scholarly journals Analisis Pemilihan Supplier Chemical Boilout Menggunakan Metode AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) Di Seksi Paper Machine#6.

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 233-242
Author(s):  
Satriardi ◽  
Martinus S

This study aims to determine the best criteria on which to base the selection of alternative Chemical Boilout suppliers for Paper Machine # 6 dissection and to determine the best supplier to be selected for the Chemical Boilout supplier. The benefit of this research is to improve the consistency of run-ability by reducing the lost time sheet break and paper rejects. The method used is data processing using AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) and data collection by means of observation, interviews and questionnaires. The results of this study indicate the criteria for supplier selection, namely quality, price, supplier performance and guarantee of product claims. Then produce a weight for each alternative supplier, in order, namely kemira supplier with a weight of 30.627%, buckman with a weight of 29.973%, solenis with a weight of 21.608% and amazone with a weight of 17.792%. therefore for the best supplier and will be recommended to be selected in the upcoming tender process is the supplier Kemira.

Author(s):  
Fadhilah Hanifah ◽  
Elpawati Puspi Eko Wiranthi

The purpose of this research is to develop a performance appraisal method to get the priority order of four restaurant beef suppliers based on the weight of the selection criteria and by showing the indicators of each criterion, using the Vendor Performance Index and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. There are seven main criteria for assessing supplier performance, namely quality, cost, delivery, flexibility, responsiveness, solutions, and relationships which are then translated into thirty-eight sub criteria or indicators. With the AHP method, weights obtained from the seven criteria in the order of quality (0.371), cost (0.256), delivery (0.101), solution (0.078), flexibility (0.070), responsiveness (0.069), and relationship (0.055). The results of supplier selection based on the AHP method obtained the weight in the order of priority of suppliers, namely PT Sukanda Djaya (0.377). PT Indoguna Utama (0.349). Santosa Agrindo (0.146), and Amino Meat (0.128).


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-94
Author(s):  
Noor Nailie Azzat ◽  
◽  
Mufidah Ulwiyatun Nafisah ◽  

PT Urchindize has more than 35 anchovy suppliers, although the company has many suppliers, it still often encounters obstacles. The obstacle felt by the company is that the supplier has not been able to meet a number of standard criteria owned by the company. The company has not yet implemented the proper selection and assessment method for suppliers. Based on this, the company must select suppliers to get suppliers who are truly able to meet company needs consistently and with quality. Based on the results of data processing using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, obtained the most influential criteria in supplier selection in the following order of priority: price criteria, delivery criteria, quality criteria, supplier relationship criteria, service criteria and responsibility. While the right supplier in the selection of suppliers for PT. Urchindize namely Mr. Ali Yudin became the main priority with a weight of 0.181, second was Mr. Akhsan with a weight of 0.159, third was Mr. Sugiyanto with a weight of 0.141, fourth was Mr. Junaidi with a weight of 0.118, the fifth was Mr. Masdawi with a weight of 0.102, the sixth was is Mrs. Mustarikah with a weight of 0.081, seventh is Mr. Sofyan and Mr. Idris with a weight of 0.073, eighth is Mr. Yusman with a weight of 0.044, the last priority is Mr. Abdul Rokhman with a weight of 0.037.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Sumanto Sumanto ◽  
Karlena Indriani ◽  
Lita Sari Marita ◽  
Ade Christian

There are several methods of decision making VSAT IT goods suppliers such as: Promethee, Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Decision-making in the selection of the best suppliers, we have the basis of assessment criteria, and we will also be faced with more than one alternative. If alternatives are only two, maybe still easy for us to choose, but if the alternative is a lot of choice, it is quite difficult for us to decide. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a technique that was developed to help overcome this difficulty, because the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a form of decision-making model with many criteria. One of the reliability of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is able to perform simultaneous analysis and integrated between the parameters of qualitative or quantitative. In this study the authors use six criteria and alternatives 6, the results of these alternatives will be obtained perangkingan alternative used as a reference supplier selection VSAT IT goods company Total EP Indonesie


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-160
Author(s):  
Nehemia Hadiwijaya ◽  
Jenie Sundari

Abstract-Supplier selection is one of the important things in purchasing activities for companies. Supplier selection is a multi-criteria problem which includes quantitative and qualitative factors. One method that can be used for supplier selection is the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method. The problems that will be discussed in this study are: (1) how is the order of priority criteria and sub-criteria in the selection of suppliers at PT Garuda Hidrotive International? (2) which supplier / supplier should PT Garuda Hidrotive International choose based on the AHP method? The sampling technique uses judgment sampling because the AHP method requires dependence on a group of experts according to the types of specialists involved in decision making. Based on the results of the analysis, the advice that can be given is, if the company will develop a partnership with suppliers, the company is preferred to choose supplier X as a supplier food chemical for the company because supplier X is the best supplier that has the highest overall value. With this partnership, the supply chain performance between suppliers and companies will be better and can facilitate the overall production activities. 


Competitive ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Sofiani Nalwin Nurbani ◽  
Siti Sholihah ◽  
Rodiah Rodiah

Pengambilan keputusan dalam pemilihan supplier bahan kemasan teh Goalpara 30’s di Industri Hilir Teh (IHT) masih bersifat intuitif dengan tidak adanya skala prioritas yang jelas antar kriteria, sehingga dibutuhkan suatu metode dalam pengambilan keputusan. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) adalah metode yang digunakan untuk mengambil sebuah keputusan pada suatu permasalahan multikriteria dengan menyusun prioritas kriteria/subkriteria dalam sebuah hirarki. Kriteria yang dijadikan sebagai bahan pertimbangan dalam pemilihan supplier bahan kemasan teh Goalpara 30’s adalah kualitas, harga, dan leadtime. Berdasarkan perhitungan dengan menggunakan metode AHP,  yang menjadi alternatif terbaik untuk supplier benang adalah PT. Argapura, untuk supplier dus adalah PT. Tunas Alfin Tbk, untuk supplier tag adalah PT. Corona Printing Asia, untuk supplier master carton adalah PT. Karya Indah Multiguna (PT KIM). Kriteria yang menjadi prioritas utama dalam pemilihan supplier dari setiap bahan kemasan adalah kualitas   In the supplier selection decision making tea packaging materials Goalpara 30's, Industri Hilir Teh (IHT) was intuitive without priority among criteria, so we need a method for decision making. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a method used to take a decision on a multicriteria problem with prioritizing criteria / sub-criteria into a hierarchy. The criteria taken into consideration in the selection of suppliers of packaging materials tea Goalpara 30's is the quality, price and leadtime. Based on calculations, the best alternative for the yarn supplier is PT. Argapura, for carton suppliers are PT. Tunas Alfin Tbk, to tag suppliers are PT. Corona Printing Asia, to the supplier master carton is PT. Karya Indah Multipurpose (PT KIM). The main criteria in the selection of suppliers of each packaging material is quality


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 60-67
Author(s):  
Dolly Rommer ◽  
Daniel B Paillin ◽  
Johan M. Tupan

This study discusses the selection of wood raw material suppliers using the AHP-F method. Problems by UD. Bless Furniture is the difficulty of determining which supplier has good performance in terms of price, quality, service, delivery, quantity determination, location as well as guarantees and claims. With many competitors and different raw material prices from each supplier. Many raw materials such as wood cracks are hollow and broken at the ends of the wood, the color of the wood, and the shape of the wood. Delivery plans that are often complained by companies where delivery is not according to the schedule in the agreement. The results of data processing carried out by the AHP fuzzy method show that the criteria that become a priority in supplier selection are the price criteria which have a weight of 0.47. By taking into account the seven criteria above, it is obtained that the supplier recommended being prioritized as the best supplier based on the highest priority weight, namely supplier C with a weight of 0,39 then supplier A with a weight of 0,37 and the third is supplier B with a weight of 0,24.


Author(s):  
Riska Mulia Arum ◽  
Trisna Yuniarti

This study aims to determine the best supplier for in-Lite lighting products. The company chose criteria and sub-criteria in supplier selection to optimize product sales continuity. This study used the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, which provided information about the criteria, sub-criteria, and alternatives in the selection of three suppliers: A, B, and C. The existence of priority weights provided a decision in choosing the supplier of the lighting product. The new criteria and sub-criteria were the results of the literature study formulation and then adjusted again with the results of the interview. Seven criteria were determined in this study: production, price, quality, site selection, product suitability, delivery, and service. The results of the calculation of the priority weights of the criteria, sub-criteria, and alternative selection using a questionnaire. The parties involved in the selection of suppliers filled out the questionnaire to obtain a weight for each supplier. Based on the results of AHP calculations, supplier A got the highest weight of 0,442 or 44%, so this supplier is used as a company priority in choosing suppliers for in-Lite type lighting products.


Author(s):  
Jakfat Haekal ◽  
Herawan Setio

The purpose of this research was to see the selection of raw material suppliers as an assessment of supplier performance. Data were obtained from the results of assessment of the experts in food and beverage company in South Jakarta. The rate selection of suppliers was based on several criteria. There was the suitability in some products with the demand for tolerance of 10% about mismatch delivery, 10% of the accuracy of the product delivery, 5% of products quality, 5% of product prices, 5% of the easiness of information or data, and 10% of the problem-solving action. The results show that 40% of suppliers get a warning letter regarding their performance from January to June 2016, 20% of suppliers have already gotten a reprimand directly from the company, 20% of suppliers have been deactivated from the list of suppliers, because they cannot meet the target value which equals to 4,05, only 20% of the supplier can maintain its performance.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 177-179
Author(s):  
Bhavik K Daxini ◽  
◽  
Prof. (Dr.) R.B. Bhatt Prof. (Dr.) R.B. Bhatt ◽  
Prof. Jayeshkumar Pitroda

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document