scholarly journals The Effect of Cooperative Learning Model Type Two Stay Two Stray and Learning Style on Social Sciences Learning Outcomes of Grade IV Elementary School Students

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wachid Yuli Irfanto ◽  
Mustaji Mustaji ◽  
Muhammad Jacky
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Posttest Score ◽  
Pretest Score ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
School Students

This study aims to determine the existence of significant differences in students who carry out learning using the two stay two stray model and learning styles towards learning outcomes. The design used in this study is the Pre-Experimental Design design of the One-Group Pretest-Posttest Design. The technique of data analysis using validity and reliability tests. The average results of the pretest and posttest values obtained in the research subjects (class IV) showed that there was an increase before the treatment and after treatment, both students who had the type of visual learning style, audiovisual and kinesthetic. In the type of visual learning style, the pretest score was 65.24 while the posttest score was 79.17. For the type of audio-visual learning style, the pretest score was 66.74, while the posttest score was 82.26 and for the last type, the kinesthetic learning style obtained a pretest score of 67.32 while the posttest score was 84.75. All types of student learning styles experience increased learning outcomes when given treatment with model two stay two strays. So from that shows that the learning model of two stay two stray with visual learning style, audiovisual and kinesthetic experiences a significant increase in improving student learning outcomes.

scholarly journals The Effect of Value Clarification Technique Learning Models and Learning Styles on the Achievement Learning Outcomes of Class VIII MTs Al-Hasanah Tanjung Leidong, Labura District

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 1371-1377
Author(s):  
Siti Halimah ◽  
Zulfahmi Lubis ◽  
Saidatun Nisa Nasution
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Class Viii

The purpose of this study was to determine: (1) the influence of the value clarification technique (VCT) learning model on student learning result. (2) Knowing the influence of learning styles on student learning result. (3) Knowing the interaction between learning models and learning styles on student learning result.   The population of this study were students of class VIII MTs Al-Hasanah Tanjung Leidong Labuhan Batu Utara consisting of three classes. The sample chosen for the class with the VCT learning model was class VIII-3 with 30 students, while students who were taught using the expository model were 32 students. The cluster random sampling technique is influenced by analysis of variance at a significant level (α = 0.05) followed by Scheffe. The results of this study are: (1) the average value of students taught with the VCT learning model (= 33.6) is higher than students taught with the expository learning model (= 24.68) with Fcount 0.0023 < Ftable 3,988. (2) The average value of learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak with visual learning styles (= 27.5), auditory (= 29.56) and kinesthetic (= 28.26) with Fcount = 0.068 < Ftable = 3,988. (3) There is an interaction between learning models and learning styles on students' learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak with Fcount 28.96 < Ftable 3,988. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded that students with visual and auditory characteristics, the appropriate learning model is the VCT, while students with the kinesthetic learning style are expository. The implication is that teachers must be trained in how to understand student learning styles. Thus it is suggested that in planning the learning process the characteristics of students must be considered.

scholarly journals The effect of CTL learning model and learning style on the historical learning outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inda Syahra ◽  
Sarkadi Sarkadi ◽  
Nurzengky Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
School Year

This study aims to obtain the influence of learning models and learning styles on historical learning outcomes. Students are given a CTL and conventional learning model by measuring visual learning styles and auditory learning styles. This type of research is a quantitative study using an experimental method with a 2 x 2 factorial design. The population is all students of class X 2019/2020 school year. The sampling technique used is multistage random sampling. Class X-A as an experimental class and grade X-B  as a control class with a total of 70 students construct validity is analyzed by the correlation between items using Product Moment Correlation, and Cronbach's alpha formula tested reliability. The results showed that learning outcomes with the CTL learning model were higher than conventional learning models. While student learning outcomes using visual learning styles are more effective than auditory learning styles. There is a relationship between learning models with learning styles.

scholarly journals Relationship Between Learning Style With Student Learning Outcomes on Structure and Function of Plants

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-105
Author(s):  
Elma Nur Hidayati ◽  
Ara Hidayat ◽  
Ukit Ukit
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Structure And Function ◽  
Correlation Test ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
And Function

Learning styles can make students learn easily, fun, meaningfully that will improve their learning outcomes. This study aimed to determine the correlation between learning styles and student’s learning outcomes in online learning about structure and function of plant. The correlation test method was used and samples were chosen using simple random sampling, consisting of 68 students in class VIII SMPN 2 Pangkalpinang. The data were collected using interview, questionnaire, documentation methods, and analyzed by Pearson product moment correlation test. The results showed that about 72% students in class VIII SMPN 2 Pangkalpinang tended to have a visual learning style and 75% with completed learning-outcomes. The correlation test indicated that there was no significant relationship between learning styles and their learning outcomes, by evidence and determination value of 0.111 more than 0.05 and 3.8% simultaneously. There is no correlation between learning styles and learning outcomes, presumably because learning styles only contribute 3.8% in which other 96.2% were determined by other factors such as teacher motivation and teaching strategies. However, although there is no correlation, learning styles still contribute to student’s learning success. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct further research related to other factors that may affect student learning outcomes.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Media Peta Sejarah Interaktif dan Gaya Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa SMP di Kota Bekasi

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Arinarita Peni Andaryati
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Interactive Media ◽  
Historical Maps ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
History Learning ◽  
Media Learning

The aim of this research is to determining the influence of media learning interactive historical map and learning style to the result of history learning through IPS subject in class IX. The method used in this research is the experimental method, a 2X2 treatment design by level. The validity and reliability are tested by Pearson Product Moment and Alpha Cronbach. The results of this research are (1) the results of historical learning outcomes students using interactive historical maps and have higher visual learning style of students who use historical maps interactive media and have auditory learning style. (2) the results of historical learing outcomes students who have higher auditory learning styles of students who have a visual learning style on instruction using conventional media, (3) There is an interaction effect the use of interactive historical maps on historical learning outcomes.

PENGARUH PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAMDI MADRASAH TSANAWIYAH MESRAKOTA PEMATANGSIANTAR

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Mul Iadi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Scientific Approach

<p>The purpose of this study was to find out: (1) differences in Akidah<br />Akhlak learning outcomes of students taught with scientific approaches<br />with students taught with contextual approaches, (2) differences in<br />learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak students who have visual, auditory and<br />kinesthetic learning styles, and (3) the influence of the scientific approach<br />and student learning styles on the learning outcomes of Akidah Akhlak.<br />This research method is quasi-experimental with the population of this<br />study are students of class VII (Seven). The sample was chosen into two<br />classes with cluster random sampling technique, in this case selected for<br />the experimental class with a scientific approach is class VIIa with the<br />number of students 31, while for the control class that is the contextual<br />approach is class VIId with the number of students 34. Instruments of data<br />collection is a questionnaire and test of learning outcomes. The technique<br />by analysis of variance (Anava) at "α" = 0.05. The results of this study are:<br />(1) student learning outcomes taught with scientific approach (= 33.5)<br />higher than student learning outcomes taught with contextual approaches<br />(= 28,7), with Fcount = 68,10&gt; Ftable = 3.988 , (2) student learning<br />outcomes with visual learning style (= 34.21) higher than student learning <br />outcomes with kinesthetic learning styles (= 28.38) and auditory learning <br />styles (= 27.69), with Fcount = 79,32 &gt; Ftable = 3.988. And (3) there is an<br />interaction between learning strategies and learning styles towards<br />learning outcomes with statistical calculations known F count = 30,16&gt;<br />Ftable = 3.988. Further test calculations using the Scheffe test also showed<br />a significant difference between student learning outcomes taught by the<br />scientific approach and the contextual approach (CTL) as well as student<br />learning outcomes with visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles.</p>

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF DAN GAYA BELAJAR MAHASISWA TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENGANTAR BISNIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 146
Author(s):  
Mendarissan Aritonang ◽  
Abdul Hamid K ◽  
Julaga Situmorang
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TST lebih tinggi daripada kooperatif tipe NHT. (2) hasil belajar  pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis dan pragmatis. (3) interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  terhadap hasil belajar pengantar bisnis. Penelitian dilaksanakan di Universitas Methodist Indonesia. Populasi 180 orang, dengan cluster random sampling berjumlah 80 orang yang terdiri dari 40 orang kelas A dan B. Metode penelitian kuasi eksperimen, desain faktorial 2 x 2. Uji statistik dengan statistik deskriptif, dilanjutkan dengan statistik inferensial ANAVA dua jalur dengan taraf signifikan α = 0,05 dilanjutkan uji Scheffe. Sebelumnya dilakukan uji persyaratan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tinggi dari pada kooperatif tipe NHT; (2) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis lebih tinggi dari pada gaya belajar pragmatis; (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar mahasiswa. Hipotesis ini menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tepat dari pada model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa, dan mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis akan memperoleh hasil yang lebih baik dari pada mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis pembelajaran yang tepat digunakan adalah strategi pembelajaran Direct Instructional.            Kata Kunci: pengantar bisnis, kooperatif tipe TST, NHT, gaya belajar Abstract: The purpose of this study is to find out: (1) the results of introductory business learning of students taught with the cooperative learning model of the TST type are higher than that of the NHT cooperative type. (2) introductory student learning outcomes that have theoretical and pragmatic learning styles. (3) the interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles on introductory business learning outcomes. The research was conducted at Methodist University in Indonesia. A population of 180 people, with a cluster random sampling of 80 people consisting of 40 people class A and B. Quasi-experimental research methods, factorial design 2 x 2. Statistical tests with descriptive statistics, followed by inferential statistics two-way ANOVA with a significant level α = 0.05 continued with the Scheffe test. Previously performed requirements testing. The results showed: (1) the results of introductory business learning of students taught with the cooperative learning model of the TSTS type were higher than that of the NHT type of cooperative; (2) the introductory learning outcomes of business students who have higher theoretical learning styles than pragmatic learning styles; (3) there is an interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles in influencing student learning outcomes. This hypothesis shows that the TSTS type of cooperative learning model is more appropriate than the NHT type of cooperative learning model in improving student business introductory learning outcomes, and students who have a theoretical learning style will get better results than students who have appropriate pragmatic learning styles of learning used is the Direct Instructional learning strategy. Keywords: business introduction, cooperative TST type, NHT, learning style

scholarly journals The Effect of Learning Models and Learning Styles on Social Science Learning Outcomes of Arrahman Percut Students

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 2076-2083
Author(s):  
Lili Nur Indah Sari ◽  
Abdul Muin Sibuea ◽  
Samsidar Tanjung
Keyword(s):  
Social Studies ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
The Social

This study aims (1) to determine the differences in social studies learning outcomes taught by the Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) learning model which is higher than the social studies learning outcomes with the Problem Based Learning model. (2) To find out the differences in social studies learning outcomes of students who have a higher visual learning style than the social studies learning outcomes of students who have a kinesthetic learning style. (3) To determine the interaction between learning models and student learning styles in influencing the social studies learning outcomes of private students, Ar Rahman Percut. The population of this study was 122 students of class VII-A and VII-B of Ar Rahman Percut Private Middle School. Samples were taken by cluster rondom sampling. The sample used in this study was 63 students. The selected sample is classVII-A and class VII-B. The instrument used was a multiple choice test, amounting to 30 items and a learning style questionnaire. The data were analyzed at the significant level = 0.05, followed by the Scheffe further test after the normality and homogeneity tests. The results showed that, (1) There are differences in social studies learning outcomes, where the social studies learning outcomes with the Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) learning model are higher than the social studies learning outcomes with the Problem Based Learning model with Fcount 8,70> Ftable 4.00, (2) There are differences in student social studies learning outcomes, where the social studies learning outcomes of students who have a visual learning style from the social studies learning outcomes of students who have a kinesthetic learning style with Fcount 5.01> Ftable 4.00, (3) There is an interaction between the learning model and the learning style of the students' social studies learning outcomes Fcount 5.20> Ftable 4.00

scholarly journals Profil Kemampuan Representasi Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-28
Author(s):  
Aula Amalia ◽  
Nurina Happy ◽  
FX Didik Purwosetiyono
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
School Students ◽  
Verbal Representation ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Student Learning Styles

This study aims to determaine the profile of the representation ability of juniorhigh school students in terms of learning styles. This type of research wasdescriptive qualitative research. The subjects taken were three junior highschool students of eight grade, each of whom had a visual learning style, andauditory learning style, and kinesthetic learning style. The data was collectedusing a learning style scale, written tests, interviews and documentation. Thedata analysis technique was carried out in 3 stages, reduction, datapresentation, and drawing conclucions or verification. The validity of the dataused time triangulation, comparaing the results of the representation abilitytest with the results of interviews in the first and second stages. The analysiswas developed based on indicators of representational ability by taking inroaccount student learning styles. Based on the results of the analysis, it isknown that subjects with visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles havelow verbal representation abilities. 

scholarly journals The Effect of Learning Method Schoology Applications and Learning Style on Student Learning Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 113-119
Author(s):  
Anna Angela Sitinjak
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Study Program ◽  
Student Learning Styles

This type of research is a quasi-experimental research. The purpose of this study is to determine whether student learning outcomes with the LMS method (using Schoology) are higher than conventional and whether there is an interaction between learning methods with student learning styles. The population of this study were all students of the mechanical engineering study program at the PTKI campus Medan. The sampling technique used was cluster random sampling. The control class and experimental class selected each consisted of 20 people. The instrument used to measure students' mathematical achievement is the essay-test. The instrument used to measure student learning styles is a questionnaire. The normality test used is the Lilliefor test and homogeneity test using the Fisher test. Then the ANOVA test was performed with a significance level of 0.05. The results showed that students who were taught using Schoology had high learning outcomes compared to conventional learning and visual learning styles were highest in learning outcomes than other learning styles. But learning styles and learning methods don't have interactions. For further research, it can be done with different learning models and adding other variables to see the readiness of our human resources in facing the industrial world.

scholarly journals Penerapan pembelajaran matematika realistik pada mata kuliah matematika II ditinjau dari gaya belajar mahasiswa Teknik Sipil

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Bq. Malikah Hr ◽  
Sukandi Sukandi ◽  
Ni Putu Ety Lismaya Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Realistic Mathematics

The research aims to know the effect of realistic mathematics learning in mathematics-II courses seen from the learning styles of Civil Engineering students. This type of research uses a quasi-experimental with a 2 x 3 factorial design. The sample consists of 30 second-semester students of Civil Engineering of Mandalika university of Education. The instruments in the research were a learning style questionnaire and an essay test that contained questions for mathematics II courses. The test of data analysis using two-way analysis of variance. The results showed that the learning method and learning style had a significant effect on student learning outcomes in mathematics II courses. The influence of learning methods was 26.8% and the influence of student learning styles was 37.8%. Based on the marginal average, the average of students with realistic mathematics learning methods was 70.73 and the average of students with conventional methods was 65.93. In a class that was treated with realistic mathematics learning, the average of students with visual learning styles was 75.80, the average of students with auditory learning styles was 70.80 and the average of students with kinesthetic learning styles was 65.60. It was concluded that in mathematics II courses, the application of realistic mathematics learning was effective in improving student learning outcomes and students with visual learning styles had better learning outcomes than students with auditory and kinesthetic learning styles and students auditory learning styles had better learning outcomes than students with kinesthetic learning styles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document