scholarly journals Clinical Management of Diabetes Mellitus in the Era of COVID-19: Practical Issues, Peculiarities and Concerns

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 2288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chrysi Koliaki ◽  
Anastasios Tentolouris ◽  
Ioanna Eleftheriadou ◽  
Andreas Melidonis ◽  
George Dimitriadis ◽  
...  

The management of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic can be challenging. Even if they are not infected, they are at risk of dysregulated glycemic control due to the restrictive measures which compromise and disrupt healthcare delivery. In the case of infection, people with DM have an increased risk of developing severe complications. The major principles of optimal care for mild outpatient cases include a patient-tailored therapeutic approach, regular glucose monitoring and adherence to medical recommendations regarding lifestyle measures and drug treatment. For critically ill hospitalized patients, tight monitoring of glucose, fluids, electrolytes, pH and blood ketones is of paramount importance to optimize outcomes. All patients with DM do not have an equally increased risk for severity and mortality due to COVID-19. Certain clinical and biological characteristics determine high-risk phenotypes within the DM population and such prognostic markers need to be characterized in future studies. Further research is needed to examine which subgroups of DM patients are expected to benefit the most from specific antiviral, immunomodulatory and other treatment strategies in the context of patient-tailored precision medicine, which emerges as an urgent priority in the era of COVID-19.

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e002032
Author(s):  
Marcela Martinez ◽  
Jimena Santamarina ◽  
Adrian Pavesi ◽  
Carla Musso ◽  
Guillermo E Umpierrez

Glycated hemoglobin is currently the gold standard for assessment of long-term glycemic control and response to medical treatment in patients with diabetes. Glycated hemoglobin, however, does not address fluctuations in blood glucose. Glycemic variability (GV) refers to fluctuations in blood glucose levels. Recent clinical data indicate that GV is associated with increased risk of hypoglycemia, microvascular and macrovascular complications, and mortality in patients with diabetes, independently of glycated hemoglobin level. The use of continuous glucose monitoring devices has markedly improved the assessment of GV in clinical practice and facilitated the assessment of GV as well as hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia events in patients with diabetes. We review current concepts on the definition and assessment of GV and its association with cardiovascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinyuan Zhang ◽  
Lin Zhao ◽  
Shijing Deng ◽  
Xuguang Sun ◽  
Ningli Wang

There has been substantial progress in our understanding of the ocular surface system/lacrimal function unit in the past 15 years. Keratoconjunctivitis sicca, more commonly referred to as dry eye syndrome (DES), is the most frequently encountered condition and diabetes mellitus (DM) has been identified as one of the leading causes of DES. Poor glycemic control affects both the anterior and the posterior segments of the eye and increasing prevalence of diabetes-associated DES (DMDES) has been reported in recent years. The pathogenesis and specific features of DMDES remain uncertain and interventions are limited to those used in DES. This review outlines the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and the current preventive and treatment strategies for diabetes-related DES.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johny Nicolas ◽  
Victor Razuk ◽  
Gennaro Giustino ◽  
Roxana Mehran

Diabetes mellitus is a complex disease that leads to long-term damage to various organ systems. Among the numerous cardiovascular disease-related complications, thrombotic events frequently occur in patients with diabetes. Although guidelines exist for treating and preventing most diabetes-related co-morbidities, the evidence on antithrombotic therapy in primary and secondary prevention is limited due to the scarcity of randomized trials dedicated to patients with diabetes mellitus. Most of the available data are derived from studies that only included a small proportion of patients with diabetes. The present review provides an overview of the status of knowledge on antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy in patients with diabetes, focusing on the risk–benefit balance of these therapies and future treatment strategies.


2019 ◽  
pp. S107-S120 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. JACKULIAK ◽  
M. KUŽMA ◽  
J. PAYER

Patients with diabetes mellitus are at an increased risk of bone fractures. Several groups of effective antidiabetic drugs are available, which are very often given in combination. The effects of these medications on bone metabolism and fracture risk must not be neglected. Commonly used antidiabetic drugs might have a positive, neutral or negative impact on skeletal health. Increased risk of fracture has been identified with use of thiazolidinediones, most definitively in women. Also treatment with sulfonylureas can have adverse effects on bone. One consequence of these findings has been greater attention to fracture outcomes in trails of new diabetes medication (incretins and SGLT-2 inhibitors). The effect of insulin on bone is discussed and the risk of fractures in patients using insulin seems to be unrelated to insulin as itself. The aim of the review is to summarize effects of antidiabetic treatment on bone – bone mineral density, fractures and bone turnover markers. The authors also try to recommend a strategy how to treat patients with diabetes mellitus regarding the risk of osteoporotic fractures. In this review the problem of how to treat osteoporosis in patient with diabetes is also discussed.


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gautam R Shroff ◽  
Craig A Solid ◽  
Charles A Herzog

Background: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and non valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) are at increased risk of ischemic stroke; but evidence regarding ischemic stroke and warfarin use in the literature is limited. We evaluated temporal trends in ischemic stroke and warfarin use among the US Medicare population with and without DM. Methods: One-year cohorts of patients with Medicare as primary payer, 1992-2010, were created using the Medicare 5% sample. ICD-9-CM codes were used to identify AF, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke and comorbidities; ≤3 consecutive prothrombin-time claims were used to identify warfarin use. Results: Demographic characteristics between 1992 (n=40255) and 2010 (n=80314) respectively were (proportions): age 65-74 years (37%, 32%); age ≤ 85 years (20%, 25%); white (94%, 93%); hypertension (46%, 80%); DM (20%, 32%), chronic kidney disease (5%, 18%). Ischemic stroke rates among Medicare AF patients with DM decreased by 71% (1992, 2010) from 65 to 19 /1000 patient-years; warfarin utilization increased from 28% to 62% respectively (Figure 1A). Among Medicare AF patients without DM, ischemic stroke rates decreased by 68% from 44 to 14/ 1000 patient-years; warfarin use increased 26% to 59% respectively (Figure 1B). About 38% Medicare AF pts with DM did not receive anticoagulation in 2010. Conclusion: Medicare patients with and without DM had a similar reduction in ischemic stroke rates; and similar increase in warfarin utilization over the study period. A significant proportion of Medicare pts with DM did not receive anticoagulation with warfarin for AF in 2010; this population deserves future attention.


2002 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 504-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Chyun ◽  
Viola Vaccarino ◽  
Jaime Murillo ◽  
Lawrence H. Young ◽  
Harlan M. Krumholz

• Objective To examine the association between (1) comorbid conditions related to diabetes mellitus, clinical findings on arrival at the hospital, and characteristics of the myocardial infarction and (2) risk of heart failure, recurrent myocardial infarction, and mortality in the year after myocardial infarction in elderly 30-day survivors of myocardial infarction who had non–insulin- or insulin-treated diabetes. • Methods Medical records for June 1, 1992, through February 28, 1993, of Medicare beneficiaries (n = 1698), 65 years or older, hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction in Connecticut were reviewed by trained abstractors. • Results One year after myocardial infarction, elderly patients with non–insulin- and insulin-treated diabetes mellitus had significantly greater risk for readmission for heart failure and recurrent myocardial infarction than did patients without diabetes mellitus, and risk was greater in patients treated with insulin than in patients not treated with insulin. Diabetes mellitus, comorbid conditions related to diabetes mellitus, clinical findings on arrival, and characteristics of the myocardial infarction, specifically measures of ventricular function, were important predictors of these outcomes. Mortality was greater in patients not treated with insulin than in patients treated with insulin; the increased risk was mostly due to comorbid conditions related to diabetes mellitus and poorer ventricular function. • Conclusions Risk of heart failure, recurrent myocardial infarction, and mortality is elevated in elderly patients who have non–insulin- or insulin-treated diabetes mellitus. Comorbid conditions related to diabetes mellitus and ventricular function at the time of the index myocardial infarction are important contributors to poorer outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Yashuo Wang ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Bin Wang ◽  
Yunyang Wang

Background. Our aim was to assess the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage associated with diabetes among patients taking low-dose aspirin (≤325 mg/day). Methods. A systematic search was conducted for publication in English and Chinese using term equivalents for “GI hemorrhage”, “aspirin”, and “diabetes mellitus” up till April 2020. Electronic databases include PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, and VIP Database. Two independent authors searched databases and reviewed abstracts for comprehensive studies keeping adequate study quality. Data of weighted odds ratios were statistically evaluated and potential bias was checked. Results. Among 446 publications, eight case-control researches, including 1601 patients, were deemed for this meta-analysis. Patients with diabetes were associated with a higher risk of GI hemorrhage than patients without diabetes: the summary ORs were 3.10 (95% CI, 2.35–4.09). The heterogeneity of the reports was not significant (Chi2=3.39, P=0.85; I2=0%). Conclusion. The meta-analysis showed that aspirin users with diabetes were more likely to have GI hemorrhage. Hence, when treating diabetics with aspirin, the increased risk of GI bleeding should be taken in consideration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document