Association between primary tumor site, perioperative CEA ratio, and overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 518-518
Author(s):  
Thomas A Odeny ◽  
Nicole Farha ◽  
Wilfred Vazquez ◽  
Amna Batool ◽  
Anwaar Saeed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Effect Modification ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
P Value ◽  
Primary Tumor Site

518 Background: There are differences in the incidence, clinical presentation, molecular pathogenesis and outcome of colorectal cancer (CRC) based on the tumor location. Emerging research suggests that the perioperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) ratio is a prognostic factor for CRC patients. We aimed to determine the association between tumor location, perioperative CEA ratio, and 5-year survival among patients with CRC. Methods: We analyzed 111 patients who underwent resection for CRC at KUMC. After excluding patients without pre- or post-operative CEA data, 62 patients for whom we could calculate a CEA ratio (post-op/pre-op CEA) were classified as either high ( ≥ 0.5) or low ( < 0.5) ratio. The primary outcomes were: 1) overall survival (OS) stratified by tumor location; 2) OS stratified by CEA ratio; and 3) whether there was effect modification by tumor location, of the association between perioperative CEA ratio and OS, after adjusting for tumor stage and smoking status. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival rates, and Cox proportional hazards models for multivariate analysis. Results: The median age was 61 years, 54% male, 31% smokers, 74% left-sided tumors, median pre-operative CEA was 3.3, and 60% had CEA ratio ≥ 0.5. The OS rates were 89.1% and 81.3% in patients with left-sided versus right-sided tumors respectively (p-value = 0.4). The OS rates were 83.8% and 92.0% in patients with high versus low CEA ratios respectively (p-value = 0.3). There was effect modification by tumor location on association between CEA ratio and OS, after adjusting for smoking status and tumor stage (p-value < 0.001). However, in the stratified analysis, the n was too small to permit inferential analysis. In multivariate analysis, both tumor location (HR 0.4; p = 0.3) and perioperative CEA ratio (HR 2.7; p = 0.3) were not significantly associated with OS after adjusting for smoking status and tumor stage. Conclusions: There was no difference in OS between left versus right-sided tumors. The association between perioperative CEA ratio and OS was significantly modified by tumor location. However, to attribute this modification to left versus right warrants validation in a larger cohort as our sample size was limited.

Association between primary tumor site, perioperative CEA ratio, smoking status, and overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15156-e15156
Author(s):  
Thomas A Odeny ◽  
Nicole Farha ◽  
Hannah Hildebrand ◽  
Jessica Allen ◽  
Wilfred Vazquez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
P Value ◽  
Primary Tumor Site

e15156 Background: There are differences in the incidence, clinical presentation, molecular pathogenesis and outcome of colorectal cancer (CRC) based on tumor location. Emerging research suggests that perioperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) ratio (post-op/pre-op CEA) is a prognostic factor for CRC patients. We aimed to determine the association between tumor location, CEA ratio, smoking status and overall survival (OS) among patients with CRC. Methods: We analysed 323 patients who underwent resection for CRC at KUMC. After excluding those without pre- or post-operative CEA data, 162 patients were classified as either high ( > = 0.5) or low ( < 0.5) ratio. Primary outcomes were: 1) OS stratified by tumor location; 2) OS stratified by CEA ratio; and 3) whether the association between CEA ratio and OS differed by tumor location, after adjusting for stage and smoking status. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival rates, and Cox proportional hazards models for multivariate analysis. Results: The median age was 63 years (inter-quartile range 53-72), 61% male, 43% smokers, 73% left-sided tumors, median pre-operative CEA was 3.0 (IQR 1.5-7), and 64% had CEA ratio > = 0.5. The OS rates were 85.7% and 91.9% in patients with left-sided vs right-sided tumors respectively (log-rank p-value = 0.9). The OS rates were 83.5% and 91.5% in patients with high vs low CEA ratios respectively (log-rank p-value = 0.3). The effect of CEA ratio on OS was significantly different when stratified by tumor location (p-value for interaction < 0.001). However, in the stratified analysis, the n was too small to permit further inferential analysis. In multivariate analysis, both tumor location (HR 0.6; p = 0.5) and CEA ratio (HR 1.5; p = 0.5) were not significantly associated with OS after adjusting for smoking status and tumor stage. Smoking was significantly associated with higher rates of death (HR 3.9; p = 0.04) when adjusted for tumor location, CEA ratio, and tumor stage. Conclusions: There was no difference in OS between left versus right-sided tumors. The association between CEA ratio and OS was significantly modified by tumor location. However, to attribute this modification to left vs right warrants validation in a larger cohort as our sample size was limited. Smoking increases mortality irrespective of right vs left sided CRC.

scholarly journals Nomogram to Predict the Overall Survival of Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Multicenter National Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (15) ◽  
pp. 7734
Author(s):  
Nasrin Borumandnia ◽  
Hassan Doosti ◽  
Amirhossein Jalali ◽  
Soheila Khodakarim ◽  
Jamshid Yazdani Charati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Family History ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
National Study ◽  
Historical Cohort

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third foremost cause of cancer-related death and the fourth most commonly diagnosed cancer globally. The study aimed to evaluate the survival predictors using the Cox Proportional Hazards (CPH) and established a novel nomogram to predict the Overall Survival (OS) of the CRC patients. Materials and methods: A historical cohort study, included 1868 patients with CRC, was performed using medical records gathered from Iran’s three tertiary colorectal referral centers from 2006 to 2019. Two datasets were considered as train set and one set as the test set. First, the most significant prognostic risk factors on survival were selected using univariable CPH. Then, independent prognostic factors were identified to construct a nomogram using the multivariable CPH regression model. The nomogram performance was assessed by the concordance index (C-index) and the time-dependent area under the ROC curve. Results: The age of patients, body mass index (BMI), family history, tumor grading, tumor stage, primary site, diabetes history, T stage, N stage, and type of treatment were considered as significant predictors of CRC patients in univariable CPH model (p < 0.2). The multivariable CPH model revealed that BMI, family history, grade and tumor stage were significant (p < 0.05). The C-index in the train data was 0.692 (95% CI, 0.650–0.734), as well as 0.627 (0.670, 0.686) in the test data. Conclusion: We improved a novel nomogram diagram according to factors for predicting OS in CRC patients, which could assist clinical decision-making and prognosis predictions in patients with CRC.

Preoperative Carbohydrate Antigen 195 (CA195) and CEA Serum Levels as Prognostic Factors in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 158-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Andicoechea ◽  
F. Vizoso ◽  
E. Alexandre ◽  
E. Cuesta ◽  
M. Cruz Díez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Carbohydrate Antigen ◽  
Primary Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Preoperative Serum ◽  
The Mean

We evaluated in 214 patients with primary colorectal cancer the prognostic value of the preoperative serum levels of CEA and CA195. For CEA these levels were above the cutoff of 6 ng/ml in 31.3% of patients, whereas for CA195 they were higher than 12 U/ml in 35.9% of patients. The simultaneous use of both antigens increased the sensitivity to 49%, which was significantly higher than that of CEA (p<0.001) and CA195 (p<0.01) taken singly. The mean preoperative CEA levels were significantly (p<0.001) correlated with Dukes’ stage only, while there was a significant correlation between preoperative serum levels of CA195 and Dukes’ stage (p<0.001), grade of differentiation (p<0.01) and tumor location (p<0.05). The results indicated that high preoperative serum levels of CEA and CA195 were associated with a shorter overall survival (p<0.0001). In addition, separate Cox multivariate analysis showed that preoperative CA195 was, after Dukes’ stage, the strongest factor to predict overall survival (p<0.0001).

scholarly journals Association between Primary Perioperative CEA Ratio, Tumor Site, and Overall Survival in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 3848
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Odeny ◽  
Nicole Farha ◽  
Hannah Hildebrandand ◽  
Jessica Allen ◽  
Wilfred Vazquez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
P Value ◽  
Inter Quartile Range ◽  
Quartile Range ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
The University

There are differences in the incidence, clinical presentation, molecular pathogenesis, and outcome of colorectal cancer (CRC) based on tumor location. Emerging research suggests that the perioperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) ratio (post-op/pre-op CEA) is a prognostic factor for CRC patients. We aimed to determine the association between CEA ratio, tumor location, and overall survival (OS) among patients with CRC. We analyzed 427 patients who underwent resection for CRC at the University of Kansas Medical Center. After excluding those without pre- or post-operative CEA data, 207 patients were classified as either high (≥0.5) or low (<0.5) ratio. Primary outcomes were as follows: (1) OS stratified by CEA ratio; (2) OS stratified by tumor location; (3) OS stratified by tumor location among those with CEA elevation > 5 ng/mL at the time of recurrence. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate survival rates. The median age was 62 years (inter-quartile range 51–71), 55% were male, 41% were smokers, 71% had left-sided tumors, the median pre-operative CEA was 3.1 ng/mL (inter-quartile range (IQR) 1.5–9.7), and 57% had a CEA ratio ≥0.5. The OS rates were 65.1% and 86.3% in patients with high versus low CEA ratios, respectively (log-rank p-value = 0.045). The OS rates were 64.4% and 77.3% in patients with right-sided vs. left-sided tumors, respectively (log-rank p-value = 0.5). Among patients with CEA levels greater than 5 at the time of recurrence, the OS rates were 42.9% and 43.4% in patients with right-sided vs. left-sided tumors, respectively (log-rank p-value = 0.7). There was a significantly higher survival among patients with low CEA ratios than among those with high CEA ratios. There was no difference in OS between left- versus right-sided tumors. Among patients with CEA elevation > 5 ng/mL at the time of recurrence, there was no difference in OS between left versus right-sided tumors. These findings warrant validation in a larger cohort as our sample size was limited.

scholarly journals An Insight into Deficient Mismatch Repair Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Romanian Population—A Bi-Institutional Pilot Study

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (8) ◽  
pp. 847
Author(s):  
Cristina Lungulescu ◽  
Vlad Mihai Croitoru ◽  
Simona Ruxandra Volovat ◽  
Irina Mihaela Cazacu ◽  
Adina Turcu-Stiolica ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Immune Checkpoints ◽  
P Value ◽  
Regional Variability ◽  
Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded

Background and Objectives: Colorectal cancer (CRC) can be classified as mismatch-repair-deficient (dMMR) with high levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-H), or mismatch-repair-proficient (pMMR) and microsatellite stable (MSS). Approximately 15% of patients have microsatellite instability (MSI). MSI-H tumors are associated with a high mutation burden. Monoclonal antibodies that block immune checkpoints can induce long-term durable responses in some patients. Pembrolizumab is the first checkpoint inhibitor approved in the EU to treat dMMR–MSI-H metastatic CRC. Materials and Methods: Our study assesses the regional variability of MSI-H colorectal cancer tumors in Romania. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks containing tumor samples from 90 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer were collected from two tertiary referral Oncology Centers from Romania. Tissues were examined for the expression loss of MMR proteins (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6) using immunohistochemistry or MSI status using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), respectively. Results: MSI-H was detected in 19 (21.1%) patients. MSI-H was located more in ascending colon (36.8% vs. 9.9%, p-value = 0.0039) and less in sigmoid (5.3% vs. 33.8%, p-value = 0.0136) than MSS patients. Most patients were stage II for MSI-H (42.1%) as well as for MSS (56.3%), with significant more G1 (40.9% vs. 15.8%, p-value = 0.0427) for MSS patients. Gender, N stage, and M stage were identified as significant prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. MSI status was not a statistically significant predictor neither in univariate analysis nor multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Considering the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitor in metastatic CRC with MSI-H or dMMR, and its recent approval in EU, it is increasingly important to understand the prevalence across tumor stage, histology, and demographics, since our study displayed higher regional MSI-H prevalence (21%) compared to the literature.

Survival trends of 89,543 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A population-based analysis.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 476-476
Author(s):  
Ulrich Guller ◽  
Ignazio Tarantino ◽  
Anthony W. Castleberry ◽  
Lukas Brugger ◽  
Dieter Koeberle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
African Americans ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Major Public Health Problem ◽  
Civil Status

476 Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer remains among the most common causes for cancer death and is a major public health problem. While overall survival improvements have been achieved in clinical trials, it is unknown how much this progress translated into increased survival on a population-based level. Methods: The SEER (Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results) registry was queried from 1988 to 2008. Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were included. Multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used. Results: In total, 89,543 patients were included. Median age was 67.1 years, 47.2% were female, 79.7% Caucasian. Median overall survival was 11 months, which increased from 8 months in 1988 to 14 months in 2008 (75% increase). In patients <= 65 years, overall survival increased from 9 months in 1988 to 20 months in 2008 (122% increase), in patients above 65 years from 7 months in 1988 to 9 months in 2008 (29% increase). In Cox proportional analyses, later year of treatment (hazard ratio=HR: 0.973 per year [95% CI: 0.972-0.975], p<0.001), tumor location in the rectum (HR: 0.72 [95% CI: 0.71 - 0.74]; p<0.001), married civil status (HR: 0.85, [95% CI: 0.84 - 0.86]; p<0.001), and cancer-directed surgery (HR: 0.44, [95% CI: 0.43 – 0.45]; p<0.001) were associated with better overall survival, while patients above 65 years (HR: 1.48, [95% CI: 1.46 - 1.51]; p<0.001) and African-Americans (HR: 1.08, [95%CI: 1.06 - 1.11], p<0.001) had worse survival. Conclusions: Tumor location in the rectum, married civil status and cancer-directed surgery are associated with significantly improved overall survival while elderly and African-Americans have worse outcomes. Moreover, a statistically significant and clinically relevant overall survival increase from 1988 to 2008 was found for metastatic colorectal cancer patients. However, most progress is observed in patients aged below 65 years, while the overall survival increase in the elderly is modest. Further studies among elderly patients assessing the reasons for the lack of a parallel survival increase are warranted.

scholarly journals Are there sex differences among colorectal cancer patients in treatment and survival? A Swiss cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 147 (5) ◽  
pp. 1407-1419
Author(s):  
Manuela Limam ◽  
Katarina Luise Matthes ◽  
Giulia Pestoni ◽  
Eleftheria Michalopoulou ◽  
Leonhard Held ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
Comorbidity Index

Abstract Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the three most common incident cancers and causes of cancer death in Switzerland for both men and women. To promote aspects of gender medicine, we examined differences in treatment decision and survival by sex in CRC patients diagnosed 2000 and 2001 in the canton of Zurich, Switzerland. Methods Characteristics assessed of 1076 CRC patients were sex, tumor subsite, age at diagnosis, tumor stage, primary treatment option and comorbidity rated by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Missing data for stage and comorbidities were completed using multivariate imputation by chained equations. We estimated the probability of receiving surgery versus another primary treatment using multivariable binomial logistic regression models. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used for survival analysis. Results Females were older at diagnosis and had less comorbidities than men. There was no difference with respect to treatment decisions between men and women. The probability of receiving a primary treatment other than surgery was nearly twice as high in patients with the highest comorbidity index, CCI 2+, compared with patients without comorbidities. This effect was significantly stronger in women than in men (p-interaction = 0.010). Survival decreased with higher CCI, tumor stage and age in all CRC patients. Sex had no impact on survival. Conclusion The probability of receiving any primary treatment and survival were independent of sex. However, female CRC patients with the highest CCI appeared more likely to receive other therapy than surgery compared to their male counterparts.

scholarly journals IL15RA and SMAD3 Genetic Variants Predict Overall Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with FOLFIRI Therapy: A New Paradigm

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1705
Author(s):  
Elena De Mattia ◽  
Jerry Polesel ◽  
Rossana Roncato ◽  
Adrien Labriet ◽  
Alessia Bignucolo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Genetic Determinants ◽  
New Paradigm

A new paradigm in cancer chemotherapy derives from the interaction between chemotherapeutics, including irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and the immune system. The patient’s immune response can modulate chemotherapy effectiveness, and, on the other hand, chemotherapeutic agents can foster tumor cell immunogenicity. On these grounds, the analysis of the cancer patients’ immunogenetic characteristics and their effect on survival after chemotherapy represent a new frontier. This study aims to identify genetic determinants in the immuno-related pathways predictive of overall survival (OS) after FOLFIRI (irinotecan, 5-FU, leucovorin) therapy. Two independent cohorts comprising a total of 335 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) homogeneously treated with first-line FOLFIRI were included in the study. The prognostic effect of 192 tagging genetic polymorphisms in 34 immune-related genes was evaluated using the bead array technology. The IL15RA rs7910212-C allele was associated with worse OS in both discovery (HR: 1.57, p = 0.0327, Bootstrap p-value = 0.0280) and replication (HR:1.71, p = 0.0411) cohorts. Conversely, SMAD3 rs7179840-C allele was associated with better OS in both discovery (HR:0.65, p = 0.0202, Bootstrap p-value = 0.0203) and replication (HR:0.61, p = 0.0216) cohorts. A genetic prognostic score was generated integrating IL15RA-rs7910212 and SMAD3-rs7179840 markers with inflammation-related prognostic polymorphisms we previously identified in the same study population (i.e., PXR [NR1I2]-rs1054190, VDR-rs7299460). The calculated genetic score successfully discriminated patients with different survival probabilities (p < 0.0001 log-rank test). These findings provide new insight on the prognostic value of genetic determinants, such as IL15RA and SMAD3 markers, and could offer a new decision tool to improve the clinical management of patients with mCRC receiving FOLFIRI.

scholarly journals Eps15 Homology Domain-Containing Protein 3 Hypermethylation as a Prognostic and Predictive Marker for Colorectal Cancer

Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 453
Author(s):  
Yu-Han Wang ◽  
Shih-Ching Chang ◽  
Muhamad Ansar ◽  
Chin-Sheng Hung ◽  
Ruo-Kai Lin
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Mrna Expression ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Uterine Cancer ◽  
Colonic Polyps ◽  
Predictive Marker ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Eps15 Homology Domain

Colorectal cancer (CRC) arises from chromosomal instability, resulting from aberrant hypermethylation in tumor suppressor genes. This study identified hypermethylated genes in CRC and investigated how they affect clinical outcomes. Methylation levels of specific genes were analyzed from The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset and 20 breast cancer, 16 esophageal cancer, 33 lung cancer, 15 uterine cancer, 504 CRC, and 9 colon polyp tissues and 102 CRC plasma samples from a Taiwanese cohort. In the Asian cohort, Eps15 homology domain-containing protein 3 (EHD3) had twofold higher methylation in 44.4% of patients with colonic polyps, 37.3% of plasma from CRC patients, and 72.6% of CRC tissues, which was connected to vascular invasion and high microsatellite instability. Furthermore, EHD3 hypermethylation was detected in other gastrointestinal cancers. In the Asian CRC cohort, low EHD3 mRNA expression was found in 45.1% of patients and was connected to lymph node metastasis. Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards survival analysis revealed that hypermethylation in women and low mRNA expression were associated with overall survival. In the Western CRC cohort, EHD3 hypermethylation was also connected to overall survival and lower chemotherapy and antimetabolite response rates. In conclusion, EHD3 hypermethylation contributes to the development of CRC in both Asian and Western populations.

Efficacy and prognostic significance of triflurodine/tipiracil beyond oxaliplatin and irinotecan based chemotherapy in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: An observational multicenter study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15586-e15586
Author(s):  
Mohamed Alghamdi ◽  
Shouki Bazarbashi ◽  
Elsamany Shereef ◽  
Mervat Mahrous ◽  
Omar Al shaer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Neutrophil Count ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
P Value ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

e15586 Background: In Saudi Arabia, the incidence of colorectal cancer has been increased over the past few years. The optimal treatment beyond the second line is not fully understood. To the best of our knowledge, the efficacy and disease outcomes of triflurodine/tipiracil in Saudi patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC) has not been studied yet. Our study is a real-life practice evaluation of the efficacy of triflurodine/tipiracil in patients with refractory mCRC. Moreover, the prognosis and the prognostic significance of the different clinical variables have been analyzed. Methods: A retrospective, multi-centers ( 5 centers representative of Saudi Arabia )observational study in patients with mCRC who have received triflurodine/tipiracil beyond oxaliplatin & Irinotecan-based chemotherapy between December 2018-December 2020.We aimed to assess the response to triflurodine/tipiracil, to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS ), the overall survival (OS), and the associated factors of prognostic significance. Results:The data of 100 patients with refractory mCRC who has received triflurodine/tipiracil have been analyzed. The mean age was 55.2 +11.8 years. Forty-two patients were (42%) females and 58 (58%) were male patients. Sigmoid was the most common primary site of cancer in 35 (35%) patients, followed by rectum 29 (29%). Peritoneal metastasis was present in 17 (23.3%) patients ,liver in 51(56.6%) and lung in 39 (50.7%). Metastatic sites were ≥ 2 in 45 (45%) patients. Metastatic lesions were ≥ 5 in 65 (65%) patients. Xelox chemotherapy regimen was the most commonly used first-line chemotherapy which represents 43%, while Folfiri or Xeliri combination was the most used second line in 57 (60%). For the third line, Folfox or Xelox was used in 81 (83.5%) patients. The fourth line was given to 49 (67.1%). For first-line biological agents, Cetuximab was used most frequently 31 (46.3%).Evaluation of the response to treatment with triflurodine/tipiracil revealed one patient (1%) with a complete response,3 patients (3%) with partial response, 28 (28%) patients with stable disease, and 66 (66%) showed progressive disease. The estimated median progression-free survival was 5 months ( 3.839 - 6.161) and the median overall survival was 12 months (9.732-14.268). The log-rank analysis showed that the baseline neutrophils ≤ 75 % ( P-value= 0.0092) and low hemoglobin level (P-value= 0.0245) were strongly associated with a higher survival. By multivariate Cox regression analysis, the neutrophil count ≤ 75 % was the only independent predictor for survival. Conclusions: Trifluridine/tipiracil is effective in patients with refractory mCRC. The low neutrophil count might predict a better overall survival.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document