THE INFLUENCE OF STUDENTS LEARNING STYLE AND LEARNING INTEREST ON THE LEARNING OUTCOMES OF PHYSICS CLASS X IPA DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 132-143
Author(s):  
Albert Lumbu ◽  
Bonefasius Y Boy ◽  
Muhamad Akbar

This study aims to determine whether there are: 1) the influence of learning styles on physics learning outcomes, 2) the influence of interest in learning on physics learning outcomes, 3) the influence of learning styles and interest in learning together on physics learning outcomes in class X SMA Negeri 1 Nimboran . This research was conducted at SMA Negeri 1 Nimboran in April - May 2021. The subjects in this study were all 52 students of class X majoring in science and the objects of research were learning styles, interest in learning and physics learning outcomes. The instruments used are questionnaires and documentation. Data analysis was carried out using the Pearson correlation test with a significance level of 0.05 and a regression test which resulted in conclusions as a result of the study. The results showed that, 1) there was a significant influence of learning style on physics learning outcomes with a contribution of 50.8%, 2) there was a significant influence of interest in learning on physics learning outcomes with a contribution of 60.9%, 3) there were significant influence of learning style and interest in learning, together on the learning outcomes of physics with a contribution of 64.3% influence

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 114
Author(s):  
Abdul Halim

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS terhadap hasil belajar fisika, pengaruh gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar fisika, dan interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar tehadap hasil belajar fisika. Metode quasi eksperimen dan desain faktorial 2x3 pada taraf signifikansi α=5%. Sebelum uji lanjut dengan uji Scheffe dilakukan uji normalitas Lilifors serta uji homogenitas menggunakan uji F dan uji Barlett. Temuan penelitian ini menunjukkan ada pengaruh strategi pembelajaran terhadap hasil belajar fisika. Hasil belajar fisika siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar fisika siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS. Ada pengaruh gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar fisika. Siswa yang memiliki kecenderungan gaya belajar auditorial memperoleh hasil belajar fisika lebih tinggi dibandingkan hasil belajar fisika siswa yang memiliki kecenderungan gaya belajar visual dan gaya belajar kinestetik. Serta terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar fisika siswa.  Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, hasil belajar fisika Abstract: This study aims to determine the effect of STAD type cooperative learning strategies and cooperative learning strategies of TPS type to the results of physics learning, the influence of learning styles on the learning outcomes of physics, and the interaction between learning strategies and learning styles tehadap the results of physics learning. Method of quasi experiment and 2x3 factorial design at significance level α = 5%. Before the advanced test with Scheffe test is done Lilifors normality test and homogeneity test using F test and Barlett test. The findings of this study indicate that there is an influence of learning strategies on physics learning outcomes. The result of student physics learning taught by STAD type cooperative learning strategy is higher than the students' physics learning result which is taught by cooperative learning strategy of TPS type. There is an influence of learning styles on the learning outcomes of physics. Students who have a tendency of auditorial learning style to obtain the results of physics learning is higher than the results of physics learning students who have a tendency of visual learning style and kinesthetic learning style. And there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning styles to student physics learning outcomes. Keywords: learning strategies, learning styles, physics learning outcomes


Author(s):  
Nastiti ◽  
Wahyu Rika Agustin

The purpose of the study was to determine whether there was a difference between learning outcomes based on VAK learning styles (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) in Integrated Social Studies subjects for seventh grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Patianrowo. Researchers used a comparative quantitative approach with a comparative causal design or ex post facto. The population in the study were all students of class VII, amounting to 295 students and the sample was 59 students taken from class VII H and I. The sample was taken using simple random sampling technique. The study used a questionnaire and documentation as data collection instruments. While the data analysis technique used kruskal wallis. The results showed that good learning outcomes based on visual learning styles were 20%, low learning outcomes were 60%, and moderate learning outcomes were 20%. Furthermore, good learning outcomes based on auditory learning styles are 68%, low learning outcomes are 3%, and moderate learning outcomes are 29%. Finally, good kinesthetic learning outcomes are 22%, low learning outcomes are 73%, and low learning outcomes are 5%. Based on these results, it can be concluded that there is a significant difference in learning outcomes based on learning styles using the VAK learning style in Integrated Social Studies subjects class VII SMP Negeri 1 Patianrowo. This can be seen from the sig value. namely 0.000 <from the significance level of 5% (0.05).


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leny Hartati

<p>This study aims to determine the effect of learning styles and attitudes of <br />students in math on math learning outcomes. The method used is the method Expose Facto. The study sample drawn from a population with affordable proportional random technique, as many as 60 students. The instrument used in this study is a questionnaire instrument to measure learning style variables and variable attitudes of students in math, and test instruments, to measure the outcomes of learning mathematics. The research design used in this study is a 3 x 2 factorial design with three variables consisting of two independent variables, namely cognitive learning styles and attitudes of students in math, as well as the dependent variable, which is the result of learning mathematics. From the <br />data processing obtained the following results: (1) There are differences in mathematics learning outcomes of students who have a visual learning style, auditory and kinesthetic. It is in the show by the price of the F - count of 2,494 with a probability of 0.047 sig (sig &lt; 0.05) at significance level ? = 5 %. (2) The results of the mathematical learning of students who have a positive attitude at a higher math than students who have a negative attitude on math. It is in the show by the price of the F - count of 3,124 with a probability <br />of 0.018 sig (sig &lt; 0.05) at significance level. (3) There is no interaction between the learning styles of students in math attitudes toward math learning outcomes. It is in the show by the price of the F - calculated interaction probability value was 1.621 while sig. for interaction (learning styles * attitude of students in math) of 0.140 (sig &gt; 0.05). </p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Suci Febriani ◽  
Muhammad Taufik ◽  
Ni Nyoman Sri Putu Verawati

The aim of this research applied a quasi-experiment by factorial design 2x3 which was conducted to the student of MAN 1 Mataram is to find out the influence of guided discovery learning model combined with experiment method and VAK style due to physics learning outcomes. The population is the students from grade X MIA in MAN 1 Mataram. The sampling technique is using purposive sampling, where, grade X of MIA 1 as an experiment class and grade X of MIA 2 as a control. Data for learning outcomes are measured by applying multiple choice test while learning style of students using a questionnaire — the hypothesis test using ANAVA test of two ways supported by SPSS 16 with 5% significance level. According to the analysis results, it can be concluded that: 1) there is an effect of guided discovery learning model with experimental method toward physics learning outcome of students because of sig. <0,05;  2) there is no effect of VAK learning style on physics learning result in MAN students because sig.>0,05; 3) there is no interaction between guided discovery learning model with experiment and VAK learning style method of physics learning result in MAN student because of sig.>0,05.


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Junaidi Amin Sitepu ◽  
Samsidar Tanjung

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untu mengetahui: (1) hasil belajar IPS siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan metode pemelajaran role play dan hasil belajar siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan metode ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual, gaya belajar auditori, dan gaya belajar kinestetik, (3) interaksi antara metode pembelajaran dengan gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar IPS. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan rancangan faktorial 2 X 3. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis varians (ANAVA) dua jalur dengan taraf signifikansi 5 % (α = 0.05).. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar IPS siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan metode pembelajaran role play lebih tinggi dari hasil belajar IPS siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan metode pembelajaran ekspositori; (2) terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual, gaya belajar auditori, dan gaya belajar kinesteti; (3) terdapat interaksi antara metode pembelajaran dan gaya belajar  dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar IPS. Kata Kunci: role play dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar ips Abstract: This study aims untu determine: (1) the results of social studies students that learned by using learning role play and learning outcomes of students that learned by using the expository method, (2) the learning outcomes of students who have a visual learning style, learning style auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles, (3) the interaction between the learning method with learning styles in influencing learning outcomes IPS. The research method using quasi-experimental method with factorial design 2 X 3. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) two lanes with a significance level of 5% (α = 0,05) .. The results showed: (1) the results of social studies students that learned with learning methods play a higher role than the results of social studies students that learned with expository teaching methods; (2) there are differences in learning outcomes between students who have a visual learning style, auditory learning styles and learning styles kinesteti; (3) There is no interaction between teaching methods and learning styles to improve learning outcomes IPS. Keywords: role play and learning style on learning outcomes ips


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 212
Author(s):  
Endang Triastuti ◽  
Putu Sudira

This study aims at revealing the influence of: (1) teaching style towards textile learning outcomes, (2) learning styles towards textile learning outcomes, (3) the effect of from teaching style, learning style, and achievement motivation towards textile learning outcomes, (4) the significance of teaching style, learning style and, achievement motivation towards textile learning outcomes for individual or group. This research can be categorized as quantitative study with a correlational model. The data analysis used multiple regression analysis techniques. The results of the study showed that (1) there is a positive and significant influence of teaching style towards textile learning outcomes, (2) there is a positive and significant influence of learning styles towards textile learning outcomes, (3) there is a positive and significant influence from teaching style, learning style, and achievement motivation towards Textile learning outcomes, (4) the influence of teaching style, learning style and achievement motivation were 26.6% and the rest was coming from other factors.


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Bastian Manurung

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS terhadap hasil belajar fisika, pengaruh gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar fisika, dan interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar tehadap hasil belajar fisika. Metode quasi eksperimen dan desain faktorial 2x3 pada taraf signifikansi α=5%. Sebelum uji lanjut dengan uji Scheffe dilakukan uji normalitas Lilifors serta uji homogenitas menggunakan uji F dan uji Barlett. Temuan penelitian ini menunjukkan ada pengaruh strategi pembelajaran terhadap hasil belajar fisika. Hasil belajar fisika siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar fisika siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS. Ada pengaruh gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar fisika. Siswa yang memiliki kecenderungan gaya belajar auditorial memperoleh hasil belajar fisika lebih tinggi dibandingkan hasil belajar fisika siswa yang memiliki kecenderungan gaya belajar visual dan gaya belajar kinestetik. Serta terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar fisika siswa.  Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, motivasi berprestasi, bahasa indonasia. Abstract: This study aims to determine the effect of STAD type cooperative learning strategy and cooperative learning strategy of TPS type to physics learning result, influence of learning style to physics learning result, and interaction between learning strategy and learning style to physics learning result. Method of quasi experiment and 2x3 factorial design at significance level α = 5%. Before the advanced test with Scheffe test is done Lilifors normality test and homogeneity test using F test and Barlett test. The findings of this study indicate that there is an influence of learning strategies on physics learning outcomes. The result of student physics learning taught by STAD type cooperative learning strategy is higher than the students' physics learning result which is taught by cooperative learning strategy of TPS type. There is an influence of learning styles on the learning outcomes of physics. Students who have a tendency of auditorial learning style to obtain the results of physics learning is higher than the results of physics learning students who have a tendency of visual learning style and kinesthetic learning style. And there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning styles to student physics learning outcomes. Keywords: learning strategy, achievement motivation, indonasia language.


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Novidawaty Tambunan

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) Perbedaan hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1 antara siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map dan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori, (2) Perbedaan hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1 antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dengan kinestetik, (3) interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1. Metode penelitian yang menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi α = 0,05. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1 siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, lebih tinggi dari pada strategi pembelajaran ekspositori; (2) hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1 siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi daripada gaya belajar Visual; (3) terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1. Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, menggambar teknik Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) Differences in learning outcomes Drawing techniques 1 between students taught with Mind Map learning strategies and expository learning strategies, (2) Differences in learning outcomes Drawing techniques 1 between students who have visual learning styles with kinestetik, (3) interaction between learning strategy and learning style to learning result Drawing technique 1. Method research using quasi experimental method with 2 x factorial research designs 2. Data analysis technique using two-way ANOVA at significance level α = 0,05. The results showed that: (1) learning result Drawing technique 1 students taught by Mind Map learning strategy, higher than expository learning strategy; (2) learning outcomes Drawing techniques 1 students who have a higher learning style Kinesthetic than Visual learning style; (3) there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning styles on learning outcomes Drawing technique 1. Keywords: learning strategy, learning style, drawing technique


Vidya Karya ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 170
Author(s):  
Sri Nur Susilawati ◽  
Ma'ruf Ma'ruf ◽  
Ahmad Yani

Abstract. This study is an ex-post facto research that is correlational analysis that aims to analyze the significance of the relationship between science process skills and learning styles with students' physics learning outcomes. The population in this study were students of class XI SMA Negeri 8 Gowa. The research instrument used was a science process skill test instrument, a learning style questionnaire and a physics learning achievement test. The results showed that there was a significant relationship between science process skills and learning styles with the physics learning outcomes of XI MIPA students of SMA Negeri 8 Gowa. Keywords: science process skills, learning styles, learning outcomes Abstrak. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian ex-post facto yang bersifat analisis korelasional yang bertujuan untuk menganalisis signifikansi hubungan antara keterampilan proses sains dan gaya belajar dengan hasil belajar fisika peserta didik.  Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah peserta didik kelas XI SMA Negeri 8 Gowa. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan adalah instrumen tes keterampilan proses sains, angket gaya belajar dan  tes hasil belajar fisika. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara keterampilan proses sains dan gaya belajar dengan hasil belajar fisika peserta didik kelas XI MIPA SMA Negeri 8 Gowa. Kata Kunci: keterampilan proses sains, gaya belajar, hasil belajar


Author(s):  
Faza Reza Mohd Yunos ◽  
Mohd Razimi Husin

This research is conducted to identify the Relationship between Introversion and Extroversion Personality with Learning Style of UPSI students. This research is conducted to identify the relationship of the Introversion and Extroversion personality affect the by the Visual, Auditory and Kinesthetic (VAK) learning style. In addition, suitable activities are also discussed to suit the needs of introversion and extroversion personality. A total of 233 second year UPSI students were selected in this research. The data was collected using questionnaire and divided into two parts. The first part is the identification of the introversion and extroversion personality of the respondent and the second part is the learning style of the respondent which are divided into 3 parts which are Visual, Auditory and Kinesthetic. The data collected was then analysed using Pearson Correlation test. The Pearson Correlation test shows no significant between the introversion and extroversion personality of the respondent and the VAK learning style due to the p=.730. Suitable activities consist of hands-on and group activities is among the major suggestion collected from the respondent. In conclusion, although there is no significant between Introversion and Extroversion personality and VAK learning style, the teacher should pay attention to their students’ behavior in a learning environment to ensure the engagement of the students towards the lesson taught by them


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document