scholarly journals COVID-19 pandemic and Thyroid cancer treatment in perspective of Bangladesh

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-181
Author(s):  
Mahmud Asif Rifat ◽  
Mostafa Kamal Arefin ◽  
Abu Yusuf Fakir ◽  
SK Nurul Fattah Rumi ◽  
Husne Qumer Osmany ◽  
...  

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh is part of the worldwide pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 which has crowded out services for both covid and non-covid patients, in a country where the health care system was already under huge stress even before the pandemic. Objectives: To postpone non-urgent surgeries along with active surveillance of thyroid cancer patients to make sure the hospitals are not unnecessarily occupied. Methods: Document based categorization of thyroid cancer patients, like- low risk, high risk and clinically extremely vulnerable groups who are at greatest risk of severe illness from coronavirus are to be done accordingly. Individuals with thyroid cancer are mostly not susceptible to COVID- 19. However, patients with thyroid cancer (papillary or medullary) having lung metastases or undergoing certain types of cancer treatment might be at increased risk of viral infection or complications. Risk benefit ratio is checked and explained to the patient and their attendants. Recommendations: As COVID-19 is spreading across the Bangladesh, hospitals are being forced to reallocate resources to the care of critically ill. So it is crucial to adhere to the advice from experts to reduce the risk of infection. All non-essential surgeries and hospital admissions can be postponed to make sure that hospitals are not unnecessarily occupied. Conclusion: In the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, cancer care has had to adapt rapidly given recommendations to postpone nonurgent surgeries with active surveillance of thyroid cancer patients except thyroid tumors requiring acute airway management. J Dhaka Medical College, Vol. 29, No.2, October, 2020, Page 178-181

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6581-6581
Author(s):  
Alexander Qian ◽  
Edmund Qiao ◽  
Vinit Nalawade ◽  
Nikhil V. Kotha ◽  
Rohith S. Voora ◽  
...  

6581 Background: Hospital readmission are associated with unfavorable patient outcomes and increased costs to the healthcare system. Devising interventions to reduce risks of readmission requires understanding patients at highest risk. Cancer patients represent a unique population with distinct risk factors. The purpose of this study was to define the impact of a cancer diagnosis on the risks of unplanned 30-day readmissions. Methods: We identified non-procedural hospital admissions between January through November 2017 from the National Readmission Database (NRD). We included patients with and without a cancer diagnosis who were admitted for non-procedural causes. We evaluated the impact of cancer on the risk of 30-day unplanned readmissions using multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression models. Results: Out of 18,996,625 weighted admissions, 1,685,099 (8.9%) had record of a cancer diagnosis. A cancer diagnosis was associated with an increased risk of readmission compared to non-cancer patients (23.5% vs. 13.6%, p < 0.001). However, among readmissions, cancer patients were less likely to have a preventable readmission (6.5% vs. 12.1%, p < 0.001). When considering the 10 most common causes of initial hospitalization, cancer was associated with an increased risk of readmission for each of these 10 causes (OR range 1.1-2.7, all p < 0.05) compared to non-cancer patients admitted for the same causes. Compared to patients aged 45-64, a younger age was associated with increased risk for cancer patients (OR 1.29, 95%CI [1.24-1.34]) but decreased risk for non-cancer patients (OR 0.65, 95%CI [0.64-0.66]). Among cancer patients, cancer site was the most robust individual predictor for readmission with liver (OR 1.47, 95%CI [1.39-1.55]), pancreas (OR 1.36, 95%CI [1.29-1.44]), and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (OR 1.35, 95%CI [1.29-1.42]) having the highest risk compared to the reference group of prostate cancer patients. Conclusions: Cancer patients have a higher risk of 30-day readmission, with increased risks among younger cancer patients, and with individual risks varying by cancer type. Future risk stratification approaches should consider cancer patients as an independent group with unique risks of readmission.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4108-4108
Author(s):  
Lindsay F Schwartz ◽  
Marcia M Tan ◽  
Julie S McCrae ◽  
Tiffany Burkhardt ◽  
Kirsten K. Ness ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims: Childhood and adolescent/young adult (AYA) cancer survivors are at increased risk for emotional distress, chronic health conditions, and premature mortality compared to peers with no cancer history. Some, but not all, of this increased risk is explained by cancer- and treatment-related exposures. Because cancer treatment remains necessary to achieve cure, it is critical to identify and target other factors to reduce sub-optimal outcomes. Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) are traumatic events occurring during childhood, such as experiencing violence and/or neglect, which are associated with poor mental health, chronic health conditions, and premature mortality in the adult general population. Little is known on how ACEs impact health in children and AYAs with cancer. Research indicates that otherwise healthy individuals exposed to ACEs experience fewer adverse health outcomes if they possess resilience, which can be learned. This provides a potential target for intervention. This pilot study aimed to identify demographic characteristics associated with ACEs and resilience as well as associations between ACEs, resilience, and the presence of chronic medical conditions, mental health issues, and substance abuse in children and AYAs with cancer. Methods: Childhood and AYA leukemia and lymphoma patients undergoing cancer treatment at the University of Chicago were included for analysis (N=38, 55.26% female, 50% non-Hispanic white, mean age at assessment 14.74±6.97 years). Participants ≤17 years old completed the study with one parent/caregiver. ACEs were measured using age-specific instruments adapted from the original ACEs study by Kaiser Permanente and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Resilience was analyzed using age-specific instruments provided by the Resilience Research Centre, and resilience scores were categorized as low (≤62), moderate (63-70), high (71-76), and exceptional (≥77). For participants 0-11 years old, a parent/guardian completed the study on their behalf. 12-17 year old participants and their parent/guardian both completed the study, and participants over 18 completed the study alone. Descriptive statistics characterized demographic, biologic, treatment, and health behavior variables. The association between total scores for ACEs and resilience were measured using Pearson's correlation. Regression analysis assessed ACEs (logistic model) and resilience scores (linear model) adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, household income, and insurance type. Participants were then stratified, and two sample t-tests compared potential outcomes based on ACE exposures. Results: 23 participants (60.53%) reported prior ACEs (mean total number of ACEs 1.45±1.77; range 1-7), and the mean resilience score for participants was 73.76±9.61 (range 49-85) indicating high resilience overall. Regression analyses showed the odds of reporting ACEs increased with age (OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.02-1.37), while resilience scores decreased with age (β=0.76; t(32)=-2.74, p=0.01) holding other variables constant. Sex, race/ethnicity, household income, and insurance type were not associated with ACEs or resilience scores. There was a strong negative correlation between the total number of ACEs and resilience, r(36)=-0.57, p&lt;0.01; the total number of ACEs explained 32% of the variation in resilience scores. Compared to participants who did not report prior ACEs, those with ACEs were more likely to report chronic medical conditions, t(31.41)=-2.47, p=0.02, prior psychiatric diagnoses or mental health issues, t(34.16)=-2.13, p=0.04, as well as substance abuse t(31.41)=-2.47, p=0.02. Conclusions: ACEs were associated with endorsement of chronic medical conditions, mental health issues, and substance abuse in our sample of childhood and AYA patients currently receiving cancer treatment. As the total number of ACEs increased, resilience scores decreased for participants. The results of this study provide the groundwork for further investigations of ACEs and resilience in large cohorts of childhood and AYA cancer patients and survivors. This future work could provide valuable information for creating and implementing interventions designed for childhood and AYA cancer patients and survivors who have experienced ACEs, thus potentially reducing additional morbidity and premature mortality for these high-risk patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Zhao ◽  
Shenglan Tang ◽  
Wenhui Mao ◽  
Tomi F Akinyemiju

Abstract Background In China, cancer deaths account for one-fifth of all deaths and exert a heavy toll on patients, families, healthcare systems, and society as a whole. This study aims to examine socio-economic and rural-urban differences in treatment, healthcare service utilization and catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) among Chinese cancer patients, and to investigate the relationship between different treatment types and healthcare service use as well as incidence of CHE. Methods We analyzed a nationally representative sample from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study including 17,224 participants in 2011 and 19,569 participants in 2015. Multivariable regression models were performed to investigate the association of cancer treatments with healthcare service utilization and CHE. Results The age-adjusted prevalence of cancer is 1.37% for 2011 and 1.84% for 2015. Approximately half of the cancer patients utilized treatment for their disease, with a higher proportion of urban residents (54%) than rural residents (46%) receiving cancer treatment in 2015. CHE declined by 22% in urban areas (25% in 2011 and 19% in 2015) but increased by 31% in rural areas (25% in 2011 to 33% in 2015). There was a positive relationship between cancer treatment and outpatient visit (OR = 2.098, 95% CI = 1.453, 3.029), admission to hospital (OR = 1.961, 95% CI = 1.346, 2.857) and CHE (OR = 1.796, 95% CI = 1.231, 2.620). Chemotherapy and surgery were each associated with a 2-fold increased risk of CHE. Conclusions Meaningful changes to improve health insurance benefit packages are needed to ensure universal, affordable and patient-centered health coverage for the Chinese cancer patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (17) ◽  
pp. 4032
Author(s):  
Chun-Hao Kao ◽  
Chi-Hsiang Chung ◽  
Wu-Chien Chien ◽  
Daniel Hueng-Yuan Shen ◽  
Li-Fan Lin ◽  
...  

(1) Background: This study aimed to investigate the association between radioactive iodine (RAI) and long-term cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity/mortality in thyroid cancer. (2) Methods: The study was conducted using data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database during 2000–2015. Thyroid cancer patients aged ≥20 years were categorized into RAI (thyroidectomy with RAI) and non-RAI (thyroidectomy only) groups. The Cox proportional hazard regression model and Kaplan–Meier method were used for analysis. (3) Results: A total of 13,310 patients were included. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated that the two groups had similar cumulative risks of CVD (log-rank p = 0.72) and CVD-specific mortality (log-rank p = 0.62). On Cox regression analysis of different RAI doses, the risk of CVD was higher in the cumulative dosage >3.7 GBq (hazard ratio = 1.69, 95% confidence interval = 1.24–2.40, p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: RAI was not associated with an increased risk of CVD in thyroid cancer. However, CVD surveillance is indicated in the patients receiving the cumulative RAI dosage above 3.7 GBq.


2021 ◽  
pp. 39-40
Author(s):  
Rajeev Kasaliwal ◽  
Srishti Jain ◽  
Naveen Gupta ◽  
Nimish Mathur ◽  
Ashish Jain ◽  
...  

Context: Following rapid spread of COVID-19, WHO on March 11, 2020, declared COVID-19 a global pandemic. Diabetes is known to confer increased risk for various infections. Studies from outside India have shown more aggressive course of COVID 19 Pneumonia in diabetic patients. Material and methods:Aretrospective observational study was carried out at Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur. Data from electronic medical records of seven thirty-one patient admitted from 15 October 2020 to 30 November 2020 were reviewed and analysed Results: Patients with diabetes had signicantly higher need of oxygen therapy and ICU admission. No difference was observed in mortality rates in the two group of patients.Conclusion: Diabetes patients appear to be at higher risk of severe illness from COVID-19 than those without diabetes.


2008 ◽  
Vol 139 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P35-P36
Author(s):  
Mrinal Supriya ◽  
Louise Santangeli ◽  
Muhammad Shakeel ◽  
Kim Ah-See

Objective Can we control MRSA incidence in head and neck cancer patients by 1) Active surveillance cultures of patients fulfilling Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) & Scottish Infection Standards and Strategy (SISS) guideline? 2) Cohorting these patients? 3) Restricted Health Care Workers (HCW) access? Methods Prospective case series: July 2007–January 2008. 26 preoperative head and neck cancer patients had a questionnaire filled in to identify known predictors for MRSA as suggested by SISS Group. Intervention: Preoperative nasal swabs, cohorting away from other cases, restricted access. MRSA incidence compared to that over the preceding year(Jan 2006-Jan 2007). Results 26 eligible patients. None of them had known risk factors for MRSA. 17 patients had swabs taken pre-admission. All screened patients were non-carriers of MRSA in their nose and none of them developed MRSA infection during hospital stay. Of remaining 9 patients swabbed after admission, 3 developed MRSA during hospital stay. The incidence of MRSA was 11.5% (3/26) during study period, compared to 28.5% (24/84) the year before implementing these interventions. Conclusions Head and neck cancer patients do not have increased risk factors for MRSA colonization and their active surveillance cultures are unlikely to influence MRSA incidence. Cohorting these patients with restricted HCW access decreased the MRSA rate at our centre.


Thyroid ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neha Janmohamed ◽  
Phillip Segal ◽  
Annmarie Corrado ◽  
Aisha Lofters ◽  
Patricia Nguyen ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 979-984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Allebeck ◽  
Christina Bolund

SYNOPSISSuicides and suicide attempts in cancer patients were analysed by following all patients treated for cancer in Stockholm County from 1975 to 1985. Among 59845 patients we identified 144 suicides and 196 suicide attempts during the follow-up, which represents a more than two-fold excess mortality from suicide and a moderately increased rate of suicide attempts. Although the absolute number of deaths from suicide in cancer patients is low, the increased risk highlights the problems of coping with severe illness and the need for psychological and social support in cancer care.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 2917
Author(s):  
Evgenii Shumilov ◽  
Petra Hoffknecht ◽  
Raphael Koch ◽  
Rudolf Peceny ◽  
Steffen Voigt ◽  
...  

Oncologists face challenges in the management of SARS-CoV-2 infections and post-SARS-CoV-2 cancer treatment. We analyzed diagnostic, clinical and post-SARS-CoV-2 scenarios in patients from three German cancer centers with RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Sixty-three patients with SARS-CoV-2 and hematologic or solid neoplasms were included. Thirty patients were initially asymptomatic, 10 of whom developed COVID-19 symptoms subsequently. Altogether 20 (32%) patients were asymptomatic, 18 (29%) had mild, 12 (19%) severe and 13 (20%) critical courses. Lymphocytopenia increased risk of severe/critical COVID-19 three-fold (p = 0.015). Asymptomatic course was not associated with age, remission status, therapies or co-morbidities. Secondary bacterial infection accompanied more than one third of critical COVID-19 cases. Treatment was delayed post-SARS-CoV-2 in 46 patients, 9 of whom developed progressive disease (PD). Cancer therapy was modified in 8 SARS-CoV-2 survivors because of deteriorating performance or PD. At the last follow-up, 17 patients had died from COVID-19 (n = 8) or PD (n = 9) giving an estimated 73% four-month overall survival rate. SARS-CoV-2 infection has a heterogenous course in cancer patients. Lymphocytopenia carries a significant risk of severe/critical COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 disruption of therapy is as serious as SARS-CoV-2 infection itself. Careful surveillance will allow early restart of the anti-cancer treatment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Xiaohong Liang ◽  
Yinan Cheng ◽  
Weijun Zhou ◽  
Jun Ni ◽  
Yuqing Li ◽  
...  

Background. Metastasis is one of the most prevalent causes of death in cancer patients and the lungs are among the organs most commonly affected by metastasis. However, analysis of the incidence and prognosis of lung metastasis (LM) based on primary cancer sites is lacking. Methods. We enrolled cancer patients with LM from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The risk factors for LM were determined using multivariate logistics regression. Forest plots were used to compare the impact of with LM versus without LM alone among different primary caner site subgroups. Results. Among 1,525,441 cases, 47,537 presented with LM at initial diagnosis. Multivariate logistics regression revealed that male sex, older age, later T/N stage, unmarried status, and lack of insurance were risk factors for LM. The incidence of LM was 11.91% in bone cancer and 11.19% in pancreatic cancer. In terms of the distribution of primary cancers, 19.22% of LMs originated from the colon and rectum, with 11.63% from the kidneys. The median survival for LM cases was 6 months, with the best survival in testicular cancer (19 months) and bone cancer (12 months). Patients with LM had higher hazard ratio (HR) for mortality compared to those without LM, except for those with primary cancer in the brain ( P = 0.09 ). We stratified patients by primary cancer site, and subgroup analyses showed that LM had a significant negative impact on survival. The most significant was in thyroid cancer (HR = 44.79), followed by melanoma (HR = 24.26), prostate (HR = 16.0), breast (HR = 13.46), endometrial (HR = 12.64), testicular (HR = 12.31), and kidney (HR = 11.33) cancer (all P < 0.001 ). Conclusion. Patients presenting with LM had higher HR for mortality compared to those without LM, except for those with brain tumor. Clinicians should pay more attention to the occurrence of LM, especially in patients with a significantly increased HR for mortality, such as those with thyroid cancer, melanoma, and prostate cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document