Expression of Concern: Medical Flaws and Failure Support the Presumption that Vaccine Booster Shots Are Dangerous
Amid the rapid mutation of SARS-Cov-2 virus, leaders in the world are under pressure to contain outbreaks. It has been suggested that vaccine booster shots are the solution. Based on available evidence from medical literature, anyone would be compelled to find that booster shots are the best option. However, discovered flaws in the foundation of medicine give me a different perspective. I have proved that population model, symptom-based side effect research method, reductionist treatment approach, mathematical models, etc. used in researches produce grossly inaccurate findings. I have shown that side effects rated by the symptom-based revaluation method are obscured by massive organ reserve, and the superimposed affects of a large number of lifestyle-related factors can further obscure side effects of vaccines. When medical journals are heavy influenced by the drug industry, medical research focus has been steered away from taking up all flaws that must be addressed before vaccines performance can be evaluated correctly. I show that population-based research model, symptom-based side-effect evaluation method, and multiple disease causes model dramatically exaggerate vaccines’ benefit-to-risk ratios. Due to those flaws, the merits of vaccines cannot be based on the literal ratings of population studies. Thus, I urge world leaders to reject evidence that is acquired from deeply flawed research models and methods. To best resolve this issue, I will explore how booster shots can cause dangerous immune responses from a kinetic point of view. Then, I deeply examine three medical failures: the DES disaster, belated discovery of stress hormones’ roles, and failure to recognize the strict requirement of immune system balance. Deep analysis of those failures clearly support a finding that medicine is unable to determine latent adverse effects as a matter of course. When our theoretical findings and catastrophic failures are considered further in view of the repeated failures in predicting latent side effects in other products such as Roundup, “forever chemicals”, asbestos, agent orange, etc., I was compelled to make a presumption that vaccines booster shots are dangerous. Boosters shots may be justified only if unique personal circumstances can overcome this presumption by carefully considering personal health, special need and willingness to accept risks.