Position of Nepali Congress in the Electoral Politics of Nepal

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 32-42
Author(s):  
Amrit Kumar Shrestha

Nepali Congress (NC) is one of the oldest political party of Nepal. It played a vital role to abolish the century long autocratic Rana rule in 1951. It fought against the party-less Panchayat system and the regressive step of the king. It opposes active kingship and communism. It believes in a representative democracy. It has participated in every election of Nepal that was conducted democratically. It won more than two-thirds majority seats in the first general election held in 1959. In every election, it stayed in the first or second position. This article tries to analyze the status of NC in the elections of Nepal. Data of seven general elections were examined in this article. Data were extracted basically from the reports of the Election Commission.

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Andina Elok Puri Maharani ◽  
Rizma Dwi Nidia

<p>This research examines problems that arise and become obstacles in the process of organizing general elections and the challenges of the General Election Commission (KPU) in increasing voter participation in general elections.</p><p>The purpose of this study is to find out what obstacles arise in the implementation of the General Election related to the role of the KPU to increase public participation in general elections. This type of research is empirical research and the data used are primary data by conducting interviews with KPU commissioners accompanied by an analysis of secondary data in the form of legislation. The results of this study indicate that barriers that can interfere with the process of holding elections, arise from news hoaxes and some obstacles that are classified based on the group of voters. Every segment of society has different needs, so the method used to increase community participation is tailored to the needs of the community in each segment.</p>


2008 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 289-291
Author(s):  
Wayne P. Steger

Understanding why certain candidates get nominated is an important aspect of political scientists. This topic is a narrow one and influences a wider variety of subjects such as the political parties, general elections, and even the extent to which the United States is a democratic country. Presidential nominees matter—they become the foremost spokesperson and the personified image of the party (Miller and Gronbeck 1994), the main selectors of issues and policies for their party’s general election campaign (Petrocik 1996; Tedesco 2001), a major force in defining the ideological direction of a political party (Herrera 1995), and candidates that voters select among in the general election. This volume is devoted to presidential nominations and the 2008 nomination specifically.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-82
Author(s):  
I Kadek Andika Setiawan ◽  
I Gusti Bagus Suryawan ◽  
I Wayan Arthanaya

A failed general election will result in a re-election and will certainly require additional budget. The purpose of this research is to find out the mechanism for the implementation of the re-election and to analyze the use of the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget in the implementation of the re-election. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that the mechanism for implementing the re-election is a dispute over the results of the disputed General Election, by presidential candidates and members of the legislative candidates through the Constitutional Court decision. The mechanism for the provision of funds from the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget in the implementation of the re-General Election is the submission of additional costs by the General Election Commission to the Budget Institution and the Budget Department to revise the budget for the implementation of General Elections that are undergoing re-election.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Agus Manfaluthi

Objective research titled Judicial Review of Registration Mechanism for Independent Candidates and Political Parties in the General Election of Mayor and Deputy Mayor (Pilwali) in 2013 to determine the depth of the registration mechanism for independent candidates and political parties in the general election of Mayor and Deputy Mayor in Kediri. The question is whether Kediri has been carrying out the registration procedure in accordance with the rules applicable. To mind the new independent candidates Pilwali adopted in 2013 in Kediri where it is the first time to implement Election Mayor followed by independent candidates. This research is conducted using empirical methods to the scope of research locations in the Election Commission office Kediri. The result: Based on Law Number 12 Year 2008 began chapters 58 to 60, the General Election Commission (KPU), Kediri City has been implementing a mechanism for registration of candidates for May or and Deputy Mayor came from political parties, the combined political parties and candidates Individual earnest, result all independent either from independent or from political party and coalition of political parties passed the registration stage


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 71
Author(s):  
Uu Nurul Huda

The institutional arrangement of election organizers through the strengthening of the Election Supervisory Board is regulated in Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. One of these arrangements is related to the strengthening of the position and authority of the Election Supervisory Board in handling election violations. This study aims to find out the position of the Election Supervisory Board in Indonesian administration system and to analyze the authority of the Election Supervisory Board in handling election violations. The method used in this study was a normative juridical method by employing library research. The collected data were then analyzed qualitatively. The results showed that the position of the Election Supervisory Board in Indonesian administration system is one of the state election organizers in which its position is equal to the General Election Commission and the Honorary Council of Election Committee. Meanwhile, the authorities of the Election Supervisory Board include; receiving and following up on reports relating to alleged violations in the implementation of legislations governing general election; examining, analyzing and deciding on violations in general election administration; examining, analyzing and deciding on violations of money politics; and receiving, examining, mediating or adjudicating, and deciding upon the resolution of election process disputes. Based on these authorities, the Election Supervisory Board as an institution is a super-body general election organizer in handling election violations.�Penataan kelembagaan penyelenggara pemilu melalui penguatan Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum telah diatur Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum. Penataan tersebut salah satunya berkaitan dengan penguatan kedudukan dan wewenang Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum dalam penanganan pelanggaran pemilu. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis bagaimana kedudukan Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Indoensia, dan untuk mengetahui serta menganalisis wewenang Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum dalam penanganan pelanggaran pemilu. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan penelitian studi kepustakaan dan analisisnya� menggunakan� deskriptif� analisis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kedudukan Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum dalam sistem ketatanegaraan merupakan salah satu lembaga negara penyelenggara pemilu, di samping Komisi Pemilihan Umun dan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum. Adapun wewenang Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum di antaranya�menerima dan menindaklanjuti laporan yang berkaitan dengan dugaan adanya pelanggaran terhadap pelaksanaan peraturan perundang-undangan yang mengatur mengenai Pemilu; memeriksa, mengkaji, dan memutus pelanggaran administrasi Pemilu; memeriksa, mengkaji, dan memutus pelanggaran politik uang; menerima, memeriksa, memediasi atau mengadjudikasi, dan memutus penyelesaian sengketa proses Pemilu.�Berdasarkan wewenang tersebut, Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum secara kelembagaan merupakan lembaga penyelenggara pemilu yang superbody dalam penanganan pelanggaran pemilu.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 29-35
Author(s):  
Ta’mirotul Biroroh

The mechanism for transferring people's sovereignty is carried out through general elections to elect leaders and representatives of the people who will be mandated to carry out state and government affairs in accordance with the provisions contained in the legislation. One of the interesting developments from the point of view of the Indonesian state administration began when Indonesia experienced a transitional period of general elections (elections) which are one of the main pillars of democracy. In Indonesia, the existence of an election management body has existed since the 1955 general election until now. In every course of political history, Indonesia has several different institutional models of election management from time to time.  The General Election Commission in Indonesia it is called Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) is an institution that carries out the function of organizing elections in Indonesia. In addition to the KPU, there are institutions that also play an important role in the implementation of elections and are closely related to the existence of the KPU, namely survey institutions that carry out quick count processes. The survey institutions in a number of developing countries, especially those that are actively building democracy, are also not a little doubted by their moral honesty, at least being sued with a critical attitude such as the existence of a poll on the existence of a political survey institution, which has resulted in an attitude of uncertainty about the performance survey agency. This condition makes people less confident in the survey results which are considered no longer independent. It is proven that every time an election is held, a number of survey institutions seem to want to lead public opinion towards certain contestants. This is certainly very unfortunate considering that the survey results are one of the important instruments in democracy.


Author(s):  
Muhammad Mukhtarrija ◽  
I gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani ◽  
Agus Riwanto

This study raises the legal issue against the enactment of Law No. 7 of 2017 on General Elections in Indonesia. The law has violated the constitutional rights of new political parties of the simultaneous general election participants that began in 2017. The injustice is seen in article 222 which requires the provision of presidential threshold for political parties nominating the president and vice-presidential pairs based on the results of general elections in 2014. If this provision is applied, automatically the new political parties of the simultaneous general election participants in Indonesia do not have the opportunity to nominate a couple of presidents and vice presidents. Based on the Constitution of the 1945 Constitution, the president and vice president are nominated by a political party or a coalition of political parties participating in the general election. Considering the constitution applicable in Indonesia should every political party participating in the general election have equal rights and opportunity in carrying the candidate of president and vice president to be elected by the people in a democracy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
Eko Ady Prabowo ◽  
Muhlis Hafel ◽  
Agus Joko Purwanto ◽  
Anfas Anfas

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the policy of providing performance allowance to employees at the Secretariat of the General Elections Commission (GEC) Kota Ternate, as well as their supporting and obstacle factors. This research is a descriptive qualitative research by using case study. The research data were obtained from informants who were respondents, ranging from staff to officials at the Secretariat of the General Elections Commission Kota Ternate. The results of the study showed that although the implementation of the performance allowance was already running  there were still some deviations in its management, namely: 1) no socialization or training was held on the management of performance allowance involving GEC Kota Ternate; 2) there is no appointment of a performance allowance management officer, namely the Performance Allowance Management Officer or the control book Management Officer, therefore, it happens overlap working  with routine treasurer; 3) there is not a standard operating procedure (SOP) as an assessment standard that aims to provide an assessment and sanctions against employees who do not carry out their duties and functions. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 405-416
Author(s):  
Wandi Subroto

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of the socialization program carried out by the General Elections Commission as a medium of political education for the community. This study uses a type of juridical-normative research. The sources of law used in this study are secondary and tertiary sources of law. Sources of data were collected using questionnaires, interviews and literature studies. The location of this research was carried out at the General Election Commission office in Palembang. The data analysis method used in this study is a qualitative method which was collected during the research. The research respondents were 50 people who were selected using purposive sampling method. To maintain the validity of the data, field observation techniques and data triangulation techniques were used. Based on the results of the research data, it can be concluded that the socialization carried out by the General Election Commission of the city of Palembang was quite effective. This is supported by the strategy used, namely holding a political discussion forum, building an Election Smart House and carrying out direct outreach to novice voters who are in high school or equivalent, as well as two-way communication conducted by the General Election Commission of the city of Palembang.


1970 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 168-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duff Spafford

The working of the electoral system in Canada is investigated in this paper. The object is to identify the more important factors which go to determine the share of seats in the federal House of Commons won by a political party at a general election. Factors considered are share of vote, distribution of the vote and number of candidates in the field. The responsiveness of share of seats to variations in these factors is estimated by fitting linear equations by least squares to data for the fourteen federal general elections which took place in Canada between 1921 and 1965.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document