scholarly journals Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe NHT dan Talking Stick Berbantu Prezi terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
Syan Risnanda ◽  
Muhtarom Muhtarom ◽  
Sutrisno Sutrisno
Keyword(s):  
Student Achievement ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Choice Test ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Design Data ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Stick Model ◽  
Better Than

Student learning achievement in mathematics lessons and using learning models are still low and not in accordance with the material. The use of models in learning must be adapted to the material to achieve satisfactory student achievement. This type of research is quantitative and aims to determine the effectiveness of learning using the Taking Stick model and Prezi's NHT assisted model on student learning achievement. The population of this research is class VII students of SMP Negeri 29 Semarang in the academic year 2017/2018. Sampling using cluster random sampling technique so that three classes were obtained randomly, namely VII A, VII B, and VII C. The design of this study was the Posttest Only Control Design. Data obtained through multiple choice test results were then processed by ANAVA test, Sceffe Test, learning completeness test and simple linear regression test. Data analysis results show that (1) there are differences in student achievement using Prezi-assisted Taking Stick learning models, Prezi-assisted NHT learning models and conventional learning models. (2) Students' learning achievement using Prezi-assisted Taking Stick models is better than conventional learning models. (3) Learning achievement of students who use Prezi-assisted NHT models is better than conventional learning models. (4) Learning achievements of students who use the Taking Stick model and Prezi-assisted NHT achieve KKM. (5) There is a correlation between student activity and learning achievement for classes that receive Prezi Talking Stick learning model and classes that receive Prezi's NHT assisted learning model.

scholarly journals Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Student Teams Achievement Division dan Team Assisted Individualization ditinjau dari Kemampuan Spasial Siswa

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 135
Author(s):  
Arie Purwa Kusuma
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Spatial Ability ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Student Teams ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Achievement In Mathematics ◽  
Better Than

The objectives of this research were to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the spatial ability of the students. This research used the quasi-experimental research method with the factorial design of 3 x 3. Its population was all of the students in grade XI of State Senior High Schools of Wonosobo regency in Academic Year 2017/2018. The samples of the research were taken by using the cluster random sampling technique. They consisted of 326 students. The data of the research were analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells.The results of the research are as follows.1) The cooperative learning model of the STAD type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the cooperative learning model of the TAI type and the direct learning model and the cooperative learning model of the STAD type results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the conventional learning model.2) The learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the high spatial ability was better than that of the students with the moderate and low spatial abilities, and the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the moderate spatial ability was better than that of the students with the low spatial ability. 3) There was an interaction the aforementioned learning models and the categories of the spatial ability on the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving Terhadap Kompetensi Belajar IPA Peserta Didik Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 13 Padang

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Sarah ◽  
Lufri Lufri ◽  
Ramadhan Sumarmin
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Skill Assessment ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Learning Competence

The low learning outcomes of students are caused by several problems encountered during the learning process, such as IPA learning process still used teacher centered and lecturing methode. The result of student learning competence still low result and the teacher hasn�t yet used learning models can make student will be active. One effort was made to improve students learning competence by applying problem solving learning models. This study aims to determine the effect of the use of problem solving, learning model to the students' learning competence SMP 13 Padang. This study is an experimental research using the design of The Static Group Comparison. The study population is all students of Class VIII SMPN 13 Padang. Sampling using purposive sampling technique. The control class uses the learning model commonly used in the classroom IE discovery learning model and experimental class using a problem solving learning model. The research instrument used is a test of learning result and affective and skill assessment in the form of observation sheet. Data were analyzed using t-test for knowledge, competence because the data were normally distributed and homogeneously. Data were analyzed using up-test for affective and skill competence.Result of hypothesis test in both classes of sample, found that class which uses problem solving, learning model have positive effect of student learning competence of Class VIII 6 SMPN 13 Padang such as knowledge, affective and skill competence

scholarly journals Keefektifan Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Think Pair And Share Melalui Pendekatan Inquiry Ditinjau dari Kemandiriran Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dewi Mutia Anggraeni ◽  
Paridjo . ◽  
Eleonora Dwi W
Keyword(s):  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
High Learning ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Inquiry Approach ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Better Than

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan : (1) Untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dan model pembelajaran Ekspositori.(2) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik dari pada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi.(3) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembeljaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah peserta didik kelas VII SMP Negeri 3 Brebes tahun pelajaran 2016/2017. Pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling. Sampel yang diambil sebanyak 2 kelas eksperimen, 2 kelas kontrol, dan 1 kelas ujicoba. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes, angket, dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dengan menetapkan taraf signifikansi 5% adalah uji Anava dengan Rancangan Acak Kelompok, uji-t satu pihak kanan, dan uji-t satu pihak kiri, yang sebelumnya telah dilakukan uji prasyarat yaitu uji normalitas dan uji homogenitas. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa: (1) Ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dengan model pembelajaran Ekspositori. (2) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi. (3) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik atau sama dengan yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out whether there are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students taught by using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach and Expository learning models. (2) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievements of students taught by the model Think Pair and Share learning through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is not better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learning independence. The population in this study were students of class VII of SMP Negeri 3 Brebes academic year 2016/2017. Sampling uses cluster random sampling technique. Samples taken were 2 experimental classes, 2 control classes, and 1 trial class. Data collection techniques used were tests, questionnaires, and documentation. The data analysis technique used by setting the 5% significance level is the Anova test with the Randomized Group Design, the right-hand t-test, and the left-hand t-test, which has previously been carried out prerequisite tests namely normality test and homogeneity test. From the results of the study it can be concluded that: (1) There are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students who are taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach with the Expository learning model. (2) Mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) Mathematics learning achievements of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach are not better or the same as those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learningindependence. Keywords: ThinkPairandShare, InquiryApproach, Learning Independence, Mathematics Learning Achievement.

scholarly journals EFFECT OF INQUIRY TRAINING LEARNING MODEL DAN CREATIVITY ON SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Purnama Silitonga ◽  
Mara Bangun Harahap ◽  
Derlina .
Keyword(s):  
Interaction Model ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Process Skills ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Science Process Skills ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Model Training ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Better Than

This study aims: 1) to determine differences in science process skills of students with learning model inquiry training and conventional learning models, 2) to determine the difference science process skills of students who have high creativity and creativity is low, 3) to determine the interaction model of learning inquiry trainingwith creativity of the science process skills. The sampling technique conducted cluster random sampling two classes, where first class as a class experiment with the number of students 32 people applied learning model inquiry training (X-1) and the second class as a class control the number of students 32 people who applied conventional learning model ( X-2). Instruments in this study is the science process skills test and a test of creativity in the form of a description. From these results it can be concluded that: 1) science process skills of students that learned with a learning model inquiry training is better than the students that learned with conventional learning models, 2)science process skills of students with high creativity better than students with creativity is low, 3) there is interaction between inquirylearning model training and creativity in influencing the science process skills of students.

scholarly journals Urgency Of Project Based Learning Model In Social Studies Learning To Improve Students Learning Achievement

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 243
Author(s):  
Siti Samsiyah ◽  
Akhmad Arif Musadad ◽  
Musa Pelu
Keyword(s):  
Student Achievement ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Social Studies ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Project Based Learning ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Interactive Analysis ◽  
Collection Data ◽  
Improve Student Achievement

<p><em>This study aims to describe the importance of a project based learning model in social studies learning to improve student achievement. This research is a descriptive qualitative study with a naturalistic approach. This research was conducted at SMP IT MTA Karanganyar. Data collection was carried out through in-depth interviews, observation and document analysis. The research instrument is the author himself as a data collector. The data validation was done by using triangulation techniques, double checking, and peer question and answer. Data analysis was performed using interactive analysis techniques which included data collection, data reduction, data display, and verification of conclusion. From the research results it can be concluded that the project based learning model is very important in social studies learning to improve student achievement. The increase in student learning achievement can be seen in the increase in student learning outcomes in material relics of the Hindu and Buddhist kingdoms in Indonesia. Project Based Learning assists teachers in developing student skills in making products that have benefits for students in participating in classroom learning. This condition is the main asset used in implementing the 2013 curriculum to create a generation that is superior, intelligent, creative, has quranic morals and environmentally friendly characters.</em></p>

scholarly journals Implementasi Teams Games Tournaments dan Number Head Together ditinjau dari Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 121
Author(s):  
Nurina Kurniasari Rahmawati
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Mathematical Achievement ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Mathematical Learning ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Communication Ability ◽  
Better Than

The purpose of this research is to know the influence of Teams Games Tournaments (TGT), Numbered Head Together (NHT) model to the students 'mathematical learning achievement that reviewed students' mathematical reasoning ability. This research is a quasi-experimental research with 3 × 3 factorial design. The researcher uses 2 indicators of learning achievement that is (1) Mathematics achievement test and (2) Test of mathematical communication ability. Analysis of the data used is the analysis of two-way variants with different cells. The results of this research can be summarized as follows. (1) Learning using TGT learning model makes better student's mathematical learning achievement compared to student's mathematical learning achievement with NHT learning model and conventional learning, while NHT model gives a better result of student's mathematical learning achievement from student's learning achievement with conventional learning. (2) Learners with high mathematical reasoning ability have better learning achievement compared with learners with medium ability as well as medium ability better than low ability. (3) Students have high and moderate reasoning abilities with the three learning models giving the same mathematical achievement, whereas students with low mathematical reasoning ability using TGT and NHT models provide the same mathematical achievement, but better than conventional learning models, and conventional learning models and NHT produces the same mathematical achievement. (4) The learning model of TGT and NHT in students with high, medium and low mathematical reasoning ability produce the same mathematical achievement, whereas conventional learning model on students with high and medium mathematical reasoning has the same mathematical achievement but better than students with reasoning low math.

scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN PENGGUNAAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN LANGSUNG TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN MENULIS TEKS BERITA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI 24 JAMBI

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 250
Author(s):  
Abdoel Gafar ◽  
Firman Tara
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Performance Test ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Direct Learning ◽  
Cooperative Models ◽  
Language Text ◽  
Better Than

This research aims to: (1) Describe the ability to write news text students are taught using STAD type cooperative learning model and students are taught using direct learning model; (2) Describe the ability to write high-priority student-language text texts that are taught using STAD-type cooperative models and are taught using direct learning models; (3) Describe the ability to write low-priority student-language text texts that are taught using STAD-type cooperative models and are taught using direct learning models, and (4) Describe the interaction of cooperative learning model type STAD and initial ability to the ability to write news text of students of class VIII SMP Negeri 24 Jambi. The type of this research is quantitative with 2x2 factorial experimental designs. The population of the research is the students of class VIII SMP Negeri 24 consisting of 6 classes. The sample of this research is class VIIIA for experiment class with 40 students and class VIIIB for control class with 38 students. Sample determination is determined by purposive sampling technique. The data of students' news text writing capability was obtained using performance test and analyzed using two ways Anova test. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that STAD type cooperative learning model affects the ability to write student news text. The effect can be explained as follows. First, the ability to write news texts of students taught using STAD type cooperative learning model is better than students taught using direct learning model. Second, the ability to write high-priority students' text news taught using STAD type cooperative models is better than students taught using direct learning models. Third, the ability to write low-priority students' text taught using STAD type cooperative models is better than students being taught using direct learning models. Fourth, there is no interaction between STAD type cooperative learning model and initial ability to write news text skills of students of class VIII SMP Negeri 24 Jambi.Keywords: Writing News Texts, Cooperative Learning, Direct Learning

scholarly journals Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share terhadap Prestasi Belajar Ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Logika Matematika

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Desi Tri Utami ◽  
Nuning Melianingsih
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Junior High Schools ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Good Learning ◽  
Better Than

<p>This research aims to prove the effect of the Think Pair Share (TPS) cooperative learning model on students' mathematics learning achievement in terms of logical-mathematical intelligence. The research is a quasi-experimental study. The population of the research is all seventh grade students of State Junior High Schools in Sukoharjo Regency. The data analysis technique used is a two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. The conclusions of the research are: (1) TPS learning model produces learning achievement better than conventional learning model; (2) there is no difference in mathematics learning achievement between students with high and average logical-mathematical intelligence, and students with average and low logical-mathematical intelligence; students with high logical-mathematical intelligence have better mathematics learning achievement than those with low logical-mathematical intelligence; (3) in the group of students with high, average, and low logical-mathematical intelligence, the use of conventional and TPS learning models produces equally good learning achievements; (4) in the group of students with high and low logical-mathematical intelligence, the use of conventional and TPS learning models produces equally good learning achievements; in the group of students with average logical-mathematical intelligence, the TPS learning model produces learning achievements better than conventional learning model</p>

scholarly journals MODEL PEMBELAJARAN ELPSA: PENGARUHNYA TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN LITERASI MATEMATIS DAN KECEMASAN BELAJAR

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-168
Author(s):  
Eka Patmi Seta ◽  
Suherman Suherman ◽  
Farida Farida
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Literacy Skills ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Mathematical Literacy ◽  
Anova Test ◽  
Learning Anxiety

The purpose of this research was to effect the ELPSA learning model on students' mathematical literacy abilities, determine the effect of student learning anxiety on mathematical literacy skills, and determine the interaction between learning models and anxiety on mathematical literacy skills. This research is a quantitative type of quasi-experimental research. The sampling technique used was simple random sampling. Data were collected through tests and questionnaires. The test uses an essay with comparative material to measure mathematical literacy skills, while a questionnaire was used to determine the categories of student learning anxiety. The pre-requisite test in this study used the normality and homogeneity test. The data analysis technique used the two-way ANOVA test with different cells. Based on the calculation of ANOVA two ways different cells have obtained a test decision that is rejected, is rejected, and is accepted, it is necessary to carry out a further post ANOVA test using the Scheffe method '. The results showed that: there was an effect of the ELPSA learning model on mathematical literacy skills, there was an effect of student learning anxiety on mathematical literacy skills, and there was no interaction between learning models and student learning anxiety on mathematical literacy abilities.

scholarly journals The Effect of Value Clarification Technique Learning Models and Learning Styles on the Achievement Learning Outcomes of Class VIII MTs Al-Hasanah Tanjung Leidong, Labura District

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 1371-1377
Author(s):  
Siti Halimah ◽  
Zulfahmi Lubis ◽  
Saidatun Nisa Nasution
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Class Viii

The purpose of this study was to determine: (1) the influence of the value clarification technique (VCT) learning model on student learning result. (2) Knowing the influence of learning styles on student learning result. (3) Knowing the interaction between learning models and learning styles on student learning result.   The population of this study were students of class VIII MTs Al-Hasanah Tanjung Leidong Labuhan Batu Utara consisting of three classes. The sample chosen for the class with the VCT learning model was class VIII-3 with 30 students, while students who were taught using the expository model were 32 students. The cluster random sampling technique is influenced by analysis of variance at a significant level (α = 0.05) followed by Scheffe. The results of this study are: (1) the average value of students taught with the VCT learning model (= 33.6) is higher than students taught with the expository learning model (= 24.68) with Fcount 0.0023 < Ftable 3,988. (2) The average value of learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak with visual learning styles (= 27.5), auditory (= 29.56) and kinesthetic (= 28.26) with Fcount = 0.068 < Ftable = 3,988. (3) There is an interaction between learning models and learning styles on students' learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak with Fcount 28.96 < Ftable 3,988. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded that students with visual and auditory characteristics, the appropriate learning model is the VCT, while students with the kinesthetic learning style are expository. The implication is that teachers must be trained in how to understand student learning styles. Thus it is suggested that in planning the learning process the characteristics of students must be considered.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document