scholarly journals PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA PROFESIONAL BERPIHAK PADA FAKTA HUKUM DAN KEADILAN

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 234
Author(s):  
Rusman Rusman

Law enforcement criminal court must dare to be assertive in the process of law enforcement should not be legalitik the chained stream normatik dogmatik, it's time to find the ideal concept in accordance with the sense of Justice in favour of society ( public) and realized that the dynamic laws of development. The small settlement of cases does not always have to be boiled down to the Court, using the means and utilizing the penal imprisonment or confinement sentence need to be considered again for the sake of the values of Justice. Investigator required material provisions of law and guided by formyl applicable investigation is part of the process of criminal law enforcement needed material, so that truth refers to legal facts and evidence obtained in order to obtain legal certainty that comes down to fairness. Keywords: Police, Law Enforcement, Professional, Justice.

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-39
Author(s):  
Efraim Mbomba Reda ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara

Progressive law puts forward the sociology of law rather than legal certainty which is the focus of legal positivism. In Indonesia, this law was coined by Satjipto Rahardjo. This study aims to determine the formulation of progressive law in future criminal law, and to determine the actualization of the concept of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia. The research method used is a normative legal research method with statute and conceptual approaches. The technique of collecting legal materials in this study is a descriptive method that aims to obtain the meaning of reality related to the problems to be discussed and solved in this study. The results show that in the current Criminal Code Bill, progressive law has been regulated, to be precise in Article 2 paragraph (1) and (2). Progressive law is also regulated in Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Then, the actualization of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia is a judge with the powers that take into account the sociological context of society in making decisions. Judges, prosecutors and lawyers can certainly discuss together in eradicating corruption. Efforts are also being made to reconstruct and redefine the power of law enforcement. This arrangement can also encourage the KPK to be more progressive in eradicating corruption, as well as building law enforcers who have morality so that they can become role models and increase public participation, for example by forming NGOs in preventing or fighting corruption in various agencies.


Author(s):  
Rahma Yanti

Terrorism is one of transnational crime base on international conventions. One of national crime which consists of transnational aspects. Transnational crime convention only manage about how to run cooperation to eliminate national crime which across country borders. Terrorism hasn’t consider as International crime because there’s no unification about its definition. Terrorism still consider as a sensitive issue in each country related with rass, etnis, culture, religion, and geographical aspects. Terrorism law enforcement proses is each country positive law jurisdiction and not as International Criminal Court jurisdiction based on Rome Statuta.Keywords: Crime, Terrorism, International Criminal Law


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 212-226
Author(s):  
Failin Failin

In criminal law there is no penalty if there is no wrongdoing, this basis is about the accountability of a person for the actions he has done. Therefore, in criminal law there are exceptions to such criminal liability, for example contained in Articles 48, 49, 50 and so forth. In addition, there are burdensome things that will be imposed on the accused for crimes committed, such as samenloop, recidive and so on. In the Muaro Sijunjung District Court there is one case concerning a combination of criminal acts, namely theft crimes accompanied by violence and moreover this theft is carried out among families (theft in the family). In this case the judge has decided the prison sentence for 6 (six) Years. But according to the analysis of the author there is no sense of justice for the victim because this perpetrator is the husband of the victim's child so that there is no deterrent effect for the perpetrator, the reason that there is no more theft in this family because no matter how small the crime committed by a person must be taken action in order to obtain justice and legal certainty. In principle, judges have the freedom to determine the measure of punishment to be imposed on the perpetrators of crimes, as long as it does not exceed the maximum provisions specified in the Criminal Code. Therefore, the sentencing of the accused for a combination of crimes committed by means of pure absorption Stelsel that is If a person commits several acts that are several delik each threatened with a different kind of criminal


Author(s):  
Peter Jeremiah Setiawan ◽  
Xavier Nugraha ◽  
Elma Putri Tanbun

The nature of law enforcement in resolving multi-dimensional information disputes has a logical consequence on the need for constructive law enforcement. This research aims to examine the forms of law enforcement that exist in resolving disputes over requests for public information and to formulate a constructive mechanism to realize a series of law enforcement procedures with legal certainty. This research is normative legal research using a statutory and conceptual approach. The results showed that law enforcement in the settlement of public information disputes consists of the objection, non-litigation adjudication, and litigation covering civil, state administration, and criminal law. In this case, The Criminal law instruments are placed as the final law enforcement if the relevant public agency does not carry out a decision that has permanent legal force. In addition, in the context of realizing comprehensive and constructive law enforcement, a Memorandum of Understanding was held between the Information Commission and the Police to synergize and effectively implement the criminal law as a final resort.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Edy Suwito ◽  
Mulyadi Aribowo

This study aims to determine the extent to which legal protection and obstacles faced against the victims of rape in criminal justice in Blitar district court. The context of legal protection against victims of crime (criminal act of rape) is by preventive or repressive efforts conducted by both society and law enforcement officers such as providing protection from various threats that can endanger the life of the victim. The research used is juridical normative and juridical empirical research. Research location in Blitar District Court. The materials used in literature study are data collection through literature study, and field research involves interviewing informant. Based on the result of the research, the researcher got the answer that, the legal protection against the victims of criminal act of rape in criminal court in Blitar state court still caused many difficulties in settling either at the investigation stage until the victim was present in the court, because the psychic pressure in victims questioned. This of course affects the mental / psychological development of the victims and also affects the law enforcement process itself to bring about a sense of justice for victims and society.


Author(s):  
Tjahyo Kusumo

ABSTRAKPerkembangan dan pembaharuan hukum pidana sudah meningkat dengan adanya penerapan penggabungan hukum dalam penyelesaian kasus tindak pidana. Perumusan masalah:Bagaimana penerapan konsep lex spesialis sistematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan Dikaitkan Dengan Ajaran Perbarengan Dalam Hukum Pidana? Bagaimana kepastian hukum penerapan konsep lex spesialis sistematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan dari sudut pandang keadilan ? Bagaimana implikasi hukum penerapan konsep lex spesialis sistematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan dalam pembaharuan hukum pidana?Tujuan Penelitian Untuk menjelaskan penerapan konsep lex spesialis systematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan Dikaitkan Dengan Ajaran Perbarengan Dalam Hukum Pidana Untuk menjelaskan kepastian hukum penerapan konsep lex spesialis systematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan dari sudut pandang keadilan.Untuk menjelaskan implikasi hukum penerapan konsep lex spesialis systematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan dalam pembaharuan hukum pidana Jenis penelitian hukumnya adalah secara normatif . Kesimpulan Penerapan konsep lex spesialis sistematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan Dikaitkan Dengan Ajaran Perbarengan Dalam Hukum Pidana terdapat dalam beberapa dakwaan yang terhadap terdakwa yang diperiksa pada persidangan. Hal ini dapat dilihat pada contoh kasus putusan Nomor: 16/Pid.Sus-PK/2018/PT.DKI dengan kronologinya: Terdakwa Nur Alam selaku Gubernur Sulawesi Tenggara didakwa sebagai yang melakukan, menyuruh melakukan perbuatan yang secara melawan hukum melakukan perbuatan memperkaya diri sendiri atau orangt lain atau suatu korporasi yang merugikan keuangan Negara atau perekonomian Negara. Kepastian hukum penerapan konsep lex spesialis systematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan dari sudut pandang keadilan yaitu bahwa Kebijakan hukum pidana melalui implementasi asas kekhususan sistematis (systematische specialiteit) merupakan upaya penting dalam harmonisasi dan sinkronisasi antar undang-undang yang terkandung sanksi pidana didalamnya, baik itu yang bersifat pure criminal act ataupun hukum pidana administrasi (administrative penal law). Asas kekhususan sistematis terdapat pada pasal 14 UU Tipikor. Interpretasi terhadap pasal ini tidak seragam sehingga seringkali mengakibatkan terjadinya kriminalisasi kebijakan pejabat. Sehingga masih belum mencapai keadilan. Implikasi hukum penerapan konsep lex spesialis sistematis pada penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di bidang Pertambangan dalam pembaharuan hukum pidana bahwa penegak hukum, JPU dan hakim,baik di tingkat pertama, banding, maupun kasasi, dalam menyikapi perkara pidana yang mempertemukan dua ketentuan hukum pidana khusus secara sistematis.ABSTRACTThe development and renewal of criminal law has increased with the application of the incorporation of law in the resolution of criminal cases. Formulation of the problem: How is the application of the concept of a systematic lex specialist on law enforcement of criminal acts of corruption in the field of Mining Associated with the Doctrine of Reform in Criminal Law? What is the legal certainty of the application of the concept of a systematic lex specialist on law enforcement for criminal acts of corruption in the Mining field from the point of view of justice? What are the legal implications of applying the concept of a systematic lex specialist to law enforcement for corruption in the field of Mining in the renewal of criminal law?Research Objectives To explain the application of the concept of systematic lex specialists in law enforcement for corruption in the Mining field Attributed to the Doctrine of Reform in Criminal Law To explain the legal certainty of the application of the concept of systemic specialist lex in law enforcement for corruption in the mining field from the perspective of justice. legal implications of the application of the concept of systematic specialist lex in law enforcement for criminal acts of corruption in the field of Mining in the renewal of criminal law The type of legal research is normative.Conclusion The application of the concept of systematic lex specialists to law enforcement of criminal acts of corruption in the field of Mining Associated with the Doctrine of Collaboration in Criminal Law is contained in a number of charges against the defendants examined at trial. This can be seen in the example of case ruling Number: 16 / Pid.Sus-PK / 2018 / PT.DKI with its chronology: Defendant Nur Alam as the Governor of Southeast Sulawesi was charged as the one who committed, ordered to do an act that unlawfully commits an act of enriching oneself or any other person or corporation that is detrimental to the State's finances or the State's economy. Legal certainty The application of the concept of systematic specialist lex to law enforcement of corruption in the mining sector from the perspective of justice is that the criminal law policy through the implementation of the principle of systematic specificity (systematische specialiteit) is an important effort in the harmonization and synchronization between the laws contained in criminal sanctions therein , both those that are pure criminal act or administrative criminal law. The principle of systematic specificity is found in article 14 of the Corruption Law. The interpretation of this article is not uniform so it often results in the criminalization of official policies. So it still hasn't reached justice. Legal implications of the application of the concept of a systematic lex specialist on law enforcement for criminal acts of corruption in the Mining sector in the renewal of criminal law that law enforcement, prosecutors and judges, both at the first level, appeals, and cassation, in addressing criminal cases that bring together two specific criminal law provisions systematic.


ISLAMIKA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 13-29
Author(s):  
Karmawan Karmawan ◽  
Suhaeny Suhaeny ◽  
Nurhalimah Nurhalimah

AbstrakTujuan penulisan ini menganalisis keadilan setiap perkara yang masuk di pengadian agama karena masih banyaknya masyarakat kurangnya keadilan terhadap putusan pengadilan agama yang dirasakan, sudah seharusnya menjadi perhatian serius bagi seorang hakim di pengadilan agama memutus perkara peradata Islam secara adil dan bijak. Dengan adanya putusan yang adil dalam setiap perkara maka masyarakat berkeyakinan dan beranggapan bahwa yang dilakukan pengadilan agama sebatas memberikan pelayanan, penegakkan hukum, kepastian hukum serta menciptakan rasa keadilan bagi warga Negara Indonesia, khususnya umat Islam. Dan juga bertujuan agar Peradilan Agama memiliki kemampuan dalam menjalankan tugas dan fungsinya sebagaimana tertera dalam peraturan perundang undangan. Nilai-nilai keadilan tentu harus diutamakan oleh pengdilan agama agar tidak terjadi multi tafsir dikalangan masyarakat karena masyarakat mengharapkan setiap perkara yang diputuskan melalui hakim di lembaga peradilan menjadi oasis yang sangat diharapkan menuju peradilan yang professional dan berkeadilanAbstractThe purpose of this paper is to analyze the fairness of each case that enters religious prosecution because there are still many people lacking justice in the perceived religious court ruling, it should be a serious concern for a judge in a religious court to decide a case of Islamic justice in a fair and wise manner. With a fair decision in every case, the community believes and believes that what is done by the religious court is limited to providing services, law enforcement, legal certainty and creating a sense of justice for the citizens of Indonesia, especially Muslims. And also aims that the Religious Courts have the ability to carry out their duties and functions as stated in the legislation. The values of justice certainly must be prioritized by religious justice so that there will not be multiple interpretations among the community because the public expects that every case decided through a judge in a judicial institution becomes an oasis that is highly expected to lead to a professional and fair trial.


Rechtsidee ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roby Satya Nugraha ◽  
Sri Ayu Astuti

The purpose of this legal research is to explain the first discussion, namely how to implement law enforcement against criminal conspiracy (samenspanning) which has been regulated in the Criminal Code and the Criminal Procedure Code. Second How is the imposition of sanctions for criminal conspiracy charges regulated in the Criminal Code in case Number: 293K / Pid / 2016. This type of research is normative research which is descriptive-analytical in nature, using secondary data with data collection techniques through library research and processing data qualitatively, it is concluded that law enforcement against criminal conspiracy is carried out by penal measures, penal measures are one of the efforts to enforce the law or all actions taken by law enforcement officials that focus more on eradication after a crime is committed under criminal law, namely criminal sanctions which constitute a threat to the perpetrator. The stages in this way include investigation, further investigation, prosecution, and so on, which in this case is part of criminal politics. The functionalization of criminal law is an effort to tackle crime through rational criminal law enforcement with the aim of creating the fulfillment of a sense of justice and efficiency. The imposition of sanctions Criminal sanctions imposed if a person has been proven to have committed a criminal act of treason can be punished with a criminal sentence contained in Article 106 of the Criminal Code with the threat of life imprisonment or twenty years in prison.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 433
Author(s):  
Ali Murtadho

Narcotics abuse is a transnational crime that is done by using a high modus operandi, advanced technology, and supported by jarigan organized. Narcotics are also considered an extraordinary crime because of the impact and the dangers posed to health damage as well as disorders of the nervous system of human, narcotics on one side are the drugs or substances that are useful in the field of medicine and the development of science and on the other hand can cause dependence highly detrimental if abused. Therefore, it is necessary to prevent and fight against the crime of abuse in the illicit traffic of Narcotics. Given the extraordinary crime then categorized the crime of Narcotics regulated more specifically in the Narcotics Act No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics. In the prevention and eradication of Narcotics Police have an important role in it. In addition to enforcing the law, the police are also expected to minimize the prevention and guidance prior to the crime of Narcotics. As a form of law enforcement committed the offenses Police Narcotics abuse is to take action in the form of an investigation. Intent and purpose of the investigation is done to make light of a criminal offense to known suspects and to provide legal certainty and a sense of justice to citizens.Keywords: Process; Investigation; Eradication; Narcotics; Police.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 209-228
Author(s):  
Munandar Munandar

Menurut pasal 66 Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayah (Qanun Jinayah) menerangkan apabila anak yang belum mencapai umur 18 (delapan belas) tahun melakukan atau diduga melakukan Jarimah, maka terhadap anak tersebut dilakukan pemeriksaan berpedoman kepada Peraturan perundang-undangan mengenai Peradilan Pidana Anak (Pasal 67 ayat (1) qanun nomor 6 tahun 2014). Hasil penelitian menunjukan kendala pelaksanaan pemidanaan anak sebagai pelaku jinayah yaitu karena Faktor perundang-undangan, Faktor Aparatur, Faktor sarana prasarana, Faktor Masyarakat, seperti belum adanya penyidik anak yang bersertifikasi, dan aturan proses pelaksanaan eksekusi terhadap Anak belum ada, sehingga Anak sebagai pelaku dalam Qanun Jinayat sama dengan proses penanganan perkara terhadap orang dewasa yang membedakan hanya mengenai pemidanaannya dan tata cara pelaksanaan 'Uqubat terhadap anak yang tidak diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan mengenai sistem peradilan anak diatur dalam Peraturan Gubernur sehingga menjadi kendala tersendiri dalam penyelesaian perkara anak yang melakukan tindak pidana yang diatur dalam Qanun. Disarankan agar Pemerintah Aceh segera membentuk dan mengundangkan Peraturan Gubernur sebagai aturan pelaksana dalam pelaksanaan eksekusi terhadap Anak yang melakukan pidana sebagaimana diatur dalam Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 tahun 2004 Tentang Hukum Jinayat. Dan diharapkan pula hakim sebagai pemutus perkara mampu memberikan rasa keadilan bagi masyarakat.Acoording to Article 66 of Qanun Aceh Number 6, 2014 regarding Islamic Criminal Law states that if a child under the age of 18 (eighteen) years committing a crime or allegedly committing Islamic criminal law, then the child shall be subjected to a Juvenile Justice statutes, Article 67 Paragraph (1) Qanun Number 6, 2014. The research shows that a child as a perpetrator in Qanun Jinayat is similar to the trial process of the cases against adults but in terms of punishments and the procedure of implementing punishments on the procedure of implementation of punishment for children as the perpetrators of criminal acts regulated in Qanun becomes its own constraint in settling the case of juvenile committing crime in Qanun. It is recommended that The Government of Aceh should immediately establish and enact the Governor Regulation as the implementing rule in executing the execution process of the youth offenders as stipulated in Qanun Aceh Number 6, 2004 on Islamic Criminal Law committed by a child by not ignoring the principles of child protection as a child and a victim. For law enforcement officers including judges are expected to have legal psychological knowledge that can sustain deep analysis and legal considerations in imprisonment or custody. And it is also expected that a judge as a decision maker might provide a sense of justice for the community.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document