Perlindungan Hak Masyarakat Adat Tengger Mendapatkan Bagi Hasil Pendapatan Wisata Taman Nasional Bromo Tengger Semeru

The purpose of this research was to find out the contribution of Balai Besar Bromo Tengger Semeru National Park (TN-BTS) from the utilization of tourism in TN-BTS to the Tengger indigenous people as the original owner of the Bromo-Tengger Semeru area as well as to know the solutions that can be done by the Balai Besar TN-BTS to contribute in improving the welfare of Tengger indigenous people living in the national park. This research is qualitative research with an explanative approach, where the interviewed informants were selected using a purposive sampling technique and analyzed with ethnographic analysis techniques. From the results of the research, it is known that Balai Besar TN-BTS has conducted a program of development and utilization of national parks for tourism object activities as well as community empowerment as a form of direct contribution to the improvement of the welfare of Tengger indigenous peoples. However, both development programs have not been able to answer the priority needs of Tengger indigenous peoples. The limitations of authority and main functions owned by Balai Besar TN-BTS become an obstacle for them to be able to contribute to the improvement of the welfare of Tengger indigenous peoples. As a strategic effort so that Balai Besar TN-BTS can contribute directly to the improvement of the welfare of Tengger indigenous people who live in the village within the National Park zone is to share the revenue of National park tourism activities. However, this strategic effort needs to be accompanied by a change in the status of Balai Besar which was originally the Technical Implementation Unit (UPT) of the Minister of Environment and Forestry to the Public Service Agency (BLU).

Download Full-text

Dehumanisation Of Moronene Hukaea Laea Indigenous Community In Setting The Boundary Of Ulayat Rights

Al-'Adl ◽

10.31332/aladl.v14i2.2932 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 14 (2) ◽

pp. 118

Author(s):

Andi Yaqub ◽

Ashadi L. Diab ◽

Andi Novita Mudriani Djaoe ◽

Riadin Riadin ◽

Iswandi Iswandi

Keyword(s):

Indigenous People ◽

National Parks ◽

Indigenous Peoples ◽

National Park ◽

Descriptive Analysis ◽

Indigenous Community ◽

Conservation Area ◽

Customary Rights ◽

The Government

The determination of the area of customary rights of indigenous peoples is a form of protection for indigenous peoples, a step to overcome vertical conflicts between the Moronene Hukaea Laea indigenous people and conservation or national park managers. This study aims to capture the extent to which the position and existence of Perda no. 4 of 2015 on the recognition of the customary rights of the moronene indigenous people of Hukaea Laea. This type of research is descriptive analysis with a qualitative approach, the research location is in Watu-Watu Village, Lantari Jaya District and Rawa Aopa Watumohai National Park, Bombana Regency and the data collection of this study is through direct interviews and deductive conclusions are drawn. Based on the results of this study, the forms of dehumanization of the Moronene Hukaea Laea indigenous people include: (1) In 1997 the Moronene Hukaea Laea indigenous people experienced intimidation by the universe broom group such as burning houses and land and in 2002 repeated home destruction and eviction ulayat areas by the government because the Moronene indigenous people are in conservation areas or national parks, the pretext of expulsion and arrest of customary leaders and indigenous peoples of Moronene Hukaea Laea has based on a negative stigma that the existence of indigenous peoples is a group that destroys ecosystems and ecology. (2) In 2015 the stipulation of Regional Regulation No. 4 of 2015 is not substantive because it only regulates the existence of indigenous peoples, not the absolute determination of territory by the Hukaea Laea indigenous people. This is indicated by the policy of the Minister of Forestry which concluded that based on the total population of the Hukaea Laea Indigenous Peoples, only 6,000 hectares could be controlled. Based on this policy, the local government shows inconsistency towards the indigenous Moronene Hukaea Laea after placing its position as a mediator between the Minister of Forestry, conservation area managers, and the Hukaea Laea Indigenous Community.

Download Full-text

MANAGEMENT MODEL WITH BY IN MODEL PENGELOLAAN DENGAN PELIBATAN MASYARAKAT ADAT PADA KAWASAN TAMAN NASIONAL RAWA AOPA KABUPATEN BOMBANA

Jurnal Ius Constituendum ◽

10.26623/jic.v2i2.658 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 2 (2) ◽

pp. 149

Author(s):

Jabal Nur ◽

Nur Intan

Keyword(s):

Qualitative Research ◽

Indigenous People ◽

National Parks ◽

Indigenous Peoples ◽

National Park ◽

Indigenous Community ◽

Management Model ◽

Normative Approach ◽

Model Of Management ◽

Park Area

MANAGEMENT MODEL WITH BY IN MODEL PENGELOLAAN DENGAN PELIBATAN MASYARAKAT ADAT PADA KAWASAN TAMAN NASIONAL RAWA AOPA KABUPATEN BOMBANA Jabalnur dan Nur IntanThe School of Law, University of Halu Oleo, Kendari, Indonesia Abstrak Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu mengidentifikasi kawasan Taman Nasional Rawa Aopa yang merupakab bagian wilayah masyarakat adat Moronene Hukaea Laea dan merumuskan model pengeloaan dengan pelibatan masyarakat adat sebagai pelestarian kearifan local pada kawasan Taman Nasional Rawa Aopa. Berdasar hasil penelitian tersebut dapat dijadikan indikator dan acuan dalam mengatasi permasalahan dalam pengelolaan kawasan taman nasional.Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu tipe penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dengan pendekatan normatif empiris karena dianggap paling tepat untuk merumuskan model pengelolaan dengan pelibatan masyarakat adat pada kawasan Taman Nasional Rawa Aopa dengan mengacu pada peraturan perundang-undangan yang mengatur tentang pengelolaan kawasan taman nasional serta menganalisis fenomena yang ada di lapangan sehingga akan diperoleh suatu strategi dalam pengelolaan taman nasional. Kata Kunci : Pengelolaan, Masyarakat Adat, Kawasan Taman Nasional VOLVING INDIGENOUS PEOPLE IN THE NATIONAL PARK AREAS OF RAWA AOPA BOMBANA DISTRICT Jabalnur and Nur IntanThe School of Law, University of Halu Oleo, Kendari, Indonesia AbstractThe purpose of this research is to identify Rawa Aopa National Park area which is part of indigenous community of Moronene Hukaea Laea and to formulate model of management by involving indigenous community as preservation of local wisdom in Rawa Aopa National Park area. Based on the results of the study, it can be used as indicators and references in overcoming problems in the management of the park area.The method used in this research was the type of descriptive qualitative research with the empirical normative approach. Since it is considered most appropriate to formulate the management model with the involvement of indigenous peoples in the area of Rawa Aopa National Park with reference to legislation regulating the management of national park area and analyze the phenomenon that exist in the field, so that it will obtain a strategy in the management of national parks.Keywords: Management, Indigenous Peoples, National Park Area

Download Full-text

Developments in the Sudan Parks

Oryx ◽

10.1017/s0030605300011066 ◽

1973 ◽

Vol 12 (1) ◽

pp. 49-52 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

J. L. Cloudsley-Thompson

Keyword(s):

National Parks ◽

National Park ◽

Blue Nile ◽

Forest Reserves ◽

The Status ◽

Roan Antelope ◽

Greater Kudu ◽

Wild Dog

The Sudan today has three National Parks and fifteen game reserves. In addition there are sanctuaries and forest reserves where hunting is forbidden.Dinder National Park covers 7120 sq. km (2750 sq. miles) and lies 406 km (315 miles) south-east from Khartoum, near the Ethiopian border in Blue Nile Province. Its fine assemblage of game includes elephant (during the rains), hippopotamus, giraffe, buffalo, roan antelope, waterbuck, tiang, greater kudu, red-fronted and Soemmering's gazelle, reedbuck, bushbuck, oribi, duiker, Salt's dikdik, warthog, bush pig, lion, leopard, cheetah, hyaena, wild dog, grivet and red hussar monkeys, and baboon. According to Dr William Dasmann (in litt. August 1972) the status of tora and lelwel hartebeest is uncertain. It has been decided not to reintroduce hippopotamus as poachers would be the only gainers.

Download Full-text

The status of rhinoceroses in South African National Parks

Koedoe ◽

10.4102/koedoe.v59i1.1392 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 59 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Sam M. Ferreira ◽

Charlene Bissett ◽

Carly R. Cowell ◽

Angela Gaylard ◽

Cathy Greaver ◽

...

Keyword(s):

South Africa ◽

South African ◽

National Parks ◽

National Park ◽

Kruger National Park ◽

The South ◽

South Central ◽

The Status ◽

Annual Population ◽

Block Based

African rhinoceroses (rhinos) experienced a poaching onslaught since 2008 with the epicentre in South Africa where most of the world’s rhinos occur. South African national parks, under the management of South African National Parks (SANParks), are custodian to 49% of South Africa’s white and 31% of the country’s black rhinos. We collated information on rhino population sizes in seven national parks from 2011 to 2015. We include and report on rhino surveys in Kruger National Park during 2014 and 2015. Southwestern black rhinos increased over the study period, which allows SANParks to achieve its contribution to South Africa’s 2020 target of 260 individuals. South-central black rhinos declined over the study period because of poaching in the Kruger National Park, making it difficult for SANParks to realise a 9% increase per annum for its expected contribution to the South African target of 2800 individuals. For southern white rhinos, SANParks requires 5% annual growth for its contribution to the South African target of 20 400 individuals. To continue to evaluate the achievement of these targets, SANParks needs annual population estimates relying on total counts, mark-recapture techniques and block-based sample counts to track trends in rhino populations. SANParks’ primary challenge in achieving its contribution to South Africa’s rhino conservation targets is associated with curbing poaching in Kruger National Park.Conservation implications: The status and trends of rhino species in SANParks highlight key challenges associated with achieving the national targets of South Africa. Conservation managers will need to improve the protection of southern white rhino, while the Department of Environmental Affairs need to be made aware of the challenges specifically associated with not achieving targets for south-central black rhino. Outcomes for south-western black rhino have already realised and the good conservation efforts should continue.

Download Full-text

PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TANAH SOKO PADA SUKU BENDANG KAMPAR RIAU DENGAN CORAK HUKUM ISLAM

FIKRI Jurnal Kajian Agama Sosial dan Budaya ◽

10.25217/jf.v3i2.366 ◽

2018 ◽

pp. 289

Author(s):

Hengki Firmanda

Keyword(s):

Indigenous People ◽

Indigenous Peoples ◽

Empirical Studies ◽

Land Ownership ◽

Maternal Lineage ◽

Legal Research ◽

Land Disputes ◽

The Status ◽

Customary Land ◽

Ownership Of Land

The purpose of this study was to describe the ownership status of Soko land in the Indigenous People of the Bendang Tribe, Kampar, Riau; and explain the settlement of the transfer dispute over the ownership of Soko Land to the Indigenous People of the Bendang Tribe, Kampar, Riau. The existence of indigenous peoples will not be separated from their customary lands. The existence of indigenous peoples will be determined by ownership of their customary land. Indigenous people will not be called indigenous peoples without owning their customary land. This type of research is sociological legal research, namely research in the form of empirical studies to find theories about the process of occurrence and the process of working the law in society. The results of this study are, the status of ownership of Soko land in the indigenous people of the kampar tribe of the kampar district is attached to the community that has a maternal lineage. The transfer of ownership of soko land to the indigenous people of the dam tribe of Kampar District is the transfer of ownership of land between generations according to lineage and the transfer of land ownership to the settlement of land disputes.

Download Full-text

Moronene Indigenous Recognition and Protection Regulation Hukaea Laea in Bombana County

Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist ◽

10.35326/volkgeist.v5i2.1203 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 5 (2) ◽

pp. 160-166

Author(s):

Bakri Sulaiman

Keyword(s):

Indigenous Peoples ◽

National Park ◽

Customary Law ◽

Legal Research ◽

The Status ◽

The Law ◽

Park Area ◽

Customary Land

Regulations on the Recognition and Protection of Customary Law Communities are not always effective. This study was to determine the concept of recognition and protection of the Customary Law Community in Rawa Aopa Watumohai National Park. This research is a normative legal research. The results of the research are First, the law still provides conditional recognition of indigenous peoples, which limits their space. second, that the recognition and protection of the customary MHA of Moronene Hukaea Laea in Bombana Regency has not been maximized. They have received recognition and protection through a recognition of perda, but their customary territory still has the status of designating a National Park Area, so they cannot use it as customary land.

Download Full-text

The Status of the Bald Eagle and Osprey in Grand Teton National Park and Vicinity

The UW National Parks Service Research Station Annual Reports ◽

10.13001/uwnpsrc.1978.2065 ◽

1978 ◽

Vol 2 ◽

pp. 25-30

Author(s):

Robert Eng ◽

Kurt Alt

Keyword(s):

National Parks ◽

National Park ◽

Baseline Data ◽

Bald Eagle ◽

Haliaeetus Leucocephalus ◽

Pandion Haliaetus ◽

Grand Teton National Park ◽

The Status ◽

The Impact ◽

Future Management

With the accelerated use of our national parks there is growing concern over the impact this increased visitation might have on their flora and fauna. For this reason it is important to gather baseline data on the biota for future management and interpretive programs. Two species of concern in Grand Teton National Park are the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and osprey (Pandion haliaetus).

Download Full-text

A Big Battle: The State vs. Indigenous People (Case Study in Jambi Province)

Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik ◽

10.22146/jsp.37568 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 23 (1) ◽

pp. 59

Author(s):

M. Yusuf ◽

Syafrial Syafrial

Keyword(s):

Indigenous People ◽

National Parks ◽

Protected Area ◽

National Park ◽

The State ◽

Park Management ◽

Case Study Approach ◽

Study Approach ◽

Protection Area

The change in designation of Bukit Duabelas area into Bukit Duabelas National Park in Jambi province raises a conflict between the national park official who was ruling the zonation system in the national park and the Orang Rimba people who have lived there for many years. The decision of the protected area aims to preserve the life and culture of Orang Rimba. However, zoning rules in the field are interpreted as an effort to limit space and access to the forest resources for Orang Rimba who have traditionally utilized them. This research uses a case study approach to explore the dynamics of conflict on the protected area. The results of the study show that conflicts in national park management are very dynamic because of shifting disagreement about the protection area. The conflicts began with debates about the zoning system which led into the fight for access to the park resources which were contested over the concept of national parks and customary forests. This paper argues the battle over the national park was not only about contested natural resources but also was a fight for authority and power between the state and indigenous people over the concept of park management.

Download Full-text

INTERAKSI SOSIAL TRANSMIGRAN DESA WERDHI AGUNG DENGAN PENDUDUK ASLI DESA IBOLIAN DI KECAMATAN DUMOGA TENGAH

AGRI-SOSIOEKONOMI ◽

10.35791/agrsosek.13.1a.2017.15649 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 13 (1A) ◽

pp. 239

Author(s):

Claudia Mouren Demakota ◽

Welson M. Wangke ◽

Jenny ., Baroleh

Keyword(s):

Indigenous People ◽

Indigenous Peoples ◽

Land Tenure ◽

Social Life ◽

Local Population ◽

Sampling Technique ◽

Population Data ◽

Primary Data ◽

Research Report ◽

The Family

This study aims to find out how cooperation, competition, conflict and accommodation between transmigration living in the village of Werdhi Agung with indigenous people in Dumoga Sub-district. This study was conducted from December 2016 to February 2017, starting from preparation to the formulation of the research report. The data used in the form of primary data and secondary data. This research is done by purposive sampling technique. The total respondents in this study were 40 people, who were the head of the family, consisting of 20 members of the transmigrant group from Bali and 20 members of the indigenous Mongondow community representing the local population. Data analysis was done descriptively by using Likert Scale. The results show that: a) The cooperation between transmigrants and indigenous peoples is so harmonious that in their daily life it has reflected a broad assimilation / mixing form arising from the realization that they have common interests, both individually and in groups, they are aware that they have different ethnic cultural backgrounds. This has a positive effect on the social life of transmigration communities and indigenous peoples in coexistence. b) Competition between transmigrants and indigenous people is marked by land ownership / social jealousy competition and competition between village youth but no competition or threat of violence. c) Conflicts between transmigrants and indigenous peoples only occur in land tenure, and the conflicts are not frequent among rural youth. d) Accommodation or work to end disputes or conflicts between conflicting parties ie between transmigrants and indigenous peoples can be resolved either through the family or with the help of villagers and government officials.

Download Full-text

Political ecology, privation and sustainable livelihoods in northern Thailand's national parks

Journal of Political Ecology ◽

10.2458/v27i1.23753 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 27 (1) ◽

pp. 360-377

Author(s):

Aurathai Phongchiewboon ◽

Trisia Farrelly ◽

Karen Hytten ◽

John Holland

Keyword(s):

Political Ecology ◽

Indigenous People ◽

National Parks ◽

Sustainable Livelihoods ◽

Indigenous Communities ◽

Economic Benefits ◽

Community Empowerment ◽

Environmental Conservation ◽

Northern Thailand ◽

Wide Range

National parks provide a wide range of ecological, social and economic benefits. However, in some cases the establishment of national parks has also lead to the displacement of indigenous people, the disruption of their livelihoods, and ongoing social conflict. Northern Thailand's national parks are home to approximately one million indigenous people. Balancing the interests and needs of national park authorities with those of indigenous communities within and adjacent to these parks poses significant challenges. This article employs qualitative research methods to assess the livelihood strategies of six indigenous hill tribe communities residing within three national parks in Northern Thailand. Due to the criminalization of the traditional farming systems and restrictions imposed on land use, these communities have had to adapt their livelihood practices to survive. Our findings suggest that communities remain in a state of flux and are continually adapting to changing circumstances. It is argued that greater community empowerment and participation in collaborative decision making is crucial to strengthen both sustainable livelihoods and environmental conservation efforts within Northern Thailand's national parks.Keywords: Sustainable livelihoods, co-management, Northern Thailand, national parks, social justice

Download Full-text