CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE SEBAGAI HAK CIPTA INTERNASIONAL DITINJAU BERDASARKAN ASPEK HUKUM INDONESIA

Perkembangan teknologi khususnya internet telah mempermudah masyarakat untuk mengakses dan mendistribusikan informasi. Namun, kegiatan seperti copy-cut-paste (menyalin-memotong-menempel), menyunting (editing) ataupun berbagi dokumen (file sharing) justru menimbulkan hal kontradiktif terhadap hukum hak cipta. Berdasarkan hal tersebut tahun 2002 sebuah organisasi nirlaba membuat inovasi dan terobosan yang memungkinkan berbagi dan menggunakan kreativitas dan pengetahuan melalui alat hukum gratis. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan fokus pada pendekatan perundang-undangan dan analisis konten. Berdasarkan analisis pembahasan creative commons bukanlah alternatif dari hukum hak cipta, melainkan bekerja berdampingan dan mampu membuat pencipta/pemegang hak cipta memodifikasi haknya ke dalam keadaan yang paling sesuai dengan kebutuhan. Lisensi creative commons di Indonesia penggunaannya dimungkinkan menurut Pasal 9 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta. Lalu pemegang hak berdasarkan Pasal 81 UU Hak Cipta, dapat mengumumkan dan/atau berhak memberikan lisensi kepada pihak lain berdasarkan perjanjian lisensi untuk melaksanakan perbuatan sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 9 ayat (1), memperbanyak ciptaannya/produk hak terkaitnya dengan persyaratan tertentu. Selanjutnya berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Pasal 1 ayat (5), kegiatan yang dilaksanakan oleh creative commons adalah kegiatan penyelenggaran sistem elektronik.Kata Kunci: Creative Commons; Hak Cipta; Lisensi. The development of technology, especially the internet, has made it easier for people to access and distribute information. However, activities such as copy-cut-paste, editing or file sharing may actually harm the copyright law. Based on that, in 2002, a non-profit organization made a breakthrough innovation where it is possible to share and use creativity and knowledge through free legal tools. The research method used in this paper is a normative juridical research method with a focus on the statutory approach and content analysis. Based on the analysis of the discussion, creative commons is not an alternative to copyright law, but rather work side by side and is able to make the creator/copyright holder to modify their rights in the most appropriate circumstances. The use of creative commons licenses in Indonesia is possible according to Article 9 paragraph (1) of Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. Furthermore, the rights holder, based on Article 81 of the Copyright Law, able to announce and/or has the right to grant license to other parties based on the license agreement to carry out the action referred to in Article 9 paragraph (1), reproduce their rightful works/products with certain conditions. Furthermore, based on Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions Article 1 paragraph (5), the activities carried out by the creative commons are the activities of organizing an electronic system. Keywords: Creative Commons; Copyright; License.

Download Full-text

Analisis Efektifitas Pola Rekrutmen Kader Rantingmuhammadiyah Di Ponorogo

10.31219/osf.io/5q9mb ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

Jurnal ARISTO

Keyword(s):

Organizational Performance ◽

Research Method ◽

Central City ◽

Educational Institution ◽

Central Area ◽

Recruitment Pattern ◽

Non Profit ◽

Main Requirement ◽

The Right ◽

Professional Resources

An organization if you want to continue to grow then the main requirement is to have enough professional resources that can support all kinds of vision, mission or goals of the organization. To get members who have a high professionalism of course required a good recruitment and not just random, because how many members of an organization would be meaningless if not have adequate competence. Conversely, if an organization, although having few members but in each member has adequate competence, then the rate of development of the organization will run well then it is important that large organizations such as Muhammadiyah looking for the right pattern in recruitment cadres in order to support organizational performance. Furthermore, in this research will use descriptive qualitative research method by taking samples from three twigs in Ponorogo regency which represents the central city area, the central area and the periphery. The conclusion this research is recruitment pattern owned by the Muhammadiyah organization is Muhammadiyah educational institution, employee charity Muhamamdiyah, and the general public and there is no direct recruitment process.Orientation or encouragement of prospective members to participate in Muhammadiyah organization other than it is as a medium of learning and means of worship (non-profit oriented). This is very different from the existing recruitment theory where recruitment theory in general is on profit oriented organizations or companies.

Download Full-text

US Copyright Infringement by File “Sharing”: Statutory Damage(s)

Computer Law Review International ◽

10.9785/ovs-cri-2010-39 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 11 (2) ◽

Author(s):

Martin Arthur Kuppers

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

File Sharing ◽

Punitive Damages ◽

Call To Action ◽

Us Supreme Court ◽

Comprehensive Examination ◽

The Usa

AbstractFor the sake of argument, not that this is something that you would necessarily do, picture yourself living in the USA, finally getting hold that elusive song you have been wanting for so long - via an unlicensed file sharing service. Your initial feeling of euphoria would rather quickly give way to that of concern since you are now liable for at least 750 USD in ‘regular’ statutory damages for copyright infringement - were the plaintiff copyright holder to elect to recover this statutory minimum amount from you. It would most likely cross your mind that that level of recovery alone by the plaintiff is not entirely compensatory.This article will thus seek to examine problems associated with statutory damages in US copyright law for copyright infringement by file sharing, in particular their punitive character. In order to facilitate a close and comprehensive examination of the issues involved, relevant provisions in US copyright law will be briefly highlighted. This will provide the context for an analysis and application of US Supreme Court jurisprudence relating to punitive damages, which will summarily be followed by a call to action and recommendations in this regard.

Download Full-text

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF IMPLICATION FOR IMPLEMENTING COPYRIGHT LAW AND BOOK LAW IN THE LIBRARY COLLECTION SERVICE

Yustisia Jurnal Hukum ◽

10.20961/yustisia.v8i2.32522 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 8 (2) ◽

pp. 234

Author(s):

Mohamad Pandu Ristiyono ◽

Ratna Nurhayati

Keyword(s):

Comparative Study ◽

Research Method ◽

Social Function ◽

Fair Use ◽

Fair Dealing ◽

Library Collection ◽

The Social ◽

The Law

This article examines the implication of Copyright Law and Book Law implementation of the service in the library. The research method used is normative juridical legal. The correlation between the Book Law, Law on Handover of Print and Recorded Works and the Library Law, both are lex specialist derogate generalist of the Copyright Law or not, according to the author is the adoption or depiction of the fair use and fair dealing doctrine as which is the social function of copyright. The Copyright Law provides protection for Author and Copyright Holder with exclusive rights to be exploited. Related to the Law on Handover of Print and Record Works which gives the obligation of the Author or Copyright Holder to deposit their work for the purpose of preservation and other social purposes to the library which is regulated in the Library Law

Download Full-text

PRAKTEK RE-UPLOAD VIDEO OLEH YOUTUBER DAN KEABSAHAN PEMBAYARANNYA

Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial ◽

10.22373/dusturiyah.v9i2.5318 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 9 (2) ◽

Author(s):

Fazlul Rahman

Keyword(s):

Private Property ◽

Original Video ◽

Video Content ◽

The Public ◽

Creative Commons ◽

Video Sharing ◽

Adobe Flash ◽

Library Research ◽

The Right

Youtube is a video sharing website created by three former Paypal employees in February 2005, this site allows users to upload, watch and share videos. The company is based in San Bruno, California, and uses Adobe Flash Video and HTML5 technology to display a variety of user-made video content, including movie clips, TV clips and music videos. In addition there are also amateur content such as video blogs, short original videos and educational videos. Currently YouTube has provided two types of licenses on its site, namely Copyright frequency (cannot be re-uploaded by other parties) and Creative Commons BY Protection (CC BY) (may be re-uploaded by other parties). Even so it is not a problem without problems, the problems that still occur on Youtube are cases of copyright on the site, such as the practice of re-uploading videos here for example. This study examines how the validity of income obtained from the video re-upload activity on Youtube in terms of the Ibtikar Rights Perspective in Islam and Muamalah Fiqh. This thesis research includes the type of library research, which is data collection using study studies of books, journals, printed documents, and from sites on the internet. The results of the research conducted by the author in this thesis are unlawful in the practice of re-uploading videos that are carried out solely to obtain personal gain without giving royalties to the relevant producer / label, in other words the act is the same as a trader selling people's property otherwise without the permission of the owner or selling stolen goods, this is clearly detrimental to the creator or copyright holder because the video circulating on youtube is not given permission by the video creator to spread the creation to the public using the Youtube website. In Islam, copyright is known as Haq Ibtikar, namely a special right attached to the original video owner and part of intellectual property, both material and immaterial, so that it must be protected by law. Islam highly respects copyright as a private property right so that the right to ibtikar is classified into the Maqashid Sharia to maintain the existence of ownership of the assets of every Muslim. Every treasure that results from a video re-upload in Islam and Muamalah Fiqh is unlawful, because it is included in violating the rights of others in a vanity. Keywords: Hak Ibtikar, video re-upload, Youtube, copyright infringement

Download Full-text

Hak Cipta Karya Seni Lukis Sebagai Jaminan Fidusia

Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum ◽

10.22225/jkh.2.1.2963.32-36 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2 (1) ◽

pp. 32-36

Author(s):

Ni Kadek Emy Kencana Wati ◽

I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽

I Ketut Sukadana

Keyword(s):

Analytical Form ◽

Moral Rights ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Economic Rights ◽

Law System ◽

Materials Used ◽

The Right

The use of copyright for painting artworks in the Intellectual Property Law system in Indonesia provides many benefits for painters as copyright owners or copyright holders. A creator or copyright holder has Economic Rights on his work which includes the right to duplicate, display, and lease his work to third parties. Copyright Law No. 28/2014 states that copyright can be used as an object of Fiduciary security. This study aims to determine the characteristics of the copyright of painting works that can be used as fiduciary guarantees to get credit in banking and to analyze the execution of copyright guarantees of painting works if the debtor defaults The method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach, and the sources of legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials with literature collection techniques which are analyzed in descriptive analytical form. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the characteristics of copyright in painting are providing protection for works of art and providing economic rights for the creators or copyright holders and moral rights for the creators. The execution of copyright guarantees can be done by executorial method in accordance with article 29 of the Fiduciary Law.

Download Full-text

Free and Open Source Software Movements as Agents of an Alternative Use of Copyright Law

Advances in Social Networking and Online Communities - Online Communities as Agents of Change and Social Movements ◽

10.4018/978-1-5225-2495-3.ch010 ◽

2017 ◽

pp. 253-270

Author(s):

Pedro Pina

Keyword(s):

Open Source ◽

Open Source Software ◽

Creative Commons ◽

Digital World ◽

Digital Network ◽

The Creation ◽

Access To Knowledge ◽

The Right ◽

Collaboration Platforms

Digital technology produced a move from a performative model to a player-as producer paradigm since it has potentiated user-generated transformative uses of intellectual works. In fact, sharing, sampling, remixing and creating new derivative content through digital network collaboration platforms are today pillars of the so-called “age of remix”. However, when unauthorized, such activities may constitute copyright infringement since the making available right and the right to make new derivative works are exclusive rights granted by copyright law. A restrictive exercise of exclusive rights may hinder the implementation of online platforms envisioned to facilitate access to knowledge and to potentiate the creation of new works. The present chapter analyzes the creation the importance of online communities of practice using free/open source software licenses like GNU GPL or Creative Commons Licenses as agents of an alternative and less rigid exercise of the powers granted by copyright law in favor of a freer system of creation and dissemination of creative works in the digital world.

Download Full-text

Analisis Efektifitas Pola Rekrutmen Kader Rantingmuhammadiyah Di Ponorogo

10.31219/osf.io/h8axv ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

Jurnal ARISTO ◽

Robby Darwis Nasution

Keyword(s):

Organizational Performance ◽

Research Method ◽

Central City ◽

Educational Institution ◽

Central Area ◽

Recruitment Pattern ◽

Non Profit ◽

Main Requirement ◽

The Right ◽

Professional Resources

Download Full-text

Urgensi Perubahan Delik Biasa Menjadi Delik Aduan dan Relevansinya terhadap Perlindungan dan Penegakan Hak Cipta

Undang Jurnal Hukum ◽

10.22437/ujh.1.2.347-362 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 1 (2) ◽

pp. 347-362 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Hanafi Amrani

Keyword(s):

Law Enforcement ◽

Civil Rights ◽

Active Role ◽

The Law ◽

The Right ◽

Exclusive Right

This article discusses two main issues: first, what is the urgency of the change in nature of offences from ordinary offence to be complaint offence in the copyright law; second, how is the relevance of the change in the nature of the offense to protect and enforce copyright. The urgency of changes in offenses is usually an offense against complaints because copyright is an exclusive right that is personal and civil rights. This personal and civil right indicate the absolute right of the creator or the copyright holder to the results of their work, including the right to report or not to infringe their copyright. Therefore conceptually this personal and civilian nature emphasizes the alignment of mindset that the complaint offence is more appropriately applied to copyright infringement. Whereas the relevance of complaint offence for protection and enforcement of copyright can be seen from the significant role of the creator or copyright holder in the law enforcement process. The creator or copyright holder can play an active role in providing information and evidence of copyright infringement so that the law enforcement process becomes more effective and efficient. Abstrak Artikel ini membahas dua permasalahan pokok: pertama, apa urgensi perubahan delik biasa menjadi delik aduan dalam Undang-undang Hak Cipta; kedua, bagaimana relevansi perubahan sifat delik tersebut terhadap perlindungan dan penegakan hukum hak cipta. Urgensi perubahan delik biasa menjadi delik aduan adalah karena hak cipta merupakan hak eksklusif yang bersifat personal dan keperdataan. Sifat personal dan keperdataan ini mengindikasikan adanya hak mutlak dari pencipta atau pemegang hak cipta atas hasil karya ciptanya, termasuk hak untuk melaporkan atau tidak atas pelanggaran hak ciptanya. Oleh karena itu secara konseptual sifat personal dan keperdataan ini lebih mengedepankan keselarasan pola pikir bahwa delik aduan lebih tepat diterapkan terhadap pelanggaran hak cipta. Sedangkan relevansi delik aduan terhadap perlindungan dan penegakan hak cipta dapat dilihat dari peran yang signifikan dari pencipta atau pemegang hak cipta dalam proses penegakan hukum. Pencipta atau pemegang hak cipta dapat berperan aktif dalam memberikan keterangan dan bukti-bukti dari pelanggaran hak cipta tersebut sehingga proses penegakan hukum dapat berjalan lebih efektif dan efisien.

Download Full-text

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP HAK PENCIPTA SOFTWARE YANG NOMOR SERIALNYA DIKOMERSIALKAN TANPA HAK DI CYBER SPACE BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA

DiH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ◽

10.30996/dih.v16i1.2899 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 16 (1) ◽

pp. 77-87

Author(s):

Billy Handiwiyanto ◽

Wisnu Aryo Dewanto

Keyword(s):

Intellectual Property ◽

Property Rights ◽

Intellectual Property Rights ◽

Research Method ◽

Economic Benefits ◽

Economic Rights ◽

Cyber Space ◽

The Right ◽

Exclusive Right

Intellectual Property Rights consist of various types, one of which is Copyright, Copyright is one of the Intellectual Property Rights that has a broad scope of scope of objects, to the Copyright that is owned, the Author and / or the Copyright Holder get an Exclusive Right on the Work , in which this Exclusive Right consists of 2 (two) types, namely the Moral Right to the Work, and also the Economic Right to the Work. The right to exploit the Work rests with the Author and/or the Copyright Holder of the Work, but there are often violations of the Exclusive Rights in this case the Economic Right which is the Right of the Author and/or the Copyright Holder to obtain economic benefits from the utilization of the Copyright, in which a Work is commercialized without Rights by other Parties who do not have the Right to Commercialize the Work. This study aims to determine the basis of the Liability of those commercializing a Work without Rights, which violates the Exclusive Rights of the Author and/or the Copyright Holder to utilize the Work in order to obtain economic benefits from the Work. This research was conducted using the Normative Jurisdiction research method which examines a problem on the basis of applicable laws and regulations, as well as from views and doctrines in the science of law. The results of this study state that other parties who without the right to commercialize a Work must be held accountable for violating the Exclusive Rights in this case the Exclusive Rights to the Economic Rights of the Author and/or the Copyright Holder.Hak Kekayaan Intelektual terdiri dari berbagai macam jenis, salah satunya Hak Cipta, Hak Cipta merupakan salah satu Hak Kekayaan Intelektual yang memiliki ruang lingkup cakupan obyek yang luas, terhadap Hak Cipta yang dimiliki, Pencipta dan/atau Pemegang Hak Cipta mendapatkan Hak Eksklusif atas Ciptaan tersebut, yang mana Hak Eksklusif ini terdiri dari 2 (dua) macam, yaitu Hak Moral atas Ciptaannya, dan juga Hak Ekonomi atas Ciptaan. Hak untuk mengeksploitasi Ciptaan tersebut terletak pada Pencipta dan/atau Pemegang Hak Cipta dari Ciptaan tersebut, namun seringkali terjadi pelanggaran terhadap Hak Eksklusif yang dalam hal ini ialah Hak Ekonomi yang merupaan Hak dari si Pencipta dan/atau Pemegang Hak Cipta untuk mendapatkan manfaat ekonomi dari pemanfaatan terhadap Hak Cipta tersebut, yang mana suatu Ciptaan dikomersialkan tanpa Hak oleh Pihak lain yang tidak punya Hak untuk Mengkomersialkan Ciptaan tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dasar Tanggung Gugat dari pihak yang mengkomersialkan suatu Ciptaan tanpa Hak, yang melanggar Hak Eksklusif Pencipta dan/atau Pemegang Hak Cipta untuk memanfaatkan Ciptaan tersebut guna mendapatkan manfaat ekonomi dari Ciptaan tersebut. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan dengan metode penelitian Yuridis Normatif yang mana meneliti suatu masalah dengan dasar peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku, juga dari pandangan-pandangan dan doktrin-doktrin dalam ilmu hukum. Hasil penelitian ini menyatakan bahwa pihak lain yang dengan tanpa hak mengkomersialkan suatu Ciptaan harus bertanggung gugat karena melanggar Hak Eksklusif dalam hal ini Hak Eksklusif terhadap Hak Ekonomi dari Pencipta dan/atau Pemegang Hak Cipta.

Download Full-text

Correlation of terms «orphan work» and «public domain work» in the modern copyright law

Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property ◽

10.33731/52021.244512 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 13-24

Author(s):

Liudmyla Mamchur ◽

Valerii Syttsevoi

Keyword(s):

Public Domain ◽

The Public ◽

Property Interest ◽

Key Factor ◽

The Difference ◽

Definition Of ◽

The Right ◽

Reasonable Use

Keywords: orphan work, copyright, work digitization, public domain, propertyrights of the author, term of copyright The authors insist on the need todifferentiate the terms «orphan work» and «public domain work». It is connected withthe necessity to follow reasonable balance between the property interest of the authoror his successors and the public interest in reasonable use of the work in order to improvethe current legal field.It is substantiated that the existing copyright system, which provides to pay royaltyfor every use of the work for its author for 70 years or more, conflicts with theneeds of society in modern digital age. It is necessary to get permission from the copyrightholder to digitize a work to make it available. For orphan works it is difficult.The traditional copyright system should provide an exception for orphan works. It isformulated that permission to use such works must be granted by a specially authorizedstate body if there is any evidence that the user has taken all possible measuresto find the copyright holder, but has not been successful.Analysis of the content of theoretical and legal definitions of the terms «orphanwork» and «public domain work» shows that the presence or absence of ongoing protectionof property rights of the author is a key factor in the difference. Such rightsare still valid for orphan works, and therefore the permission of the right holder touse such a work is required. Meanwhile, the «public domain work» includes workswhich the term of copyright has expired. Therefore, the work can be used without permission.So, the approach that an orphan work becomes public domain is incorrect.On a basis of analysis of legislation conclusions is drawn that it is inexpedient touse too voluminous definition of the term «orphan work». It is argued that the systemof issuing permits for use of orphan works by the state bodies at request of a potentialuser must be defined in legislation.

Download Full-text