scholarly journals Association between Primary Perioperative CEA Ratio, Tumor Site, and Overall Survival in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 3848
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Odeny ◽  
Nicole Farha ◽  
Hannah Hildebrandand ◽  
Jessica Allen ◽  
Wilfred Vazquez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
P Value ◽  
Inter Quartile Range ◽  
Quartile Range ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
The University

There are differences in the incidence, clinical presentation, molecular pathogenesis, and outcome of colorectal cancer (CRC) based on tumor location. Emerging research suggests that the perioperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) ratio (post-op/pre-op CEA) is a prognostic factor for CRC patients. We aimed to determine the association between CEA ratio, tumor location, and overall survival (OS) among patients with CRC. We analyzed 427 patients who underwent resection for CRC at the University of Kansas Medical Center. After excluding those without pre- or post-operative CEA data, 207 patients were classified as either high (≥0.5) or low (<0.5) ratio. Primary outcomes were as follows: (1) OS stratified by CEA ratio; (2) OS stratified by tumor location; (3) OS stratified by tumor location among those with CEA elevation > 5 ng/mL at the time of recurrence. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate survival rates. The median age was 62 years (inter-quartile range 51–71), 55% were male, 41% were smokers, 71% had left-sided tumors, the median pre-operative CEA was 3.1 ng/mL (inter-quartile range (IQR) 1.5–9.7), and 57% had a CEA ratio ≥0.5. The OS rates were 65.1% and 86.3% in patients with high versus low CEA ratios, respectively (log-rank p-value = 0.045). The OS rates were 64.4% and 77.3% in patients with right-sided vs. left-sided tumors, respectively (log-rank p-value = 0.5). Among patients with CEA levels greater than 5 at the time of recurrence, the OS rates were 42.9% and 43.4% in patients with right-sided vs. left-sided tumors, respectively (log-rank p-value = 0.7). There was a significantly higher survival among patients with low CEA ratios than among those with high CEA ratios. There was no difference in OS between left- versus right-sided tumors. Among patients with CEA elevation > 5 ng/mL at the time of recurrence, there was no difference in OS between left versus right-sided tumors. These findings warrant validation in a larger cohort as our sample size was limited.

Association between primary tumor site, perioperative CEA ratio, and overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 518-518
Author(s):  
Thomas A Odeny ◽  
Nicole Farha ◽  
Wilfred Vazquez ◽  
Amna Batool ◽  
Anwaar Saeed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Effect Modification ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
P Value ◽  
Primary Tumor Site

518 Background: There are differences in the incidence, clinical presentation, molecular pathogenesis and outcome of colorectal cancer (CRC) based on the tumor location. Emerging research suggests that the perioperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) ratio is a prognostic factor for CRC patients. We aimed to determine the association between tumor location, perioperative CEA ratio, and 5-year survival among patients with CRC. Methods: We analyzed 111 patients who underwent resection for CRC at KUMC. After excluding patients without pre- or post-operative CEA data, 62 patients for whom we could calculate a CEA ratio (post-op/pre-op CEA) were classified as either high ( ≥ 0.5) or low ( < 0.5) ratio. The primary outcomes were: 1) overall survival (OS) stratified by tumor location; 2) OS stratified by CEA ratio; and 3) whether there was effect modification by tumor location, of the association between perioperative CEA ratio and OS, after adjusting for tumor stage and smoking status. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival rates, and Cox proportional hazards models for multivariate analysis. Results: The median age was 61 years, 54% male, 31% smokers, 74% left-sided tumors, median pre-operative CEA was 3.3, and 60% had CEA ratio ≥ 0.5. The OS rates were 89.1% and 81.3% in patients with left-sided versus right-sided tumors respectively (p-value = 0.4). The OS rates were 83.8% and 92.0% in patients with high versus low CEA ratios respectively (p-value = 0.3). There was effect modification by tumor location on association between CEA ratio and OS, after adjusting for smoking status and tumor stage (p-value < 0.001). However, in the stratified analysis, the n was too small to permit inferential analysis. In multivariate analysis, both tumor location (HR 0.4; p = 0.3) and perioperative CEA ratio (HR 2.7; p = 0.3) were not significantly associated with OS after adjusting for smoking status and tumor stage. Conclusions: There was no difference in OS between left versus right-sided tumors. The association between perioperative CEA ratio and OS was significantly modified by tumor location. However, to attribute this modification to left versus right warrants validation in a larger cohort as our sample size was limited.

scholarly journals Therapeutic Characteristics, Chemotherapy-Related Toxicities and Survivorship in Colorectal Cancer Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zineb Aoullay ◽  
Meriem Slaoui ◽  
Rachid Razine ◽  
Abdelouahed Er-Raki ◽  
Bouchra Meddah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
P Value ◽  
Major Health Problem ◽  
Major Health ◽  
Lung Cancers ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients ◽  
Grade Iii ◽  
Chi2 Test

BACKGROUND: Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is a major health problem around the globe. In Morocco, the disease ranks third after breast and lung cancers. This study is the first in Morocco to investigate epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic features while exhaustively describing toxic side-effects to chemotherapy of CRC and studying the 3-years survivorship.METHODS: This is a descriptive and analytical retrospective study of about 290 patients with CRC enrolled during the period of January-December 2013. Statistical analysis was performed to correlate clinicopathological data with chemotherapy toxicity and survivorship in patients, by Chi2 test. Overall Survival (OS) rate has been calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using Log-rank test.RESULTS: Fifty-five percent had a tumor localized in rectum, and 42,8% in colon. Mean age of these patients at diagnosis was 56,16 ±14,6. incidence rate of adverse events (grade I to IV) was 85,6%. Diarrhea was the predominant toxicity (4.6%) occurring at a high grade (grade III-IV). The 3-years OS rate of patients with CRC was 71%. OS decreased by age, and patients with age subgroup between 40 to 59 years had a better OS than the other age subgroups (60 to 79 years and >80 years) with a p-value of 0.0001. Occurence of toxicity (all grades and types) was linked to a higher survival rates compared to the group who had no toxicity noticed (p-value of 0.001).CONCLUSION: Our study shows that patients who had a polychemotherapy had a better OS than those who had monotherapy (p-value of 0.002). 

Association between primary tumor site, perioperative CEA ratio, smoking status, and overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15156-e15156
Author(s):  
Thomas A Odeny ◽  
Nicole Farha ◽  
Hannah Hildebrand ◽  
Jessica Allen ◽  
Wilfred Vazquez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
P Value ◽  
Primary Tumor Site

e15156 Background: There are differences in the incidence, clinical presentation, molecular pathogenesis and outcome of colorectal cancer (CRC) based on tumor location. Emerging research suggests that perioperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) ratio (post-op/pre-op CEA) is a prognostic factor for CRC patients. We aimed to determine the association between tumor location, CEA ratio, smoking status and overall survival (OS) among patients with CRC. Methods: We analysed 323 patients who underwent resection for CRC at KUMC. After excluding those without pre- or post-operative CEA data, 162 patients were classified as either high ( > = 0.5) or low ( < 0.5) ratio. Primary outcomes were: 1) OS stratified by tumor location; 2) OS stratified by CEA ratio; and 3) whether the association between CEA ratio and OS differed by tumor location, after adjusting for stage and smoking status. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival rates, and Cox proportional hazards models for multivariate analysis. Results: The median age was 63 years (inter-quartile range 53-72), 61% male, 43% smokers, 73% left-sided tumors, median pre-operative CEA was 3.0 (IQR 1.5-7), and 64% had CEA ratio > = 0.5. The OS rates were 85.7% and 91.9% in patients with left-sided vs right-sided tumors respectively (log-rank p-value = 0.9). The OS rates were 83.5% and 91.5% in patients with high vs low CEA ratios respectively (log-rank p-value = 0.3). The effect of CEA ratio on OS was significantly different when stratified by tumor location (p-value for interaction < 0.001). However, in the stratified analysis, the n was too small to permit further inferential analysis. In multivariate analysis, both tumor location (HR 0.6; p = 0.5) and CEA ratio (HR 1.5; p = 0.5) were not significantly associated with OS after adjusting for smoking status and tumor stage. Smoking was significantly associated with higher rates of death (HR 3.9; p = 0.04) when adjusted for tumor location, CEA ratio, and tumor stage. Conclusions: There was no difference in OS between left versus right-sided tumors. The association between CEA ratio and OS was significantly modified by tumor location. However, to attribute this modification to left vs right warrants validation in a larger cohort as our sample size was limited. Smoking increases mortality irrespective of right vs left sided CRC.

scholarly journals IL15RA and SMAD3 Genetic Variants Predict Overall Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with FOLFIRI Therapy: A New Paradigm

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1705
Author(s):  
Elena De Mattia ◽  
Jerry Polesel ◽  
Rossana Roncato ◽  
Adrien Labriet ◽  
Alessia Bignucolo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Genetic Determinants ◽  
New Paradigm

A new paradigm in cancer chemotherapy derives from the interaction between chemotherapeutics, including irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and the immune system. The patient’s immune response can modulate chemotherapy effectiveness, and, on the other hand, chemotherapeutic agents can foster tumor cell immunogenicity. On these grounds, the analysis of the cancer patients’ immunogenetic characteristics and their effect on survival after chemotherapy represent a new frontier. This study aims to identify genetic determinants in the immuno-related pathways predictive of overall survival (OS) after FOLFIRI (irinotecan, 5-FU, leucovorin) therapy. Two independent cohorts comprising a total of 335 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) homogeneously treated with first-line FOLFIRI were included in the study. The prognostic effect of 192 tagging genetic polymorphisms in 34 immune-related genes was evaluated using the bead array technology. The IL15RA rs7910212-C allele was associated with worse OS in both discovery (HR: 1.57, p = 0.0327, Bootstrap p-value = 0.0280) and replication (HR:1.71, p = 0.0411) cohorts. Conversely, SMAD3 rs7179840-C allele was associated with better OS in both discovery (HR:0.65, p = 0.0202, Bootstrap p-value = 0.0203) and replication (HR:0.61, p = 0.0216) cohorts. A genetic prognostic score was generated integrating IL15RA-rs7910212 and SMAD3-rs7179840 markers with inflammation-related prognostic polymorphisms we previously identified in the same study population (i.e., PXR [NR1I2]-rs1054190, VDR-rs7299460). The calculated genetic score successfully discriminated patients with different survival probabilities (p < 0.0001 log-rank test). These findings provide new insight on the prognostic value of genetic determinants, such as IL15RA and SMAD3 markers, and could offer a new decision tool to improve the clinical management of patients with mCRC receiving FOLFIRI.

scholarly journals Correlation of Body Mass Index with Oncologic Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Large Population-Based Study

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3592
Author(s):  
Chong-Chi Chiu ◽  
Chung-Han Ho ◽  
Chao-Ming Hung ◽  
Chien-Ming Chao ◽  
Chih-Cheng Lai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Body Weight ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Normal Weight ◽  
P Value ◽  
Administrative Claims ◽  
The Impact

It has been acknowledged that excess body weight increases the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC); however, there is little evidence on the impact of body mass index (BMI) on CRC patients’ long-term oncologic results in Asian populations. We studied the influence of BMI on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and CRC-specific survival rates in CRC patients from the administrative claims datasets of Taiwan using the Kaplan–Meier survival curves and the log-rank test to estimate the statistical differences among BMI groups. Underweight patients (<18.50 kg/m2) presented higher mortality (56.40%) and recurrence (5.34%) rates. Besides this, they had worse OS (aHR:1.61; 95% CI: 1.53–1.70; p-value: < 0.0001) and CRC-specific survival (aHR:1.52; 95% CI: 1.43–1.62; p-value: < 0.0001) rates compared with those of normal weight patients (18.50–24.99 kg/m2). On the contrary, CRC patients belonging to the overweight (25.00–29.99 kg/m2), class I obesity (30.00–34.99 kg/m2), and class II obesity (≥35.00 kg/m2) categories had better OS, DFS, and CRC-specific survival rates in the analysis than the patients in the normal weight category. Overweight patients consistently had the lowest mortality rate after a CRC diagnosis. The associations with being underweight may reflect a reverse causation. CRC patients should maintain a long-term healthy body weight.

Outcomes of Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatment for Colorectal Cancer in Nonagenarian Patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482199506
Author(s):  
Youngbae Jeon ◽  
Kyoung-Won Han ◽  
Won-Suk Lee ◽  
Jeong-Heum Baek
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Nonsurgical Treatment ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Number Of Patients

Purpose This study is aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of surgical treatment for nonagenarian patients with colorectal cancer. Methods This retrospective single-center study included patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer at the age of ≥90 years between 2004 and 2018. Patient demographics were compared between the operation and nonoperation groups (NOG). Perioperative outcomes, histopathological outcomes, and postoperative complications were evaluated. Overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and log-rank test. Results A total of 31 patients were included (16 men and 15 women), and the median age was 91 (range: 90‐96) years. The number of patients who underwent surgery and who received nonoperative management was 20 and 11, respectively. No statistical differences in baseline demographics were observed between both groups. None of these patients were treated with perioperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Surgery comprised 18 (90.0%) colectomies and 2 (10.0%) transanal excisions. Short-term (≤30 days) and long-term (31‐90 days) postoperative complications occurred in 7 (35.0%) and 4 (20.0%) patients, respectively. No complications needed reoperation, such as anastomosis leakage or bleeding. No postoperative mortality occurred within 30 days: 90-day postoperative mortality occurred in two patients (10.0%), respectively. The median overall survival of the operation group was 31.6 (95% confidence interval: 26.7‐36.5) and that of NOG was 12.5 months (95% CI: 2.4‐22.6) ( P = 0.012). Conclusion Surgical treatment can be considered in carefully selected nonagenarian patients with colorectal cancer in terms of acceptable postoperative morbidity, with better overall survival than the nonsurgical treatment.

Efficacy and prognostic significance of triflurodine/tipiracil beyond oxaliplatin and irinotecan based chemotherapy in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: An observational multicenter study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15586-e15586
Author(s):  
Mohamed Alghamdi ◽  
Shouki Bazarbashi ◽  
Elsamany Shereef ◽  
Mervat Mahrous ◽  
Omar Al shaer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Neutrophil Count ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
P Value ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

e15586 Background: In Saudi Arabia, the incidence of colorectal cancer has been increased over the past few years. The optimal treatment beyond the second line is not fully understood. To the best of our knowledge, the efficacy and disease outcomes of triflurodine/tipiracil in Saudi patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC) has not been studied yet. Our study is a real-life practice evaluation of the efficacy of triflurodine/tipiracil in patients with refractory mCRC. Moreover, the prognosis and the prognostic significance of the different clinical variables have been analyzed. Methods: A retrospective, multi-centers ( 5 centers representative of Saudi Arabia )observational study in patients with mCRC who have received triflurodine/tipiracil beyond oxaliplatin & Irinotecan-based chemotherapy between December 2018-December 2020.We aimed to assess the response to triflurodine/tipiracil, to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS ), the overall survival (OS), and the associated factors of prognostic significance. Results:The data of 100 patients with refractory mCRC who has received triflurodine/tipiracil have been analyzed. The mean age was 55.2 +11.8 years. Forty-two patients were (42%) females and 58 (58%) were male patients. Sigmoid was the most common primary site of cancer in 35 (35%) patients, followed by rectum 29 (29%). Peritoneal metastasis was present in 17 (23.3%) patients ,liver in 51(56.6%) and lung in 39 (50.7%). Metastatic sites were ≥ 2 in 45 (45%) patients. Metastatic lesions were ≥ 5 in 65 (65%) patients. Xelox chemotherapy regimen was the most commonly used first-line chemotherapy which represents 43%, while Folfiri or Xeliri combination was the most used second line in 57 (60%). For the third line, Folfox or Xelox was used in 81 (83.5%) patients. The fourth line was given to 49 (67.1%). For first-line biological agents, Cetuximab was used most frequently 31 (46.3%).Evaluation of the response to treatment with triflurodine/tipiracil revealed one patient (1%) with a complete response,3 patients (3%) with partial response, 28 (28%) patients with stable disease, and 66 (66%) showed progressive disease. The estimated median progression-free survival was 5 months ( 3.839 - 6.161) and the median overall survival was 12 months (9.732-14.268). The log-rank analysis showed that the baseline neutrophils ≤ 75 % ( P-value= 0.0092) and low hemoglobin level (P-value= 0.0245) were strongly associated with a higher survival. By multivariate Cox regression analysis, the neutrophil count ≤ 75 % was the only independent predictor for survival. Conclusions: Trifluridine/tipiracil is effective in patients with refractory mCRC. The low neutrophil count might predict a better overall survival.

Prognostic significance of the TNM system criteria, levels of serum insulin-like growth factors and their transport proteins, VEGF and MMP-7 in colorectal cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (8) ◽  
pp. 459-464
Author(s):  
A. A. Nikolaev ◽  
I. V. Babkina ◽  
Elena Sergeevna Gershtein ◽  
A. A. Alferov ◽  
V. V. Delektorskaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Serum Insulin ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Colon Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Tnm System ◽  
Results Of Treatment ◽  
Kaplan Meier

The analysis of long-term results of treatment of 88 primary patients with colon adenocarcinoma at various stages of tumor process is presented, taking into account the TNM system criteria, and serum IGF-1, IGF-2, IGFBP-1, IGFBP-2, IGFBP-3, VEGF, and MMP-7 levels. The overall survival rate assessed by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox multivariate regression model was used as the criterion of prognosis. It was established that IGF-1, IGFBP-2 and VEGF serum levels along with the stage of colorectal cancer might be considered as statistically significant independent predictors of overall survival in patients.

scholarly journals Coadjuvant Anti-VEGF A Therapy Improves Survival in Patients with Colorectal Cancer with Liver Metastasis: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-85
Author(s):  
Isabel Novo ◽  
Bárbara Campos ◽  
Filipa Pinto-Ribeiro ◽  
Sandra F. Martins
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Metastasis ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Effective Treatment Modality ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
The Impact

Background: the presence of liver metastasis in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the most significant prognostic factors. Objective: systematically review the results of studies evaluating the benefit of adding bevacizumab to a normal chemotherapy regime in the survival of patients with colorectal-cancer liver metastasis (CRLM). Search methods: Pubmed and Google Scholar databases were searched for eligible articles (from inception up to the 2 April 2019). Inclusion criteria: studies including patients with CRLM receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; bevacizumab) as treatment, overall survival as an outcome; regarding language restrictions, only articles in English were accepted. Main results: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. In 73% of these cases, chemotherapy with bevacizumab was an effective treatment modality for treating CRLM, and its administration significantly extended both overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS). Nevertheless, three articles showed no influence on survival rates of bevacizumab-associated chemotherapy. Author conclusions: It is necessary to standardize methodologies that aim to evaluate the impact of bevacizumab administration on the survival of patients with CRLM. Furthermore, follow-up time and the cause of a patient’s death should be recorded, specified, and cleared in order to better calculate the survival rate and provide a comparison between the produced literature.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document