scholarly journals RESEARCH OF NATIONAL, RELIGIOUS AND SOCIAL STRUCTURE OF THE POPULATION MOVED FROM RUSSIAN EMPIRE TO TURKISTAN COUNTRY IN “TURKISTAN COLLECTION”

2020 ◽  
pp. 83-86
Author(s):  
Jurayev Husniddin Pazliddinovich
Keyword(s):  
Social Structure ◽  
Social Status ◽  
Key Words ◽  
Religious Beliefs ◽  
Russian Empire ◽  
Economic Relations ◽  
Social Composition ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Russian Empire

This article explores the significance of the national, religious and social composition of the population of the Turkistan Turks migrated from the Russian Empire to Turkestan. Cultural, socio-economic relations and religious changes in the country are explained through the study of the social status, national composition and religious beliefs of those who were deported to Turkistan. Turkistan Russian Empire was given political motives and purposes of relocation. KEY WORDS: Turkistan collection, source, agricultural issue, province, governorate, Russian villages, settlement, migrational poles, colonization.

scholarly journals Parish Priesthood of the Don Host Region: Features of the Formation of the Social Status and Its Change Between the Mid 17th and the Early 20th Century

2019 ◽  
pp. 111-123
Author(s):  
Alla Shadrina
Keyword(s):  
Social Status ◽  
Comparative Method ◽  
Russian Empire ◽  
Historical Science ◽  
Initial Stage ◽  
The Social ◽  
Regional Community ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Russian Empire ◽  
First Time

Introduction. This article deals with a pressing problem of historical science: the analysis of the social status of the parish priesthood in the South of Russia, and its transformations on the example of the Don Host region. Methods and materials. Some pre-revolutionary regional research works, as well as some published and unpublished materials, are used as references. This article is based on sets of documents of central and regional archives, most of which being introduced scientifically for the first time ever. The methodological basis for this article is made up of the principles which are traditional for this type of research: scientific objectivism, systematic approach and historicism, and the general scientific method of structural and functional analysis that allowed to determine the social position of the priesthood in the regional community of the Don region. Being guided by the historical and comparative method allowed revealing and specifying the peculiar conditions of the priesthood in the Don region against the background of the changes in the cultural and historical situation. Analysis and Results. By the middle of the 17th century, being part of the Don Host, the local priests had acquired a status that made them really different from priests of other provinces of the Russian Empire, for they only reported to the army authorities and were considered to be part of the Cossack community, without having any signs of making an independent estate. Since the establishment of the independent Don and Novocherkassk Diocese in 1829, the priesthood became subordinate to the diocesan archbishop, that allowed to speak about the initial stage of the formation of the priesthood and its social status that corresponded to it. In the period of the reforms introduced by emperor Alexander II, aimed at improving the social status of the parish priesthood of the Russian Empire, the social status of the Don priesthood, due to the completion of integration into the all-Russian practice, significantly increased and got unified with the all-Russian social status. The highest point of development of the social status of the Don priesthood is the time of existence of the All-Great Don Host (1918–1919), which, in accordance with its peculiar ideology, provided the priesthood with exclusive rights and privileges in conditions of the Civil war.

scholarly journals Resettlement Policy Of The Russian Empire: A Historical Analysis (On The Example Of The Fergana Valley!)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (09) ◽  
pp. 561-567
Author(s):  
Kurbonova N.N.
Keyword(s):  
Social Status ◽  
Raw Materials ◽  
Historical Analysis ◽  
Russian Empire ◽  
Colonial Policy ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Russian Empire

The article reveals the resettlement policy of the Russian Empire in Turkestan using the example Fergana Valley: in addition, it shows the social status of dehkans (farmers) and discontent against the colonial policy of the empire. The need for the growth of raw materials is consecrated on the basis of archival materials.  

Honored Citizens and the Creation of a Middle Class in Imperial Russia

Slavic Review ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-349
Author(s):  
Alison K. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Middle Class ◽  
Social Structure ◽  
Russian Empire ◽  
Imperial Russia ◽  
Historical View ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Russian Empire ◽  
Estate Law ◽  
Imperial State

In 1832, an imperial manifesto established a new social estate (soslovie) of “honored citizens.” The new status was granted to successful merchants, professionals, and artists, and gave them permanent (and sometimes inherited) privilege. Honored citizens have been largely forgotten or discounted, both by literary authors of the nineteenth century and by historians. They were, however, a conscious effort on the part of the imperial state to create a middle class in the context of an estate-based social structure, an effort that followed several decades of previous experimentation and discussion. Thousands of subjects of the Russian Empire took on the new status, to the point that by 1897 honored citizens outnumbered merchants. They understood themselves as having an honorable place in the social structure, and were understood as a sign of the status of Russian towns. Honored citizen status gave a certain amount of stability to the new middle class, although not every honored citizen prospered. As a social estate, honored citizens were unique, for they were not unified in opportunity, and because they did not have a collective association—they were individuals in the law. They were, as a result, present and important but paradoxical: while defined by estate law, they were closer to individual subjects or even citizens than almost anyone else in imperial society. In addition, their lack of a collective voice muted their radical potential, masking them from contemporary and historical view.

scholarly journals The Senate under Paul I and the issue of fiscal status of petty szlachta in the Russian western provinces at the turn of the 19th century

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 99-107
Author(s):  
Constantin Vadimovich Troianowski
Keyword(s):  
Social Status ◽  
19Th Century ◽  
Social Group ◽  
Russian Empire ◽  
Governmental Body ◽  
The Social ◽  
Privileged Status ◽  
The Russian Empire ◽  
The Individual ◽  
The 19Th Century

After the partitions of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in 1795 the Russian empire faced a problem of determining the social status of petty Polish nobles (szlachta) in imperial hierarchy. At the turn of the 19th century the Senate was the governmental body that had to resolve this issue. In April of 1800 Paul I approved the proposal of the Senates 3d department to confirm lesser szlachtas fiscal immunity and other privileges enjoyed by her under Rzecz Pospolita. Yet, in the same year the Senates 1st department when deliberating on a separate case of szlachtas tax status in Novorossiysk province, passed two resolutions that contradicted the legal norm adopted in April. This paper focuses on the analysis of circumstances under which the Senates departments came to different decisions on the same problem. Their resolutions reflected two approaches to the policy of petty szlachtas inclusion in the imperial nobility. The resolution of the 3d department, supported by Paul I, envisaged a co-optation of szlachta as a social group through legislative confirmation of its privileged status in the empire. The approach of the 1st department emphasized the necessity of szlachtas integration into imperial nobility on the individual basis (by submitting proofs of noble origin compliant to the Russian laws). As a result the imperial government gave preference to the second model of inclusion.

scholarly journals THE DRAFT PROVISIONS OF THE PENAL PRISONS IN THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 164-169
Author(s):  
M. . Artemenkov
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Work ◽  
Russian Empire ◽  
General Context ◽  
Economic Relations ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
State Archives ◽  
The Russian Empire ◽  
Work Education ◽  
Xix Century

The article analyzes in detail the issues of the formation and development of the penitentiary legislation of the Russian Empire during the Great Reforms of Alexander II. The author notes that changes in the field of execution of punishments were an integral part of the changes that took place in the country, had their historical substantiation and should be considered in the general context of liberal changes of the second half of the XIX century. The formation of new economic relations, changes in the social structure of society, the emergence of new political practices made it necessary to liberalize the penitentiary sphere. New legal theories associated with understanding the purposes, purpose and execution of punishments, became the basis for the transformation in European countries, including the Russian Empire. The main form of punishment is imprisonment, which was the result of changing the purpose of punishment. It is the correction of the person who committed the crime, through work, education and upbringing. The article analyzes the practice of preparing normative and legal acts related to the study of foreign experience, the organization of experimental places of detention, the discussion of the provisions of the draft of the Regulations on Correctional Prisons in the Russian Empire in various commissions. The prepared draft law, in spite of certain shortcomings, was progressive and corresponded to the tasks that faced the system of execution of punishment. Thus, the article concludes that the ongoing reforms were progressive, an assessment was made on the issues of discussion. When writing a scientific work the author used the materials of the State Archives of the Russian Federation, as well as scientific literature of both domestic and foreign authors.

The Samarin Family and the Parish Question in the Russian Empire. 1860s–1910s

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 235-246
Author(s):  
Alexey L. Beglov
Keyword(s):  
Twentieth Century ◽  
Russian Empire ◽  
Public Discussion ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Social ◽  
Church Life ◽  
The Russian Empire ◽  
In The Beginning ◽  
The Church ◽  
Do So

The article examines the contribution of the representatives of the Samarin family to the development of the Parish issue in the Russian Empire in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The issue of expanding the rights of the laity in the sphere of parish self-government was one of the most debated problems of Church life in that period. The public discussion was initiated by D.F. Samarin (1827-1901). He formulated the “social concept” of the parish and parish reform, based on Slavophile views on society and the Church. In the beginning of the twentieth century his eldest son F.D. Samarin who was a member of the Special Council on the development the Orthodox parish project in 1907, and as such developed the Slavophile concept of the parish. In 1915, A.D. Samarin, who took up the position of the Chief Procurator of the Most Holy Synod, tried to make his contribution to the cause of the parish reforms, but he failed to do so due to his resignation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document