scholarly journals Juridical Analysis of Implementation of a Virtual Trials for Criminal Case during the Covid-19 Pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 04 (07) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Mukti ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Case Review ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Government Regulations ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Normative Approach ◽  
Adjustment Mechanism ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Supreme Court

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to changes in human order and patterns of life by implementing a new normal life. One of those affected is the law enforcement sector in Indonesia. Enforcement of Criminal Law ultimately applies an adjustment mechanism when conducting a case review in court. If during this time the examination of the case bases KUHAP with face-to-face directly methods, then with COVID-19 turn it into a mechanism of remote trial electronically (virtual) using the Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) as the basis. Further research is needed to ensure the legality of the use of PERMA in the application of such electronic hearings. This research method is a normative approach that combines conceptual approach in the form of prevailing views and doctrines, statute approach by attracting conformity between rules, sociological, philosophical, juridical and case approach as a form of implementation or application of norms. The results of the study stated that PERMA is a legal product that is legally binding and have binding legal force. It's just that the arrangement of this virtual trial needs to be raised to the level of law so that it has parallels with Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), or at has the force of law least can be proposed to the President to be published into Government Regulations in Lieu of Laws or Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang (Perppu).

scholarly journals URGENSI PEMBANGUNAN YURISPRUDENSI PEMIDANAAN KORPORASI PELAKU KORUPSI UNTUK EFEKTIVITAS PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA / URGENCY OF JURISPRUDENCY DEVELOPMENT OF CORPORATION PUNISHMENT OF CORRUPTION ACTORS FOR EFFECTIVENESS OF LAW IN INDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 459
Author(s):  
Budi Suhariyanto
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Corporate Crime ◽  
Fundamental Problem ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
The Supreme Court

Realitas pemberantasan tindak pidana korporasi di Indonesia banyak mengalami kendala, termasuk dalam perkara korupsi. Ketiadaan yurisprudensi yang bisa dijadikan pedoman bagi penegak hukum dan hakim menjadi persoalan yang mendasar dalam mengatasi kegalauan yang selama ini ada.Menarik dipermasalahkan yaitu bagaimanakah urgensi pembangunan yurisprudensi pemidanaan korporasi Pelaku korupsi untuk efektivitas penegakan hukum di Indonesia? Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mendorong Mahkamah Agung menginisiasi pembentukan yurisprudensi pemidanaan korporasiPelaku korupsi. Jika telah ditetapkan sebagai yurisprudensi dapat berguna sebagai inspirasi dan dipedomani oleh penegak hukum dan hakim. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatankasus. Hasil pembahasan mengemukakan bahwa beberapa putusan pemidanaan terhadap korporasi Pelaku korupsi memiliki kaidah hukum baru yang perlu mendapatkan perhatian penegak hukum dan hakim Pengadilan Tipikor. Kaidah hukum baru tersebut perlu dipertimbangkan untuk dijadikan yurisprudensi sehingga bisa menjadi solusi atas kendala efektivitas pemberantasan korupsi korporasi yang selama ini ada. Mengingat persyaratan yurisprudensi pemidanaan korporasi Pelaku korupsi telah terpenuhi maka sesegera mungkin dapat dimulai proses dan tahapannya oleh Mahkamah Agung.The reality of the eradication of corporate crime in Indonesia has many obstacles, including in corruption cases. The absence of jurisprudence that can be used as a guide for law enforcers and judges to be a fundamental problem in overcoming the turmoil that has been there. Interest in question is how urgency of jurisprudence development corporations corruption Actors of corruption for the effectiveness of law enforcement in Indonesia? The purpose of this study is to encourage the Supreme Court to initiate the formation of corporate criminal prosecution jurisprudence. If it has been established as jurisprudence can be useful as an inspiration and guided by law enforcement and judges. This research uses normative research method with the approach of legislation, conceptual approach and approach of case. The results of the argument suggest that some criminal verdicts against corporations Perpetrators of corruption have new legal rules that need to get the attention of law enforcers and judges of the Corruption Court. The new law rules need to be considered for jurisprudence so that it can be a solution to the obstacles to the effectiveness of corruption eradication of corporations that have been there. In view of the requirements of corporations punishment lawsuit The perpetrators of corruption have been fulfilled as soon as possible can begin the process and its stages by the Supreme Court.

scholarly journals Praperadilan Terhadap Penetapan Status Tersangka Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-103
Author(s):  
Claudia Permata Dinda ◽  
Usman Usman ◽  
Tri Imam Munandar
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Status ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights

ABSTRAK Praperadilan yang diatur dalam KUHAP menjamin perlindungan HAM dan aparat penegak hukum dalam menjalankan tugas dan kewenangannya secara konsekwen. Lembaga praperadilan telah menciptakan mekanisme kontrol sebagai lembaga yang berwenang melakukan pengawasan terhadap kinerja aparat penegak hukum dalam menjalankan tugasnya guna tercipta proses peradilan pidana yang baik. Terkait dengan penegakan hukum dan pemberantasan korupsi, Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi merupakan lembaga yang diamanatkan oleh undang-undang dengan wewenangnya untuk menetapkan status tersangka guna proses penyelidikan dan penyidikan tindak pidana korupsi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui akibat dari perluasan objek praperadilan atas penetapan status tersangka terhadap KUHAP dan mengetahui akibat dari perluasan objek praperadilan terhadap penetapan status tersangka tindak pidana korupsi oleh KPK. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Sebelumnya, sah atau tidaknya penetapan status tersangka oleh KPK bukan merupakan objek praperadilan, namun melalui Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 praperadilan telah berwenang memeriksa sah atau tidaknya penetapan status tersangka. Hal ini menjadi sebuah pembaharuan dalam Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia. ABSTRACT Pretrial regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code guarantees the protection of human rights and law enforcement officers in carrying out their duties and authorities consistently. The pretrial institution has created a control mechanism as an institution authorized to supervise the performance of law enforcement officers in carrying out their duties in order to create a good criminal justice process.This study aims to determine the effects of the expansion of pretrial objects over the determination of the status of suspects against the Criminal Procedure Code and to determine the consequences of expanding pretrial objects to determine the status of suspected criminal acts of corruption by the KPK. The research method used in writing this thesis is a normative juridical research method through the conceptual approach, the statutory approach and the case approach. Previously, the KPK was not a pretrial object or not, but through the Constitutional Court Decision Number 21 / PUU-XII / 2014 the pretrial had the authority to examine whether or not the status of the suspect was determined. This has become a renewal in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code.

scholarly journals Pembatasan Kasasi Perkara Pidana Oleh Mahkamah Agung Ditinjau Dari Hak Rakyat Untuk Memperoleh Keadilan

ADALAH ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurelia Verina Withania ◽  
Ahmad Mahyani
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Public ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Basic Purpose ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Prescriptive Analysis

The existence of rules limiting the cassation becomes an obstacle for the public to obtain justice and is not in accordance with the principles of the state of Indonesia as a state of law which is stated in the provisions of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in Article 28D. Problem: Is the limitation of cassation in Article 45A of the Supreme Court Law in accordance with the provisions of the 1945 Constitution and the Criminal Procedure Code. This research is a normative research method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach as well as prescriptive analysis techniques. The cassation legal effort should return to its basic purpose, namely maintaining legal uniformity and unity and providing justice for the community.

scholarly journals KAJIAN YURIDIS UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 18 TAHUN 2017 TENTANG PELINDUNGAN PEKERJA MIGRAN INDONESIA

GANEC SWARA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 230
Author(s):  
LELISARI LELISARI ◽  
IMAWANTO IMAWANTO ◽  
FAHRURROZI FAHRURROZI
Keyword(s):  
Migrant Workers ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Assistance ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Government Regulations ◽  
The Law ◽  
Rubber Article

   Since the enactment of Law No. 18 of 2017 concerning the Protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers (PPMI Law), there is a new term as a substitute for Indonesian Labor (for the next term TKI) to become Indonesian Migrant Workers (hereinafter referred to as PMI). By carefully reading the law governing TKI or PMI, namely Law Number 18 of 2017 concerning PPMI, it is made to correct various weaknesses in Law No. 39 of 2004, in which the main objective is to improve the law. thus TKI or PMI are increasingly protected. In fact, this law also still has some weaknesses. The research objective is to analyze weaknesses in Law No. 18 of 2017 concerning PPMI. The method used is a normative juridical research method with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. From the results of the study, there are five weaknesses in the PPMI Law, namely: There is inconsistency in implementing the rules, the PPMI Law still holds potential institutional conflicts regarding the authority of Ministries and Institutions / Non-Ministerial Bodies in the management of migrant workers protection, Articles in the PPMI Law concerning coaching and supervision also has the potential to be a rubber article because it does not elaborate on what forms of supervision and supervision should be carried out. There is no specific article that affirms the specific needs of PMI protection (especially women) who work in the domestic sector. Regulations regarding legal assistance for PMI are not regulated in detail. As a suggestion to immediately revise the PPMI Law, then it must be guarded and completed 27 regulations derived from the mandate of the PPMI Law consisting of 12 Government Regulations, 11 Ministerial Regulations, 3 Agency Regulations and 1 Presidential Regulation

scholarly journals Urgensi Pembentukan Peradilan Khusus Pemilu dalam rangka Mewujudkan Integritas Pemilu

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
Iwan Rois ◽  
Ratna Herawati
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Method ◽  
District Court ◽  
Election Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
High Court ◽  
Provincial Level ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
General Elections

This study aims to analyze the need to establish a special election court which has the authority to solve various election law cases in order to realize elections with integrity; and analyzing the formulation of election special justice in order to realize the integrity of the election. The research method used is the method of normative legal research and the implementation of this research collects data from various sources in order to get an answer to the issues that have been formulated. The results of the study shows that  the purpose of the need for the formation of special judicial elections; First, to meet the growing demands of increasingly complex justice in society and more election law enforcement so as to realize the integrity of the elections; Second, To handle the election law cases quickly and simply so as to obey the integrity of the election. Formulation; First, the election special justice to be able to work quickly and simply in handling election law cases, domiciled at the central and provincial level, then entering the District Court or the High Court; Secondly, the Guidelines for the election special judicial law shall be based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 Year 2017 on Procedures for the Settlement of Administrative Offenses of the General Elections in the Supreme Court. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlunya membentuk peradilan khusus pemilu yang mempunyai kewenangan menyelesaikan berbagai perkara hukum pemilu agar terwujud pemilu yang berintegritas; dan menganalisis formulasi pembentukan peradilan khusus pemilu dalam rangka mewujudkan integritas pemilu. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah metode penelitian hukum normatif dan pelaksanaan dari penelitian ini mengumpulkan bahan hukum dari berbagai sumber guna mendapatkan suatu jawaban atas pokok-pokok permasalahan yang telah dirumuskan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tujuan perlunya pembentukan peradilan khusus pemilu; Pertama, Untuk memenuhi tuntutan perkembangan akan keadilan yang semakin kompleks dalam masyarakat dan lebih penegakan hukum pemilu sehingga mewujudkan integritas pemilu; Kedua, Untuk menangani perkara hukum pemilu dengan cepat dan sederhana sehingga mewudkan integritas pemilu. Formulasi; Pertama, Peradilan khusus pemilu agar bisa bekerja cepat dan sederhana dalam menangani perkara hukum pemilu, berkedudukan di tingkat pusat dan provinsi, selanjutnya masuk pada Pengadilan Negeri atau Pengadilan Tinggi; Kedua, Pedoman beracara pada peradilan khusus pemilu berdasarkan pada Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2017 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Administratif Pemilihan Umum Di Mahkamah Agung.

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTASI TUGAS HAKIM PENGAWAS DAN PENGAMAT DALAM PENGAWASAN DAN PENGAMATAN TERHADAP NARAPIDANA (Kajian di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Klas II A Purwokerto)

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dessy Perdani Yuris PS
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Internal Resistance ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Research Results ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Supreme Court

The implementation of court judgments needs to be observed and perceived, thus the birth of Supervisor and Observer Judge Institution by Law No. 8 of 1981. The position of a Judge is not simply responsible for imposition of punishment, but also have to responsible for completion of punishment term by inmates in Correctional Institute by appropriate pattern and program of counseling. Besides in article 277 KUHAP till article 288 KUHAP it is charged another task as supervisor and observer of the court decision. The research results show that the implementation of the Supervisory Judge task and Observers in the execution of court decisions in Purwokerto Penitentiary is based on the Criminal Procedure Code Article 277 through Article 283 Criminal Procedure Code, the implementing regulations of the Supreme Court Circular No. RI. No. 7 of 1985. Supervisory Judge in the performance of duties and Observers in Purwokerto Penitentiary still met the constraints that are internal or external, internal resistance from law enforcement and the factors of factor means or facilities. Then the external barriers are the ruling factor.Keywords : Supervisor and Observer Judge, Purwokerto Penitentiary and prisoner

scholarly journals From the Rejection of Court Disqualification to the Change of the Territorial Jurisdiction

2021 ◽  
pp. 22-26
Author(s):  
Antonina S. Taran ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Recent Change ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
High Position ◽  
Territorial Jurisdiction ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Status ◽  
Cast Doubt ◽  
The Russian Federation

The author refers to the institution of rejection as one of the most important guarantees of the independence of judges. The relevance of this research is due to the need to study and demonstrate the mechanism of influence of the ECHR decisions on Russian legislation and law enforcement practice. The article tracks the recent change in the position of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the issue of rejection judges due to the special status of the person whose interests are affected by the criminal case under consideration/. In particular, it can be the status of a judge, a high position in law enforcement agencies and so on. The specificity of this rejection is to extend to the entire composition of the court, which makes it necessary to change the territorial jurisdiction. The author concludes that the fixing in part 1 of art. 35 of the Criminal procedure code of such a reason change territorial jurisdiction, as «the existence of circumstances that may cast doubt on the objectivity and impartiality of the court» has not eliminated entirely the need for use of the institution of rejection.

scholarly journals Syariat Islam dan Kemaslahatan Manusia di Era New Normal pada Kegiataan Keagamaan dan Pendidikan

FENOMENA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-106
Author(s):  
Mukran H. Usman ◽  
Aswar Aswar ◽  
Andi Wahyu Irawan
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Religious Activities ◽  
Educational Activities ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Normative Approach ◽  
It Impacts ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Government

Shari'a is a rule or law that is sourced from Allah Ta'ala to be a guide to human life so that it impacts on the benefit of life, both personally and socially. The Shari'a of Allah Ta'ala, everything is benefit and there is no evil, although sometimes it is considered bad by humans, but in essence is good for humans themselves. This study aims to explore the harmony of Islamic law on the benefit of humans in the midst of the Covid-19 outbreak. The details are aimed at giving explanations and religious insights that are washatiyah (moderate) from a number of suggestions in the form of a prohibition or restriction by the government regarding religious activities and education carried out face to face when the Covid-19 outbreak occurred. The research method used is the library research method with a phenomenological and normative approach. The issues studied are sourced from literacy which has a relation to the focus of the research, obtained from reading turats, research results and others. The results showed that the government's prohibition on termination and restriction in religious and educational activities during the Covid-19 period, such as: restrictions on religious and educational activities carried out face-to-face, were cases permitted in the Shari'a for human benefit.

scholarly journals Problematika Pendaftaran Partai Politik Peserta Pemilu di Era Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
Faizi Zain ◽  
Udiyo Basuki
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Research Field ◽  
Election Law ◽  
Normative Approach ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Taking Action

AbstractThe birth of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning Elections strengthens the position of the Election Supervisory Body in enforcing election law. In addition to election crimes, other powers he has are taking action and deciding administrative violations, even though the authority is the authority of the State Administrative Court. This study is a combination of library research (library research) and field research (field research) that are descriptive analytical. The approach used is a normative approach. This study attempts to answer two questions; how to settle the election dispute process, and how the electoral dispute law enforcement system in Indonesia. The results showed that the authority to decide on dispute resolution in the electoral process was in Bawaslu whose decision was final and binding, but in practice legal remedies were made to the Administrative Court of Negarab and ended at the Supreme Court through appeals, appeals and judicial review.AbstrakLahirnya Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilu menguatkan posisi Badan Pengawas Pemilu dalam menegakkan hukum pemilu. Selain tindak pidana pemilu, kewenangan lain yang dimilikinya adalah menindak dan memutus pelanggaran administrasi, padahal kewenangan tersebut merupakan kewenangan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Penelitian ini merupakan kombinasi dari penelitian kepustakaan (library research) dan penelitian lapangan (field research) yang bersifat deskriptif analitis. Adapun pendekatan yang dipakai adalah pendekatan normatif. Penelitian ini berusaha menjawab dua pertanyaan; bagaimana penyelesaian proses sengketa pemilu, dan bagaimana sistem penegakan hukum sengketa pemilu di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kewenangan memutus penyelesaian sengketa proses pemilu berada di Bawaslu yang putusannya bersifat final dan mengikat, akan tetapi pada prakteknya dilakukan upaya hukum ke Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negarabdan berakhir di Mahkamah Agung melalui banding, kasasi dan peninjauan kembali.

ANALYSIS OF ELEMENT ‘UNLAWFUL’ OF CORRUPTION IN THE BANKING SECTOR (STUDY OF THE SUPREME COURT DECISION NUMBER 1812 K / PID.SUS / 2014)

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 397
Author(s):  
Angga Wijaya Holman Fasa ◽  
Ferianto Ferianto ◽  
Tommy Hendrix
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Bank Credit ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Application Of Law ◽  
Banking Service ◽  
The Supreme Court

The banking sector as one of the drivers of the national economy plays an important role in funding a business through bank credit distributing activities. In practice, this banking service raises legal problems, not only banking crimes but also corruption. Supreme Court Decision No. 1812 K / PID.SUS / 2014 on behalf of the Defendant Dian Siswanto, S.E. MM., in the case of a corruption shows this. This paper examines the element of unlawful and abuse of authority in cases of corruption in the banking sector. The research method used is normative law which is prescriptive with a statute approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. The results show 2 (two) things, first, that the defendant's actions met the unlawful element in the act of corruption as charged in the primary indictment. Second, the judge had wrongly in the application of law based on the subsidiary indictment concerning abuse of authority which was not fulfilled. The judge in this case, was not punctilious in digging up legal facts and was not correct in applying the law. Therefore, in the case of deciding a case, if the charges are of subsidiarity, the judge should prove the primary indictment carefully before deciding based on the subsidiary indictment to create justice, benefit and legal certainty in law enforcement in general, and especially for the accused.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document