scholarly journals Konflik Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum Di Kabupaten Maros

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 162-180
Author(s):  
Bustam Bustam ◽  
Syahruddin Nawi ◽  
Hamza Baharuddin
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Conflict Resolution ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Public Understanding ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Law

Tujuan Penelitian ini adalah 1) Untuk mengetahui bentuk konflik yang timbul pada pelaksanaan pengadaan tanah bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum di Kabupaten Maros setelah pemberlakuan Undang-undang No. 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah dan 2) Untuk mengetahui bentuk penyelesaian konflik dalam pelaksanaan pengadaan tanah bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum di Kabupaten Maros. Penelitian ini berbentuk socio legal research. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 1) Bentuk-bentuk konflik  dalam pelaksanaan pengadaan tanah bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum adalah konflik horizontal yakni konflik yang melibatkan dua pihak atau lebih  di mana pihak-pihak yang terlibat tidak berada dalam keseimbangan kedudukan. Konflik   ini terjadi karena faktor substansi hukum yang multitafsir, inkonsistensi pelaksanaan tugas dari penyelenggara pengadaan tanah dengan ketentuan dalam Undang-undang Pengadaan Tanah  dan kurangnya pemahaman masyarakat mengenai pengadaan tanah. 2) Bentuk penyelesaian terhadap konflik pengadaan tanah dilakukan melalui  harmonisasi substansi hukum, sinkronisasi antar sektor dalam pengambilan  keputusan, redefinisi beberapa konsep pengadaan tanah dan sosialisasi hukum pengadaan tanah kepada masyarakat, sosialisasi hukum kepada masyarakat. The objectives of this study are 1) To determine the form of conflict that arises in the implementation of land acquisition for development in the public interest in Maros Regency after the enactment of Law No. 2 of 2012 concerning Land Acquisition and 2) To determine the form of conflict resolution in the implementation of land acquisition for development in the public interest in Maros Regency. This research is in the form of socio legal research. The results showed that 1) The forms of conflict in the implementation of land acquisition for development of the public interest are horizontal conflicts, the conflicts involving two or more parties in which the parties involved are not in a balanced position. This conflict occurred due to the substance of the law which has multiple interpretations, inconsistency in the implementation of the duties of the land acquisition organizer with the provisions in the Land Acquisition Law and the lack of public understanding of land acquisition. 2) The form of resolution of land acquisition conflicts is carried out through harmonization of legal substance, synchronization between sectors in decision making, redefinition of several land acquisition concepts and socialization of land acquisition law to the community, and socialization of the law to the community.

scholarly journals Application of Environmental Conflict Resolution to Public Interest Issues in Water Disputes

2011 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Jeffrey QC ◽  
Donna Craig
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Conflict Resolution ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Environmental Conflict ◽  
The Public ◽  
Environmental Conflict Resolution ◽  
Political Economic

This article examines the role of environmental conflict resolution (ECR) in the public interest issues of water disputes. The article endeavours to  illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of a range of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and negotiation approaches in the context of decision-making. Although many embrace ECR as the cheaper and more effective alternative to more formalistic and entrenched judicial processes before courts of law and quasi-judicial tribunals, the authors argue that there is an urgent need for a more critical, contextual and issue-oriented approach. In particular, the article highlights the significant difficulties associated with representing the full range of stakeholders who should be involved in an ADR process, and the lack of transparency and procedural safeguards associated with ADR in complex public interest disputes. The strength of ADR in smaller project-specific disputes involving a very limited number of stakeholders is well understood. The authors argue that ADR may have a significant role in scoping the issues and associated research as well as facilitating agreement on procedural aspects of large, complex public interest water disputes. However, ADR has severe limitations as a decision-making process. For example, water conflicts necessarily involve the concept of sustainability that in turn touches on a complex maze of social, political, economic and ecological values. The probability of reaching a mediated settlement in such a context is severely curtailed. A preferable approach may be one that is entirely transparent, capable of being both monitored and enforced, and is binding on all stakeholders whether or not they are parties to the mediation.

scholarly journals Axiology of Judicial Application of Enforcement Law: View on the Bailiff’s Discretion

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 149
Author(s):  
Piotr Szczekocki
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Special Role ◽  
Application Process ◽  
Important Place ◽  
The Public ◽  
General Clause ◽  
The Law ◽  
And Function

<p class="Standard">In the article, the author focused on three theoretical and philosophical issues of the judicial enforcement law in Poland, connected with the new enforcement acts which entered into force on 1 January 2019. First, the judicial enforcement proceedings were presented as an element of the law application process. The axiological dimension of this law, the place and function of a court bailiff in the law application process and the introduction of general clauses, combined with the basic values of the court enforcement law in the form of efficiency, effectiveness and reliability, form the new picture of the judicial enforcement law. Secondly, the problem of a general clause as a “carrier” of extralegal criteria was discussed, which takes an important place in the process of enforcement law application in the new bailiff’s law. There is the special role of the “public interest” and the “interest of justice” clauses as normative constructions introduced by the legislator to judicial enforcement. Thirdly, an attempt was made to answer the question about the presence and possible limits of discretion (free decision-making) of a court bailiff in the surrounding of the new axiology of enforcement law, and especially the formulation of this issue in the process of operative interpretation of law by a court bailiff.</p>

Konsep Penggabungan Antara NJOP dan Nilai Pasar dalam Pengadaan Tanah untuk Kepentingan Umum

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Jibril ◽  
Arvel Mulia Pratama ◽  
Jinan Raidangi
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Mass Media ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
The Public ◽  
Existing Problems ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

Abstract: Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest in Indonesia still often causes polemic, as is still often found in various mass media. The problem in the implementation of land aquisition is because the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2012 concerning Land Aquisition for Development in the Public Interest, and the Presidential Regulation that follows it, has not rigidly stipulated the basis for determining the compensation value used to determine the compensation value. This research was conducted by making a comparison between ius constitutum and in concreto events in the field. Primary data in this study were obtained byinterviewing several sources in August 2017, which can be accounted for, while the secondary data were obtained byliterature studies. Based on the research, it is known that there is injustice in determining the value of compensation to the entitled parties. Seeing this, the author tried to describe the existing problems and provide solutions tailored to the situation and conditions in land aquisition in Indonesia. This was intended to actualize the value of social justice in the aquisition of land for development in the public interest in Indonesia.Intisari: Pengadaan Tanah bagi Pembangunan untuk Kepentingan Umum di Indonesia masih sering menimbulkan polemik, sebagaimana yang masih kerap ditemui dalam berbagai media massa. Permasalahan dalam pelaksanaan pengadaan tanah disebabkan karena Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum, serta Peraturan Presiden yang mengikutinya belum mengatur secara rigid tentang dasar penetapan nilai ganti kerugian yang digunakan untuk menetapkan nilai ganti kerugian. Kajian ini dilakukan dengan melakukan komparisi antara ius constitutum dengan peristiwa in concreto yang ada di lapangan. Data primer dalam kajian ini diperoleh dari hasil wawancara dari beberapa narasumber pada Agustus 2017 yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan dan data sekunder dalam kajian ini diperoleh dari studi kepustakaan. Berdasarkan penelitian diketahui bahwa terdapat ketidakadilan dalam penetapan nilai ganti kerugian terhadap pihak-pihak yang berhak. Melihat hal tersebut penulis mencoba menguraikan permasalahan yang ada dan memberikan solusi yang disesuaikan dengan situasi dan kondisi dalam pengadaan tanah di Indonesia. Hal ini dimaksudkan untuk mengaktualisasikan nilai keadilan sosial dalam pengadaan tanah bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum di Indonesia 

scholarly journals FUNGSI NOTARIS SELAKU PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA IKRAR WAKAF (PPAIW) DALAM PERUBAHAN PERUNTUKAN HAK ATAS TANAH WAKAF

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Muhammad Khoirul Utami
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Public Understanding ◽  
Land Area ◽  
The Public ◽  
Barriers To Change ◽  
The Law ◽  
Board Of Supervisors ◽  
Spatial Plan

The thesis entitled "The role of the Notary Deed Official Pledge As Waqf In the allotment of Land Rights Amendment Waqf" examines the waqf land already diwakafkan by wakif and run through the process of making the Pledge of Endowments and already certified waqf land. However, the waqf land area experiencing growth and progress resulting in a change General Spatial Plan (which disturb the position of the donated land. Based on the above, the writers compose thesis raises the issue of whether the allotment of land endowments can be changed, how the role of the notary as Officer Deed of Pledge Waqf in the change designation of land rights endowments, and any obstacles in the change designation of land rights waqf , In writing this thesis, the author uses the normative method. It can be concluded that the change of land designation endowments can be done on the condition that these changes to the public interest in accordance with the General Spatial Plan which is based on the law and not contrary to Islamic principles, changes in the allotment of land endowments can be done after approval Ministry of Religious Affairs on consideration of Indonesian waqf Board and the replacement of at least one rank and balanced with original waqf property. The role of the Notary as Officer Deed of Pledge Waqf  is to legalize or register the minutes of the meeting of the board of supervisors, made a deed of exchange of land endowments, making back Deed of Pledge Waqf of land which has been exchanged in accordance with the Deed of Pledge Waqf originally , providing information on the legal acts penghadap. Barriers to change the designation of land rights endowments of which is still going controversy about peraliahan rights to the donated land, the lack of public understanding of the donated land so many waqf land that is not registered and does not have a certificate endowments, as well as a lack of public understanding of the transfer of rights over donated land, if there is a legal act on changes in land endowments frequent rejection, and understanding Nazhir towards waqf property itself is still lacking, as well as other obstacles.

scholarly journals Prinsip Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Kepentingan Umum

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-267
Author(s):  
Agung Basuki Prasetyo
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Public ◽  
Regulation Approach

Abstract This study aims to find out how the principle of land acquisition for the public interest. The principle is only sought based on the legal norms that apply in Indonesia. This research is a normative legal research based on a legal regulation approach. the results of the study show that the principle of land acquisition for the public interest must meet the provisions of Law No. 2 of 2012 concerning Land Procurement for Development in the Public Interest. Keywords: Land Procurement, Public Interest, Land AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimanakah prinsip pengadaan tanah bagi kepentingan umum. Prinsip tersebut hanya dicari berdasarkan pada norma hukum yang berlaku di Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang berdasarkan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa prinsip pengadaan tanah bagi kepentingan umum harus memenuhi sebagaimana ketentuan Undang-Undang No. 2 Tahun 2012 Tentang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum. Kata Kunci: Pengadaan Tanah, Kepentingan Umum, Pertanahan

scholarly journals Kedudukan Hukum Deponeering dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-29
Author(s):  
Desi Ratnasari ◽  
Sahuri Lasmadi ◽  
Elly Sudarti
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Public ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

This article aims to identify and analyze the legal implications and analyze the regulation of public interest as a condition for implementing deponeering by the Attorney General for the sake of the public interest in the perspective of the development of criminal procedural law. This research is a legal research, obtained from statutory studies (statute approach), concept (conceptual approach), cases. The result of this research is that there is discrimination against equality before the law contained in Article 27 Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and can trigger misinterpretation by the Attorney General. Then in its implementation there is no clear regulation regarding the application of the opportunity principle related to the authority of the attorney general in the implementation of case waiver (deponeering) for the public interest in the Criminal Procedure Code.  Abstrak Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis implikasi hukum serta menganalisis terhadap regulasi kepentingan umum sebagai syarat pelaksanaan pengesampingan perkara (deponeering) oleh Jaksa Agung demi kepentingan umum dalam prespektif perkembangan hukum acara pidana.  Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum, yang diperoleh dari studi perundang-undangan (statute approach), konsep (conceptual approach), kasus. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah adanya diskriminatif terhadap equality before the law yang terdapat dalam Pasal 27 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 dan dapat memicu salah tafsir oleh Jaksa Agung. Lalu di dalam pelaksanaannya belum terdapat regulasi yang jelas mengenai penerapan asas oportunitas yang berhubungan dengan kewenangan jaksa agung dalam pelaksanaan pengesampingan perkara (deponeering) demi kepentingan umum di dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum acara Pidana (KUHAP). 

scholarly journals PELAKSANAAN PENGADAAN TANAH BAGI PEMBANGUNAN UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM (STUDI DI KOTA MAKASSAR)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-157
Author(s):  
Sulastri M
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Legal Rule ◽  
The State ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Public ◽  
Know How ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
The City

The focus of the research is based on facts in the field regarding public land acquisition. Besides wanting to know how the land acquisition process is, it also wants to know the factors that influence land acquisition for the public interest in the city of Makassar. This research is legal research (empirical research) with a legal approach (statute approach). The results of the study indicate that the politics of land law in Indonesia is contained in the LoGA, that the state is not the owner so that the state does not own land. Therefore, the UUPA is not known as eigendom. However, the existence of a state within the scope of the land is only authorized to regulate various issues relating to land in Indonesia, including the authority of land regulation that is increasingly important especially if there are government agencies that need land as the land where development is carried out in the public interest. land to government agencies for development in the public interest, it is deemed necessary to have a legal rule that can be used as a reference in a positive law.

Tanggung Jawab Hukum Penilai Publik terhadap Laporan Penilaian Kegiatan Pengadaan Tanah bagi Pembangunan untuk Kepentingan Umum (Studi Atas Kantor Jasa Penilai Publik Toto Suharto)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gagah Yaumiyya Riyoprakoso ◽  
AM Hasan Ali ◽  
Fitriyani Zein
Keyword(s):  
Future Development ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Government ◽  
Conducting Research ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Systematic Explanation

This study is based on the legal responsibility of the assessment of public appraisal reports they make in land procurement activities for development in the public interest. Public assessment is obliged to always be accountable for their assessment. The type of research found in this thesis is a type of normative legal research with the right-hand of the statue approach and case approach. Normative legal research is a study that provides systematic explanation of rules governing a certain legal category, analyzing the relationship between regulations explaining areas of difficulty and possibly predicting future development. . After conducting research, researchers found that one of the causes that made the dispute was a lack of communication conducted between the Government and the landlord. In deliberation which should be the place where the parties find the meeting point between the parties on the magnitude of the damages that will be given, in the field is often used only for the delivery of the assessment of the compensation that has been done.

Implementasi Asas Keterbukaan pada Pengadaan Tanah bagi Pembangunan untuk Kepentingan Umum: Antara Harapan dan Kenyataan

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Priyo Katon Prasetyo ◽  
Rosye Villanova Christine ◽  
Sudibyanung Sudibyanung
Keyword(s):  
Information Asymmetry ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Economic Inequality ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
The Public ◽  
Land Scarcity ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Role Of Information

Abstract: Based on Law Number 2 of 2012 concerning Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest, the Openness Principle is one of the ten principles as the basis of the implementation of development. This principle is significant because its complex role can lead to conflicts and disputes. In this paper, discussions are divided into two parts: 1) how the implementation is expected to be applied according to the acquisition procedure in theory; and 2) the reality that occurs in the field. The first discussion was conducted by reviewing the applicable regulations and the methods or concepts of development of the openness principle. Meanwhile, the second discussion about the reality on the field was conducted by elaborating case studies regarding problems in land acquisition. The results of this study indicate that there are gaps in the implementation of the openness principle between theory and reality in regards of land scarcity, economic inequality, and information asymmetry among the involved parties. In conclusion, the implementation of the openness principle is significant with the role of information in land acquisition.Intisari: Berdasarkan Undang Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum, Asas Keterbukaan adalah salah satu dari sepuluh asas yang menjadi dasar pelaksanaannya. Asas ini menjadi signifikan karena perannya yang kompleks dapat menimbulkan konflik dan sengketa. Artikel ini akan membagi pembahasan menjadi dua bagian: pertama, bagaimana implementasi yang seharusnya diterapkan pada prosedur pengadaan secara harapan, dan kedua, membahas mengenai realita yang terjadi di lapangan. Secara harapan pembahasan dilakukan dengan melakukan library research atau studi terhadap peraturan yang berlaku dan metode-metode atau prinsip perkembangan dari asas keterbukaan. Realitas di lapangan akan dielaborasi dari studi kasus mengenai permasalahan dalam pengadaan tanah. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan ada gap dalam implementasi asas keterbukaan antara harapan dan realitas di lapangan yang bersumber dari kelangkaan sumber daya/tanah, ketimpangan ekonomi dan asimetri informasi di antara para pihak yang terlibat. Tulisan ini menyimpulkan bahwa implementasi asas keterbukaan signifikan dengan peran informasi dalam pengadaan tanah. 

Normative Juridical Review Comparison of Land Acquisition Regulations for Railway Infrastructure between Indonesia and Malaysia

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhina Setyo Oktaria ◽  
Agustinus Prasetyo Edi Wibowo
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Influencing Factor ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
The Public ◽  
Indonesian Government ◽  
The People ◽  
Railway Infrastructure ◽  
The World ◽  
The Government

Land acquisition for public purposes, including for the construction of railroad infrastructure, is a matter that is proposed by all countries in the world. The Indonesian government or the Malaysian royal government needs land for railroad infrastructure development. To realize this, a regulation was made that became the legal umbrella for the government or royal government. The people must agree to regulations that require it. Land acquisition for public use in Malaysia can be completed quickly in Indonesia. The influencing factor is the different perceptions of the understanding of what are in the public interest, history and legal systems of the two countries as well as the people's reaction from the two countries

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document