INNOVATION MANAGEMENT STANDARDS. RUNNING ROUND IN CIRCLES OR DRIVING THE GROWTH OF COUNTRY'S ECONOMY?

2022 ◽  
pp. 19-25
Author(s):  
Viktor Yakovlevich BELOBRAGIN ◽  
Tatiana Anatol'evna SALIMOVA ◽  
Lyudmila Ivanovna BIRYUKOVA
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 8151
Author(s):  
M-Chukri Idris ◽  
Alptekin Durmuşoğlu

In order to establish an innovation culture, a set of organizational procedures and practices called “Innovation Management”, which may differ among companies, should be followed. At the enterprise level, systematic innovation management becomes more complicated. A number of works covering various aspects of this subject have been published. However, a systematic synthesis of all of these contributions is still lacking in management literature. In this review, we aim to analyze and classify the main contributions published on the topic of innovation management systems/standards in management literature, seeking to discover the gaps which still remain in the literature, and to outline future avenues of research in this domain. More than 70 articles in Innovation Management Systems/Standards (IMS/St) studies published in peer-reviewed journals during 2006–2020 are reviewed and analyzed systematically by searching the science databases ScienceDirect, Scopus and Emerald, etc., and using Google Scholar and Mendeley Elsevier to identify related terms. A complete and accurate view of the latest literature on IMS/St is provided, which identifies the main topics developed in the management literature on IMS/St, as well as significant gaps, and demonstrates the low maturity level of the current state of the field. This paper contributes theoretically to the development of literature on IMS/St and provides a clear understanding of the state of the field during the period 2006–2020, shedding light on the research needed in the future in this field of study. From a managerial perspective, it can help companies to better understand the implications of IMS/St, and to harvest the best benefits from the implementation of IMS/St. Our study also answers these three important questions: 1. What are the main topics developed in the management literature on IMS/St so far? 2. Are innovation management standards mature from a practical point of view? 3. What are the main research gaps in management literature, and how could future avenues of research be shaped?


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Alvaro Cristian Sánchez Mercado

Throughout history the development of the countries has been generated mainly by the impulse in two complementary axes: Science and Technology, and Trade. At present we are experiencing an exponential scientific and technological development and the Economy in all its fronts is driven by the intensive application of technology. According to these considerations, this research tries to expose the development of Innovation Management as a transversal mechanism to promote the different socioeconomic areas and especially those supported by engineering. To this end, use will be made of Technology Watch in order to identify the advances of the main research centres related to innovation in the world. Next, there will be an evaluation of the main models of Innovation Management and related methodologies that expose some of the existing Innovation Observatories in the world to finally make a proposal for Innovation Management applicable to the reality of Peru, so that it can be taken into consideration by stakeholders (Government, Academy, Business and Civil Society) committed to Innovation Management in the country


Author(s):  
Jovo Lojanica ◽  

All management standards have requirements for different aspects of improvements on the personal level, family level, company level, in business and life. What is about national level and country level? Is it possible for today’s generations to learn history of nations and of civilizations? If it is — ok, let’s apply it on actual time and people to have less problems and difficulties — especially if is actual in field of risk management. Majority of people are occupied by today’s problems. They don’t consider past and future challenges. People from each country strive for better quality, better and cleaner environment, higher safety etc. historically and today. But could we remember: How did Genghis Khan conquer many regions and how was he defeated? How did Mayas and Aztecs die out? How were Native Americans in North America drastically reduced in numbers? How did the Roman Imperium vanish? How was the Ottoman Imperium established and how it vanished? How many people were killed in the wars in XX century, etc? In all these catastrophic changes risks were not considered in an adequate way. Requirements of risk management — Principles and guidelines — ISO 31000:2009 are very consultative. They could be used on country level, national level, regional level, continental and intercontinental level.


2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 227-232
Author(s):  
Ioan Moise Achim ◽  
Teodora Popescu ◽  
Manuella Kadar

AbstractThe aim of this paper is to offer an insight into innovation management in the knowledge-based society. It sets off by explaining the concept of knowledge-based society and why it bears relevance for the modern world. Next, innovation and related concepts are introduced. Furthermore, a presentation of National Innovation Systems (NIS) is made, their history and role in the understanding of a systemic approach to research, development and innovation at both national and global level. Next, the OECD main guidelines for the elaboration of national innovation policies are presented. Last but not least, an analysis of the current situation of research and innovation in Romania is also included.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 199
Author(s):  
Parwanto

Abstrak:Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui gambaran keefektifan sekolah dilihat dari delapan standar nasional pendidikan. mengetahui tingkat ketecapaian keefektifan sekolahdilihat dari delapan standar nasional pendidikan dan mengetahui dari kedelapan standartnasional pendidikan butir mana disetiap standart yang masih perlu mendapatkan perhatiansecara serius. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalahmetode survai yakni upayamengumpulkan informasi dari responden yang merupakan contoh dengan menggunakankuesioner yang terstruktur. Populasi dari penelitian ini adalah jumlah satuan pendidikanSekolah Mengengah Pertama (SMP) sebanyak 349 sekolah yang bersatatus sekolah negeriyang menyebar di wilayah eks karesidenan Surakarta. Sampel diambil sebanyak 172 sekolahdengan pendekatan area probability sampling. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian inimerupakan kuesioner tertutup dengan skala likert. Setelah data terkumpul kemudian dianalisisdengan pendekatan kuantitatif secara deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dilihatdari standar isi; standar proses; standar kompetensi kelulusan; standar pendidikan dan tenagakependididkan; standar sarana dan prasarana ; standar pengelolaan; standar pembiayaan; danstandar penilaian sudah cukup baik. Ketercapaian delapan standar nasional pendidikan seluruhsekolah sampel sudah mencapai tingkat yang cukup tinggi yakni di atas 90%, kendati masihada beberapa dari sub butir standart yang masih perlu lebih diperbaiki Abstract:The aim of this research is to discover the school effectiveness seen from eightcomponents of standards of national education. From these eight components, we will find outwhich components still need to be regenerated. This research is using survey method bystructured questionnaire to gather information from respondents. The population is 349Government Junior High Schools in a region of ex Surakarta Residence. Total of samples frompopulation is 172 schools, using area probability sampling approach. To collect the data, weused closed questionnaire with Likert scale as the instrument. After all data collected, then weanalyze it descriptively with quantitative approach. The result shown that all the componentsof standards of national education, including content standards; process standards;competence of graduates standards; educational standards and human resource standards;facilities standards; management standards; funding standards; and assesment standards arefairly good. The achievement of eight standards of national education from all sample schoolsalready achieved high level, i.e. above than 90%. But still there are several sub componentsneeds to be regenerated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document