scholarly journals How to Boost the Development of the Russian Economy: Priority Actions (Suggestions for the Main Activities of the State until 2024)

Author(s):  
V. V. Ivanter ◽  
V. N. Porfiryev ◽  
D. E. Sorokin ◽  
M. A. Eskindarov ◽  
V. V. Maslennikov ◽  
...  

This report was prepared by the staff of the Institute for Economic Forecast of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation. It gives suggestions to implement priority measures to facilitate the transfer the Russian economy to the direction defined by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation (est. May 7, 2018). The report also highlights priority directions of the economic policy, primarily in investment activity, development of the domestic market, as well as financial and organizational support for the suggested actions.

2021 ◽  
pp. 77
Author(s):  
Margarita N. Kobzar-Frolova

In 1936, the Institute of State Law of the USSR Academy of Sciences underwent an internal reorganization, as a result of which three sectors were formed, one of which was the public law sector. Since that time, the current Sector of Administrative Law and administrative procedure has its history. In the 20–30s of the XX century, the science of administrative law developed poorly, scientists were subjected to political repression for their scientific beliefs. In the mid-30s, the idea of the death of Administrative Law was even replicated. The leading positions were occupied by the science of management. Meanwhile, the scientific staff of the sector continued to develop the science of Administrative Law. With the beginning of the Great Patriotic War, many of them went to the front. The country noted their exploits with state awards. S.S. Studenikin became the first scientist who defended his dissertation for the degree of PhD in Law in Administrative Law (1940). In the 50–60s, in the Sector work was actively carried out to train young specialists in the field of Administrative Law. The name of the Sector has repeatedly changed, but service to the state and science remained unchanged. In the 60s, new directions of scientific research were formed at the Institute, reflecting the issues of strengthening Soviet democracy, forms and methods of people's participation in the leadership of the state and society, etc. The result of the fruitful work of the staff of the Sector was the publication of a number of monographs on Administrative Law. The political and economic transformations of the 80–90s could not but be reflected in the works of the scientific staff of the Sector. In the late 90s - early 2000s, the direction of research in the Sector changed towards the administrative process and the problems of automated control systems. In 2018, the Sector of Administrative Law and administrative process was established. Currently, the scientific staff of the Sector carries out fundamental, exploratory and applied scientific research on the conceptual problems of Administrative Law, administrative process and Financial, Tax, Budget Law. Actively participates in the work on the reform of administrative and tort legislation, legislation regulating control and supervisory activities, are members of the expert subgroups of the Government of the Russian Federation on the development of the draft of the new Administrative Code of the Russian Federation. During its 85-year history, the Sector has given the country and science a lot of honored scientists and honored lawyers, outstanding scientists who have left significant fruits of their scientific research that will be relevant and in demand for a long time.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergey Kaledin ◽  
Ekaterina Shestakova

The problems of inadequacy in the assessment of the activities of economic entities in the Russian economy are exaggerated in scientific thoughts and public consciousness for quite a long time and, in fact, have acquired a constant and increasingly deepening process. The unresolved nature of these problems have the adversely affects on the economic and social growth of the state, hinders its development. The identified issues were raised in 2004 in the monograph "Actual problems of assessing the activity and investment of business entities in modern Russia," the main provisions of which served as material for writing and defending a doctoral dissertation at the Academy of National Economy under the Government of the Russian Federation (Moscow, 2008). And, now, after a long period of time (about 10 years), one can say that the problems and shortcomings in the Russian economy raised in the monographs and the thesis are not only not solved, but they are even more deepened. Authors in the article from critical positions assess the current situation with the objectivity and adequacy of assessing the activities of economic entities, tax administration by the state of small business functioning, the impact of these problems on investment flows in the Russian Federation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (10(79)) ◽  
pp. 12-18
Author(s):  
G. Bubyreva

The existing legislation determines the education as "an integral and focused process of teaching and upbringing, which represents a socially important value and shall be implemented so as to meet the interests of the individual, the family, the society and the state". However, even in this part, the meaning of the notion ‘socially significant benefit is not specified and allows for a wide range of interpretation [2]. Yet the more inconcrete is the answer to the question – "who and how should determine the interests of the individual, the family and even the state?" The national doctrine of education in the Russian Federation, which determined the goals of teaching and upbringing, the ways to attain them by means of the state policy regulating the field of education, the target achievements of the development of the educational system for the period up to 2025, approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of October 4, 2000 #751, was abrogated by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of March 29, 2014 #245 [7]. The new doctrine has not been developed so far. The RAE Academician A.B. Khutorsky believes that the absence of the national doctrine of education presents a threat to national security and a violation of the right of citizens to quality education. Accordingly, the teacher has to solve the problem of achieving the harmony of interests of the individual, the family, the society and the government on their own, which, however, judging by the officially published results, is the task that exceeds the abilities of the participants of the educational process.  The particular concern about the results of the patriotic upbringing served as a basis for the legislative initiative of the RF President V. V. Putin, who introduced the project of an amendment to the Law of RF "About Education of the Russian Federation" to the State Duma in 2020, regarding the quality of patriotic upbringing [3]. Patriotism, considered by the President of RF V. V. Putin as the only possible idea to unite the nation is "THE FEELING OF LOVE OF THE MOTHERLAND" and the readiness for every sacrifice and heroic deed for the sake of the interests of your Motherland. However, the practicing educators experience shortfalls in efficient methodologies of patriotic upbringing, which should let them bring up citizens, loving their Motherland more than themselves. The article is dedicated to solution to this problem based on the Value-sense paradigm of upbringing educational dynasty of the Kurbatovs [15].


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1234-1255
Author(s):  
Valerii V. SMIRNOV

Subject. The article investigates a Russian approach to ensuring economic growth. Objectives. The aim is to identify the basis of the Russian approach to ensuring economic growth. Methods. The study rests on the systems approach, using the methods of statistical, neural network, and cluster analysis. Results. The paper defines the structural importance of exports of goods and services, and changes in inventories. It highlights significant links with public consumption expenditures. The Russian approach to ensuring economic growth comes down to devaluation of the national currencyб resulting from the loss of the real inflationary potential of economic growth to maintain the volume of exports of goods and services in the context of maintaining public consumption expenditures. The increase in M2 forces the Central Bank of the Russian Federation to increase its foreign exchange reserves. This has a restraining effect on the growth of Russian Ruble’s monetary exchange rate. This phenomenon causes a drop in the Russian federal loan bond (OFZ) index and a replacement of strategic priorities with tactical ones. Conclusions. The basis of the Russian approach to ensuring economic growth is a reflection of the limits of the Russian economy development and the effectiveness of the Government of the Russian Federation.


2022 ◽  
pp. 70-80
Author(s):  
D. E. Mereshkin ◽  
V. A. Plotnikov

The COVID-19 pandemic interrupted many trends that had developed before it and again updated the issue of modernizing the Russian economy, restarting the mechanisms of economic growth and sustainable socio-economic development. The key to resolving these issues is to increase the investment activity of the business. The investment climate is one of the key characteristics that testify to the freedom of entrepreneurial activity, the ease of opening and conducting business, the quality of regulatory procedures in the economy, the effectiveness of business entities, and the provision of equal opportunities for the development of the private sector. A favorable investment climate reveals the potential for the development of private companies. The article considers the system of state procedures in the field of improving the national investment climate, gives a brief description of the main tools and projects to improve the investment climate, analyses the changes in the main target indicators of investment attractiveness of the Russian Federation.


2021 ◽  
pp. 125-133
Author(s):  
A. V. Yaschenko

The article attempts to assess the results of the development of the Russian economy from the moment of privatization to the present. The urgency of the problem lies in the fact that, despite significant resources, including human capital, the economy is stagnating, there are no structural reforms, and high-tech companies do not appear. The main thing is not creating conditions for business development on the principles of self-organization: entrepreneurship, initiative, personal competence and investment. Reforming the socio-economic system of the USSR has no historical analogue, and is perceived as a unique practice of testing some theoretical positions and hypotheses that guided researchers and entrepreneurs in the framework of a market economy, for example, the theory of market equilibrium, theory of the firm, theory of preferences, and others. Russia has demonstrated a kind of phenomenon, both from the point of view of theory and practice of market transformations, when it is not entrepreneurship, not the investment activity of business and the population, but the narrowly selfish interests of persons affiliated with the government, began to determine market processes, such an economy was called the «economy of individuals», And in the case of a direct focus on the state budget,» the economy of the distribution». The transformations could be based on the market experience of a large number of countries, both developed and developing (China), this has not been done. Time was lost on the creation of new jobs; in the industrial orientation of the state, there were no priorities for the development of important industries for national competitiveness. As a result, the economic growth was lost.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-210
Author(s):  
Екатерина Стрижакова ◽  
Ekaterina Strizhakova ◽  
Дмитрий Стрижаков ◽  
Dmitriy Strizhakov

The analysis of the structure of industrial production in Russia, the level of profitability by type of activity, an analysis of R & D expenses, as well as trends in the development of industrial production and its prospects are given . To identify and support the key role of the state in regu-lating influence on the Russian economy as a whole, and on the development of industrial poten-tial of the country. Formed the main directions of development and implementation of industrial policy in the Russian Federation.


Author(s):  
Viacheslav Olegovich Mosalygin ◽  

For more than 15 years, a significant part of the budget revenues of the Russian Federation have been tax revenues from the sale of hydrocarbons, in particular oil and natural gas. Despite the desire of our government to minimize its dependence on oil and gas revenues, the government continues to implement measures to encourage both small and large companies by providing some tax-related benefits, thereby encouraging the fields to further develop and expand.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3.14) ◽  
pp. 291
Author(s):  
Mihail Nikolaevich Dudin ◽  
Diana Dmitrievna Burkaltseva ◽  
Oleg Georgiyevich Blazhevich ◽  
Aleksandr Viktorovich Betskov ◽  
Vladimir Fedosovich Gaponenko ◽  
...  

Subject/theme. SWOT analysis of the financial security of modern Russia is carried out herein to identify the prospects for the improvement of the financial security at the macrolevel.Purpose/objectives. The purpose of the article is to analyze the financial security of the state through the example of Russia. To achieve the purpose hereof, it is required to solve the following tasks:To provide the SWOT analysis matrix of the financial security of the Russian Federation.To determine the influence of the strengths on the opportunities and threats to the financial security of the Russian Federation.To determine the influence of the weaknesses on the opportunities and threats to the financial security of the Russian Federation.To quantify the elements of SWOT analysis.To identify the current threats to the financial security of the Russian Federation.To propose the measures to reduce the threats and to improve the level of financial security of the Russian Federation.Methods. The most common and high-quality strategic planning instrument – the SWOT analysis method – is used herein.Results.The imposition of anti-Russian sanctions made it possible to identify the problematic areas of the state, which are a threat to the financial security of the Russian Federation.The following can be identified as the current threats to the financial security of the Russian Federation: the outflow of domestic capital abroad and offshore; the quantitative restriction of money supply when issuing rubles for the growth of foreign exchange reserves; a high level of external public debt; high tax burden on business; weak investment activity and a slowdown in the rate of foreign investment; the instability of the banking system.Despite the considerable pressure from foreign countries, the Russian Federation is taking measures to neutralize the external threats to national security, reducing the possibility of external influence on its international position.Conclusion/relevance.SWOT analysis of the financial security of the state shows that the strengths prevail in the Russian Federation, but there are many weaknesses and external threats. In the aggregate, the field of strengths and opportunities prevails over the field of weaknesses and threats. Consequently, the Russian Federation has the prospects for development, but for further development the strength should be used to neutralize the threats.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document