scholarly journals Association of Psoriasis With Anxiety and Depression: A Case–Control Study in Chinese Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danrong Jing ◽  
Hui Xiao ◽  
Minxue Shen ◽  
Xiang Chen ◽  
Xi Han ◽  
...  

Background: Patients with psoriasis are prone to suffer from anxiety and depression during their lifetime. This study aimed to investigate the association of psoriasis with anxiety and depression in Chinese patients.Methods: A case-control study in Chinese patients with psoriasis vulgaris and healthy controls was conducted. Clinical information based on patient-reported, clinical information, and reliable structured questionnaires were collected. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate the associations, in terms of adjusted odds ratios (AORs).Results: We continuously selected 1,571 patients who were firstly diagnosed with psoriasis vulgaris, and 1,571 healthy controls, matched by age and sex. The risk of depression in the psoriasis vulgaris group was higher than that in the healthy controls (AOR = 1.30, P = 0.047), while no differences were found in the risk of anxiety between the two groups (AOR = 1.18, P = 0.381). Subgroup analysis by disease onsets showed that late-onset psoriasis (LOP) was significantly associated with a higher risk of anxiety (AOR = 1.47, P = 0.033) and depression symptoms (AOR = 1.85, P = 0.012) but not with early-onset psoriasis (EOP). Subgroup analysis by disease severity indicated that no difference was observed in the associations of mild psoriasis vulgaris, moderate-to-severe psoriasis vulgaris with anxiety and depression.Conclusion: Patients with psoriasis vulgaris were more likely to develop depression compared with the general population. LOP patients were positively associated with anxiety and depression. We believe the screening of emotional disorders should be included in the daily management of psoriasis patients.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanxia Wang ◽  
Zhaoyan Meng ◽  
Jianyin Pei ◽  
Liu Qian ◽  
Baohong Mao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: To evaluate the interaction of depression and anxiety with the development of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL).Methods: A nested case–control study involving 2,558 participants was conducted with data from the prospective Miscarriage Woman Cohort study between 2017 and 2019 in the province of Gansu, China. The questionnaire data, self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale were collected after each participant’s first miscarriage. Information on RPL outcomes was obtained from the medical records within the subsequent two years. All patients diagosed RPL were recruited as cases whilst a randomly selected group of women with only one miscarriage in the past were recruited as controls. The logistic regression and the interaction effects between anxiety and depression and RPL were analysed.Results: The prevalence of anxiety (n=325, 28.7% vs. n=278, 19.5%) and depression symptoms (n=550, 48.6% vs. n=589, 41.3%) for the 1,132 RPL cases were higher than 1,426 non-RPL controls (P< 0.001). After adjusting for possible confounding variables, the odds ratio (OR) value, reflecting the multiplicative interaction, was 1.91 (95% CI: 1.50–2.44, P<0.001) for cases with both anxiety and depression symptoms compared with the non-RPL group. The relative excess risk of interaction value, reflecting the additive interaction between anxiety and depression to RPL was 1.15 (95% CI: 0.32–4.21). Moreover, the adjusted OR for RPL cases with mild anxiety and severe depression was 2.77 (95% CI:1.07-44.14, P<0.001) , for RPL cases with severe anxiety and mild depression was 4.23 (95% CI: 1.01–22.21, P<0.001), for RPL cases with severe anxiety and moderate depression was 4.34 (95% CI: 1.03–21.28, P<0.001) and for RPL cases with severe anxiety and severe depression was 5.95 (95% CI: 1.09–45.09, P<0.05).Conclusions: Either depression or anxiety alone could increase the risk of subsequent RPL. Anxiety and depression had a synergistic effect after the first miscarriage which increased the development of subsequent RPL disease.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanxia Wang ◽  
Zhaoyan Meng ◽  
Jianyin Pei ◽  
Liu Qian ◽  
Baohong Mao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To evaluate the interaction of depression and anxiety with the development of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Methods A nested case–control study involving 2558 participants was conducted with data from the prospective Miscarriage Woman Cohort study between 2017 and 2019 in the province of Gansu, China. The questionnaire data, self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale were collected after each participant’s first miscarriage. Information on RPL outcomes was obtained from the medical records within the subsequent 2 years. All patients diagosed RPL were recruited as cases whilst a randomly selected group of women with only one miscarriage in the past were recruited as controls. The logistic regression and the interaction effects between anxiety and depression and RPL were analysed. Results The prevalence of anxiety (n = 325, 28.7% vs. n = 278, 19.5%) and depression symptoms (n = 550, 48.6% vs. n = 589, 41.3%) for the 1132 RPL cases were higher than 1426 non-RPL controls (P < 0.001). After adjusting for possible confounding variables, the odds ratio (OR) value, reflecting the multiplicative interaction, was 1.91 (95% CI 1.50–2.44, P < 0.001) for cases with both anxiety and depression symptoms compared with the non-RPL group. The relative excess risk of interaction value, reflecting the additive interaction between anxiety and depression to RPL was 1.15 (95% CI 0.32–4.21). Moreover, the adjusted OR for RPL cases with mild anxiety and severe depression was 2.77 (95% CI 1.07–44.14, P < 0.001), for RPL cases with severe anxiety and mild depression was 4.23 (95% CI 1.01–22.21, P < 0.001), for RPL cases with severe anxiety and moderate depression was 4.34 (95% CI 1.03–21.28, P < 0.001) and for RPL cases with severe anxiety and severe depression was 5.95 (95% CI 1.09–45.09, P < 0.05). Conclusions Either depression or anxiety alone could increase the risk of subsequent RPL. Anxiety and depression had a synergistic effect after the first miscarriage which increased the development of subsequent RPL disease.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanxia Wang ◽  
Zhaoyan Meng ◽  
Jianyin Pei ◽  
Liu Qian ◽  
Baohong Mao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: To evaluate the depression–anxiety interaction with the development of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Methods: A nested case–control study involving 2,558 participants was conducted with data from the prospective Miscarriage Woman Cohort study between 2017 and 2019 in the province of Gansu, China. The questionnaire data, the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and the Self-Rating Depression Scale were collected after each participant’s first miscarriage. Information on RPL outcomes was obtained from the medical records within the subsequent two years. The logistic regression and the addition and multiplication interaction effects between anxiety and depression to RPL were analysed.Results: The prevalence of anxiety (28.7% vs. 19.5%) and depression symptoms (48.6% vs. 41.3%) for the 1,132 RPL cases were higher than 1,426 non-RPL controls (P< 0.001). After adjustment for possible confounding variables, compared with the non-RPL participants without depression and anxiety symptoms, the odds ratio (OR) value, reflecting the multiplicative interaction, was 2.788 (95%CI: 1.511–5.144, P < 0.001) for cases with both anxiety and depression symptoms. Moreover, among these, the OR for cases with mild anxiety and severe depression was 5.369 (95%CI: 1.074–26.832, P < 0.001), and the OR for cases with severe anxiety and mild depression was 5.339 (95%CI: 1.033–27.590, P < 0.001). The relative excess risk of interaction value (RERI), reflecting the additive interaction between anxiety and depression to RPL was also 1.148 (95%CI: 0.316–4.212).Conclusions: Either depression or anxiety alone could increase risk of subsequent RPL. There also was a synergistic effect of anxiety and depression after the first miscarriage that increased the development of subsequent RPL disease.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 973-973
Author(s):  
R. Gonzalez Mazario ◽  
J. J. Fragio-Gil ◽  
P. Martinez Calabuig ◽  
E. Grau García ◽  
M. De la Rubia Navarro ◽  
...  

Background:Cardiovascular disease (CV) is the most frequent cause of death in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. It is well known that RA acts as an independent cardiovascular risk factor.Objectives:To assess the CV risk in RA patients using carotid ultrasonography (US) additionally to the traditional CV risk factors.Methods:A prospective transversal case control study was performed, including adult RA patients who fulfilled ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria and healthy controls matched according to CV risk factors. Population over 75 years old, patients with established CV disease and/or chronic kidney failure (from III stage) were excluded. The US evaluator was blinded to the case/control condition and evaluated the presence of plaques and the intima-media thickness. Statistical analysis was performed with R (3.6.1 version) and included a multivariate variance analysis (MANOVA) and a negative binomial regression adjusted by confounding factors (age, sex and CV risk factors).Results:A total of 200 cases and 111 healthy controls were included in the study. Demographical, clinical and US data are exposed in table 1. Not any difference was detected in terms of CV risk factors between the cases and controls. In both groups a relationship between age, BMI and high blood pressure was detected (p<0.001).Table 1.Table 2.RA basal characteristicsDisease duration (years)16,98 (11,38)Erosions (X-Ray of hands/feet)163 (81,5%)Seropositive (RF/anti-CCP)146 (73%)Extra-articular symptoms44 (22%)Intersticial difusse lung disease10 (5%)Rheumatoid nodules14 (7%)Prednisone use103 (51,5%)Median dose of Prednisone last year (mg)2,34 (2,84)sDMARDsMethotrexate104 (52%)Leflunomide29 (14,5%)Hydroxycloroquine9 (4,5%)bDMARDs89 (44,5%) TNFi41 (20,5%) Abatacept15 (7,5%) IL6i22 (11%) RTX11 (5,5%)JAKi26 (13%) Baricitinib11 (5,5%) Tofacitinib15 (7,5%)DAS 28-ESR3,1 (2,3, 3,9)SDAI7,85 (4,04, 13,41)HAQ0,88 (0,22, 1,5)RF (U/mL)51 (15, 164,25)Anti-CCP (U/mL)173 (22, 340)Patients showed higher intima-media (both right and left) thickness compared to controls (p<0.006). Moreover it was also related to the disease duration and DAS28 score (p<0.001). A higher plaque account was noted in cases(p<0.004) and it was also related to the disease duration (p<0.001).Conclusion:RA implies a higher CV risk. Traditional CV risk factors explains only partially the global risk. These findings support that RA acts as an independent cardiovascular risk factor.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmut Alpayci ◽  
Aysel Milanlioglu ◽  
Veysel Delen ◽  
Mehmet Nuri Aydin ◽  
Huseyin Guducuoglu ◽  
...  

Citrullinated proteins have been suggested to play a critical role in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS). Anticyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibody is used in the early diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objective of this study was to investigate the presence of anti-CCP antibody in patients with MS compared to RA patients and healthy controls. Fifty patients with MS (38 females, 12 males; mean age 36.72 ± 8.82 years), 52 patients with RA (40 females, 12 males; mean age 40.87 ± 10.17 years), and 50 healthy controls (32 females, 18 males; mean age 38.22 ± 11.59 years) were included in this study. The levels of serum anti-CCP antibody were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The results of the study showed that anti-CCP antibody levels were significantly higher in RA patients versus MS or healthy controls(P<0.001). Moreover, anti-CCP antibody was positive in 43 (83%) patients with RA, while it was negative in all MS patients as well as in all healthy controls. Also, no significant correlation was found between the anti-CCP levels and EDSS scores(r=-0.250). In conclusion, the results of this study did not support a positive association between serum anti-CCP antibody and MS.


2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 350-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tinatin Gagua ◽  
Besarion Tkeshelashvili ◽  
David Gagua ◽  
Nino Mchedlishvili

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document