scholarly journals The Characterization of Disease Severity Associated IgG Subclasses Response in COVID-19 Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huanle Luo ◽  
Tingting Jia ◽  
Jiamin Chen ◽  
Shike Zeng ◽  
Zengzhao Qiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Disease Severity ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Igg Subclasses ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
Obvious Effect ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Biological Sex ◽  
Specific Igg

Increasing evidence suggests that dysregulated immune responses are associated with the clinical outcome of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Nucleocapsid protein (NP)-, spike (S)-, receptor binding domain (RBD)- specific immunoglobulin (Ig) isotypes, IgG subclasses and neutralizing antibody (NAb) were analyzed in 123 serum from 63 hospitalized patients with severe, moderate, mild or asymptomatic COVID-19. Mild to modest correlations were found between disease severity and antigen specific IgG subclasses in serum, of which IgG1 and IgG3 were negatively associated with viral load in nasopharyngeal swab. Multiple cytokines were significantly related with antigen-specific Ig isotypes and IgG subclasses, and IL-1β was positively correlated with most antibodies. Furthermore, the old patients (≥ 60 years old) had higher levels of chemokines, increased NAb activities and SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG1, and IgG3 responses and compromised T cell responses compared to the young patients (≤ 18 years old), which are related with more severe cases. Higher IgG1 and IgG3 were found in COVID-19 patients with comorbidities while biological sex had no effect on IgG subclasses. Overall, we have identified diseases severity was related to higher antibodies, of which IgG subclasses had weakly negative correlation with viral load, and cytokines were significantly associated with antibody response. Further, advancing age and comorbidities had obvious effect on IgG1 and IgG3.

scholarly journals Differential Association of Viral Dynamics With Disease Severity Depending on Patients’ Age Group in COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuri Kim ◽  
Shinhyea Cheon ◽  
Hyeongseok Jeong ◽  
Uni Park ◽  
Na-Young Ha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Disease Severity ◽  
Acute Phase ◽  
Inflammatory Responses ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Younger Patients

Despite a clear association of patient’s age with COVID-19 severity, there has been conflicting data on the association of viral load with disease severity. Here, we investigated the association of viral load dynamics with patient’s age and severity of COVID-19 using a set of respiratory specimens longitudinally collected (mean: 4.8 times/patient) from 64 patients with broad distribution of clinical severity and age during acute phase. Higher viral burden was positively associated with inflammatory responses, as assessed by IL-6, C-reactive protein, and lactate dehydrogenase levels in patients’ plasma collected on the same day, primarily in the younger cohort (≤59 years old) and in mild cases of all ages, whereas these were barely detectable in elderly patients (≥60 years old) with critical disease. In addition, viral load dynamics in elderly patients were not significantly different between mild and critical cases, even though more enhanced inflammation was consistently observed in the elderly group when compared to the younger group during the acute phase of infection. The positive correlation of viral load with disease severity in younger patients may explain the increased therapeutic responsiveness to current antiviral drugs and neutralizing antibody therapies in younger patients compared to elderly patients. More careful intervention against aging-associated inflammation might be required to mitigate severe disease progression and reduce fatality in COVID-19 patients more than 60 years old.

scholarly journals COVID-19 infection with asymptomatic or mild disease severity in young patients: Clinical course and association between prevalence of pneumonia and viral load

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. e0250358
Author(s):  
Cherry Kim ◽  
Wooil Kim ◽  
Ji Hoon Jeon ◽  
Hyeri Seok ◽  
Sun Bean Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Disease Severity ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Clinical Course ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Viral Loads ◽  
Mild Disease ◽  
Recovery Times ◽  
The Mean

Few studies have focused on clinical courses or viral loads in young asymptomatic or mild patients with COVID-19 infection. We sought to better understand the clinical course and association between viral load and prevalence of pneumonia in young COVID-19 patients with asymptomatic or mild disease severity. In this retrospective study, 106 COVID-19 young patients with asymptomatic or mild disease severity were analyzed for clinical characteristics, clinical course, prevalence of radiologically proven pneumonia and viral load. The cut-off value of viral load for presence of pneumonia was also investigated. The mean age was 28.0±9.3 years. Eleven patients (10.4%) experienced viral remission within one week of diagnosis, but one (0.9%) transferred to the hospital due to aggravation of pneumonia. Patients with pneumonia had significantly higher viral load than those without, and the cut-off value of the Ct value for presence of pneumonia were 31.38. The patients with pneumonia had significantly slower recovery times than those without. Diarrhea was significantly more common in patients with pneumonia than patients without pneumonia. In conclusion, most young asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients showed stable clinical course. There were significant differences in viral load and recovery times between patients with and without pneumonia.

scholarly journals SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load Is Correlated With the Disease Severity and Mortality in Patients With Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maha Al-Mozaini ◽  
Abu Shadat M. Noman ◽  
Jawaher Alotaibi ◽  
Mohammed Rezaul Karim ◽  
A. S. M. Zahed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Disease Severity ◽  
High Viral Load ◽  
Attributable Mortality ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
Viral Loads ◽  
Hematologic Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Anticancer Treatment

The correlation between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral load and risk of disease severity in cancer patients is poorly understood. Given the fact that cancer patients are at increased risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), analysis of viral load and disease outcome in COVID-19-infected cancer patients is needed. Here, we measured the SARS-CoV-2 viral load using qPCR cycle threshold (Ct) values collected from 120 noncancer and 64 cancer patients’ nasopharyngeal swab samples who are admitted to hospitals. Our results showed that the in-hospital mortality for high viral load cancer patients was 41.38%, 23.81% for medium viral load and 14.29% for low viral load patients (p < −0.01). On the other hand, the mortality rate for noncancer patients was lower: 22.22% among patients with high viral load, 5.13% among patients with medium viral load, and 1.85% among patients with low viral load (p < 0.05). In addition, patients with lung and hematologic cancer showed higher possibilities of severe events in proportion to high viral load. Higher attributable mortality and severity were directly proportional to high viral load particularly in patients who are receiving anticancer treatment. Importantly, we found that the incubation period and serial interval time is shorter in cancer patients compared with noncancer cases. Our report suggests that high SARS-CoV-2 viral loads may play a significant role in the overall mortality and severity of COVID-19-positive cancer patients, and this warrants further study to explore the disease pathogenesis and their use as prognostic tools.

scholarly journals Is Higher Viral Load in SARS-CoV-2 Associated With Death?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klinger Soares Faico-Filho ◽  
Victor Cabelho Passarelli ◽  
Nancy Bellei
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Viral Load ◽  
Disease Severity ◽  
Prognostic Marker ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
High Viral Load ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab

There is no proven prognostic marker or adequate number of studies in patients hospitalized for Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19). We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 from March 14 to June 17, 2020, at Sao Paulo Hospital. SARS-CoV-2 viral load was assessed using the cycle threshold (Ct) values obtained from an RTPCR assay applied to the nasopharyngeal swab samples. Disease severity and patient outcomes were compared. Among the 875 patients, 50.1% (439/875) had mild, 30.4% (266/875) moderate, and 19.5% (170/875) severe disease. A Ct value of <25 (472/875) indicated a high viral load, which was independently associated with mortality (OR: 0,34; 95% CI: 0,217 to 0,533; p < 0.0001). Admission SARS-CoV-2 viral load is an important surrogate biomarker of infectivity and is independently associated with mortality among patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

scholarly journals Disease Severity and Prognosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Hospitalized Patients Is Not Associated With Viral Load in Nasopharyngeal Swab

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabetta Cocconcelli ◽  
Gioele Castelli ◽  
Francesco Onelia ◽  
Enrico Lavezzo ◽  
Chiara Giraudo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
Disease Severity ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
Asymptomatic Individuals ◽  
The Right ◽  
Asymptomatic Subjects ◽  
The Impact

Background: The impact of viral burden on severity and prognosis of patients hospitalized for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still a matter of debate due to controversial results. Herein, we sought to assess viral load in the nasopharyngeal swab and its association with severity score indexes and prognostic parameters.Methods: We included 127 symptomatic patients and 21 asymptomatic subjects with a diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection obtained by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and presence of cycle threshold. According to the level of care needed during hospitalization, the population was categorized as high-intensity (HIMC, n = 76) or low intensity medical care setting (LIMC, n = 51).Results: Viral load did not differ among asymptomatic, LIMC, and HIMC SARS-CoV-2 positive patients [4.4 (2.9–5.3) vs. 4.8 (3.6–6.1) vs. 4.6 (3.9–5.7) log10 copies/ml, respectively; p = 0.31]. Similar results were observed when asymptomatic individuals were compared to hospitalized patients [4.4 (2.9–5.3) vs. 4.68 (3.8–5.9) log10 copies/ml; p = 0.13]. When the study population was divided in High (HVL, n = 64) and Low Viral Load (LVL, n = 63) group no differences were observed in disease severity at diagnosis. Furthermore, LVL and HVL groups did not differ with regard to duration of hospital stay, number of bacterial co-infections, need for high-intensity medical care and number of deaths. The viral load was not an independent risk factor for HIMC in an adjusted multivariate regression model (OR: 1.59; 95% CI: 0.46–5.55, p = 0.46).Conclusions: Viral load at diagnosis is similar in asymptomatic and hospitalized patients and is not associated with either worse outcomes during hospitalization. SARS CoV-2 viral load might not be the right tool to assist clinicians in risk-stratifying hospitalized patients.

Rezidivrisiko nach thyreostatischer Behandlung immunogener und nicht-immunogener Hyperthyreosen

1990 ◽  
Vol 29 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Voth ◽  
N. Dickmann ◽  
H. Schicha ◽  
D. Emrich
Keyword(s):  
Relapse Rate ◽  
Urinary Iodine ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Antithyroid Drugs ◽  
Urinary Iodine Excretion ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Primary Disease ◽  
Iodine Excretion ◽  
Immunogenic Hyperthyroidism

Data of 196 patients treated for hyperthyroidism exclusively with antithyroid drugs were analyzed retrospectively concerning the relapse rate within a follow-up period of four years. Patients were subdivided for primary or recurrent disease, and for immunogenic or non-immunogenic hyperthyroidism, respectively. In immunogenic as well as in non-immunogeriic hyperthyroidism, the relapse rate was significantly lower for patients with primary disease (35% and 52%, respectively) compared to those with recurrent hyperthyroidism (82%, p <0.001 and 83%, p <0.001, respectively). In patients with primary disease, clinical, biochemical and scintigraphic parameters were tested with respect to their capability of predicting a relapse. For immunogenic hyperthyroidism the highest relapse rates were observed in young patients and in those with large goitres, whereas for non-immunogenic hyperthyroidism they were highest in old patients, in those with nodular goitres and in those without an increased urinary iodine excretion at the time of diagnosing hyperthyroidism.

Viral Load Dynamics and Clinical Disease Severity in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shufa Zheng ◽  
Jian Fan ◽  
Fei Yu ◽  
Baihuan Feng ◽  
Bin Lou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Disease Severity ◽  
Clinical Disease

scholarly journals Correlation of Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Viral Load with Disease Severity and Prolonged Viral Shedding in Children

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 1265-1272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chung-Chen Li ◽  
Lin Wang ◽  
Hock-Liew Eng ◽  
Huey-Ling You ◽  
Ling-Sai Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Disease Severity ◽  
Pandemic H1n1 ◽  
Viral Shedding ◽  
Pandemic H1n1 2009

scholarly journals Viral Dynamics and Real-Time RT-PCR Ct Values Correlation with Disease Severity in COVID-19

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1091
Author(s):  
Ali A. Rabaan ◽  
Raghavendra Tirupathi ◽  
Anupam A Sule ◽  
Jehad Aldali ◽  
Abbas Al Mutair ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Disease Severity ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Influential Factors ◽  
Confirmatory Test ◽  
Acid Extraction ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Viral Kinetics ◽  
Ct Value

Real-time RT-PCR is considered the gold standard confirmatory test for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, many scientists disagree, and it is essential to understand that several factors and variables can cause a false-negative test. In this context, cycle threshold (Ct) values are being utilized to diagnose or predict SARS-CoV-2 infection. This practice has a significant clinical utility as Ct values can be correlated with the viral load. In addition, Ct values have a strong correlation with multiple haematological and biochemical markers. However, it is essential to consider that Ct values might be affected by pre-analytic, analytic, and post-analytical variables such as collection technique, specimen type, sampling time, viral kinetics, transport and storage conditions, nucleic acid extraction, viral RNA load, primer designing, real-time PCR efficiency, and Ct value determination method. Therefore, understanding the interpretation of Ct values and other influential factors could play a crucial role in interpreting viral load and disease severity. In several clinical studies consisting of small or large sample sizes, several discrepancies exist regarding a significant positive correlation between the Ct value and disease severity in COVID-19. In this context, a revised review of the literature has been conducted to fill the knowledge gaps regarding the correlations between Ct values and severity/fatality rates of patients with COVID-19. Various databases such as PubMed, Science Direct, Medline, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched up to April 2021 by using keywords including “RT-PCR or viral load”, “SARS-CoV-2 and RT-PCR”, “Ct value and viral load”, “Ct value or COVID-19”. Research articles were extracted and selected independently by the authors and included in the present review based on their relevance to the study. The current narrative review explores the correlation of Ct values with mortality, disease progression, severity, and infectivity. We also discuss the factors that can affect these values, such as collection technique, type of swab, sampling method, etc.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document