INVESTIGATING THE VARIATIONS OF HORIZONTAL (H) AND VERTICAL (Z) COMPONENTS OF THE GEOMAGNETIC FIELD AT SOME EQUATORIAL ELECTROJET STATIONS

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 539-557
Author(s):  
Aniefiok Akpaneno ◽  
O. N. Abdulahi
Keyword(s):  
Seasonal Variations ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Geomagnetic Field ◽  
Satellite Communication ◽  
Geomagnetic Latitude ◽  
Equatorial Electrojet ◽  
Geomagnetic Equator ◽  
Monthly Average ◽  
June Solstice ◽  
Baseline Values

This research is monitoring equatorial geomagnetic current which causes atmospheric instabilities and affects high frequency and satellite communication. It presents the variations of Horizontal (H) and vertical (Z) component of the geomagnetic field at some Equatorial Electrojet (EEJ) Stations during quiet days. Data from five (5) observatories along the magnetic equator were used for the study. Daily baseline values for each of the geomagnetic element 𝐻 and Z were obtained. The monthly average of the diurnal variation and the seasonal variations were found. Results showed that the variations of the geomagnetic element of both H and Z differ in magnitudes from one stations to another along the geomagnetic Equator due to the differences of their geomagnetic latitude. The Amplitude curves for Z) are seen to be conspicuously opposite to that of H), and there is absence of CEJ in Z- Component but present in H- Components. The  values during the pre-sunrise hours are low compare to daytime hours. Minimum variations of dH was observed during June solstice and maximum variations was observed during Equinox season. This study shows that daily variations of (H) and (Z) occur in all the stations. The enhancement in H is as a result of EEJ current.

scholarly journals INVESTIGATING THE VARIATIONS OF HORIZONTAL (H) AND VERTICAL (Z) COMPONENTS OF THE GEOMAGNETIC FIELD AT SOME EQUATORIAL ELECTROJET STATIONS

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 531-548
Author(s):  
Aniefiok F. Akpaneno ◽  
O. N. Abdullahi
Keyword(s):  
Seasonal Variations ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Geomagnetic Field ◽  
Satellite Communication ◽  
Geomagnetic Latitude ◽  
Equatorial Electrojet ◽  
Geomagnetic Equator ◽  
Monthly Average ◽  
June Solstice ◽  
Baseline Values

This research is monitoring equatorial geomagnetic current which causes atmospheric instabilities and affects high frequency and satellite communication. It presents the variations of Horizontal (H) and vertical (Z) component of the geomagnetic field at some Equatorial Electrojet (EEJ) Stations during quiet days. Data from five (5) observatories along the magnetic equator were used for the study. Daily baseline values for each of the geomagnetic element 𝐻 and Z were obtained. The monthly average of the diurnal variation and the seasonal variations were found. Results showed that the variations of the geomagnetic element of both H and Z differ in magnitudes from one stations to another along the geomagnetic Equator due to the differences of their geomagnetic latitude. The Amplitude curves for Z) are seen to be conspicuously opposite to that of H), and there is absence of CEJ in Z- Component but present in H- Components. The  values during the pre-sunrise hours are low compare to daytime hours. Minimum variations of dH was observed during June solstice and maximum variations was observed during Equinox season. This study shows that daily variations of (H) and (Z) occur in all the stations. The enhancement in H is as a result of EEJ current

THE STUDY OF LONGITUDINAL AND LATITUDINAL VARIATION OF EQUATORIAL ELECTROJET SIGNATURE AT STATIONS WITHIN THE 96°MM AND 210°MM AFRICAN AND ASIAN SECTORS RESPECTIVELY UNDER QUIET CONDITIONS.

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 511-532
Author(s):  
Aniefiok Akpaneno ◽  
Matthew Joshua ◽  
K. R. Ekundayo
Keyword(s):  
Seasonal Variation ◽  
Geomagnetic Field ◽  
Satellite Communication ◽  
Equatorial Electrojet ◽  
Latitudinal Variation ◽  
Magnetic Data ◽  
Horizontal Magnetic Field ◽  
Baseline Values ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Current Systems

Solar quiet current (S_q) and Equatorial Electrojet (EEJ) are two current systems which are produced by electric current in the ionosphere.  The enhancement of the horizontal magnetic field is the EEJ. This research is needed for monitoring equatorial geomagnetic current which causes atmospheric instabilities and affects high frequency and satellite communication. This study presents the longitudinal and latitudinal variation of equatorial electrojet signature at stations within the 96°mm and 210°mm African and Asian sectors respectively during quiet condition. Data from eleven observatories were used for this study. The objectives was  to determine the longitudinal and latitudinal geomagnetic field variations during solar quiet conditions, Investigate monthly variation and diurnal transient seasonal variation; Measure the strength of the EEJ at stations within the same longitudinal sectors and find out the factors responsible for the longitudinal and latitudinal variation of EEJ. Horizontal (H) component of geomagnetic field for the year 2008 from Magnetic Data Acquisition System (MAGDAS) network were used for the study. The International Quiet Days (IQDs) were used to identify quiet days. Daily baseline values for each of the geomagnetic element H  were obtained.  The monthly average of the diurnal variation was found. The seasonal variation of dH was found. Results showed that: The longitudinal and latitudinal variation in the dH differs in magnitude from one station to another within the same longitude due to the difference in the influence of the EEJ on them.

scholarly journals Solar quiet variation of the horizontal and vertical components of geomagnetic field using wavelet analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 450-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.O. Falayi ◽  
O.O. Ogundile ◽  
J.O. Adepitan ◽  
A.A. Okusanya
Keyword(s):  
Electric Fields ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Geomagnetic Field ◽  
Equatorial Electrojet ◽  
Magnetic Observatory ◽  
Ionospheric Conductivity ◽  
Time Scaling ◽  
Variation Rate ◽  
Field Aligned Current ◽  
Earth Conductivity

The solar quiet (Sq) variations of horizontal and vertical (SqH and SqZ) components of the geomagnetic field obtained from both the Northern Hemisphere and Southern Hemisphere of the International Real-Time Magnetic Observatory Network (INTERMAGNET) during solar maximum year 2001 were investigated. The results show enlargement of the SqH component of the geomagnetic field during the daytime, attributed to equatorial electrojet (EEJ) current closer to the geomagnetic equator at the electrojet stations (BNG and MBO), which are produced from large eastward flow of the current. It was observed that SqZ is positive at the southward and negative at the northward hemispheres. SqZ is amplified at HER and HBK around the daytime. Wavelet power spectrum based approach was employed to analyse the SqH, SqZ, and rate of induction (SqZ/SqH) time series in a sequence of time scaling from January to December. The higher energy of SqH and SqZ of the wavelet coefficients is noticeable at high frequency. The monthly variation rate of induction (SqZ/SqH) analyses during the Sq variations are associated with the influence of equatorwards penetration of electric fields from the field-aligned current, Earth conductivity, effect of the ocean, and ionospheric conductivity.

scholarly journals Influence of high-latitude geomagnetic pulsations on recordings of broadband force-balanced seismic sensors

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Kozlovskaya ◽  
A. Kozlovsky
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Geomagnetic Field ◽  
Geomagnetic Latitude ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Auroral Oval ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Geomagnetic Pulsations ◽  
Seismic Sensors ◽  
Magnetic Poles ◽  
Magnetic Disturbances

Abstract. Seismic broadband sensors with electromagnetic feedback are sensitive to variations of surrounding magnetic field, including variations of geomagnetic field. Usually, the influence of the geomagnetic field on recordings of such seismometers is ignored. It might be justified for seismic observations at middle and low latitudes. The problem is of high importance, however, for observations in Polar Regions (above 60° geomagnetic latitude), where magnitudes of natural magnetic disturbances may be two or even three orders larger. In our study we investigate the effect of ultra-low frequency (ULF) magnetic disturbances, known as geomagnetic pulsations, on the STS-2 seismic broadband sensors. The pulsations have their sources and, respectively, maximal amplitudes in the region of the auroral ovals, which surround the magnetic poles in both hemispheres at geomagnetic latitude (GMLAT) between 60° and 80°. To investigate sensitivity of the STS-2 seismometer to geomagnetic pulsations, we compared the recordings of permanent seismic stations in northern Finland to the data of the magnetometers of the IMAGE network located in the same area. Our results show that temporary variations of magnetic field with periods of 40–150 s corresponding to regular Pc4 and irregular Pi2 pulsations are seen very well in recordings of the STS-2 seismometers. Therefore, these pulsations may create a serious problem for interpretation of seismic observations in the vicinity of the auroral oval. Moreover, the shape of Pi2 magnetic disturbances and their periods resemble the waveforms of glacial seismic events reported originally by Ekström (2003). The problem may be treated, however, if combined analysis of recordings of co-located seismic and magnetic instruments is used.

scholarly journals Observed Auroral Ovals Secular Variation Inferred from Auroral Boundary Data

Geosciences ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 351
Author(s):  
Bruno Zossi ◽  
Hagay Amit ◽  
Mariano Fagre ◽  
Ana G. Elias
Keyword(s):  
High Frequency ◽  
Field Model ◽  
Geomagnetic Latitude ◽  
Auroral Zone ◽  
Secular Change ◽  
Polar Cap ◽  
High Frequency Signal ◽  
Area Increase ◽  
Northern And Southern Hemispheres

We analyze the auroral boundary corrected geomagnetic latitude provided by the Auroral Boundary Index (ABI) database to estimate long-term changes of core origin in the area enclosed by this boundary during 1983–2016. We design a four-step filtering process to minimize the solar contribution to the auroral boundary temporal variation for the northern and southern hemispheres. This process includes filtering geomagnetic and solar activity effects, removal of high-frequency signal, and additional removal of a ~20–30-year dominant solar periodicity. Comparison of our results with the secular change of auroral plus polar cap areas obtained using a simple model of the magnetosphere and a geomagnetic core field model reveals a decent agreement, with area increase/decrease in the southern/northern hemisphere respectively for both observations and model. This encouraging agreement provides observational evidence for the surprising recent decrease of the auroral zone area.

scholarly journals An early mid-latitude aurora observed by Rozier (Béziers, 1780)

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1139-1147
Author(s):  
Chiara Bertolin ◽  
Fernando Domínguez-Castro ◽  
Lavinia de Ferri
Keyword(s):  
Solar Activity ◽  
Geomagnetic Field ◽  
18Th Century ◽  
Geomagnetic Latitude ◽  
Careful Analysis ◽  
Universal Time ◽  
Low Latitudes ◽  
Solar Storms ◽  
Mass Ejection ◽  
Atmospheric Phenomena

Abstract. Aurora observations are an uncommon phenomenon at low and mid latitudes that, at the end of the 18th century, were not well known and understood. Low and mid geomagnetic latitude aurora observations provide information about episodes of intense solar storms associated with flares and outstanding coronal mass ejection (CME) and about the variation of the geomagnetic field. However, for many observers at mid and low latitudes, the features of a northern light were unknown, so they could easily report it as a phenomenon without explanation. In this work, we found that an earlier mid geomagnetic latitude aurora was observed in Beauséjour, close to Béziers (43∘19′ N, 3∘13′ E), France, by the abbot François Rozier. He was a meticulous botanist, doctor and agronomist with a special interest in atmospheric phenomena. On 15 August 1780, from 19:55 to 20:07 (Universal Time), François Rozier observed a “phosphoric cloud”. A careful analysis of the report indicates that he was reporting an auroral event. The recovery of auroral events at low and mid latitude during the 1780s is very useful for shedding light on solar activity during this period because there are few records of sunspot observations.

scholarly journals A Comparison of Equatorial Electrojet in Peru and East Brazil

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.G. Rastogi ◽  
H. Chandra ◽  
Rahul Shah ◽  
N.B. Trivedi ◽  
S.L. Fontes
Keyword(s):  
South America ◽  
Geomagnetic Field ◽  
Daily Variation ◽  
Equatorial Electrojet ◽  
Horizontal Component ◽  
Low Latitude ◽  
Vertical Field ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Western Side ◽  
The Magnetic Field

The paper describes the characteristics of the equatorial electrojet at Huancayo (HUA, 12.1oS, 75.3oW, inclination 1.5oN, declination 1.0oE) in western side of South America, where the geomagnetic field is aligned almost along the geographic meridian, and at Itinga (ITI, 4.3oS, 47.oW, inclination 1.4oN, declination 19.3oW) in eastern part of South America, where the geomagnetic field is aligned about 19o west of the geographic meridian; although the mean intensity of the magnetic field in the two regions are almost of the same order. Further comparisons are made of the current at Itinga and at Tatuoca (TTB, 1.2oS, 48.5oW, inclination 7.8o N, declination 18.7oW), a low latitude station in the same longitude sector. The daily range of horizontal component of the geomagnetic field, H, is shown to be almost 16% higher at HUA compared to that at ITI. The daily variation of the eastward field, Y, showed a strong minimum of -40 nT around 13-14 hr LT at ITI whereas very low values were observed at HUA with a positive peak of about 4 nT around 11- 12 hr LT. The vertical field, Z, showed abnormally large negative values of -70 nT at TTB around 13 hr LT. The day-today fluctuations of midday and midnight values of X field were positively correlated between HUA and ITI with a high correlation coefficient of 0.78 and 0.88 respectively. Values of Y field were also significantly positively correlated between HUA and ITI for midnight hours (0.72), while no correlation was observed for the midday hours. The midnight values of X field at HUA, ITI and TTB showed significant (0.90 or greater) correlation with Dst index. Correlation values of about 0.7 were observed between Dst and midday values of X at ITI and TTB and to a lesser degree (0.4) at HUA.

scholarly journals Intravaginal Devices and GNSS Collars with Satellite Communication to Detect Calving Events in Extensive Beef Production in Northern Australia

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (23) ◽  
pp. 3963
Author(s):  
Christie Pearson ◽  
Lucy Lush ◽  
Luciano A. González
Keyword(s):  
High Frequency ◽  
Satellite Communication ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Behavioral Changes ◽  
Very High Frequency ◽  
Average Activity ◽  
Newborn Calves ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite ◽  
Further Development ◽  
Very High

Observing calves at birth may help to identify risk factors for, and reduce, calf loss in extensive beef systems. The objectives of this study were to: (1) evaluate two commercial satellite birth alert systems to enable the observation of newborn calves and (2) assess behavioral changes of cows around calving. Vaginal Implant Transmitters (VIT) paired with Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) collars were worn by 20 cows in Trial 1 and 10 cows in Trial 2 to identify birthing events. The VIT and GNSS collars contained a temperature sensor, accelerometer, and very high frequency (VHF) to communicate with a handheld tracker, and ultra-high frequency (UHF) for communication between the VIT and GNSS collar, which had two-way communication using Iridium satellites. A change (Brand 1) or drop (Brand 2) in temperature of more than 3 °C and inactivity triggered the VIT to communicate an expelled alert to the collar, which transmitted the birth alert information via Iridium (device ID, date, time and geolocation of the GNSS collar at expulsion). Cows and calves were tracked in the paddock following a birth alert to assess their health and status. Overall, true birth alerts occurred in only 27.6% of devices. Cows remained active on the day of calving travelling 5.54 ± 4.11 and 5.00 ± 2.80 km/day compared to 6.45 ± 2.79 and 6.12 ± 2.30 km/d on days when calving did not occur for Trial 1 and 2, respectively (mean ± SD). Average activity of the accelerometer X- and Y-axis on calving day was reduced by 15%–20% compared to other days in Trial 1 (p < 0.05) but not in Trial 2 (p > 0.05). Results suggest that these two birth alert systems are not suitable for use in extensive systems and the further development of the technology is required. Cows in the current trials remained active on the day of, and after, calving, indicating that a faster, real-time alert system and communication protocol would be required to achieve the aim of finding newborn calves.

scholarly journals Magnetic local time dependence of geomagnetic disturbances contributing to the AU and AL indices

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 673-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Tomita ◽  
M. Nosé ◽  
T. Iyemori ◽  
H. Toh ◽  
M. Takeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Local Time ◽  
Geomagnetic Field ◽  
Field Data ◽  
Geomagnetic Latitude ◽  
Magnetic Activity ◽  
Auroral Zone ◽  
Magnetic Local Time ◽  
Geomagnetic Disturbances ◽  
Current Systems ◽  
Local Time Dependence

Abstract. The Auroral Electrojet (AE) indices, which are composed of four indices (AU, AL, AE, and AO), are calculated from the geomagnetic field data obtained at 12 geomagnetic observatories that are located in geomagnetic latitude (GMLAT) of 61.7°–70°. The indices have been widely used to study magnetic activity in the auroral zone. In the present study, we examine magnetic local time (MLT) dependence of geomagnetic field variations contributing to the AU and AL indices. We use 1-min geomagnetic field data obtained in 2003. It is found that both AU and AL indices have two ranges of MLT (AU: 15:00–22:00 MLT, ~06:00 MLT; and AL: ~02:00 MLT, 09:00–12:00 MLT) contributing to the index during quiet periods and one MLT range (AU: 15:00–20:00 MLT, and AL: 00:00–06:00 MLT) during disturbed periods. These results are interpreted in terms of various ionospheric current systems, such as, Sqp, Sq, and DP2.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document