Suicide Attempters Showed More Anger than Non-attempters When Advising on a Hypothetical Life Dilemma
Objective: to explore wisdom and emotion as suicide attempters advised on a life dilemma. Method: a study was conducted with 130 adults, of whom 36 indicated a previous suicide attempt. In addition to advising a hypothetical protagonist of a friend’s betrayal, participants also completed scales of suicide risk, meaning of life, collectivism and individualism. Three well-trained raters rated their transcribed advice on wise reasoning; moreover, their micro-facial expression during advice-giving was analyzed by software Facereader7.1. Results: suicide attempters had significantly lower meaning of life, lower horizontal collectivism, and higher horizontal individualism than non-attempters. There was no significant difference in wise reasoning; nevertheless, the suicide attempters showed significantly more anger during advising than non-attempters. Moreover, a Support Vector Machine trained on the participants’ micro-facial expression during advice-giving predicted suicide attempt with an accuracy above chance, i.e., 72%. Conclusion: the lack of meaning in life is a potential cause of suicide. Horizontal collectivism, rather than vertical collectivism, is a buffer against suicide. Suicide attempters showed more anger than non-attempters when advising on a life dilemma. Therefore, the wisdom advising task may help to predict and therefore prevent suicide based on the participants’ authentic emotional reaction, instead of their verbal responses.