scholarly journals Eksistensi Perjanjian Internasional di Era Global

Author(s):  
Haris Kusumawardana

This study aims to determine and analyze the existence of international agreements in the era of globalization. This research is a descriptive normative juridical law research. The approach used is a qualitative approach. In international relations, many countries experience problems in carrying out their relationships. This makes the role of international treaties very important, in order to regulate various matters that become agreements between countries in carrying out relations with other countries. For this reason, the role of international agreements in the era of globalization is an important topic to discuss. It aims to measure how far the country's compliance in carrying out international agreements. The implementation of international treaties well by the countries involved is the goal of the establishment of the international agreement.

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-103
Author(s):  
Komang Sukaniasa

International agreements are agreements between international subjects that give rise to binding obligations in international rights, which can be bilateral or multilateral. Based on these opinions, an understanding can be taken that international treaties are agreements or agreements entered into by two or more countries as subjects of international law that aim to cause certain legal consequences. International agreements, whether ratified or through approval or acceptance or accession, or other methods that are permitted, have the same binding force as ratified international treaties established in the Ratification Law of International Treaties. Once again, it is equally valid and binding on the state. Therefore, the authors consider that the position of international treaties are not made in the form of the Ratification Act of the International Agreement but are binding and apply to Indonesia. Then Damos Dumoli Agusman argues that ratification originates from the conception of international treaty law which is interpreted as an act of confirmation from a country of the legal acts of its envoys or representatives who have signed an agreement as a sign of agreement to be bound by the agreement.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 314-324
Author(s):  
Ali Maksum ◽  
Aris Fauzan ◽  
Sidiq Ahmadi

This article departs from the reality that identity played a significant role in Indonesia-Malaysia brotherhood relations. In addition, Malaysia is home to many Indonesian diasporas, either to work or study. In fact, the Indonesian diaspora still maintains a connection with the motherland through communities amid of identity issues with the Malaysian local. For instance, the emergence of anti-Malaysian versus anti-migrant sentiments, the use of a controversial term called ‘Indon’ and ‘Malingsia’ in the middle of Muslim brotherhood identity. Therefore, using a qualitative approach supplemented with unstructured interviews, this study found that Islamic identity obviously contributed to the harmony of people to people relations between the two nations. Indeed, Islamic identity became a catalyst especially for many Indonesian workers to build close contact with the Muslim local community. These findings are important for sociology and international relations students and researchers.


Author(s):  
Iryna Osmirko ◽  
Ivanna Maryniv

Problem setting. Due to the fact that the constitutional norms determine the status of an international treaty, the binding nature of which has been approved by the parliament as part of national legislation, it is important to study the temporal effect of international treaties, namely their retroactivity. In general, the Vienna Convention contains a provision according to which an international treaty has no retroactive effect in respect of the States which are parties to it, except where the intention to give retroactive effect to the treaty follows from the treaty itself or the agreements of its parties. These exceptions to the general rule indicate the non-absoluteness of the latter, so it is appropriate to study the factors that determine the existence of retroactive agreements, as well as controversial and controversial issues that arise in this regard. Analysis of recent researches and publications. Scholars such as S.N. Ivanov, RA Kalamkaryan, M.A. Kapustina, II Lukashuk, OV Pushnyak and others. However, this area needs further study and analysis, given the existence of exceptions to the general provision on the lack of retroactive effect of international agreements. Target of research. Тo consider the conditions under which an international treaty has retroactive effect, to investigate the factors influencing the decision to grant retroactive effect and the issues arising in connection with the retroactivity of international treaties. Article’s main body. This study examines the non-absoluteness of the provision on the absence of retroactive effect of international agreements. Among the reasons that encourage states to anticipate retroactive effect – the interpretive or additional nature of the international agreement or the need to resolve the situation that arose before its conclusion. It should be emphasized that some agreements have retroactive effect by virtue of their object, which provides this retroactive effect, as agreed by the parties, although not explicitly stated in the contract. It is also not uncommon for certain rights and obligations to arise not because of an international treaty that has not yet entered into force, but because of customary norms that are enshrined in it. Conclusions and prospects for the development. The principle of no retroactive effect of an international agreement is not absolute. In each case, the reasons for the application of retroactivity must be decided by a judicial authority in the process of interpreting the contractual obligations. An important role in the possibility of retroactive application of an international treaty is played by its object or the co-existing customary norms of international law and the principles recognized by civilized nations as binding.


From trade relations to greenhouse gases, from shipwrecks to cybercrime, treaties structure the rights and obligations of states, international organizations, and individuals. For centuries, treaties have regulated relations among nation states. Today, they are the dominant source of international law. Thus, being adept with treaties and international agreements is an indispensable skill for anyone engaged in international relations. This revised and updated edition provides a comprehensive guide to treaties, shedding light on the rules and practices surrounding the making, interpretation, and operation of these instruments. The chapters are designed to introduce the law of treaties and offer practical insights into how treaties actually work. Foundational issues are covered, including what treaties are and when they should be used, alongside detailed analyses of treaty formation, application, interpretation, and exit. Special issues associated with treaties involving the European Union and other international organizations are also addressed. These are complimented by a set of model treaty clauses. Real examples illustrate the approaches that treaty-makers can take on topics such as entry into force, languages, reservations, and amendments. The book thus provides an authoritative reference point for anyone studying or involved in the creation or interpretation of treaties or other forms of international agreement.


2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 173-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphane Paquin

This article aims to assess the effectiveness of two systems of governance with respect to the making of international treaties: the Canadian system, where the decision-making process is more centralized and where intergovernmental mechanisms are poorly institutionalized; and the Belgian system, where sub-state actors have the role of co-decision and where intergovernmental mechanisms are highly institutionalized. The central question to be discussed is: is the fact that one gives an important role to sub-state actors in the making of a country’s treaty by means of institutionalized intergovernmental mechanisms something that negatively or positively affects the foreign policy of a state? And is this a positive- or a negative-sum game at the level of the conclusion and implementation of treaties? The article concludes that the Belgian system is more effective, largely because its sub-state actors have an important role at every step of the conclusion of a treaty.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Tamblé

Since the Kadi judgment, the ECJ has repeatedly emphasised that obligations imposed by international agreements cannot have the effect of prejudicing the constitutional principles of Union law. Based on a case law analysis, the study examines these constitutional principles of Union law, which have so far lacked contours. The focus is on the effect of these principles in relation to acts of Union law and international treaties of the Union that are determined by international law. Based on the results, individual constitutional principles are elaborated. A comparison also shows clear similarities of the concept with ordre public exceptions. An outline of the role of constitutional principles in solving current issues rounds off the work.


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 56
Author(s):  
Siti Sumartini

International agreements (treaties) is one of the mechanisms in international relations as well as one of the sources of international law. Lack of understanding of what the public understanding of international agreements often giving riseto confuse in ournational legal system. Thereby also on the status and position of international treaties in the practice of Indonesia has not provided clarity about what the system is about to be followed by Indonesia.


Author(s):  
Alan Dashwood

The new institutional balance resulting from the Treaty of Lisbon is being tested nowhere as sharply as in the field of the exercise of the EU’s powers of external action. There is a wealth of recent litigation clarifying aspects of the procedural code, now set out in Article 218 TFEU, which governs the negotiation, conclusion, and implementation of international agreements concluded on behalf of the EU. This chapter explores issues connected with the adoption of acts within the framework of Article 218, including the designation of the Union negotiator, the choice of legal basis for decisions on the conclusion of agreements and the enhanced role of the European Parliament in such decisions. Also discussed are certain controversial developments in the procedure that applies for determining the Union’s position in a decision-making body established under an international agreement, and other issues including the legality of so-called ‘hybrid acts’.


2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 497
Author(s):  
Agustina Merdekawati ◽  
Andi Sandi Ant. T. T

AbstractThis research aims to examine the positions of international law and the applicable principles regarding the issues of fulfillment of international obligations under ratified/acceded international agreements by Indonesia. Upon assessment, this research concludes that: Firstly, there are two main obligations that should be fulfilled by Indonesia in an international agreement and treaties, which is legal obligation and moral obligation. Secondly, practices shown that Indonesia’s commitments in fulfilling its international obligation are still not optimal, as a solution, it is recommended that future ratification of international agreement should include additional executorial / performance provision either in the form of Law or Presidential Regulation.IntisariPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana ketentuan hukum internasional mengatur persoalan kewajiban hukum negara terhadap pemenuhan perjanjian internasional yang telah diratifikasi/diaksesi dan untuk mengetahui bagaimana praktik yang Indonesia terkait pemenuhan kewajiban tersebut. Hasil pembahasan menunjukkan bahwa: Pertama, bahwa terdapat 2 kewajiban yang harus dilakukan oleh setiap negara pihak terkait dengan pemenuhan Perjanjian Internasional yakni kewajiban hukum dan kewajiban moral. Kedua, bahwa praktik pelaksanaan kewajiban pemenuhan Perjanjian Internasional di Indonesia masih kurang optimal dan sebagai solusinya dapat ditambahkan beberapa penegasan untuk pemenuhan berbagai kewajiban tersebut dalam bentuk penambahan klausula dalam produk pengesahan perjanjian internasional baik yang berupa Undang­Undang Ratifikasi maupun Peraturan Presiden.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 182-191
Author(s):  
Elfia Farida

International agreements have advantages over other sources of international law. International agreements are used consistently as a tool for cooperation or peaceful relations between countries regardless of their political, economic and social systems. Indonesia has also taken many binding actions on international treaties. If Indonesia is bound by an international agreement, then it is obliged not to carry out something that is contrary to the essence, purpose and purpose of the international agreement and morally must obey obligations arising from the existence of the international agreement in good faith (pacta sunt servanda). The International Convention on The Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers of Their Families has been ratified through Law No. 6 of 2012 so that Indonesia is obliged to realize the rights set out in the Convention into law in force in Indonesia, as a form of State protection for Indonesian migrant workers and members of their families. Keywords: state obligations, international treaties, ratification Abstrak Perjanjian internasional mempunyai kelebihan dibandingkan sumber hukum internasional lainnya. Perjanjian internasional digunakan secara konsisten sebagai alat kerja sama atau hubungan damai antar negara apapun sistem politik, ekonomi dan sosialnya. Indonesia juga telah banyak melakukan tindakan pengikatan terhadap perjanjian internasional. Apabila Indonesia sudah terikat pada suatu perjanjian internasional, maka berkewajiban untuk tidak melaksanakan sesuatu yang bertentangan dengan esensi, maksud dan tujuan perjanjian internasional dan secara moral harus mentaati kewajiban-kewajiban yang timbul akibat adanya perjanjian internasional tersebut dengan iktikad baik (pacta sunt servanda).  International Convention on The Protection of The Rights of All Migrant Workers of Their Families  telah diratifikasi melalui UU No. 6 Tahun 2012 sehingga Indonesia berkewajiban merealisasikan hak-hak yang diatur dalam Konvensi ke dalam hukum yang berlaku di Indonesia, sebagai wujud pelindungan Negara kepada pekerja migran Indonesia dan anggota keluarganya. Kata Kunci:  kewajiban negara, perjanjian internasional, ratifikasi


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document