scholarly journals Towards an Ideal In Cell Hybridization-Based Strategy to Discover Protein Interactomes of Selected RNA Molecules

2022 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 942
Author(s):  
Michele Spiniello ◽  
Mark Scalf ◽  
Amelia Casamassimi ◽  
Ciro Abbondanza ◽  
Lloyd M. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Cell Hybridization ◽  
Rna Molecules ◽  
Cellular Context ◽  
Protein Binders ◽  
Non Coding Rnas ◽  
Technical Features ◽  
Experimental Strategies

RNA-binding proteins are crucial to the function of coding and non-coding RNAs. The disruption of RNA–protein interactions is involved in many different pathological states. Several computational and experimental strategies have been developed to identify protein binders of selected RNA molecules. Amongst these, ‘in cell’ hybridization methods represent the gold standard in the field because they are designed to reveal the proteins bound to specific RNAs in a cellular context. Here, we compare the technical features of different ‘in cell’ hybridization approaches with a focus on their advantages, limitations, and current and potential future applications.

scholarly journals RNA regulons and the RNA-protein interaction network

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 403-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jochen Imig ◽  
Alexander Kanitz ◽  
André P. Gerber
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interaction ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Interaction Network ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Interaction Network ◽  
Coordinated Control ◽  
Non Coding Rnas ◽  
Rna Interaction

AbstractThe development of genome-wide analysis tools has prompted global investigation of the gene expression program, revealing highly coordinated control mechanisms that ensure proper spatiotemporal activity of a cell’s macromolecular components. With respect to the regulation of RNA transcripts, the concept of RNA regulons, which – by analogy with DNA regulons in bacteria – refers to the coordinated control of functionally related RNA molecules, has emerged as a unifying theory that describes the logic of regulatory RNA-protein interactions in eukaryotes. Hundreds of RNA-binding proteins and small non-coding RNAs, such as microRNAs, bind to distinct elements in target RNAs, thereby exerting specific and concerted control over posttranscriptional events. In this review, we discuss recent reports committed to systematically explore the RNA-protein interaction network and outline some of the principles and recurring features of RNA regulons: the coordination of functionally related mRNAs through RNA-binding proteins or non-coding RNAs, the modular structure of its components, and the dynamic rewiring of RNA-protein interactions upon exposure to internal or external stimuli. We also summarize evidence for robust combinatorial control of mRNAs, which could determine the ultimate fate of each mRNA molecule in a cell. Finally, the compilation and integration of global protein-RNA interaction data has yielded first insights into network structures and provided the hypothesis that RNA regulons may, in part, constitute noise ‘buffers’ to handle stochasticity in cellular transcription.

How to find small non-coding RNAs in bacteria

2005 ◽  
Vol 386 (12) ◽  
pp. 1219-1238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Vogel ◽  
Cynthia Mira Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Small Rnas ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Rna Molecules ◽  
Regulatory Circuit ◽  
Non Coding Rna ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Response To Stress ◽  
Non Coding Rnas

AbstractSmall non-coding RNAs (sRNAs) have attracted considerable attention as an emerging class of gene expression regulators. In bacteria, a few regulatory RNA molecules have long been known, but the extent of their role in the cell was not fully appreciated until the recent discovery of hundreds of potential sRNA genes in the bacteriumEscherichia coli. Orthologs of theseE. colisRNA genes, as well as unrelated sRNAs, were also found in other bacteria. Here we review the disparate experimental approaches used over the years to identify sRNA molecules and their genes in prokaryotes. These include genome-wide searches based on the biocomputational prediction of non-coding RNA genes, global detection of non-coding transcripts using microarrays, and shotgun cloning of small RNAs (RNomics). Other sRNAs were found by either co-purification with RNA-binding proteins, such as Hfq or CsrA/RsmA, or classical cloning of abundant small RNAs after size fractionation in polyacrylamide gels. In addition, bacterial genetics offers powerful tools that aid in the search for sRNAs that may play a critical role in the regulatory circuit of interest, for example, the response to stress or the adaptation to a change in nutrient availability. Many of the techniques discussed here have also been successfully applied to the discovery of eukaryotic and archaeal sRNAs.

scholarly journals The search for RNA-binding proteins: a technical and interdisciplinary challenge

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey M. Smith ◽  
Jarrod J. Sandow ◽  
Andrew I. Webb
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Target Validation ◽  
Binding Function ◽  
Technical Features ◽  
Post Transcriptional Regulation ◽  
The Impact

RNA-binding proteins are customarily regarded as important facilitators of gene expression. In recent years, RNA–protein interactions have also emerged as a pervasive force in the regulation of homeostasis. The compendium of proteins with provable RNA-binding function has swelled from the hundreds to the thousands astride the partnership of mass spectrometry-based proteomics and RNA sequencing. At the foundation of these advances is the adaptation of RNA-centric capture methods that can extract bound protein that has been cross-linked in its native environment. These methods reveal snapshots in time displaying an extensive network of regulation and a wealth of data that can be used for both the discovery of RNA-binding function and the molecular interfaces at which these interactions occur. This review will focus on the impact of these developments on our broader perception of post-transcriptional regulation, and how the technical features of current capture methods, as applied in mammalian systems, create a challenging medium for interpretation by systems biologists and target validation by experimental researchers.

scholarly journals The RNA-Protein Interactome of Differentiated Kidney Tubular Epithelial Cells

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 564-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Ignarski ◽  
Constantin Rill ◽  
Rainer W.J. Kaiser ◽  
Madlen Kaldirim ◽  
René Neuhaus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Epithelial Cells ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Collecting Duct ◽  
Rna Stability ◽  
Tubular Epithelial Cells ◽  
Experimental Conditions ◽  
Rna Molecules ◽  
Ciliated Epithelial Cells

BackgroundRNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are fundamental regulators of cellular biology that affect all steps in the generation and processing of RNA molecules. Recent evidence suggests that regulation of RBPs that modulate both RNA stability and translation may have a profound effect on the proteome. However, regulation of RBPs in clinically relevant experimental conditions has not been studied systematically.MethodsWe used RNA interactome capture, a method for the global identification of RBPs to characterize the global RNA‐binding proteome (RBPome) associated with polyA-tailed RNA species in murine ciliated epithelial cells of the inner medullary collecting duct. To study regulation of RBPs in a clinically relevant condition, we analyzed hypoxia-associated changes of the RBPome.ResultsWe identified >1000 RBPs that had been previously found using other systems. In addition, we found a number of novel RBPs not identified by previous screens using mouse or human cells, suggesting that these proteins may be specific RBPs in differentiated kidney epithelial cells. We also found quantitative differences in RBP-binding to mRNA that were associated with hypoxia versus normoxia.ConclusionsThese findings demonstrate the regulation of RBPs through environmental stimuli and provide insight into the biology of hypoxia-response signaling in epithelial cells in the kidney. A repository of the RBPome and proteome in kidney tubular epithelial cells, derived from our findings, is freely accessible online, and may contribute to a better understanding of the role of RNA-protein interactions in kidney tubular epithelial cells, including the response of these cells to hypoxia.

scholarly journals The Landscape of RNA-Protein Interactions in Plants: Approaches and Current Status

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 2845
Author(s):  
Vesper Burjoski ◽  
Anireddy S. N. Reddy
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Translational Regulation ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Protein Coding ◽  
Rna Molecules ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Binding Domains

RNAs transmit information from DNA to encode proteins that perform all cellular processes and regulate gene expression in multiple ways. From the time of synthesis to degradation, RNA molecules are associated with proteins called RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). The RBPs play diverse roles in many aspects of gene expression including pre-mRNA processing and post-transcriptional and translational regulation. In the last decade, the application of modern techniques to identify RNA–protein interactions with individual proteins, RNAs, and the whole transcriptome has led to the discovery of a hidden landscape of these interactions in plants. Global approaches such as RNA interactome capture (RIC) to identify proteins that bind protein-coding transcripts have led to the identification of close to 2000 putative RBPs in plants. Interestingly, many of these were found to be metabolic enzymes with no known canonical RNA-binding domains. Here, we review the methods used to analyze RNA–protein interactions in plants thus far and highlight the understanding of plant RNA–protein interactions these techniques have provided us. We also review some recent protein-centric, RNA-centric, and global approaches developed with non-plant systems and discuss their potential application to plants. We also provide an overview of results from classical studies of RNA–protein interaction in plants and discuss the significance of the increasingly evident ubiquity of RNA–protein interactions for the study of gene regulation and RNA biology in plants.

PlncRNADB: A Repository of Plant lncRNAs and lncRNA-RBP Protein Interactions

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 621-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youhuang Bai ◽  
Xiaozhuan Dai ◽  
Tiantian Ye ◽  
Peijing Zhang ◽  
Xu Yan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Populus Trichocarpa ◽  
Noncoding Rnas ◽  
Reference Database ◽  
Protein Coding ◽  
Arabidopsis Lyrata ◽  
User Friendly

Background: Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are endogenous noncoding RNAs, arbitrarily longer than 200 nucleotides, that play critical roles in diverse biological processes. LncRNAs exist in different genomes ranging from animals to plants. Objective: PlncRNADB is a searchable database of lncRNA sequences and annotation in plants. Methods: We built a pipeline for lncRNA prediction in plants, providing a convenient utility for users to quickly distinguish potential noncoding RNAs from protein-coding transcripts. Results: More than five thousand lncRNAs are collected from four plant species (Arabidopsis thaliana, Arabidopsis lyrata, Populus trichocarpa and Zea mays) in PlncRNADB. Moreover, our database provides the relationship between lncRNAs and various RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), which can be displayed through a user-friendly web interface. Conclusion: PlncRNADB can serve as a reference database to investigate the lncRNAs and their interaction with RNA-binding proteins in plants. The PlncRNADB is freely available at http://bis.zju.edu.cn/PlncRNADB/.

scholarly journals Compendium of Methods to Uncover RNA-Protein Interactions In Vivo

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Mrinmoyee Majumder ◽  
Viswanathan Palanisamy
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Pathways ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Protein Nucleic Acid

Control of gene expression is critical in shaping the pro-and eukaryotic organisms’ genotype and phenotype. The gene expression regulatory pathways solely rely on protein–protein and protein–nucleic acid interactions, which determine the fate of the nucleic acids. RNA–protein interactions play a significant role in co- and post-transcriptional regulation to control gene expression. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are a diverse group of macromolecules that bind to RNA and play an essential role in RNA biology by regulating pre-mRNA processing, maturation, nuclear transport, stability, and translation. Hence, the studies aimed at investigating RNA–protein interactions are essential to advance our knowledge in gene expression patterns associated with health and disease. Here we discuss the long-established and current technologies that are widely used to study RNA–protein interactions in vivo. We also present the advantages and disadvantages of each method discussed in the review.

scholarly journals RNA-Centric Approaches to Profile the RNA–Protein Interaction Landscape on Selected RNAs

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
André P. Gerber
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Cell Protein ◽  
Transcriptional Regulatory Networks ◽  
Technological Advances

RNA–protein interactions frame post-transcriptional regulatory networks and modulate transcription and epigenetics. While the technological advances in RNA sequencing have significantly expanded the repertoire of RNAs, recently developed biochemical approaches combined with sensitive mass-spectrometry have revealed hundreds of previously unrecognized and potentially novel RNA-binding proteins. Nevertheless, a major challenge remains to understand how the thousands of RNA molecules and their interacting proteins assemble and control the fate of each individual RNA in a cell. Here, I review recent methodological advances to approach this problem through systematic identification of proteins that interact with particular RNAs in living cells. Thereby, a specific focus is given to in vivo approaches that involve crosslinking of RNA–protein interactions through ultraviolet irradiation or treatment of cells with chemicals, followed by capture of the RNA under study with antisense-oligonucleotides and identification of bound proteins with mass-spectrometry. Several recent studies defining interactomes of long non-coding RNAs, viral RNAs, as well as mRNAs are highlighted, and short reference is given to recent in-cell protein labeling techniques. These recent experimental improvements could open the door for broader applications and to study the remodeling of RNA–protein complexes upon different environmental cues and in disease.

scholarly journals Posttranscriptional regulation of lipid metabolism by non-coding RNAs and RNA binding proteins

2018 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 129-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhishek K. Singh ◽  
Binod Aryal ◽  
Xinbo Zhang ◽  
Yuhua Fan ◽  
Nathan L. Price ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lipid Metabolism ◽  
Posttranscriptional Regulation ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Non Coding Rnas

scholarly journals The effective function of circular RNA in colorectal cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mandana Ameli-Mojarad ◽  
Melika Ameli-Mojarad ◽  
Mahrooyeh Hadizadeh ◽  
Chris Young ◽  
Hosna Babini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Circular Rna ◽  
Circular Rnas ◽  
Colorectal Tumorigenesis ◽  
Non Coding Rnas ◽  
Mirna Sponges ◽  
Mechanisms Of Development

AbstractColorectal cancer (CRC) is the 3rd most common type of cancer worldwide. Late detection plays role in one-third of annual mortality due to CRC. Therefore, it is essential to find a precise and optimal diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for the identification and treatment of colorectal tumorigenesis. Covalently closed, circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a class of non-coding RNAs, which can have the same function as microRNA (miRNA) sponges, as regulators of splicing and transcription, and as interactors with RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). Therefore, circRNAs have been investigated as specific targets for diagnostic and prognostic detection of CRC. These non-coding RNAs are also linked to metastasis, proliferation, differentiation, migration, angiogenesis, apoptosis, and drug resistance, illustrating the importance of understanding their involvement in the molecular mechanisms of development and progression of CRC. In this review, we present a detailed summary of recent findings relating to the dysregulation of circRNAs and their potential role in CRC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document