scholarly journals Sepsis—A Retrospective Cohort Study of Bloodstream Infections

Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biagio Santella ◽  
Veronica Folliero ◽  
Gerarda Maria Pirofalo ◽  
Enrica Serretiello ◽  
Carla Zannella ◽  
...  

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, among infectious diseases. Local knowledge of the main bacteria involved in BSIs and their associated antibiotic susceptibility patterns is essential to rationalize the empiric antimicrobial therapy. The aim of this study was to define the incidence of infection and evaluate the antimicrobial resistance profile of the main pathogens involved in BSIs. This study enrolled patients of all ages and both sexes admitted to the University Hospital “San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d’Aragona”, Salerno, Italy between January 2015 to December 2019. Bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing were performed with Vitek 2. A number of 3.949 positive blood cultures were included out of 24,694 total blood cultures from 2015 to 2019. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) were identified as the main bacteria that caused BSI (17.4%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (12.3%), Escherichia coli (10.9%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (9.4%). Gram-positive bacteria were highly resistant to Penicillin G and Oxacillin, while Gram-negative strains to Ciprofloxacin, Cefotaxime, Ceftazidime, and Amoxicillin-clavulanate. High susceptibility to Vancomycin, Linezolid, and Daptomycin was observed among Gram-positive strains. Fosfomycin showed the best performance to treatment Gram-negative BSIs. Our study found an increase in resistance to the latest generation of antibiotics over the years. This suggests an urgent need to improve antimicrobial management programs to optimize empirical therapy in BSI.

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S726-S726
Author(s):  
Heather L Cox ◽  
April E Attai ◽  
Allison M Stilwell ◽  
Kasi B Vegesana ◽  
Frankie Brewster ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Rapid diagnostic testing paired with ASP intervention optimizes therapy and improves outcomes but few data guide ASP response in the absence of organism identification (ID). We describe the microbiology for organisms unidentified by Accelerate Pheno™ Gram-negative platform (AXDX) in order to inform ASP-provider team communication (PTC). Methods Consecutive, non-duplicate inpatient blood cultures with Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) following AXDX implementation at a single university hospital between April 2018 and March 2019 were included. Standard of care (SOC) ID and susceptibility followed AXDX. Clinical Microbiology emailed AXDX results to the ASP in real time; results were released into the EMR paired with telephone PTC or withheld after ASP review. Bloodstream Infections (BSIs) and patient outcomes for organisms labeled no/indeterminate ID by the AXDX were characterized. Results AXDX was performed on 351 blood cultures. Among 52 (15%) labeled no/indeterminate ID, SOC methods revealed: Enterobacteriaceae (40%; 9 monomicrobial with AXDX targets), anaerobes (21%), non-lactose fermenters (NLFs) other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa (21%), and fastidious GNB (10%). Frequent organisms without AXDX targets included: Raoultella planticola (4); Bacteroides fragilis, Cupriavidus spp., Haemophilus spp., Prevotella spp., Providencia spp., non-aeruginosa Pseudomonas spp., Salmonella spp. (3 each); Pasteurella multocida, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (2 each). BSI sources were most commonly intra-abdominal (21%), central line-associated (17%), or unknown (17%). CLABSIs were associated with immune suppression and/or substance abuse in all but 1 case. BSIs without active empiric therapy included: NDM-producing Providencia stuartii SSSI; OXA-48-producing R. planticola intraabdominal infection (IAI); Pandoraea spp. CLABSI after liver transplant; enteric fever; B. fragilis, Leptotrichia wadei, and S. maltophilia, each of unknown source. In-hospital mortality occurred in 4 of these cases. Conclusion When AXDX yields no/indeterminate ID, ASP chart review for possible anaerobic/IAI, unique environmental exposures, and travel history may assist in guiding empiric therapy. GNB with AXDX targets are not excluded. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 39-44
Author(s):  
Nandalal Jaishi ◽  
Pramila Pathak ◽  
Pradeep Kumar Shah ◽  
Puspa Raj Dahal

Background: Bacteraemia can develop a broad array of complications that may be difficult to recognize initially and can increase morbidity. The study was thus conducted to identify the causative agents of bacteraemia and to assess antibiogram of the isolates among the patients suspected of blood stream infection visiting Everest hospital, New Baneshwor Kathmandu. Methods: Altogether 400 blood cultures were processed during March, 2015 to August, 2015. Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) was followed during the processing of the specimens. Antibiotic susceptibility testing of bacterial isolates was done by Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method with Muller-Hinton agar using the guidelines and interpretive criteria of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI 2013). Result: The positivity of blood culture was found to be 48 (12%). Gram negative bacterial were found to be more predominant 27(56.2%) than gram positive bacteria 21(43.7%) in causing bacteraemia. The most prevalent isolate was Staphylococcus aureus 15 (31.2%) followed by Salmonella Paratyphi A 10 (20.8%) and Salmonella Typhi 8 (16.6%), E. coli & CoNS 4 (8.3%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa 3 (6.2%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae & Streptococcus pneumoniae 2 (4.1%) respectively. All gram-positive isolates were found to be sensitive to Cefoxitin, Ceftriaxone and Vancomycin followed by Ampicillin (90.42%), Erythromycin (85.71%), Ciprofloxacin (83.33%), Doxycycline (75%) and Cephalexin (70.58%) whereas gram negative isolates were sensitive to Ceftriaxone followed by Chloramphenicol (92%), Gentamicin (88.8%), Cefixime (85.71%), Ofloxacin (83.3%) and Amoxycillin and Ciprofloxacin (71.3%) Conclusion: The isolation of etiological agents of blood stream infection should be assessed by proper microbiological analysis and it would be helpful for controlling of the outbreaks of resistance strains through effective empirical therapy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fevronia Kolonitsiou ◽  
Matthaios Papadimitriou-Olivgeris ◽  
Anastasia Spiliopoulou ◽  
Vasiliki Stamouli ◽  
Vasileios Papakostas ◽  
...  

The aim of the study was to assess the epidemiology, the incidence of multidrug-resistant bacteria and bloodstream infections’ (BSIs) seasonality in a university hospital. This retrospective study was carried out in the University General Hospital of Patras, Greece, during 2011–13 y. Blood cultures from patients with clinical presentation suggestive of bloodstream infection were performed by the BacT/ALERT System. Isolates were identified by Vitek 2 Advanced Expert System. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by the disk diffusion method and E-test. Resistance genes (mecA in staphylococci; vanA/vanB/vanC in enterococci; blaKPC/blaVIM/blaNDM in Klebsiella spp.) were detected by PCR. In total, 4607 (9.7%) blood cultures were positive from 47451 sets sent to Department of Microbiology, representing 1732 BSIs. Gram-negative bacteria (52.3%) were the most commonly isolated, followed by Gram-positive (39.5%), fungi (6.6%) and anaerobes bacteria (1.8%). The highest contamination rate was observed among Gram-positive bacteria (42.3%). Among 330 CNS and 150 Staphylococcus aureus, 281 (85.2%) and 60 (40.0%) were mecA-positive, respectively. From 113 enterococci, eight were vanA, two vanB and two vanC-positives. Of the total 207 carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (73.4%), 202 carried blaKPC, four blaKPC and blaVIM and one blaVIM. A significant increase in monthly BSIs’ incidence was shown (R2: 0.449), which may be attributed to a rise of Gram-positive BSIs (R2: 0.337). Gram-positive BSIs were less frequent in spring (P < 0.001), summer (P < 0.001), and autumn (P < 0.001), as compared to winter months, while Gram-negative bacteria (P < 0.001) and fungi (P < 0.001) were more frequent in summer months. BSIs due to methicillin resistant S. aureus and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria increased during the study period. The increasing incidence of BSIs can be attributed to an increase of Gram-positive BSI incidence, even though Gram-negative bacteria remained the predominant ones. Seasonality may play a role in the predominance of Gram-negative’s BSI.


2017 ◽  
Vol 06 (03) ◽  
pp. 132-133
Author(s):  
Preetam Kalaskar ◽  
Asha Anand ◽  
Harsha Panchal ◽  
Apurva Patel ◽  
Sonia Parikh ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: The treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) consists of induction therapy with anthracyclines and cytarabine followed by two to four cycles of consolidation therapy with high-dose cytarabine after achieving remission. There have been very few studies comparing infections during induction and consolidation. We have analyzed blood cultures of patients with AML during episodes of fever occurring during induction and consolidation, for comparing the bloodstream infections in both the phases. Materials and Methods: Blood cultures of patients during febrile episodes were collected from central venous catheters and peripheral blood, both during induction and consolidation therapy of AML. Results: The study population included 52 AML patients. During induction, there were 52 episodes of fever and 25 (48%) blood cultures were positive, 15 of these blood cultures reported Gram-negative organisms, 9 reported Gram-positive organisms and 1 as yeast. During consolidation, 47 episodes of fever were recorded and blood cultures were positive in 12, of which 7 were Gram-negative, 5 were Gram-positive. Conclusion: The incidence of blood culture positive infections during therapy of AML at our center was higher. The predominant organism isolated was Gram-negative both during induction and consolidation. The incidence of blood culture positive infections had decreased by 50% during consolidation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S116-S117
Author(s):  
Connor Deri ◽  
Whitney Nesbitt ◽  
George Nelson ◽  
Jessica Keefe

Abstract Background Bloodstream infections are a leading cause of mortality amongst hospitalized patients. Optimizing time to pathogen identification and receipt of appropriate antibiotic therapy significantly decreases mortality, morbidity, and length of hospitalization. Rapid diagnostic tests, such as Verigene, assist in the early identification of bacteria and resistance determinants from positive blood cultures; however, Verigene assays are limited to the detection of 13 gram-positive and 9 gram-negative bacteria. Methods The purpose of this study was to describe gram-negative and gram-positive aerobic bacteria identified from positive blood cultures with no Verigene target detected and to use the susceptibilities to create an antibiogram to assist in empiric antibiotic selection. A total of 2325 positive blood cultures resulted between January 2017 and October 2018 underwent Verigene testing. Results Of the 2325 isolates, 383 (16.5%), had no Verigene organism or resistance mechanism detected. Of these, there were 239 (62.4%) gram-positive isolates, 141 (36.8%) gram-negative isolates, and 3 yeast isolates with 96 unique organisms. Seventy-six (19.8%) of the organisms identified by standard culture, but not Verigene testing, are included on Verigene panel. We analyzed nine common antibiotics active against gram-negative organisms to determine percent susceptibilities against the isolated aerobic pathogens: amikacin (92.1%), cefepime (93.5%), ceftazidime (94.0%), ceftriaxone (79.7%), ciprofloxacin (88.5%), gentamicin (91.9%), levofloxacin (86.9%), piperacillin–tazobactam (83.8%), and tobramycin (85.5%). Additionally, four antibiotics active against gram-positive organisms were analyzed for gram-positive susceptibilities: cefotaxime (91.8%), ceftriaxone (98.1%), levofloxacin (82.5%), and vancomycin (91.8%). Conclusion The results of this study provide clinicians with antibiotic susceptibilities against organisms that were not identified through Verigene to better guide timely and appropriate antibiotic therapy against gram-negative and gram-positive aerobic bacteria. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3703-3703
Author(s):  
Xiaofeng Luo ◽  
Jinhua Ren ◽  
Zhizhe Chen ◽  
Ting Yang ◽  
Jianda Hu

Abstract High procalcitonin (PCT) levels are strongly associated with systemic bacterial infections. PCT is produced in response to bacterial endotoxin and inflammatory cytokines. Few studies are available in the literature on PCT ability to distinguish different strains of bloodstream infections in patients with hematologic diseases. The aim of the present study was to explore the value of determining serum PCT values early, i.e., as soon as blood cultures are positive, in a large population of patients with hematologic diseases. Patients with hematologic diseases admitted to the hematology department of our hospitalfrom January 2013 to March 2016 who had bloodstream infections were retrospectively analyzed. Patients whose blood samples were collected for simultaneous blood culture and PCT test were enrolled in the study, and they were divided into agranulocytosis and non-agranulocytosis groups. Automatic microbial analyzer was used to identify all strains, and PCT levels were analyzed with an automatic electrochemiluminescence system. The relationship between PCT levels and the strains in bloodstream infections was analyzed and compared, and the diagnostic efficacy of PCT was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. A total of 494 bloodstream infection cases that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in the study, involving 312 cases of bloodstream infection with single Gram-negative, 146 cases with single Gram-positive, 12 cases with single fungi, 19 cases with polymicrobes, and 5 cases identified as contaminated specimens. Unpaired t-test was used for data analysis. PCT levels for single Gram-negative infection (15.17±2.11 ng/ml) were significantly higher than those for Gram-positive infection (3.30 ± 0.93 ng/ml) (P<0.0001), or those for single fungi infection (0.22 ± 0.04 ng/ml) (P<0.0001). PCT levels for single Gram-positive infection were also significantly higher than those in single fungi infection (P<0.01). In the agranulocytosis group, which included 403 cases, the PCT levels in the single Gram-negative infection (14.14 ± 2.13 ng/ml) were significantly higher than those in single Gram-positive (2.49 ± 0.73 ng/ml) (P<0.0001), or in single fungi infection (0.24 ± 0.04 ng/ml) (P<0.0001). The PCT levels in the single Gram-positive bacterial infection were also significantly higher than those in single fungi infection (P<0.01). In the single Gram-negative bacteria bloodstream infection, we further found that the PCT levels in Enterobacteriaceae infection (17.00 ± 3.04 ng/ml) were significantly higher than those in nonfermentative Gram-negatives infection (6.49 ± 1.50 ng/ml) (P<0.01). ROC analysis was performed on monomicrobial blood cultures. ROC of single Gram-negative and Gram-positive infections revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.687, the best cut-off value was 0.58 ng/ml, the sensitivity was 60.81% and specificity was 71%. ROC of single Gram-negative and fungi infections revealed that the AUC was 0.795, the best cut-off value was 0.42 ng/ml, the sensitivity was 67% and specificity was 100%. ROC of single Gram-positive and fungi infections revealed that the AUC was 0.6, the best cut-off value was 0.44 ng/ml, the sensitivity was 37% and specificity was 100%. In the non-agranulocytosis group, we only found that the PCT levels in the single Gram-negative infection were significantly higher than those in single Gram-positive infection (P<0.05). In summary, early serum PCT quantitative determination can be used as a routine test to help to distinguish Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria, or fungi bloodstream infections in patients with hematologic diseases. These findings will be of great clinical value to select appropriate antibiotics for patients with hematologic diseases and bloodstream infections. Figure Figure. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


1997 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 333-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonia Teresinha TRESOLDI ◽  
Maria Luíza Moretti BRANCHINI ◽  
Djalma de Carvalho MOREIRA FILHO ◽  
Maria Clara PADOVEZE ◽  
Sonia P. Evangelista DANTAS ◽  
...  

The frequency of microorganisms identified in nosocomial infections at Unicamp University Hospital from 1987 to 1994 was analysed. The most common microorganism was S. aureus (20.9%), which was found in surgical wound, bloodstream and arterial-venous infections. In urinary tract infections (UTI), gram-negative rods (56.5%) and yeasts (9%) predominated. A. baumannii isolates were observed to have increased in the last three years. There was a gradual increase in the frequency of coagulase-negative staphylococci and A. baumannii in bloodstream infections but there wasn’t any change in Candida sp


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shamshul Ansari ◽  
Hari Prasad Nepal ◽  
Rajendra Gautam ◽  
Sony Shrestha ◽  
Puja Neopane ◽  
...  

Introduction. Children are among the most vulnerable population groups to contract illnesses. The varying microbiological pattern of septicemia warrants the need for an ongoing review of the causative organisms and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern. Therefore, the objective of this study was to document the bacterial etiology of childhood septicemia and its antibiotic susceptibility profile.Methods.Cross-sectional type of study in 1630 suspected patients was conducted at CMCTH from January 2012 to December 2013. Blood samples were collected aseptically for culture. The organisms grown were identified by standard microbiological methods recommended by American Society for Microbiology (ASM) and subjected to antibiotic susceptibility testing by modified Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Methicillin resistance was confirmed using cefoxitin and oxacillin disks methods.Results.Septicemia was detected in 172 (10.6%) cases. Among Gram-positive organisms, coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) were leading pathogen andAcinetobacterspp. were leading pathogen among Gram-negative isolates. Vancomycin, teicoplanin, and clindamycin were the most effective antibiotics against Gram-positive isolates while amikacin was effective against Gram-positive as well as Gram-negative isolates. Methicillin resistance was detected in 44.4% ofStaphylococcus aureus.Conclusions. This study has highlighted the burden of bacterial etiology for septicemia among children in a tertiary care center of central Nepal.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document