scholarly journals Penerapan Peradilan Adat Berbasis Kuasi Yudisial Dalam Memutus Sengketa Adat

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 260
Author(s):  
Al Araf Assadallah Marzuki
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
National Court ◽  
District Court ◽  
Domestic Court ◽  
Legal Remedy ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
Customary Court ◽  
Legal Force ◽  
Judicial Hierarchy

The customary court is not a judicial institution that can decide a dispute with the direction of justice as in the national court so that recognition of customary decisions does not get permanent legal force which results in legal uncertainty in dispute resolution through customary court institutions. Thus, there is an idea that is offered in this research that implements customary courts as quasi-judicial in resolving customary disputes. Through normative juridical research, it is found that: first, the position of customary courts is only limited to deliberative dispute resolution, and in the judicial hierarchy its position is not recognized. Second, the quasi-judicial model that can be applied in customary courts can emulate KPPU in deciding disputes where to obtain permanent legal force, the KPPU's decision needs to be ruled by a district court, and if some object to the verdict, they can file an objection legal remedy in the domestic court. a period of 14 days from receipt of the decision on the parties.

scholarly journals Rejection of Accident Insurance Claims by Insurance Companies

NORMA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Berto Samudra
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Insurance Companies ◽  
District Court ◽  
Insurance Claim ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Remedy ◽  
Risk Takers ◽  
Premium Risk ◽  
Insurance Agreement

Insurance is a form of compensation for the occurrence of uncertain risks and the delegation of responsibility to bear those risks. The event of this risk is uncertain because it depends on uncertainty. The transfer of risk is carried out by making an insurance agreement or insurance agreement. The first party is usually referred to as the insured. The second is the party willing to accept the risk of the first party by accepting a payment called a premium. Risk takers are often referred to as insurance companies. The research method used in this study uses a legal approach research method (statute approach) and a conceptual approach (conceptual approach). Based on the results of this study, the researcher states that the basis or cause of the rejection of an insurance agreement is because the insurance agreement is a conditional agreement, where the insurer only bears the loss suffered by the insured party following the terms of the event that resulted in the loss to the insured as agreed, by the parties in the insurance agreement. Or the insured party does not carry out its obligations to pay premiums to the insurer. The legal remedy that the insured party can take if the insurer rejects the claim is to file a lawsuit at the local District Court, as regulated in Article 23 of Law no. 8 of 1999. It can be completed through the BMAI institution.Keywords: Insurance, Claim, Dispute Resolution.

scholarly journals Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase oleh Pengadilan dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XII/2014

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tri Ariprabowo ◽  
R. Nazriyah
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Binding Force ◽  
Arbitral Award ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
Mutual Agreement ◽  
Arbitration Award

Kewenangan pengadilan dalam proses penyelesaian sengketa melalui arbitrase antara lain, putusan arbitrase harus didaftarkan di Pengadilan Negeri. Menurut Mahkamah, Penjelasan Pasal 70 Undang-Undang Nomor 30 tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (UU AAPS) menambah norma baru dan menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum. Pasal 70 UU AAPS tersebut sudah cukup jelas (expressis verbis), yang justru menimbulkan multi tafsir adalah penjelasan pasal tersebut sehingga menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum yang adil. Mahkamah menyatakan bahwa, Penjelasan Pasal 70 UU AAPS bertentangan dengan Pasal 28 ayat (1) UUD 1945 dan tidak mempunyai kekuatan mengikat. Dengan adanya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XII/2014, bagi para pihak yang tidak puas terhadap putusan arbitrase mempunyai peluang yang lebar untuk dapat pengajukan permohonan pembatalan putusan arbitrase tanpa harus dibuktikan terlebih dahulu di Pengadilan. Hak para pihak untuk mengajukan permohonan pembatalan putusan arbitrase sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 70 UU AAPS dapat dikesampingkan berdasarkan kesepakatan bersama para pihak. Dengan demikian putusan arbitrase yang merupakan mahkota seorang Arbiter tidak mudah “tercabik” oleh suatu kepentingan. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XII/2014 harus diapresiasi dan secepatnya direspon oleh pembentuk undang-undang untuk merevisi UU No. 30 Tahun 1999 terkait dengan mekanisme pembatalan putusan arbitrase setelah adanya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut.The jurisdiction of the court in the process of resolving disputes through arbitration among other arbitral rulings shall be registered in the district court. According to the Court, the Explanation of Article 70 of Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (Act AAPS) adds new norms and creates legal uncertainty. Article 70 of the AAPS Act is quite clear (expressis verbis), the thing which leads to multiple interpretations is an explanation of the article so that this rises fair legal uncertainty. It stated that, Explanation of Article 70 of AAPS Law is contrary to Article 28 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution and has no binding force. By the decision of the Constitutional CourtNumber 15/PUUXII/2014, for the parties which are not satisfied with the arbitration decision, this provides wide opportunities to pursue cancellation request of arbitral decision without having been proofed in court. The rights of the parties to apply for the cancellation of an arbitral award under Article 70 of AAPS Law may be waived by mutual agreement of the parties. Thus the arbitration award which is the crown of an arbitrator does not easily "torn apart" by an interest.Constitutional Court decision should be appreciated and quickly responded to by the legislators to revise Law No. 30, 1999 related to the cancellation mechanism arbitration decision after the decision of the Constitutional Court.

KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN DALAM PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL DI INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Yuanita Permatasari ◽  
Pranoto ,
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
District Court ◽  
International Arbitration ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Recognition And Enforcement ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Legal Substances ◽  
Arbitration Award

<p>Abstract<br />This article aims to find out the recognition and enforcement of international arbitration award in Indonesia, as well as the authority of the courts in annulment the international arbitration award in Indonesia. This research is a normative and prescriptive legal research. The type and source of materials used is the source of secondary legal material. The legal substances used in this study are of two kinds, namely primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The method of collecting legal materials in this study is obtained through assessment of existing libraries, books, law journals, and court awards. Based on the result of the discussion, it can be concluded: Firstly, the international arbitration award can be recognized and enforced if the award is registered and obtain an execution from the Central Jakarta District Court. International arbitration rulings can only be recognized and enforced if they full fil the conditions in Article 66 of Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution law. Second, the international arbitration award is final and binding. However, in reality many international arbitration awards are requested for annulment to the Court in Indonesia.</p><p>Keywords: international arbitration award, annulment of international arbitration award, enforcement of international arbitration award</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengakuan dan pelaksanaan putusan arbitrase internasional di Indonesia, serta kewenangan pengadilan dalam membatalkan putusan arbitrase internasional di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif bersifat preskriptif. Pendekatan yang digunakan penulis adalah pendekatan kasus. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder, dengan teknik analisis bahan hukum menggunakan metode silogisme dan interpretasi dengan menggunakan pola berpikir deduktif. Berdasarkan hasil pembahasan dapat disimpulkan: Pertama, agar putusan arbitrase internasional dapat diakui dan dilaksanakan, maka putusan tersebut harus terlebih dahulu didaftarkan dan memperoleh exequatur dari Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat. Putusan arbitrase internasional hanya dapat diakui dan dilaksanakan apabila memenuhi syarat-syarat yang ditentukan dalam Pasal 66 Undang-Undang Nomor. 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Kedua, putusan arbitrase internasional bersifat final and binding. Sehingga, putusan arbitrase internasional tidak dapat diajukan upaya pembatalan putusan arbitrase. Namun, dalam realitanya banyak putusan arbitrase internasional yang dimintakan pembatalannya kepada Pengadilan di Indonesia.</p><p>Kata Kunci: putusan arbitrase internasional, pembatalan putusan arbitrase internasional, pelaksanaan putusan arbitrase internasional</p>

scholarly journals Kekuatan Pembuktian Wasiat Di Bawah Tangan dan Ratio Legis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bitung Nomor 43/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Bit. tentang Jual Beli Tanpa Adanya Bukti Tertulis

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 369
Author(s):  
Inca Nadya Damopolii ◽  
R. Imam Rahmat Sjafi’i
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Witness Testimony ◽  
Physical Evidence ◽  
Legal Consideration ◽  
Material Evidence ◽  
Laws And Regulations ◽  
Legal Force

This study aimed to analyze the force of private testament proofing and the judge's consideration in the Bitung District Court Decision Number 43 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Bit. about sale without any written evidence. The study used a normative research method with a statutory approach and a case approach. The results showed the power of private testament regarding the Bitung District Court Decision Number 43 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Bit. is strong, judging from the power of physical evidence, the power of formal evidence, and the power of material evidence. However, the sale carried out between the plaintiff and the defendant which was not in the presence of the Land Deed Official had weak legal force because it was not in accordance with the prevailing laws and regulations. In their legal considerations, judges used the principle of sale customary law only, namely light and cash, and witness testimony de auditu as evidence. This legal consideration was deemed inappropriate because it was against the Basic Agrarian Law and in general the witness testimony de auditu was rejected as evidence.

scholarly journals PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATION OF RELIGIOUS COURT COMPETENCE TOWARDS ENCUMBRANCE RIGHT EXECUTION

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 222
Author(s):  
Abd. Shomad ◽  
Rahadi Wasi Bintoro
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Philosophical Foundation ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Historical Approach ◽  
Legal Relationship

Religious court as forefront in economic sharia dispute resolution in litigation has not ideal place to perform their duty since there are still regulation conflicts such as implementation of encumbrance right execution which still becomes a domain in district court. As explained, this article discusses phi-losophical foundation of Religious Court competence to resolve economic sharia issues. In regard to this, conceptual approach, law approach and historical approach are respectively used. Based on the analysis, basic competence of religious court is Islamic personality principle which carries the use of Islamic law elements (sharia principle) in its legal relationship. From the analysis the implication is drawn that as long as a dispute belongs to economic sharia, then it is Religious Court which is com-petent to handle including court decision.Keywords: law enforcement, economic sharia dispute, absolute competence, court decision implementation

scholarly journals KEWENANGAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN DALAM MENANGANI SENGKETA ANTARA PT. SINAR MENARA DELI DENGAN SARI ALAMSYAH

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 392
Author(s):  
Samuel Samuel ◽  
Siti Nurbaiti
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
District Court ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Consumer Protection Act ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

In principle, the resolution of consumer disputes can be pursued peacefully. through an alternative mediation dispute resolution. In Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and Regulation of the Minister of Trade of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 / M-DAG / PER / 2017 concerning the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body does not impose limits on the authority of BPSK in handling and adjudicating a consumer dispute. However, in reality many times the decisions of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body (BPSK) are submitted to the district court and stated that BPSK is not authorized to handle such disputes. How is the authority of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Board in handling disputes between PT. Sinar Menara Deli and Sari Alamsyah are the issues discussed. The method used in this research is descriptive normative legal research, using secondary data and primary data as supporting data with the law approach. The results of the study illustrate that BPSK is not authorized to handle disputes between PT. Sinar Menara Deli with Sari Alamsyah, because the business actors in this dispute have submitted a refusal to be resolved through BPSK and not achieving the requirements for consumer disputes. It is recommended that BPSK members pay more attention to the provisions in the Consumer Protection Act and other regulations concerning the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body.

Part 1 General and Special Reports, 6 UNIDROIT: The Model Clauses for the Choice of the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts and Article 3 of the Hague Principles

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veneziano Anna
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
National Court ◽  
Regional Level ◽  
Appropriate Use ◽  
Choice Of Law ◽  
The Hague ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
The Way

This chapter looks at the relationship between the ‘Model Clauses for the use of the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts’ and Article 3 of the Hague Principles. The Model Clauses were drafted with the aim to give parties to international commercial contracts a range of options in order to make the most appropriate use of the UNIDROIT Principles (UPICC) in accordance with their interests and the specific circumstances of the case. At the same time, their goal is also to raise awareness on the variety of possible ways the UPICC may be used as an advantageous tool in international contracting and dispute resolution. Being drafted as choice of law clauses, they fit within the scope of Article 3 of the Hague Principles. Article 3 opens the way towards a wider acceptance of internationally recognized non-national codifications, expressly allowing the choice of ‘rules of law’, irrespective of whether the dispute is solved by an arbitrator or a national court, when such rules are generally accepted on an international, supranational, or regional level as a neutral and balanced set of rules. The UPICC are expressly cited, in the commentary to Article 3, as ‘rules of law’ satisfying such requirements.

scholarly journals INTEGRASI LEMBAGA PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA ALTERNATIF DALAM PROSES ACARA PERADILAN PERDATA: STUDI TENTANG PUTUSAN PENGADILAN YANG DI MEDIASI BERDASARKAN PERMA NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2008

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
AAN Roy Sumardika
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Negotiation Process ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Peace Agreement ◽  
Legal Concept ◽  
Legal Remedy ◽  
The Law ◽  
Court Proceedings

Mediation process means dispute resolution through negotiation process for obtaining a peace agreement between the parties by using a third party in settling the dispute. Article 130 HIR/154 RBg determines peace efforts may use since the trial began before a judge hands down the dispute. Mediation as part of the Alternative Dispute Resolution is a process outside the court, but Indonesian Supreme Court Rules No. 1/2008 integrates it in the court proceedings and allows the mediation process at the level of legal remedy. So the problem investigated is the court decision re-mediated and the peace agreement mediation results. The method used normative legal research by Legislation Approach and to deepen the research study also use a Legal Concept Analysis Approach which is intended to establish a view and legal arguments in solving the problem at hand. Case that has been decided by the courts is not possible to re-mediated. The mediation process at the level of legal remedy is contrary to the law, especially the provisions of Article 130 HIR / 154 RBg. Indonesian Supreme Court Rules as rules are hierarchically under the law (HIR/RBg) not justified material being regulated substance exceeding material are governed by higher laws. So Indonesian Supreme Court Rules No. 1/2008 can not be a legal basis to regulate the integration of mediation into the docket particularly about mediation at the level of legal remedy because the principle of lex superiori derogat legi inferiori and the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali not met.

KENDALA PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERBANKAN SYARIAH MELALUI PENGADILAN AGAMA KOTA MALANG

JURISDICTIE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 175 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Zulhefni
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Field Study ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Causative Factor ◽  
District Court ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Economic Problems ◽  
Descriptive Qualitative

<p>Authority to prosecute sharia economy is an Islamic Religious Court’s absolute authority. However, there are still a lot of Sharia economic problems presented to the District Court. This fact raises the question, what causes an Sharia economic dispute still filed in the District Court. This research is a field research or field study with a juridical sociology approach. As for method of analysis, the research used descriptive qualitative analysis method. Causative factor that make Sharia economic problems still exist in an environment of Public Justice is not caused by one party but the entire parties concerned in transactions of Islamic economy. In addition, the authorities in resolving the disputes also be the cause. There are at least 4 causes that can be categorized which is associated with the contract clause in terms of dispute resolution, the customer, the competence of religious court judges and the attitude of the District Court.</p><p><br />Kewenangan untuk mengadili perkara ekonomi syariah merupakan kewenangan absolut yang dimiliki Pengadilan Agama. Namun pada kenyataanya masih banyak perkara ekonomi syariah yang diajukan oleh pelaku ekonomi syariah ke Pengadilan Negeri. Hal ini menimbulkan tanda tanya, faktor apakah yang menyebabkan sengketa ekonomi syariah sampai saat ini masih diajukan di Pengadilan Negeri. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian field research atau studi lapangan dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis sosiologis. Adapun metode analisis data yang menggunakan analisis deskriptif kualitatif. Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini adalah faktor penyebab masih adanya perkara ekonomi syariah di lingkungan Peradilan Umum tidaklah disebabkan oleh satu pihak saja, melainkan seluruh pihak yang terkait dalam transaksi ekonomi syariah tersebut. Selain itu, pihak yang berwenang dalam menyelesaikan sengketa juga ikut menjadi penyebab. Setidaknya ada 4 penyebab yang dapat penulis kategorikan dalam penelitian yaitu sebab yang terkait dengan klausula akad dalam hal penyelesaian sengketa, nasabah, kompetensi hakim Pengadilan Agama dan sikap dari Pengadilan Negeri itu sendiri.</p>

scholarly journals Questioning the Customary Inheritance Law After Law No. 3 of 2006 about Religious Jurisdiction

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-122
Author(s):  
Yuli Prasetyo Adhi ◽  
Triyono Triyono ◽  
Muhyidin Muhyidin
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Action ◽  
Inheritance Law ◽  
Central Java ◽  
The Future ◽  
Narrow Space ◽  
Legal Product ◽  
Inheritance Laws

Customary inheritance dispute might occur when the heirs cannot reach agreement between divisions of property or during inheritance law point which will be used. Indonesia acknowledges 3 existing inheritance laws which are western civil inheritance law, Moslem’s inheritance law, and customary inheritance law. Legal action of inheritance law is usually resolved by deliberation but if there is no agreement reached between these processes, therefore court mechanism can be used to make law suit and dispute resolution. UU No 3 of 2006 about religious jurisdiction is a legal product that is issued to provide improvement (Amendment) against UU No 7 of 1989 about religious jurisdiction. UU No 3 of 2006 is giving significant impact against the existence of custom inheritance law in Indonesia. Before this constitution is created, religious jurisdiction can accept customary inheritance disputes for Moslem people according to the criteria which have been stated in UU No 7 of 1989. Since UU No 3 of 2006 is created, therefore customary inheritance law, even though the heirs are Moslem, must follow the district court mechanism. This will provide increasingly narrow space for the existence of customary law in the future. This program is held in Pati, Central Java, where custom inheritance law still exists and is being used in Pati community. Dissemination and harmonization regarding customary law is important to maintain sustainability and existence of customary law in Indonesia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document