scholarly journals Politik Hukum Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi atas Pelaksanaan Pemilu dan Pemilukada di Indonesia

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 480
Author(s):  
Wahyu Nugroho
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Local Elections ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
Local Election ◽  
Electoral Laws ◽  
Commission Regulation ◽  
Building Area

After amendment 1945, whether legislative elections and the election of the executive power implementing held directly by the people, and going political reform electoral laws and local election, both in the revision of the existing political regulations, and rules in the law after the Constitutional Court decision, namely Law No. 42 of 2008 on General Election of President and Vice President, and and Law No. 10 of 2016 on the Second Amendment of Act No. 1 of 2015 on Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No. 1 of 2014 on the election of Governors, Regents and Mayors became acts. The purpose of the study on the implementation of the legal political and local elections are to conduct political rearrangement and local elections law in a mosaic of Indonesian state structure, maturity in politics, the consolidation of local democracy, and changes in local people’s minds to develop the region very hung to the figure of its leader, as well as ensuring the political rights of citizens in national and local political constellation. The results in this study is the need for consistency of law enforcement for compliance with a number of legal instruments and the implementation of procedures and penalties in the administration of elections. Aspects of legal certainty and the cultural aspect is very important law met in order for the elections and the local election purpose in achieving this goal idealized.In addition, the electoral administration in central and local levels, as well as participating in the election and the election shall comply with laws and regulations, ranging from the Commission Regulation, Act, as well as adherence to Constitutional Court decision. The author draws conclusions that the renewal of electoral politics and the local election after the Constitutional Court Decision in the Indonesian constitutional structure has implications for changes in the system, the mechanism and the pattern of elections and the local election organizers and participants of the election and the local election. On some empirical experience that was shown in the administration of elections and the election, people think the dynamic to organize and improve the system, as well as have awareness of constitutional rights guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution on political rights for the sake of the spirit of building area through the local elections to choose a figure that is idealized.

scholarly journals Legalitas Hukum Komisi Pemilihan Umum Daerah dalam Menyelenggarakan Pilkada

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 553
Author(s):  
Ansori Ansori
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Hierarchical Organization ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Local Elections ◽  
Legal Validity ◽  
Local Election ◽  
The Law ◽  
Election Commission ◽  
Special Duty

Penelitian ini membahas legalitas hukum Komisi Pemilihan Umum Daerah (KPUD) dalam menyelenggarakan pemilihan kepala daerah pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan memahami legalisasi pengaturan kedudukan hukum KPUD dalam penyelenggaraan Pilkada pasca putusan MK Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis-normatif, dengan teori lembaga negara, hierarki, kewenangan, keabsahan hukum, dan tujuan hukum. Hasil penelitian yang diperoleh adalah bahwa legalitas kedudukan hukum KPUD dalam penyelenggaraan Pilkada pasca putusan MK Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013 yaitu bahwa KPUD tidak dapat menyelenggarakan Pilkada karena KPUD bagian dari KPU yang bersifat hierarki, sedangkan KPU berwenang secara konstitusional menyelenggarakan Pemilu, sedangkan Pilkada bukan bagian dari Pemilu pasca putusan MK Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013 dan KPUD bukan lembaga daerah yang diberikan tugas khusus oleh undang-undang untuk menyelenggarakan pilkada, tugas menyelenggarakan Pilkada tersebut diberikan oleh undang-undang kepada KPU dan dilaksanakan oleh KPUD.The study addressed the legality of Regional Election Commission (KPUD) to hold local elections after the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 97/PUU-XI /2013. It aims to give analysis and to better understand the law that provides legal status of KPUD for organizing the elections after the court decision. The type of research is a juridical-normative research by employing the theory of state organs, hierarchy, powers, legal validity, and legal objectives. The obtained results showed that based on its legal status in organizing regional head elections, after the judgment of the Court decision No. 97/PUU-XI/2013, KPUD cannot hold regional head elections due to its position as subordinate of KPU as a hierarchical organization. KPU has the constitutional power to hold elections while regional head elections are not parts of the Election after the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 97/PUU-XI/2013. KPUD is not a regional organ given a special duty by the law to hold a local election. The task of organizing the local election is given by law to KPU and implemented by KPUD.

scholarly journals IMPLIKASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 11-017/PUU-I/2003 TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM HAK DIPILIH

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Ketut Ngastawa
Keyword(s):  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The State ◽  
The Body ◽  
State System ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Right

Paper that had the title: "Juridical implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 011-017/PUU-I/2003 on the Legal Protection for the Rights to be Eelected." This explores two issues: 1) how the legal protection of the settings selected in the state system of Indonesia ; 2) what are juridical implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 011-017/PUU-I/2003 on the legal protection for the rights to be elected. To solve both problems, this paper uses normative legal research methods. Approach being used is the statute approach, case approach, and a conceptual approach. Further legal materials collected were identified and analyzed using descriptive analysis techniques. Legal protection for the right to be elected in the state system of Indonesia can be traced from the 1945 opening, the articles in the body of the 1945 Constitution, Article 27 paragraph (1), Article 28D (1) and paragraph (3) and Article 28 paragraph (3) 1945 Second Amendment, MPR Decree Number XVII/MPR/1998, Article 43 of Law Number 39 of 1999, Article 21 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and Article 25 of the International Covenant  on Civil and Political Rights. Discussion of the juridical implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 011-017/PUU-I/2003 on the legal protection for the rights to be elected have been included: a) only on the juridical implications of representative institutions no longer marked with specified requirements as stipulated in Article 60 letter g of Law Number 12 Year 2003 in Law Number 10 Year 2008; b) juridical implications of the political field for the right to be elected is the absence of any discriminatory treatment in legislative product formed by the House of Representatives and the President as well as products of other legislation forward.

scholarly journals DESIGN OF SPECIAL JUSTICE AGENCY ELECTION CHAIN IN INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 68
Author(s):  
Tri Susilo
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Institutional Design ◽  
National Level ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Local Elections ◽  
Direct Election ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
Election Results

<p>Past-approval of government regulation in lieu of Law No.1 of 2014 concerning the election of governor, regent, and mayor (hereinafter called local election), In accordance with the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 97 /PUU-XI / 2013, the Constitutional Court is no longer authorized to resolve disputes on direct election results, because the provisions of Article 236C of Law Number 12 Year 2008 NRI are against the Constitution of 1945. Article 157 paragraph (1) Law No. 8 Year 2015 determines that the dispute settlement on direct election results become the authority of specialized judiciary. But before a specialized judiciary is formed, then the Constitutional Court is authorized to resolve disputes on direct election results. The authority of the Constitutional Court is the constitutional authority to fulfill temporary legal vacuum (rechtvakum). Therefore legislators should immediately establish a specialized judiciary which has the authority to resolve the disputes on direct election results. There is a new design in election mechanisms of regional hand. The law a quo stated that elections be held simultaneously at the national level. This design would require regulatory support, such as the establishment of as special court, solve any disputes that arise from the election. The problems emerge in this study is how the urgency of special court, how it compares to special court on election matters in various countries and how the relevance of the comparison can be applied in Indonesia. This was conducted using a legal-normative research. The research conclude unable to meet the demands for justice, for example, the court's decision are settled after the elections conducted and thick-layers on legal remedies so it is counterproductive to the election that have limited period of time. These legal remedies are even separated in several judicatures. Various countries have also established a special court on local elections with a variety of institutional design and procedural law. For Indonesia, the special court is ad hoc court, based on provincial and district or city and authorized to settle disputes concerning the local elections.</p>

scholarly journals Pengujian Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Marwan Hsb
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Form Of Government ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

Article 24C Section (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia authorizes the Constitutional Court to reviewthe law against the constitution. However, when referring to the hierarchy of legislation, the law has the equal hierarchy with government regulation in lieu of law. It makes a question whether the Constitutional Court truly has the authority to review government regulation in lieu of law against the constitution? Based on the research in this paper, it was found that by the Constitutional Court Decision Number 138/PUU-VII/2009, the Constitutional Court stated that the authority to review government regulation in lieu of law under the authority of the Constitutional Court because the substance of government regulation in lieu of law is similar with the substance of law. So, the Constitutional Court has the authority to review a government regulation in lieu of law materially. Such decision is correct; the Constitutional Court has the authority to review a government regulation in lieu of law in material because the substance is similar with the law. While formally reviewing should be the authority of the Supreme Court due to government regulation in lieu of law formally is in the form of government regulation

scholarly journals PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH DALAM KONTEKS UUD NRI TAHUN 1945

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Sodikin Sodikin
Keyword(s):  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Political Process ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Local Elections ◽  
Democratic Process ◽  
Local Election ◽  
Direct Election ◽  
Current Implementation ◽  
Regional Leaders ◽  
Local Leaders

Pemilihan kepala daerah merupakan salah satu proses politik yang dapat dikatakan proses yang sangat demokratis, sehingga pemilihan kepala daerah perlu terus diupayakan agar proses demokrasi itu menjadi bagian dalam sistem pemerintahan pada tingkat daerah. Pelaksanaan pemilihan kepala daerah setelah amandemen UUD 1945 dilakukan secara melalui pemilihan umum. Akan tetapi, pelaksanaannya menimbulkan permasalahan,terutama adalah konflik sosial secara horizontal di masyarakat dan juga kepala daerah yang dipilih tidak menghasilkan kepala daerah apa yang diidealkan dari pemilihan kepala daerah secara langsung. Dengan menggunakan metode deskriptif normatif dapat disimpulkan Pemilihan kepala daerah yang sekarang dilaksanakan secara langsung dan akan terus dilaksanakan secara langsung dan serentak, tidaklah sesuai dengan apa yang dikehendaki dalam Pasal 18 ayat (4) khususnya dan umumnya UUD NRI 1945. Penulis merekomendasikan agar pembentuk undang-undang (DPR dan Pemerintah) dalam membuat undang-undang untuk mengatur pemilihan kepala daerah disesuaikan dengan UUD NRI 1945, untuk menghindari kemungkinan diujimaterialkan ke Mahkamah Konstitusi. Hal ini termasuk undang-undang Pemilihan Kepala Daerah yang sekarang sudah diundangkan.<p>Local election for regional leaders is one of the political process that can be said to be a very democratic process, so that the local elections should be fostered so that it becomes part of the democratic process in the system of governance at the regional level. Implementation of local elections after the amendments of the 1945 Constitution is conducted through elections. However, its implementation has caused problems, particularly horizontally social conflict in the society and moreover the elected regional leaders are not what is idealized by the direct election of local leaders. By using descriptive- normative method, it can be concluded that the current implementation of local election for regional leaders which will be conducted directly and simultaneously, is not correspond with what the Article 18 paragraph (4) stipulates and generely with the 1945 Constitution. Therefore, legislators (House of Representatives and Government) in making laws- especially one that regulated the local elections for regional leaders, need to seek the conformity with the 1945 Constitution, to avoid the possibilty it being submitted to the Constitutional Court for judicial review. This includes the law on local election for regional leaders which has been enacted.</p>

scholarly journals PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TENTANG PEMILU SERENTAK DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN PENCEGAHAN KORUPSI POLITIK

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 532
Author(s):  
Dedi Mulyadi ◽  
M. Rendi Aridhayandi
Keyword(s):  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Research Result ◽  
Political Corruption ◽  
Vice President ◽  
The Political ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Local Elections ◽  
Financing System ◽  
Potential Problems ◽  
The Republic

Given the importance of the elections in a democracy, the principle of keeping the elections in accordance Luber Jurdil, especially of political corruption. Then on January 23, 2014 the Constitutional Court passed a decision in a judicial review of Law No. 42 of 2008 on General Election of President and Vice President of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945, by decision No. 14 / PUU-XI /2013 decided elections simultaneously at in 2019 and beyond. Concurrent elections is one of the prevention of political corruption. Political corruption is an act of power holders in order to take advantage of the power. For example: the financing of political parties, the purchase "ticket" or "boat" in local elections, as well as imaging and campaign costs. Constitutional Court decisions on the implementation of simultaneous elections in the year 2019 is one of the prevention of political corruption. The method used in this study using sociological juridical approach, specification of descriptive analysis. Identification of problems regarding (1) the background of the political corruption in the electoral operations, (2) the potential for problems in the implementation of elections simultaneously in 2019 can save and prevention of corruption of political, (3) attempts to resolve any potential problems in the elections simultaneously 2019 against the corruption of political purpose of this study is to know about the background of the political corruption, potential problems in the implementation of simultaneous elections and the efforts of its completion. The method used in this study is juridical sociological analysis with descriptive specification. The research result that the background of the political corruption is the ambition to achieve dynastic power, while the verdict was handed down too lightly, and the efforts made by the political financing system and raising the parliamentary threshold.Keywords : Political corruption, The Constitutional Court ruling, The elections simultaneously.

PERBEDAAN TAFSIR MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA PEMILIHAN UMUM SERENTAK

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suparto Suparto
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Vice President ◽  
General Election ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legislative Elections ◽  
General Elections ◽  
Legislative Election

ABSTRAKSelama ini pemilu presiden dan pemilu legislatif dilakukan secara terpisah atau tidak serentak. Pemilu legislatif selalu dilakukan sebelum pemilu presiden dan wakil presiden. Pemilihan umum yang dilakukan secara terpisah dianggap lebih banyak dampak negatifnya serta tidak sesuai dengan UUD NRI 1945. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah deskriptif analitis dengan pendekatan peraturan perundangundangan. Rumusan masalahnya adalah bagaimanakah pertimbangan hakim konstitusi dalam memutus Putusan Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 sehingga terjadi perbedaan dengan putusan sebelumnya Nomor 51-52-59/PUUVI/ 2008 terkait dengan pelaksanaan pemilu serentak. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pertimbangan hakim konstitusi dalam memutus Putusan Nomor 14/PUUXI/ 2013 tentang pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 2008 tentang Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Wakil Presiden terjadi inkonsistensi. Putusan Nomor 14/ PUU-XI/2013 memutuskan bahwa pemilu presiden dan wakil presiden harus dilaksanakan secara bersamaan dengan pemilu anggota DPR, DPR, dan DPRD. Sedangkan dalam putusan sebelumnya yaitu Putusan Nomor 51-52-59/PUU-VI/2008 pada pengujian pasal dan undang-undang yang sama (Pasal 3 ayat (5) Undang- Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 2008), Mahkamah Konstitusi memutuskan bahwa pemilu presiden dan wakil presiden yang dilaksanakan setelah pemilu anggota DPR, DPD, dan DPRD (tidak serentak) adalah tidak bertentangan dengan UUD NRI 1945 (konstitusional). Terjadinya pertentangan putusan ini antara lain disebabkan oleh perbedaan pilihan penafsiran konstitusi.Kata kunci: inkonsistensi, mahkamah konstitusi, pemilu serentak. ABSTRACTDuring this time, the presidential and legislative elections are conducted separately or not simultaneously. The Legislative Elections are always carried out prior to the General Elections of the President and Vice President. The general election is conducted separately as considerably having more negative impacts and inconsistency with the 1945 Constitution. This analysis uses descriptive analysis method with the pertinent laws and regulations approach. The formulation of the issue is what the Constitutional Court Justices took into consideration in its Decision Number 14/PUU-XI/2013 leading to differences to that of its previous Decision Number 51- 52-59/PUU-VI/2008 concerning the implementation of simultaneous elections. The analysis results show inconsistencies in the consideration of the Constitutional Court Justices in ruling the case through the Decision Number 14/PUU-X/2013 on the judicial review of Law Number 42 of 2008 concerning the General Elections of the President and Vice President. The Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/PUU-X/2013 decided that the General Election of the President and Vice President should be implemented simultaneously with the Legislative Election for the Member of the House of Representatives, the Regional Representatives Council, and the Regional House of Representatives. As for the previous decision, the Constitutional Court Decision Number 51-52-59/PUU-VI/2008 on the judicial review of the same article and law (Article 3 (5) of Law Number 42 of 2008), the Constitutional Court decided that the elections of the President and Vice President conducted after the Legislative Election for the Member of the House of Representatives, the Regional Representatives Council, and the Regional House of Representatives (not simultaneously) is not contradictory to the 1945 Constitution. The contradiction of these decisions is partly due to the variety of interpretation on the constitution.Keywords: inconsistency, the constitutional court, simultaneous elections.

Problematika Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Calon Tunggal Dalam Demokrasi Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurfaika Ishak
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Local Elections ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Political Awareness ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
The People ◽  
Election Process ◽  
Commission Regulation ◽  
Election Commission

<p><em>This study aims to explain the arrangements for a single candidate regional head election and how people's sovereignty is channeled into the democratic process of regional head elections. This type of research is a descriptive normative juridical study. The data used are secondary data in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials obtained through literature study. The results showed that the regulation of regional head elections with only 1 (one) pair of candidates began with the issuance of the Constitutional Court decision Number 100 / PUU-XIII / 2015 which was subsequently followed by the issuance of General Election Commission Regulation Number 14 of 2015 and Law Number 10 of 2016. Whereas the people are the determinants of government administration power through the regional head election process so that the people as the main activator of the wheel of democracy should not be hindered in choosing candidates for regional head leaders even though there is only one pair of candidates involved in the election. Election of heads must be carried out honestly and fairly so that political awareness by all citizens can be realized.</em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords: </em></strong><em>Local Elections; Sovereignty; Democracy.</em></p>

scholarly journals Analisis Pasangan Calon Tunggal Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Kota Pematang Siantar Tahun 2020

PERSPEKTIF ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 298-317
Author(s):  
Gary Timothy Hasian Purba ◽  
Subhilhar Subhilhar ◽  
Hatta Ridho
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
Political Party ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Candidate Pair ◽  
Local Election ◽  
Legal Power ◽  
Post Conflict ◽  
Legal Force ◽  
Descriptive Qualitative

The purpose of this study was to analyze a single candidate pair in the regional head election of Pematang Siantar City in 2020. The purpose of this study was to explain why there was a single candidate pair in Pematang Siantar City. The legality of the Constitutional Court Decision number 100/PUU-XII/2015 is a legal force to uphold the meaning of democracy in political contestation, in this case regional head elections. Besides that, the essence of democracy which promises freedom to be elected and to vote is an additional power to bring up a single candidate pair. The failure to regenerate political parties is another trigger for the emergence of a single candidate pair in the post-conflict local election. Not only in Pematang Siantar City but also throughout Indonesia. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative with interview instruments involving political party administrators and political observers in Pematang Siantar City in addition to references to single candidate pairs. The weak cadre of political parties with the presence of wholesale parties makes incumbents not get support in Pematang Siantar City. The legal power of the Constitutional Court's decision and the meaning of democracy to be elected and voted made the single candidate pair in Pematang Siantar City win the post-conflict local election against an empty box.

scholarly journals Peningkatan Calon Tunggal Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 134
Author(s):  
Christya Putranti
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
The Public ◽  
Commission Regulation ◽  
General Elections ◽  
Harsh Criticism ◽  
The Right ◽  
Regional Leaders

Regional Leaders Election (Pilkada) is an interesting matter to discuss, Pilkada regulations have undergone several changes, the phenomenon of change occurs starting from the appointment of a regional head, in which was initially elected by House of Presentatives (DPR) until finally returned to the public as people's sovereignty, the enactment of Law No. 1 of 2015 concerning about the stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perpu) No. 1 of 20114 which discussed about the Election of Governors, Regents and Mayors into a law which enforced the return of elections to be carried out by House of Presentatives  which led to harsh criticism from the public so in the end government restored the public's right to vote. Another interesting thing is that as a result of the people's sovereignty, the right to be elected and to elect the citizens, especially in regions, must be implemented. Unfortunately, the problem this has become a new problem, which was the delay in the implementation of regional elections. In Law No. 32 of 2004 concerning about Regional Government in which only regulates that regional heads are proposed through a combination of political parties and political parties, after the decision of  Constitutional Court Number 5 / PUU-V / 2007 individual candidates also can run for regional head candidates.  Law Number 18 of 2015 had been reviewed by the Constitutional Court Number 100 / PUU-VIII / 2015. The blank ballot box regulation then appears in General Elections Commission Regulation (PKPU) Number 14 of 2015 concerning about the election for Governor and Vice Governor, Regent and Vice Regent and / or Mayor and Vice Mayor upon follow-up to the Constitutional Court decisions. This study will focus on the increasing blank ballot box that continues to increase, starting from a single candidate with “agree and disagree" boxes to the enforcement of the blank ballot box. It means that from 2015 Regional Leaders Election experienced a significant increase. This research used normative legal research method by examining laws and regulations, General Elections Commission Regulation (PKPU), and literature studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document