scholarly journals Keabsahan Putusan Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Eko Priadi ◽  
Mhd Erwin Munthe
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Action ◽  
Arbitration Board ◽  
Two Factors ◽  
Islamic Economic ◽  
Religious Courts

The growth of Sharia Economic accelerating in the last three decades is also affecting the increase of potential disputes on sharia economic field. For the purposes of fast, effective and efficient dispute settlement, the disputing parties tend to prefer non-litigation dispute settlement through alternative dispute resolutions (ADR), one of which is through the National Sharia Arbitration Board. The results of this study showed that the authority of the National Sharia Arbitration Board on sharia economic dispute settlement is determined by whether or not the arbitration agreement, either before a dispute arises (Pactum Compromittendo) or after the dispute arises (Acta Compromise). Thereby, the legitimacy of the authority of the National Sharia Arbitration Board on Syariah economic dispute settlement, based on the principle of Pacta Sunt Servanda and Consensual Principles contained in the Civil Code. Further, registration and execution of the National Sharia Arbitration Board verdict should be carried out by the Religious Courts, including the cancellation of the legal action on the verdict. It is based on two factors: (1) the basic legality of absolute competence of the Religious Courts in the Islamic economic dispute resolution as set out in Article 49 of Regulation No. 3/2006 on the Religious Courts; and (2) the basic relevance of the substance of Islamic law which is implemented by the National Sharia Arbitration Board.

scholarly journals Penyelesaian Sengketa antara Bank Sharî‘ah dengan Nasabah Bermasalah melalui Badan Arbitrase Sharî‘ah Nasional (BASYARNAS) menurut UU No. 30 tahun 1999

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 193
Author(s):  
Sulistyowati Sulistyowati
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Arbitration Board ◽  
Strong Emphasis ◽  
The Cost

<p>This study deals with dispute settlement between <em>Bank Syari’ah</em> and its customers through the National Shari’ah Arbitration Board (BASYARNAS). It focuses to elaborate the procedures of dispute settlement between <em>Bank Syari’ah</em> and its customers of financing from the perspective of Islamic law according to Bill No. 30/1999 above law No. 30 year 1999. Based on procedures as mentioned in the bill with regard to arbitration and alternative dispute resolution, Basyarnas, in proofing and resolving cases, has fulfilled the procedures and satisfied the conflicting parties with justice, so there is no need to appeal and reconsideration. This means that Basyarnas has conducted dispute resolution according to the existing procedures. The dispute settlement has also been in accordance with the Qur’ân and other Islamic legal rules which consist of the principles of power and mandate applied by the arbitrator in deciding and resolving the dispute. The board—as an independent institution—has setttled the disputes on the basis of justice for all parties, rejected the act of bribery since the cost is measurable. In addition, Basyarnas also gives strong emphasis on the principle of equality, friendship, consistence and response-bility in resolving disputes.</p>

scholarly journals JUSTICE IN MANY ROOMS IN SHARIA BANKING DISPUTE RESOLUTION TO ACHIEVE JUSTICE

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Nita Triana
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Second Step ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Long Time ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Religious Courts

This paper examines the dispute resolution of Sharia Banking. The method is a non-doctrinal legal research using qualitative research  and Socio Legal approach. Sharia banking cannot be separated from the problems between the banking and the Customer. This problem is calledproblematic financing. The resolution  of problematic financing of sharia banks in litigation is now the absolute authority of the Religious Courts. The downside of litigation settlement usually takes a long time, the need for proof, the cost is quite expensive and the result is winningor lost. Therefore, the settlement of sharia banking is very rarely resolved through litigation. Alternative Dispute Resolution is a choice of dispute settlement chosen by Sharia Banking. The first stage isto carry out negotiation between all parties, namely Banking (lender) and The Customer (Debtor) in the form of warning and guidance. If it does not succeed, there will bedebt restructuration. The second step is mediation, in the form of consultation with third party as a mediator.  The mediation determines the rescue process of debt by Banks when a debtor is still unable to return his debt, executed by the bank. According to Marc Galanter these various dispute resolutionsis called justice in many rooms. In Islamic Law it is known as Sulh (peace). However, to a large extent this non-litigation settlement is more satisfactory to both parties in resolving the dispute because it senses fairness and a win-win solution.

scholarly journals REKONSTRUKSI HUKUM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PASAR MODAL SYARIAH: PENGUATAN ASPEK REGULASI UNTUK MEMBERIKAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 297
Author(s):  
Edi Hudiata
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Capital Markets ◽  
Capital Market ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Quantitative Research Methods ◽  
Arbitration Board ◽  
Islamic Economic

The regulation of the Islamic capital market following the rules contained in Law 8/1995 on Capital Market, DSN MUI Fatwa No. 40 / IX / 2003, Bapepam-LK Number IX.A.13, No. IX.A.14, and No. II. K.1 From that rules, nothing has clearly set the Islamic capital market dispute resolution, both litigation and non-litigation resulting in a legal vacuum (leemten in het recht). Islamic economic dispute settlement provisions, including the dispute over the Islamic capital market, is only found in Law 3/2006. Through quantitative research methods, the study sought to harmonize the empty rules at the same time filling thus legal vacuum. The research concluded that the settlement litigation of disputes in Islamic capital markets settled in the Religious Court, while in non-litigation resolved through BASYARNAS (National Sharia Arbitration Board) and / or as other civil disputes can also be resolved through Alternative Dispute Resolution in accordance with Law 30/1999.Keywords: legal vacuum, the Islamic capital market.

scholarly journals JUSTICE IN MANY ROOMS IN SHARIA BANKING DISPUTE RESOLUTION TO ACHIEVE JUSTICE

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Nita Triana
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Second Step ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Long Time ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Religious Courts

This paper examines the dispute resolution of Sharia Banking. The method is a non-doctrinal legal research using qualitative research  and Socio Legal approach. Sharia banking cannot be separated from the problems between the banking and the Customer. This problem is calledproblematic financing. The resolution  of problematic financing of sharia banks in litigation is now the absolute authority of the Religious Courts. The downside of litigation settlement usually takes a long time, the need for proof, the cost is quite expensive and the result is winningor lost. Therefore, the settlement of sharia banking is very rarely resolved through litigation. Alternative Dispute Resolution is a choice of dispute settlement chosen by Sharia Banking. The first stage isto carry out negotiation between all parties, namely Banking (lender) and The Customer (Debtor) in the form of warning and guidance. If it does not succeed, there will bedebt restructuration. The second step is mediation, in the form of consultation with third party as a mediator.  The mediation determines the rescue process of debt by Banks when a debtor is still unable to return his debt, executed by the bank. According to Marc Galanter these various dispute resolutionsis called justice in many rooms. In Islamic Law it is known as Sulh (peace). However, to a large extent this non-litigation settlement is more satisfactory to both parties in resolving the dispute because it senses fairness and a win-win solution.

scholarly journals PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI ISLAM BERBASISKAN NILAI KEPASTIAN HUKUM

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 205
Author(s):  
Misbahul Huda
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
National Economy ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Economic Instruments ◽  
Business Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Islamic Economic ◽  
Religious Courts

<p align="center"><strong>PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI ISLAM BERBASISKAN NILAI KEPASTIAN HUKUM</strong></p><p align="center"> </p><p align="center"> </p><p align="center"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Misbahul Huda</span></p><p align="center">Dosen Institute of Business Law and Legal Management</p><p align="center">ABSRAK</p><p>Ekonomi islam sebagai salah satu instrumen ekonomi indonesia telah menwarkan sebuah sistem yang tepat bagi keberlangsungan ekonomi nasional. Namun dalam praktiknya, sistem ekonomi islam mestinya masih perlu dilakukan perbaikan yang salah satunya dalam sistem penyelesaian sengket. Selama ini dalam praktinya sesuai dengan perundang-undangan penyelesaian sengketa dilakukan oleh pengadilan agama, akan tetap masih terbukanya peluang dalam penyelesaian segketa melalui pengadilan negeri telah membuka peluang besar bagi terciptanya ketidakpastian hukum. Disinilah perlunya mahkamah agung memberikan penegasan yang berkaitan hal-hal masalah sengketa ekonomi islam diselesaikan melalui pengadilan agam dan secara khusus kewenangan tersebut bersifat mutlak sehingga nilai penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi islam nantinya dapat berbasiskan nilai kepastian hukum.</p><p> </p><p align="left">Keyword : <em>sengketa, ekonomi islam dan kepastian hukum.</em></p><p align="left"><em> </em></p><p align="center"><strong>ISLAMIC ECONOMIC DISPUTE SETTLEMENT </strong></p><p align="center"><strong>BASED ON THE VALUE OF LEGAL DEFINITION</strong></p><p align="center"> </p><p align="center"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Misbahul Huda</span></p><p align="center">Lecture Institute of Business Law and Legal Management</p><p align="center">Abstract</p><p>Islamic economics as one of the economic instruments in Indonesia has offered a system that is right for the sustainability of national economy. But in practice, the Islamic economic system should still need to be repaired, one of them is in the system of settlement of clutch. So far, in practice in accordance with the dispute resolution legislation carried out by religious courts, there is open opportunities in the dispute settlement through the district court. It has opened up great opportunities for the creation of legal uncertainty. This is where the necessity of the Supreme Court to provide affirmations related to issues of economic disputes of Islam. It is resolved through religious courts and specifically the authority is absolute, so that the value of Islamic economic dispute resolution will be based on the value of legal certainty.</p><p>Keyword: dispute, Islamic economy and legal certainty.</p>

TINJAUAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARIAH DALAM PUTUSAN HAKIM PENGADILAN AGAMA MAKASSAR

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Muh Wahyudin Anugrah ◽  
Hamsir Hamsir ◽  
Muhammad Anis
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Research Field ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
Case Number ◽  
Laws And Regulations

AbstrakPenelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan Untuk mengetahui ketentuan Hukum Islam dan peraturan perundang-undangan terkait sistem penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah dan untuk mengetahui implementasi sistem penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah dalam putusan hakim pengadilan Agama makassar dalam perkara Nomor (2279/Pd.G/2015/PA Mks). Jenis penelitian yang akan digunakan adalah penelitian deskriptif kualitatif lapangan (field research). dengan pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan : Pendekatan kasus (case approach), Pendekatan Perundang-undangan (Statute approach). Adapun sumber sumber data penelitian ini adalah data sekunder yang disebut bahan hukum. Yaitu berupa inventarisasi berkas Putusan Pengadilan Agama Makassar No.2279/Pdt.G/2015/PA.Mks, peraturan perundang-undangan, buku-buku, literatur, jurnal dan dokumen yang berkaitan dengan pokok masalah. . Selanjutnya metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah : wawancara, observasi, dan dokumentasi. Sedangkan teknik pengelolaan dan analisis data yang dilakukan adalah dengan mendasarkan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan hingga dapat menjawab permasalahan dari penelitian ini. Semua bahan hukum yang diperoleh disusun secara sistematis, diolah dan diteliti serta dievaluasi. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Ketentuan Hukum dalam Penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di atur dalam Undang-undang Peradilan Agama dan Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif penyelesaian sengketa yang bersifat opsional atau pilihan yaitu melalui jalur pengadilan (litigasi) dan di luar pengadilan (non litigasi). Paradigma litigasi meyakini bahwa hukum harus ditegakkan untuk mengakhiri konflik yang terjadi. Di samping itu juga di gunakan paradigma non-litigasi yaitu paradigma yang ber asas atau berakar pada konsensus, musyawarah atau penyelesaian damai antar para pihak, Implementasi sengketa Ekonomi Syari`ah Dalam Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Agama Makassar Dalam Kasus Nomor 2279/Pdt.G/2015/PA Mks Telah terimplementasi sesuai ketentuan hukum yang ada akan tetapi menurut hemat penulis belum memenuhi aspek keadilan yang wajib hukumnya melekat pada suatu putusan.Kata Kunci: Ekonomi Syariah, Pengadilan Agama, Penyelesaian Sengketa, Tinjauan Hukum. AbstractThis research was conducted with the aim of knowing the provisions of Islamic Law and laws and regulations regarding the syariah economic dispute settlement system and to find out the implementation of the sharia economic dispute resolution system in the decision of the Makassar Religious Court judge in case Number (2279 / Pd.G / 2015 / PA Mks ). This type of research will be used is descriptive qualitative field research (field research). with the research approach used: the case approach (case approach), the statutory approach (statute approach). The data source of this research is secondary data which is called legal material. Namely in the form of an inventory of the files of the Makassar Religious Court Decision No.2279 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PA.Mks, laws and regulations, books, literature, journals and documents related to the subject matter. . Furthermore, the data collection methods used are: interviews, observation, and documentation. Meanwhile, the data management and analysis techniques are based on the Prevailing Laws so that they can answer the problems of this research. All legal materials obtained are systematically compiled, processed and researched and evaluated. The results of this study indicate that the legal provisions in the settlement of sharia economic disputes are regulated in the Religious Courts Law and Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative dispute resolution that are optional or optional, namely through court (litigation) and outside the court. (non litigation). The litigation paradigm believes that the law must be enforced to end conflicts that occur. In addition, a non-litigation paradigm is also used, namely a paradigm that is based on or is rooted in consensus, deliberation or peaceful settlement between the parties, Implementation of Shari`ah Economic disputes in the Judge of the Makassar Religious Court in Case Number 2279 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PA Mks Has been implemented in accordance with existing legal provisions however, according to the author's opinion, it has not fulfilled the aspect of justice which is obligatory according to a decision.Keywords: Legal Review, Dispute Resolution, Sharia Economics, Religious Courts.

scholarly journals ARBITRASE SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARIAH MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 1999

Asy-Syari ah ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhibuthabary Muhibuthabary
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Civil Religion ◽  
Arbitration Process ◽  
Islamic Jurisprudence ◽  
New Knowledge ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
The Law ◽  
Islamic Economic ◽  
Religious Courts

This paper describes the arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution in Shariah economy. Dispute resolution in general civil religion has resolved through litigation in the religious courts that refer to Article 49 of Law Number 7 of 1989 Jo. Law Number 3 of 2006 Jo. Law Number 50 of 2009 on the Religious Courts. However, there are some interesting cases, one of which is the Islamic economic disputes could be resolved through non-litigation or arbitration process, which refers to the Law No. 30 Year 1999. Now, the Shari'ah economic dispute resolution becomes the object of this study which interesting to study both theoretically and practically, not only because the case is to be part of the absolute authority of religious courts, but also becomes a new knowledge in the field of Islamic Jurisprudence

scholarly journals PELAKSANAAN MEDIASI PADA PENYELESAIAN PERCERAIAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA KUNINGAN

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 98
Author(s):  
Fitri Purnamasari, Diding Rahmat Dan Gios Adhyaksa
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Negotiation Process ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Thesis Writing

AbstractThe author conducted this research with the background of the implementation of Mediation in Kuningan Religious Court in Kuningan. The purposes of writing this paper are to know how the Implementation on Divorce Settlement in Kuningan Religious Court and to know the factors that affect the success of mediation in the Kuningan Religious Court. The method used in this research is with empirical juridical approach using primary data and secondary data and data collection techniques are interviews, observation and literature study. The results of this research are the mediation arrangements set out in the Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA ) Number 1 Year 2016 about Mediation Procedures in Courts and more specifically stipulated in the Decree of the Chief Justice Number 108 / KMA / AK / VI / 2016 on Mediation Governance at the Court. Mediation is the means of dispute resolution through the negotiation process to obtain agreement of the Parties with the assistance of the Mediator. Mediator is a Judge or any other party who has a Mediator Certificate as a neutral party assisting Parties in the negotiation process to see possible dispute resolution without resorting to the disconnection or enforcement of a settlement. Its implementation has been regulated in Law Number 1 Year 1974 about concerning Marriage, Compilation of Islamic Law, and Supreme Court RegulationNumber 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedure in Court. The conclusion of this thesis writing is Mediation which should be one of the alternative process of dispute settlement which can give greater access to justice to the parties in finding satisfactory dispute settlement and to fulfill the sense of justice, and become one of the effective instrument to overcome the problem of case buildup especially for the case Divorce, in the end has not been effectively implemented.Keywords: Mediation, Divorce, Marriage.�AbstrakPenulis melakukan penelitian ini dengan latar belakang yaitu bagaimana pelaksanaan Mediasi pada Pengadilan Agama Kuningan. Tujuan penulisan ini untuk mengetahui bagaimana Pelaksanaan pada Penyelesaian Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Kuningan dan untuk mengetahui bagaimana faktor-faktor yang memepengaruhi keberhasilan mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Kuningan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah dengan pendekatan yuridis empiris dengan menggunakan data primer dan data sekunder serta alat pengumpulan data yang digunakan melalui wawancara, observasi dan studi pustaka. Hasil penelitian ini adalah pengaturan mediasi diatur dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PERMA) Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan dan lebih spesifik diatur dalam Keputusan Ketua Mahkamah Agung Nomor : 108/KMA/AK/VI/2016 tentang Tata Kelola Mediasi di Pengadilan. Mediasi adalah cara penyelesaian sengketa melalui proses perundingan untuk memperoleh kesepakatan Para Pihak dengan dibantu oleh Mediator. Mediator adalah Hakim atau pihak lain yang memiliki Sertifikat Mediator sebagai pihak netral yang membantu Para Pihak dalam proses perundingan guna mencari berbagai kemungkinan penyelesaian sengketa tanpa menggunakan cara memutus atau memaksakan sebuah penyelesaian. Pelaksanaannya telah di atur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkwinan, Kompilasi Hukum Islam, dan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan. Kesimpulan dari penulisan skripsi ini adalah Mediasi yang seharusnya menjadi salah satu alternatif proses penyelesaian sengketa yang dapat memberikan akses keadilan yang lebbesar kepada para pihak dalam menemukan penyelesaian sengketa yang memuaskan dan mmemenuhi rasa keadilan, serta menjadi salah satu instrumen efektif mengatasi masalah penumpukan perkara khususnya untuk perkara perceraian, pada akhirnya belum efektif dilaksanakan.Kata Kunci : Mediasi, Perceraian, Perdata

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR I TAHUN 2008 TENTANG PROSEDUR MEDIASI DI PENGADILAN AGAMA BANDUNG KELAS I.A

1970 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Kun Budianto
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Regulatory Policy ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Court Cases ◽  
Policy Rules ◽  
Litigation Process ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes ◽  
Sense Of Justice ◽  
Religious Courts

This article discussed regulatory policy on mediation in religious courts way dispute resolution through mediation according to Islamic law and implementation of mediation in settlement court cases in Religious Courts Bandung Class I A. This research base on the policy rules by mediation in the  Religious Courts;  (a)  the  benefits to  be  gained if mediation used as a means in the  settlement  of  disputes,  namely  the  mediation process  could overcome  the  problem  of  accumulation of  matter,  the  mediation process is viewed as a means of dispute resolution that is faster and cheaper than the litigation process, enforcement of mediation can expand access for all parties to gain a sense  of  justice,  (b)  provision their peace  efforts in legislation.  (c) Indonesian society is a society that likes peace. The Implementation of the mediation process done with two ways, namely mediation initial litigation, and over litigation.

scholarly journals RECOGNITION OF ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN IN VARIOUS LAWS IN INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
Yunanto Yunanto
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Action ◽  
Marriage Law ◽  
Biological Father ◽  
Illegitimate Children ◽  
Biological Fathers ◽  
The Relationship

In any regulations in Indonesia, there are differences in the inherent status and rights between legitimate and illegitimate children. Consequently, it surely affects the relationship between the children and their parents. Illegitimate children only have the civil relationship with their mothers. In order that the illegitimate children have a certain relationship with their biological fathers, it requires a legal action in the form of the recognition of biological father. However, there are legal ambiguities in the regulations that govern the institution of the recognition of children as stated in the Indonesian Civil Code, Law No. 23 of 2006 in conjunction with Law No. 24 of 2013, and the Decisions of the Constitutional Court No. 46/ PUU-VIII/ 2010 as a corrective provision to the Marriage Law (UUP), and the Islamic Law Compilation (KHI). The legal effects are: the discrimination derived from legal injustice and certainty in the implementation of the child recognition.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document