions written in the law and other legal sources. By using statute approach and historical approach, this research is focused on examining the application of norms in positive law regarding legal certainty in the execution and cancellation of sharia arbitration decisions, especially after the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 93/PUU-X/2012. Contradicting legal norms regarding the authority to carry out the execution and cancellation of the arbitration decision, even though there is a juridical conflict, the Supreme Court has taken legal political steps to resolve the dualism of authority which can be resolved in the short term. Yet for long-term solutions, it is necessary to reform existing laws and regulations to ensure legal certainty for justice seekers. 

scholarly journals Keabsahan Putusan Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Eko Priadi ◽  
Mhd Erwin Munthe
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Action ◽  
Arbitration Board ◽  
Two Factors ◽  
Islamic Economic ◽  
Religious Courts

The growth of Sharia Economic accelerating in the last three decades is also affecting the increase of potential disputes on sharia economic field. For the purposes of fast, effective and efficient dispute settlement, the disputing parties tend to prefer non-litigation dispute settlement through alternative dispute resolutions (ADR), one of which is through the National Sharia Arbitration Board. The results of this study showed that the authority of the National Sharia Arbitration Board on sharia economic dispute settlement is determined by whether or not the arbitration agreement, either before a dispute arises (Pactum Compromittendo) or after the dispute arises (Acta Compromise). Thereby, the legitimacy of the authority of the National Sharia Arbitration Board on Syariah economic dispute settlement, based on the principle of Pacta Sunt Servanda and Consensual Principles contained in the Civil Code. Further, registration and execution of the National Sharia Arbitration Board verdict should be carried out by the Religious Courts, including the cancellation of the legal action on the verdict. It is based on two factors: (1) the basic legality of absolute competence of the Religious Courts in the Islamic economic dispute resolution as set out in Article 49 of Regulation No. 3/2006 on the Religious Courts; and (2) the basic relevance of the substance of Islamic law which is implemented by the National Sharia Arbitration Board.

scholarly journals Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Pengadilan Agama pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 542-556
Author(s):  
Muhamad Hasan Mafruh ◽  
Muhammad Iqbal Fasa ◽  
Ahmad Kumedi Ja'far
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Islamic Banking ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
The Government ◽  
Islamic Economic ◽  
Religious Courts

The authority to adjudicate sharia economic disputes has absolutely become the authority of the Religious Courts since the issuance of Law No. 3/2006 concerning Amendments to Law No. 7/1989 concerning Religious Courts and strengthened by Law No. 21/2008 concerning Sharia Banking and the Constitutional Court Decision No. 93/PUU-X/2012. Every year, Islamic economic transactions always increase, even though during the pandemic, Islamic banking in Indonesia grows positively. However, the higher and increasing sharia economic transactions in Indonesia, the more disputes that occur. During the current covid-19 pandemic, the government has issued regulations regarding restrictions ranging from PSBB to PPKM. The purpose of this research is to encourage the emergence of sharia economic dispute resolution innovations, especially in the Judiciary during the Covid-19 pandemic without having to violate the Health protocol. This study uses a qualitative descriptive study, which uses literature studies quoted from books and regulations, both laws and other regulations, as well as direct research into the field to see the realities on the ground related to the settlement of sharia economic disputes during the pandemic. The results in this study indicate that the Supreme Court responds quickly to the rules and policies issued by the government by launching an e-court application and investigation (electronic trial). There are many benefits and conveniences that are felt by people seeking justice, especially parties in sharia economic disputes. However, there are still some obstacles experienced by the Religious Courts and justice seekers in electronic proceedings.

scholarly journals ARBITRASE SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARIAH MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 1999

Asy-Syari ah ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhibuthabary Muhibuthabary
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Civil Religion ◽  
Arbitration Process ◽  
Islamic Jurisprudence ◽  
New Knowledge ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
The Law ◽  
Islamic Economic ◽  
Religious Courts

This paper describes the arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution in Shariah economy. Dispute resolution in general civil religion has resolved through litigation in the religious courts that refer to Article 49 of Law Number 7 of 1989 Jo. Law Number 3 of 2006 Jo. Law Number 50 of 2009 on the Religious Courts. However, there are some interesting cases, one of which is the Islamic economic disputes could be resolved through non-litigation or arbitration process, which refers to the Law No. 30 Year 1999. Now, the Shari'ah economic dispute resolution becomes the object of this study which interesting to study both theoretically and practically, not only because the case is to be part of the absolute authority of religious courts, but also becomes a new knowledge in the field of Islamic Jurisprudence

scholarly journals KEWENANGAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN DALAM MENANGANI SENGKETA ANTARA PT. SINAR MENARA DELI DENGAN SARI ALAMSYAH

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 392
Author(s):  
Samuel Samuel ◽  
Siti Nurbaiti
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
District Court ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Consumer Protection Act ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

In principle, the resolution of consumer disputes can be pursued peacefully. through an alternative mediation dispute resolution. In Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and Regulation of the Minister of Trade of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 / M-DAG / PER / 2017 concerning the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body does not impose limits on the authority of BPSK in handling and adjudicating a consumer dispute. However, in reality many times the decisions of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body (BPSK) are submitted to the district court and stated that BPSK is not authorized to handle such disputes. How is the authority of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Board in handling disputes between PT. Sinar Menara Deli and Sari Alamsyah are the issues discussed. The method used in this research is descriptive normative legal research, using secondary data and primary data as supporting data with the law approach. The results of the study illustrate that BPSK is not authorized to handle disputes between PT. Sinar Menara Deli with Sari Alamsyah, because the business actors in this dispute have submitted a refusal to be resolved through BPSK and not achieving the requirements for consumer disputes. It is recommended that BPSK members pay more attention to the provisions in the Consumer Protection Act and other regulations concerning the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body.

scholarly journals Legal Pollution of Dispute Settlement Results of Regional Head Selection Realizing the Election Justice

2021 ◽  
Vol 04 (05) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gita Santika Ramadhani, Suteki ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Election Results ◽  
Law And Justice ◽  
The Government ◽  
Dispute Resolution Mechanism ◽  
Sense Of Justice

The implementation of direct regional head elections in the regions often raises disputes regarding the determination of the results of the vote. Efforts made by candidates who are dissatisfied with this determination are to submit a cancellation to the judicial institution. The update on the system for resolving the election results was carried out by the government to overcome this problem, namely the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No. 1 of 2014. Problems discussed in this study include: how the dispute resolution mechanism was issued before the regulation, what updates are contained in the regulation how to achieve effective and fair election outcome dispute resolution. This study is a normative legal research that is descriptive in nature using a legal and analytical approach. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the fundamental renewal lies with the institution authorized to handle, namely from the Constitutional Court to the High Court appointed by the Supreme Court. The author recommends that the renewal must be supported by technical regulations to ensure effectiveness and fulfill a sense of justice. Based on this research, the results show that the dynamics of the shifting of dispute resolution authority over the election results are influenced by the decision of the MK opened legally policy and the background of certain events. Namely: the problem of bribery that ensnares the judge, decisions that are considered controversial, case accumulation, and unpreparedness of institutional structure and infrastructure. Regarding the threshold requirements as a condition for receiving a dispute over a dispute over the results of a regional election, it has not yet supported the fulfillment of electoral / election justice. Because it has the potential to ignore aspects of substantive justice, mainly because it does not make the facts of the violations structured, systematic and massive (TSM) as a variable in examining cases. This neglect is not in line with one of the universally adopted principles of law and justice, which states that no one can benefit from irregularities and violations committed by himself and no one may be harmed by irregularities and violations committed by others (nullus / nemo commodum capere potes de injuria sua propria).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document