scholarly journals The Urgency of the Harmonization of Interception Regulation in the Context of Law Enforcement

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 125
Author(s):  
Moh. Fadhil
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Right To Privacy ◽  
Legal Remedy ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Permit Application ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Subjects ◽  
Current Mechanism

Systems regarding the legal remedy of communication interception can be found in several regulations. However, those systems are not supported by horizontal harmonization since each regulation governs the mechanism differently, so there is a disparity among interception regulation. This paper analyzes the harmonization of wiretapping regulations in Indonesia from a law enforcement perspective with an inventory of regulations governing the current mechanism of interception. The results concluded that first, the disparity in intercepting authority of communication interception practice regulated by several institutions in the same form of crime eradication authority must be reformulated to restore overlapping regulations. Secondly, the interception regulation as a coercive force that derogates the right to privacy must contain detailed provisions in terms of a permit request and the wiretapping authority. The permit application must contain the purpose of the request for wiretapping permission descriptively. Moreover, these provisions must explicitly regulate legal subjects that are authorized to conduct wiretapping practice in the form of clear mechanisms and coordination with the direct superiors and court supervision regulating the interception procedure as well as the cooperation between law enforcement officials and telecommunications service providers. Third, prospectively interception regulations can be assessed from the political will of the legislators. The decision of the Constitutional Court No. 5/PUU-VIII/2010 mandates the need for horizontal harmonization of interception regulations in the form of the Interception Bill, which is also included in the 2019 National Legislation Program.

scholarly journals Kedudukan Perempuan dalam Hukum Waris Adat Batak Toba

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elpina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Social Culture ◽  
Kinship System ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Common ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Political Economic

Customary law is the law of life (living low) that grow and develop in the midst of the community in accordancewith the development of society. Customary law who live in midst of ethnic Indonesia is very strategic to be knownand understood by law enforcement officials, legal observers and guidance in applying the appropriate legal andfair for Indonesian society. The common law does not give the right role and the same degree between men andwomen in life, social, culture, political, economic and domestic life and marriage property and inheritance.Landing directly above the law would cause problems among indigenous peoples, especially the indigenous peopleembrace patrilinieal or matrilineal kinship system, such as that experienced by the Batak people who mbracepatrilineal kindship systems knows in Toba Batak society is patrilineal system, which through the male lineage andis the next generation of his parents while girls not the generation of their parents, as a result of this system is veryinfluential on the position of girls in matters of inheritance.

scholarly journals ANALISA YURIDIS PENYIMPANGAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM PADA KONFLIK LAHAN DI PROVINSI JAWA TIMUR

Arena Hukum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-66
Author(s):  
Teddy Putra ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Land Conflicts ◽  
Study Approach ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Judicial Administration ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Corrupt Behavior

Abstract This paper examines the deviations of law enforcement in land conflicts in East Java based on the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No.38/Pra.Pe /2015.PN.Sby (case of Notary Nora Maria Lidwina, SH). This empirical or socio legal research uses a case study approach. The results show that irregularities in law enforcement in land conflicts by public service providers and law enforcement officials are generally based on corrupt behavior and violations of ethical codes, such as abuse of power, maladministration, case brokers, accepting bribes from certain parties, violence, intervening in cases, and other human rights violations. Mitigation efforts are improving the law enforcement officers isntitutions; improving the judicial administration and justice management systems; imposing strict sanctions; conducting supervision; conducting a transparent service and treatment; socializing anti-corruption movement; and creating an anti-corruption culture and excellent public services.

scholarly journals Lembaga Jaminan Fidusia: Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Ari Wirya Dinata
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Methods ◽  
Power Relations ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Power Relationship ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Subjects ◽  
Legal Consequences

Fiduciary is one of the guarantees where the debtor has the right to control and take advantage of the goods that are used as fiduciary security objects. Article 15 paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of Law Number 42 Year 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantee regulates the execution mechanism for fiduciary security objects when the fiduciary giver (debtor) experiences breach of promise to the fiduciary recipient (creditor). So far, the execution mechanism for fiduciary security objects regulated in the Act creates legal uncertainty and harms the debtor's rights. Because it gives too much power to the creditor. The imbalance of power relations between debtors and creditors towards the handling of the problem of breach of contract actually causes an injustice in existing fiduciary institutions. The Constitutional Court, through decision number 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019, tries to return the fiduciary institution to the spirit of equilibrium relations between debtors, creditors, and fair fiduciary guarantees. After the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019. Has there been a harmonious power relationship between two legal subjects in fiduciary guarantees. This paper examines the pre and post fiduciary guarantee institutions of the Constitutional Court and analyzes the legal consequences that occur. This paper uses a type of juridical-normative research using primary data and primary, secondary and tertiary legal material. While the analysis method uses qualitative methods

scholarly journals La utilización de la cámara oculta en el periodismo de investigación : ¿El fin justifica los medios?

2012 ◽  
pp. 515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Magdaleno Alegría
Keyword(s):  
The Self ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Freedom Of Information ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Investigative Journalism ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Right To Privacy ◽  
The Press ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
The Right

Los métodos que utilizan algunos periodistas para recabar información generan importantes conflictos. En nuestro país, las técnicas de investigación periodísticas han cobrado interés como consecuencia de que la STC 12/2012 ha determinado la prohibición constitucional del uso de la cámara oculta. Se trata de una decisión polémica, pues algunos profesionales de la información consideran que dicho pronunciamiento supone el fin del periodismo de investigación, con los consecuentes efectos negativos para el funcionamiento del sistema democrático. Si bien se considera que en los casos estudiados por el TC hasta el presente momento deben prevalecer los derechos a la intimidad y a la propia imagen sobre la libertad de información, no se comparte su prohibición total, pues pueden existir casos límite que, como consecuencia de la imposibilidad de utilizar otros métodos alternativos para obtener la información y de la gran relevancia pública de lo informado, podrían justificar la utilización de la cámara oculta. De no admitir esta posibilidad, se impediría a la prensa ejercer su papel de «perro guardián público» y, por ende, no serían de conocimiento público muchas cuestiones esenciales para el autogobierno de los ciudadanos.The methods used by some journalists to get information generate important conflicts. Journalistic investigation techniques have gathered interest in our country due to the constitutional prohibition of the use of hidden camera in the STC 12/2012. It is a polemic decision, as some professionals of information consider it implies the end of investigative journalism and therefore a negative effect on democratic system’s running. Up to now, in the cases studied at the Constitutional Court, it has been considered that the right to privacy and one’s own image should prevail over the freedom of information. Even so, the complete prohibition of the hidden camera is not shared as there may be extreme cases in which its use could be justified both due to the impossibility of using other alternative methods as well as to the public relevance of the information. If that possibility was not to be admitted, the press could not practice its role as «public watchdog» and therefore essential matters for the self-government of citizens may not be public.

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak yang Menjadi Korban Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan di Bawah Umur

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Agustinus Yitsak Mannuel Kapitan ◽  
I Made Sepud ◽  
I Nyoman Sujana
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Sexual Intercourse ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Medical Assistance ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Sense Of Security ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Body And Soul ◽  
The Right

Legal protection is a legal effort that must be provided by law enforcement officials to provide a sense of security to the community both body and soul from interference and threats from any party. The protection of children who are victims of moral crimes is regulated in Law Number 23 of 2002 jo and Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection. This research was conducted with the aim of describing the legal protection of a child who is the victim of criminal acts of sexual intercourse and the criminal sanctions against the perpetrators of the sexual intercourse crime on a child. This research was conducted using the normative legal research method. Based on the results of the research and discussion, the legal protection for children who are victims of criminal acts of intercourse is regulated in Law No. 35/2014. Children who are victims are given protection in the form of medical assistance, psycho-rehabilitation, the right to restitution, the right to compensation. Criminal sanctions against the perpetrator of the criminal act of child sexual intercourse in decision number 58 / Pid.Sus / 2015 / PN.Tab, the perpetrator was sentenced to 7 (seven) years in prison and a fine of 150,000,000.00. Seeing the perpetrator's actions were very cruel, robbing other people's honor, namely his own daughter, the punishment that should be given to the perpetrator is the maximum punishment. If the fine cannot be paid, the defendant's sentence will be increased to 6 (six) months.

scholarly journals ANALISIS YURIDIS PENGATURAN IDEAL PENINJAUAN KEMBALI PERKARA PIDANA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 34/PUU-XI/2013

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agung Barok Pratama ◽  
Aminah . ◽  
Mohammad Jamin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Ideal

<p>Abstract<br />This article  discusses the ideal setting reconsideration after the Constitutional Court decision No. 34/PUU-XII/2013. This research is legal (judicial) normative, namely by reviewing library materials (literature study). Therefore, the data used in this research is secondary data, which includes the primary legal materials, secondary, and tertiary. The results of this study showed that realizing an ideal regulatory application for review should be conducted, first, the MA should retract SEMA 7 2014 it is necessary to avoid confusion law enforcement officials and people seeking justice so as to interfere with the judicial system. If want to make additional rules to facilitate the course of justice, the MA should be poured in the form of PERMA. Second, by accelerating the process of PK and execution. Thirdly, provision PK in the future submission must be adapted to the Constitutional Court decision No. 34/PUU-X/2013. That way the material truth and justice will actually be realized.</p><p>Keywords: Judicial Review; Justice; Rule of Law; Supreme Court Decisions.</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini meneliti tentang pengaturan ideal peninjauan kembali pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 34/PUU-XII/2013.Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum (yuridis) normatif, yaitu dengan mengkaji bahan-bahan pustaka (studi kepustakaan). Karena itu, data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data skunder, yang mencakup bahan hukum primer, skunder, dan tersier. Hasil Penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa, demi menwujudkan suatu peraturan yang ideal permohonan peninjauan kembali maka perlu dilakukan, pertama, MA harus menarik kembali SEMA No.7 Tahun 2014 hal ini ini diperlukan agar tidak terjadi kebingungan aparat penegak hukum dan masyarakat pencari keadilan sehingga dapat mengganggu sistem peradilan. Kedua, dengan mempercepat proses PK dan eksekusinya. Ketiga, ketentuan pengajuan PK kedepanya harus disesuaikan dengan putusan MK No. 34/PUU-XI/2013. Dengan begitu keadilan dan kebenaran materiil akan benar-benar dapat diwujudkan.<br />Kata kunci: Peninjauan Kembali, Keadilan, Kepastian Hukum, Putusan Mahkamah Agung</p>

scholarly journals Czy państwo może decydować o miejscu pochówku dyktatora? Komentarz do postanowienia hiszpańskiego Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z 17 października 2019 roku w sprawie ekshumacji szczątków Francisca Franco Bahamondego

2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 339-353
Author(s):  
Marta Kłopocka-Jasińska
Keyword(s):  
Family Life ◽  
The Body ◽  
Political Regime ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Francisco Franco ◽  
The Right To Privacy ◽  
Depth Analysis ◽  
Constitutional Right ◽  
Private Matter ◽  
The Right

This article comments on the Spanish Constitutional Court’s order of 17 October 2019, ATC 119/2020, regarding the exhumation and transfer of the remains of Francisco Franco Bahamonde from the Valley of the Fallen. Franco’s relatives brought a constitutional complaint before the Constitutional Court against the resolutions of the Council of Ministers of 15 February and 15 March 2019, which concerned the exhumation of the dictator’s remains and their transfer to the Mingorrrubio Cemetery in El Pardo. This was done against the wishes of the family, who had indicated another location. The applicants submitted, inter alia, that their right to respect for private and family life had been violated. In fact, certain issues relating to the treatment of the body of a deceased person fall within the scope of the right to privacy. However, the Spanish Court did not accept the applicants’ plea and held that there was no violation of the constitutional right. It justified its decision on the grounds that the right to protection of private and family life is not absolute and is subject to limitations, and that the measures applied in this case were in line with a “constitutionally legitimate aim,” proportionate and necessary. The Court’s decision is correct, although its reasoning leaves much to be desired. The Court could have strengthened its argumentation with, first, a more in-depth analysis of proportionality, and, second, with reference to Strasburg standards. In particular, as the Court pointed out, the historical and political importance of the person at the head of the political regime established after the civil war and acting as head of state meant that the decision on where to bury his remains went beyond the dimension of an individual private matter.

scholarly journals Warrantless Search and Seizures by the South African Police Service: Weighing up the Right to Privacy versus the Prevention of Crime

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 1-27
Author(s):  
Windell Nortje
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Search And Seizure ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Right To Privacy ◽  
The Right To Privacy ◽  
Reasonable Suspicion ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Search Warrant ◽  
Prevention Of Crime ◽  
The Right

The constitutional right to privacy is enshrined in section 14 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. It is premised on the notion that all persons should be protected from intrusions on their privacy by any person or institution. The Constitutional Court has also, on numerous occasions, held that the right to privacy is bolstered by its connection with the right to human dignity. It is undeniable that every person's right to privacy should be protected. However, a person's right to privacy is violated when police officials conduct warrantless search and seizure operations. Generally section 22 of the Criminal Procedure Act provides for warrantless search and seizure operations when a police official has a reasonable suspicion that a search warrant will be issued to him and that a delay in obtaining such a warrant would defeat the object of the search. Warrantless searches are important for the prevention of crime, but recent case law has suggested that there has been a progressive shift towards protecting the right to privacy of the individual subjected to warrantless searches, since there are a number of laws besides section 22 that regulate warrantless searches and which have been declared to be constitutionally invalid. This article seeks to demonstrate that the current regulatory framework for warrantless searches should be reviewed in order to protect the legitimacy of the police as well as the dignity and privacy of the citizens of South Africa.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document