scholarly journals The CWI Pathway: A Versatile Toolbox to Arrest Cell-Cycle Progression

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 1041
Author(s):  
Inma Quilis ◽  
Mercè Gomar-Alba ◽  
Juan Carlos Igual
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Wall ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Genetic Material ◽  
Regulatory System ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Dna Integrity ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Reciprocal Regulation

Cell-signaling pathways are essential for cells to respond and adapt to changes in their environmental conditions. The cell-wall integrity (CWI) pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is activated by environmental stresses, compounds, and morphogenetic processes that compromise the cell wall, orchestrating the appropriate cellular response to cope with these adverse conditions. During cell-cycle progression, the CWI pathway is activated in periods of polarized growth, such as budding or cytokinesis, regulating cell-wall biosynthesis and the actin cytoskeleton. Importantly, accumulated evidence has indicated a reciprocal regulation of the cell-cycle regulatory system by the CWI pathway. In this paper, we describe how the CWI pathway regulates the main cell-cycle transitions in response to cell-surface perturbance to delay cell-cycle progression. In particular, it affects the Start transcriptional program and the initiation of DNA replication at the G1/S transition, and entry and progression through mitosis. We also describe the involvement of the CWI pathway in the response to genotoxic stress and its connection with the DNA integrity checkpoint, the mechanism that ensures the correct transmission of genetic material and cell survival. Thus, the CWI pathway emerges as a master brake that stops cell-cycle progression when cells are coping with distinct unfavorable conditions.

The regulation of the DNA damage response at telomeres: focus on kinases

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michela Galli ◽  
Chiara Frigerio ◽  
Maria Pia Longhese ◽  
Michela Clerici
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Replicative Senescence ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Linear Chromosomes

The natural ends of linear chromosomes resemble those of accidental double-strand breaks (DSBs). DSBs induce a multifaceted cellular response that promotes the repair of lesions and slows down cell cycle progression. This response is not elicited at chromosome ends, which are organized in nucleoprotein structures called telomeres. Besides counteracting DSB response through specialized telomere-binding proteins, telomeres also prevent chromosome shortening. Despite of the different fate of telomeres and DSBs, many proteins involved in the DSB response also localize at telomeres and participate in telomere homeostasis. In particular, the DSB master regulators Tel1/ATM and Mec1/ATR contribute to telomere length maintenance and arrest cell cycle progression when chromosome ends shorten, thus promoting a tumor-suppressive process known as replicative senescence. During senescence, the actions of both these apical kinases and telomere-binding proteins allow checkpoint activation while bulk DNA repair activities at telomeres are still inhibited. Checkpoint-mediated cell cycle arrest also prevents further telomere erosion and deprotection that would favor chromosome rearrangements, which are known to increase cancer-associated genome instability. This review summarizes recent insights into functions and regulation of Tel1/ATM and Mec1/ATR at telomeres both in the presence and in the absence of telomerase, focusing mainly on discoveries in budding yeast.

scholarly journals Cell Cycle and DNA Repair Regulation in the Damage Response: Protein Phosphatases Take Over the Reins

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrián Campos ◽  
Andrés Clemente-Blanco
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Protein Phosphatases ◽  
Genetic Material ◽  
Protein Composition ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Protein Dephosphorylation

Cells are constantly suffering genotoxic stresses that affect the integrity of our genetic material. Genotoxic insults must be repaired to avoid the loss or inappropriate transmission of the genetic information, a situation that could lead to the appearance of developmental abnormalities and tumorigenesis. To combat this threat, eukaryotic cells have evolved a set of sophisticated molecular mechanisms that are collectively known as the DNA damage response (DDR). This surveillance system controls several aspects of the cellular response, including the detection of lesions, a temporary cell cycle arrest, and the repair of the broken DNA. While the regulation of the DDR by numerous kinases has been well documented over the last decade, the complex roles of protein dephosphorylation have only recently begun to be investigated. Here, we review recent progress in the characterization of DDR-related protein phosphatases during the response to a DNA lesion, focusing mainly on their ability to modulate the DNA damage checkpoint and the repair of the damaged DNA. We also discuss their protein composition and structure, target specificity, and biochemical regulation along the different stages encompassed in the DDR. The compilation of this information will allow us to better comprehend the physiological significance of protein dephosphorylation in the maintenance of genome integrity and cell viability in response to genotoxic stress.

scholarly journals Control of cell cycle progression by phosphorylation of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) substrates

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 243-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randy Suryadinata ◽  
Martin Sadowski ◽  
Boris Sarcevic
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Genetic Material ◽  
Eukaryotic Cell ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Unicellular Organisms ◽  
Multicellular Organisms

The eukaryotic cell cycle is a fundamental evolutionarily conserved process that regulates cell division from simple unicellular organisms, such as yeast, through to higher multicellular organisms, such as humans. The cell cycle comprises several phases, including the S-phase (DNA synthesis phase) and M-phase (mitotic phase). During S-phase, the genetic material is replicated, and is then segregated into two identical daughter cells following mitotic M-phase and cytokinesis. The S- and M-phases are separated by two gap phases (G1 and G2) that govern the readiness of cells to enter S- or M-phase. Genetic and biochemical studies demonstrate that cell division in eukaryotes is mediated by CDKs (cyclin-dependent kinases). Active CDKs comprise a protein kinase subunit whose catalytic activity is dependent on association with a regulatory cyclin subunit. Cell-cycle-stage-dependent accumulation and proteolytic degradation of different cyclin subunits regulates their association with CDKs to control different stages of cell division. CDKs promote cell cycle progression by phosphorylating critical downstream substrates to alter their activity. Here, we will review some of the well-characterized CDK substrates to provide mechanistic insights into how these kinases control different stages of cell division.

scholarly journals A library of yeast genomic MCM1 binding sites contains genes involved in cell cycle control, cell wall and membrane structure, and metabolism.

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 348-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
M H Kuo ◽  
E Grayhack
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Wall ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Serum Response Factor ◽  
Fusion Gene ◽  
Control Cell ◽  
Membrane Structures ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Yeast Genes

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae MCM1 protein, which is essential for viability, participates in both transcription activation and repression as well as DNA replication. However, neither the full network of genes at which MCM1 acts nor whether MCM1 itself mediates a regulatory response is known. Thus far, sites of MCM1 action have been identified by chance during analysis of particular genes. To identify a more complete set of genes on which MCM1 acts, we isolated a library of yeast genomic sequences to which MCM1 binds and then identified known genes within this library. Fragments of genomic DNA, bound to bacterially expressed MCM1 protein, were collected on a nitrocellulose filter, cloned, and analyzed. This selected library contains a large number of genes. As expected, it is enriched for strong MCM1 binding sites and contains cell-type-specific genes known to require MCM1. In addition, it also includes sequences upstream (or near the 5' end) of a number of identified yeast genes that have not yet been shown to be controlled by MCM1. These include genes whose products are involved in (i) the control of cell cycle progression (CLN3, CLB2, and FAR1), (ii) synthesis and maintenance of cell wall or cell membrane structures (PMA1, PIS1, DIT1,2, and GFA1), (iii) cellular metabolism (PCK1, MET2, and CCP1), and (iv) production of a secreted glycoprotein which is heat shock inducible (HSP150). The previously unidentified MCM1 binding site in the essential PMA1 gene is required for expression of a PMA1:lacZ fusion gene, providing evidence that one site is functionally important. We speculate that MCM1 coordinates decisions about cell cycle progression with changes in cell wall integrity and metabolic activity. The presence in the library of three genes involved in cell cycle progression reinforces the idea that one of the functions of MCM1 is indeed analogous to that of the mammalian serum response factor.

scholarly journals Expression of NES-hTERT in Cancer Cells Delays Cell Cycle Progression and Increases Sensitivity to Genotoxic Stress

PLoS ONE ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. e10812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga A. Kovalenko ◽  
Jessica Kaplunov ◽  
Utz Herbig ◽  
Sonia deToledo ◽  
Edouard I. Azzam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Cycle Progression

scholarly journals Critical role of SMG7 in activation of the ATR-CHK1 axis in response to genotoxic stress

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Ho ◽  
Hongwei Luo ◽  
Wei Zhu ◽  
Yi Tang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Essential Step

AbstractCHK1 is a crucial DNA damage checkpoint kinase and its activation, which requires ATR and RAD17, leads to inhibition of DNA replication and cell cycle progression. Recently, we reported that SMG7 stabilizes and activates p53 to induce G1 arrest upon DNA damage; here we show that SMG7 plays a critical role in the activation of the ATR-CHK1 axis. Following genotoxic stress, SMG7-null cells exhibit deficient ATR signaling, indicated by the attenuated phosphorylation of CHK1 and RPA32, and importantly, unhindered DNA replication and fork progression. Through its 14-3-3 domain, SMG7 interacts directly with the Ser635-phosphorylated RAD17 and promotes chromatin retention of the 9-1-1 complex by the RAD17-RFC, an essential step to CHK1 activation. Furthermore, through maintenance of CHK1 activity, SMG7 controls G2-M transition and facilitates orderly cell cycle progression during recovery from replication stress. Taken together, our data reveals SMG7 as an indispensable signaling component in the ATR-CHK1 pathway during genotoxic stress response.

scholarly journals Dynamic NF-κB and E2F interactions control the priority and timing of inflammatory signalling and cell proliferation

eLife ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M Ankers ◽  
Raheela Awais ◽  
Nicholas A Jones ◽  
James Boyd ◽  
Sheila Ryan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Nuclear Factor Kappa B ◽  
Cellular Systems ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulators ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Response To Stress ◽  
Computational Analyses ◽  
Inflammatory Signalling

Dynamic cellular systems reprogram gene expression to ensure appropriate cellular fate responses to specific extracellular cues. Here we demonstrate that the dynamics of Nuclear Factor kappa B (NF-κB) signalling and the cell cycle are prioritised differently depending on the timing of an inflammatory signal. Using iterative experimental and computational analyses, we show physical and functional interactions between NF-κB and the E2 Factor 1 (E2F-1) and E2 Factor 4 (E2F-4) cell cycle regulators. These interactions modulate the NF-κB response. In S-phase, the NF-κB response was delayed or repressed, while cell cycle progression was unimpeded. By contrast, activation of NF-κB at the G1/S boundary resulted in a longer cell cycle and more synchronous initial NF-κB responses between cells. These data identify new mechanisms by which the cellular response to stress is differentially controlled at different stages of the cell cycle.

The amino-terminal matrix assembly domain of fibronectin stabilizes cell shape and prevents cell cycle progression

1999 ◽  
Vol 112 (19) ◽  
pp. 3225-3235 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.A. Christopher ◽  
S.R. Judge ◽  
P.A. Vincent ◽  
P.J. Higgins ◽  
P.J. McKeown-Longo
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Extracellular Matrix ◽  
Cell Shape ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cytochalasin D ◽  
Matrix Assembly ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Amino Terminal ◽  
Fibronectin Matrix

Adhesion to the extracellular matrix modulates the cellular response to growth factors and is critical for cell cycle progression. The present study was designed to address the relationship between fibronectin matrix assembly and cell shape or shape dependent cellular processes. The binding of fibronectin's amino-terminal matrix assembly domain to adherent cells represents the initial step in the assembly of exogenous fibronectin into the extracellular matrix. When added to monolayers of pulmonary artery endothelial cells, the 70 kDa fragment of fibronectin (which contains the matrix assembly domain) stabilized both the extracellular fibronectin matrix as well as the actin cytoskeleton against cytochalasin D-mediated structural reorganization. This activity appeared to require specific fibronectin sequences as fibronectin fragments containing the cell adhesion domain as well as purified vitronectin were ineffective inhibitors of cytochalasin D-induced cytoarchitectural restructuring. Such pronounced morphologic consequences associated with exposure to the 70 kDa fragment suggested that this region of the fibronectin molecule may affect specific growth traits known to be influenced by cell shape. To assess this possibility, the 70 kDa fragment was added to scrape-wounded monolayers of bovine microvessel endothelium and the effects on two shape-dependent processes (i.e. migration and proliferation) were measured as a function of time after injury and location from the wound. The addition of amino-terminal fragments of fibronectin to the monolayer significantly inhibited (by >50%) wound closure. Staining of wounded monolayers with BrdU, moreover, indicated that either the 70 kDa or 25 kDa amino-terminal fragments of fibronectin, but not the 40 kDa collagen binding fragment, also inhibited cell cycle progression. These results suggest that the binding of fibronectin's amino-terminal region to endothelial cell layers inhibits cell cycle progression by stabilizing cell shape.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document