scholarly journals Model Pedukung Keputusan Dengan Metode Analitycal Hierarchy Process: Studi Kasus Proses Bongkar Muatan Barang Kapal

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-142
Author(s):  
Ari Muzakir
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Arrival Time ◽  
Pairwise Comparisons ◽  
Decision Criteria ◽  
Optimal Loading ◽  
Priority Weights ◽  
Trading Activities ◽  
The Right ◽  
Consistent Information ◽  
Hierarchy Process

As a center for leaning ships, the Port is a center that plays an important role as a facility that can connect one island to another in trading activities. In this study emphasizes the final goal of (1) determining the factors used as criteria for determining the right and optimal loading decisions, (2) calculating the priority weights of the decision criteria, (3) determining priority weights, (4) obtaining a design that best in priority ship unloading. In this study we use hierarchical based analysis methods or commonly called Analytical hierarchy process (AHP). This method performs pairwise comparisons between criteria and sub criteria by producing a criteria value matrix and produces consistent information each factor from the sub-criteria assessed where the CR <0.1. The results of the scores for each 3 respondents are where the arrival time of the ship scores a total of 17.46 with the highest score, the type of load total score of 11.89, the type of ship the total score is 6.61 and the total loading score of 3.05.

scholarly journals Analisis Pemilihan Pemasok dengan Metode Analitycal Hierarchy Process di Proyek Indarung VI PT Semen Padang

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Suci Oktri Viarani ◽  
Hilma Raimona Zadry
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Cement Industry ◽  
Goods And Services ◽  
Priority Weights ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Planning Development ◽  
Set Up ◽  
The Right ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The cement industry is an industry that is desperately needed by public. Cement always used to make houses, buildings, bridges and other buildings. Heightened demand for cement, making PT Semen Padang, which is one of the largest producers of cement in Indonesia, wants to increase the productivity of cement annually. One way is to set up a new cement plant that is able to meet consumer demand. The establishment of a new plant would require careful planning, especially planning development and planning costs. To set up a new plant, also required the planning of goods and services to be used in its manufacture. Therefore, it is necessary a good supplier that is able to provide the needs according to required specifications. The Indarung Project VI, PT Semen Padang requires the right supplier selection method, so as to provide quality goods and services. Method of procurement of goods and services performed Indarung Project VI, PT Semen Padang today is the commonly used method of procurement. AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) is a systematic method and does not require a long time, and can show priority weights of criteria and selected suppliers. This study using AHP to select suppliers of goods and services in the Indarung Project VI, PT Semen Padang. Based on supplier selection has been made, PT ABB Industrial Way elected as a supplier to supply substations for the Indarung Project VI, PT Semen Padang. Keywords: Analytical Hierarchy Process, priority weight, supplierAbstrakIndustri semen merupakan industri yang sangat dibutuhkan masyarakat umum. Semen selalu digunakan untuk membuat rumah, gedung, jembatan dan bangunan lainnya. Semakin tingginya permintaan terhadap semen, membuat PT Semen Padang yang merupakan salah satu produsen terbesar semen di Indonesia, menginginkan peningkatan produktivitas semen setiap tahunnya. Salah satu caranya adalah dengan mendirikan pabrik semen baru sehingga mampu memenuhi permintaan konsumen. Pendirian sebuah pabrik baru tentunya memerlukan perencanaan yang matang, terutama perencanaan waktu pembangunan dan perencanaan biaya. Untuk mendirikan pabrik baru, juga diperlukan perencanaan barang dan jasa yang akan digunakan dalam pembuatannya. Untuk itu diperlukan pemasok yang baik dan mampu menyediakan kebutuhan sesuai dengan spesifikasi yang diperlukan. Oleh sebab itu, dalam Proyek Indarung VI PT Semen Padang, diperlukan metode pemilihan pemasok yang tepat, sehingga mampu menyediakan barang dan jasa yang berkualitas. Metode pengadaan barang dan jasa yang dilakukan Proyek Indarung VI PT Semen Padang saat ini adalah dengan metode pengadaan yang umum digunakan. Metode AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) merupakan metode yang sistematis dan tidak membutuhkan waktu yang lama, dan dapat melihatkan bobot prioritas dari kriteria dan pemasok yang terpilih. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode AHP untuk memilih pemasok pengadaan barang dan jasa Proyek Indarung VI PT Semen Padang. Berdasarkan pemilihan pemasok yang telah dilakukan, PT ABB Sakti Industri terpilih menjadi pemasok untuk pengadaan gardu induk untuk Proyek Indarung VI PT Semen Padang.Kata kunci: Analytical Hierarchy Process, bobot prioritas, pemasok

Comparison of Judgment Scales of the Analytical Hierarchy Process — A New Approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (02) ◽  
pp. 445-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus D. Goepel
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Analytic Functions ◽  
Decision Problem ◽  
Decision Criteria ◽  
Maximum Weight ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Scale Functions ◽  
Decision Method ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) remains a popular multi-criteria decision method. One topic under discussion of AHP is the use of different scales to translate judgments into ratios. The author makes a new approach to compare different scale functions and to derive a recommendation for the application of scales. The approach is based on simple analytic functions and takes into consideration the number of criteria of the decision problem. A generalization of the so-called balanced scale is proposed, and a new adaptive-balanced scale is introduced. Scales are then categorized and compared based on weight boundaries and weight ratios, weight uncertainties, weight dispersion and number of decision criteria. Finally, a practical example of a decision hierarchy is presented applying the different scales. The results show that the generalized balanced scale improves weight dispersion and weight uncertainty in comparison to the fundamental AHP scale. The proposed adaptive-balanced scale overcomes the problem of a change of the maximum weight depending on the number of decision criteria.

scholarly journals Analisis Analitical Hierarchy Process Dalam Percepat Penyeleksian Penerimaan Tenaga Pendidik

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-90
Author(s):  
Loneli Costaner ◽  
Guntoro Guntoro ◽  
Febrizal Alfarasy
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Support ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Decision Process ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Teaching Staff ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
A Value ◽  
The Right ◽  
Educational Staff ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Sekolah khoiru ummah merupakan salah satu lembaga yang selalu berhubungan dengan tenaga pendidik sebagai aktor pertama dan tenaga kependidikan sebagai support organisasi. Permasalahan terjadi ketika harus menyeleksi calon tenaga pendidik, dimana banyaknya pelamar membuat proses penyeleksian dalam menentukan alternatif  terbaik yang dilakukan masih dengan cara menimbang setiap skor secara manual diatas kertas. Kondisi tersebut terjadi kendala sulitnya untuk memutuskan calon tenaga pendidik yang sesuai kebutuhan dikarenakan harus menimbang dengan prasaan, kemudian proses keputusan juga masih lambat karena harus bermusyarawah yang cukup panjang dari personalia, kepala sekolah hingga yayasan demi konsistensi keputusan tepat untuk dipilih. Dengan demikian persoalan ini dibutuhkan suatu solusi proses keputusan yang relevan dan cepat dengan analisis metode Analytical hierarchy  process (AHP) dengan kriteria kelengkapan adminitrasi pelamar, ujian tertulis, penilaian personality, wawancara dan micro teaching. Sedangkan sampel data alternatif ada tiga pelamar yang akan dianalisis dengan metode  AHP. Data nilai awal masukan didapatkan melalui quisioner perbandingan yang dinilai oleh personalia, kepala sekolah dan Yayasan dengan konsistensi kriteria 0.08 dimana nilai ini falid karena sesuai dengan kaedah konsistensi standar Thomas l.Saaty yaitu konsisten nilai < 0.1. Pengujian ini dilakukan dengan langkah perhitungan consisten indek dan index random yang terdapat pada tahapan AHP kepada nilai masukan nilai tabel matrik perbandingan dari data alternatif. Hasil pengujian dengan nilai konsistensi seluruh data baik kriteria dan alternatif mendapatkan keputusan tebaik  rekomendasi dengan nilai tertinggi didapatkan oleh Husen ahmad dengan nilai 0.729, kedua Sikin al hafidz dengan nilai 0.163 dan Sulaiman akhbar dengan nilai 0.109.   Abstract  The khoiru ummah school is one of the institutions that is always in touch with educators as the first actors and educational staff as organizational support. The problem occurs when it comes to selecting prospective teaching staff, where many applicants make a selection process in determining the best alternative which is still done by weighing each score manually on paper. In this condition, there is an obstacle in the difficulty of deciding the candidate for educators who are suitable for their needs because they have to weigh carefully, then the decision process is also still slow because they have to have a long discussion from personnel, principals to foundations for consistency in the right decision to be chosen. Thus, this problem requires a solution for the decision process that is relevant and fast by analyzing the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method with the criteria for completeness of applicant administration, written examinations, personality assessments, interviews and micro teaching. Meanwhile, the sample of alternative data were three applicants who were analyzed using the AHP method. Initial input value data were obtained through comparative questionnaires assessed by personnel, principals and foundations with the consistency of the criterion of 0.08 where this value was falid because it was in accordance with Thomas L.aaty's standard consistency principle, which was consistent with a value of <0.1. This test is carried out by calculating the consisten index and random index contained in the AHP stage to the input values ​​of the comparison matrix table values ​​from alternative data. The results of the test with the consistency value of all data, both criteria and alternatives, get the best recommendation with the highest value obtained by Husen Ahmad with a value of 0.729, both Sikin al Hafidz with a value of 0.163 and Sulaiman akhbar with a value of 0.109.

scholarly journals Determination of Priorities in Apparel Purchasing from Private Sale Websites

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 386-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Canan Saricam ◽  
Nazan Erdumlu
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Online Shopping ◽  
Product Information ◽  
Online Marketing ◽  
Pairwise Comparisons ◽  
Sample Group ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Hierarchical Manner

Abstract In the fast-changing internet era, private sale websites attracted an enormous interest from the consumers in especially online marketing of apparel goods. The retailers may garner more benefit if the prior issues for the consumers when they are purchasing apparel products online is known. Reviewing the literature, this study presents the factors in three groups in a hierarchical manner considering the multidimensional aspect of online purchasing of apparel products from private sale websites and then determines the prior issues for the consumers by making pairwise comparisons among these factors using analytical hierarchy process on a sample group of 100 Turkish respondents. The findings revealed that “privacy/security” in terms of online shopping criteria, “product information” in terms of apparel products criteria, and “discount ratio” in terms of private shopping criteria took highest scores of importance when the aspects were analyzed individually. Nonetheless, the parameters regarding the online shopping criteria were found to be more important than the criteria regarding the apparel products and private shopping criteria. In the end, it was also observed that these items that were found to have highest importance were actually corresponding to the risks of the situation.

scholarly journals Analytical Hierarchy Process Providing Loans to the North Sumatra Regional Police Cooperative Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
pp. 35-45
Author(s):  
Rizaldy Khair
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
The North ◽  
Weight Value ◽  
The One ◽  
The Right ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
To Receive ◽  
North Sumatra ◽  
Selection Of

Loans for civil servants and police employees must be given to employees who are entitled to receive them. Lending without any criteria makes other employees not accept them. Lending using criteria ensures that the employee given the loan is an employee who deserves to receive it. The ahp method is able to complete the selection of employees who are eligible for the loan. Because of the criteria that can determine the weight value for each attribute, and then proceed with a ranking process that will select the best alternative from a number of alternatives. In this case, the alternative in question is the one who is entitled to receive a loan based on attributes, or determining criteria in selecting employees who are eligible to receive loans. Based on the ranking, Juliana Situmorang's employee has the highest score of 0.977 compared to other employees. The ahp method is the right step in determining employees who are eligible to receive loans.

scholarly journals ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS SEBAGAI EVALUASI SUPPLIER ALAT KESEHATAN DAN OBAT – OBATAN DI RUMAH SAKIT MUHAMMADIYAH

MANAJERIAL ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (01) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Abdurrahman Faris Indriya Himawan
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Medical Devices ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Past Performance ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Performance Payment ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive ◽  
The Right ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Supplier selection is one of the important things in purchasing activities for companies, because the selection of suppliers is very influential on the quality of a product. One way to choose the right supplier for the company can be done using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, the Analytical Hierrarchy Process method is a decision-making method developed to give priority to several alternatives when several criteria must be considered. Some things to consider in choosing suppliers such as: shipping, quality, service, past performance, payment. This research was conducted at one of Muhammadiyah's charitable businesses, namely at the Muhammadiyah Hospital or Clinic. This study aims to find out the best supplier for Muhammadiyah Hospital. This study uses a quantitative descriptive research approach. With the use of samples from this study is the decision making in the purchase of drugs and medical devices Clinic or Muhammadiyah Hospital. The results of the data analysis concluded that the indicators of quality, acceleration of service, credibility of suppliers are bets in determining the best suppliers for the procurement of drugs and medical devices clinics or hospitals Muhammadiyah. Whereas from the overall simulation results Supplier Q is considered as the best supplier for Muhammadiyah Hospital, because overall of all criteria Supplier Q has the highest value compared to other suppliers.    

scholarly journals PENERAPAN SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN UNTUK SELEKSI MAHASISWA BERPRESTASI MENGGUNAKAN METODE AHP

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
Titis Handayani
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Support System ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Data Selection ◽  
Main Function ◽  
College Level ◽  
The Right ◽  
The University ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Of

<p>Decision support systems play a role in helping the university to take appropriate decisions. In this study has made a Decision Support System for Selection of Student Achievement which serves to help the university take the right decision by using the method of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The main function of this system is to process the data selection of outstanding students college level.</p>

scholarly journals SELECTION OF THE RIGHT MARKETPLACE FOR SALE OF ORNAMENTAL PLANTS USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) METHOD

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-48
Author(s):  
Syarif Hidayat HR ◽  
Melan Susanti ◽  
Mari Rahmawati
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Ornamental Plants ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Business People ◽  
Structured Problems ◽  
Online Business ◽  
Computer Based ◽  
The Right ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Of

Basically, each marketplace has its own market, therefore as a seller who will start an online business, especially those who use the marketplace, they must know which marketplace is right to start their online business according to what category of goods to sell. This research is needed to help business people, in this case ornamental plant traders, choose the right marketplace for their online business activities. Decision Support System (DSS) is a computer-based system used to help make decisions from structured and semi-structured problems. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a method that can be used to select from the specified criteria. This method can simplify the criteria that are considered in making decisions for marketplace selection to be simpler and easier to understand. The results of the study show that the decisions made using the AHP method are very effective, and are expected to help make objective decisions. After processing data and analyzing respondent data, with the criteria for the number of visitors, transaction system, features, and searc engine optimization (SEO), it was found that Lazada (0.428) has the highest priority, Tokopedia (0.235) with second priority, Shopee (0.204) with priority third, and Bukalapak (0.133) with the fourth priority

scholarly journals Selecting the Affected Factors on Pavement Distress Problems Using Analytical Hierarchy Process [AHP]

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2.29) ◽  
pp. 716
Author(s):  
Abdalrhman Milad ◽  
Noor Ezlin Ahmed Basri ◽  
Mohammad K.Younes ◽  
Hassan. M.Abdelsalam ◽  
Riza Atiq Abdullah Bin O.K Rahmat
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Surface Defects ◽  
Flexible Pavement ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Tropical Region ◽  
Pairwise Comparisons ◽  
Pavement Maintenance ◽  
Pavement Distress ◽  
Surface Deformations ◽  
Hierarchy Process

This study describes the implementation of analytical hierarchy process [AHP] in pavement multi-criteria selection problem solving. The practice of expressing flexible pavement distress priority is widely accepted. However, an insistent demand exists for a technique that allows decision makers to determine their priorities, rational weights of the importance of pavement distress priority and the ranking of these factors. In this study, AHP is adopted in selecting the best level of distress in flexible pavements in Malaysia as an example of a tropical region. Knowledgeable and experienced experts in flexible pavement maintenance at jabatan kerja raya [JKR] and Kumpulan Ikram Sdn Bhd [IKRAM] were interviewed; as pairwise comparisons, their inputs were structured. Four criteria are set as follows: cracking, surface defects, surface deformations and patching and potholes. These criteria developed into a few other sub-criteria. Results show that cracking is the most significant factor [0.5500], followed by surface deformations [0.2300], patching and potholes [0.1600] and surface defects [0.0600]. Thus, cracking has the most significant distress among the four factors.

WEAK CONSISTENCY AND QUASI-LINEAR MEANS IMPLY THE ACTUAL RANKING

2002 ◽  
Vol 10 (03) ◽  
pp. 227-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
LUCIANO BASILE ◽  
LIVIA D'APUZZO
Keyword(s):  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Arithmetic Mean ◽  
Pairwise Comparisons ◽  
Relative Importance ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Left Eigenvector ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
Linear Means ◽  
The Right ◽  
Hierarchy Process

It is known that in the Analytic Hierarchy Process (A.H.P.) a scale of relative importance for alternatives is derived from a pairwise comparisons matrix A = (aij). Priority vectors are basically provided by the following methods: the right eigenvector method, the geometric mean method and the arithmetic mean method. Antipriority vectors can also be considered; they are built by both the left eigenvector method and mean procedures applied to the columns of A. When the matrix A is inconsistent, priority and antipriority vectors do not indicate necessarily the same ranking. We deal with the problem of the reliability of quantitative rankings and we use quasi-linear means for providing a more general approach to get priority and antipriority vectors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document