scholarly journals L’AUTONOMIE NORMATIVE DANS L’ENTREPRISE: APPROCHES DE THÉORIE DU DROIT - DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5216/rfd.v39i2.39569

2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 253
Author(s):  
Rabah Belaidi
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Analysis ◽  
The State ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Normative Power ◽  
Academic Activities ◽  
The Law ◽  
Sociological Explanation

RESUMO:A discussão sobre o fundamento do poder normativo na empresa mobilizou vários recursos retóricos ao longo de mais de um século de ativitades discursivas acadêmicas. Os limites das teorias dogmática-doutrinárias necessitam uma verticalização da reflexão que pode ser oferecida por uma abordagem de teoria do direito. A partir de um ponto de vista metajurídico, a autonomia normativa pode ser estudado de forma real e completa na condição de achar um protocolo ou uma ferramenta operatória. A análise institucional, bem que desprovida de fronteiras sempre delimitadas oferece possibilidades e vitudes heurísticas e revela além da explicação sociológica do poder na empresa, suas relações com o direito do estado. ABSTRACT:The discussion about the foundation of the normative power at an enterprise mobilized multiple retorical resources for more than a century of discursive academic activities. The limits of the doctrinaire-dogmatic theories need a reflection verticalization which can be offered through an approach of law theory. Starting from a metajuridical point of view, the normative autonomy can be studied in a real and complete way, under the condition of finding a protocol or an operative tool. The institutional analysis, well devoid of always delimited frontiers, offer possibilities and heuristic virtues and reveal beyond the sociological explanation of the power at the enterprise, but also your relations with the law of the state. 

Comparing the incomparable and legal discourse

Semiotica ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (209) ◽  
pp. 5-14
Author(s):  
Augusto Ponzio
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Emmanuel Levinas ◽  
Personal Responsibility ◽  
Legal Discourse ◽  
The State ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
The Other ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Human Being ◽  
The Law

AbstractIt is not with the State that personal responsibility arises towards the other. According to Emmanuel Levinas, the other is every single human being I am responsible for, and I am this responsibility for him. The other, my fellow, is the first comer. But I do not live in a world with just one single “first comer”; there is always another other, a third, who is also my other, my fellow. Otherness, beginning with this third, is a plurality. Proximity as responsibility is a plurality. There is a need for justice. There is the obligation to compare unique and incomparable others. This is what is hidden, unsaid, implied in legal discourse. But recourse to comparison among that which cannot be compared, among that which is incomparable is justified by love of justice for the other. It is this justification that confers a sense to law, which is always dura lex, and to the statement that citizens are equal before the law. From this point of view, State justice is always imperfect with respect to human rights understood as the rights of the other, of every other in his absolute difference, in his incomparable otherness.

scholarly journals AL-IJARAH AL-MUNTAHIYAH BI AL-TAMLIK (IMBT) DALAM PERSPEKTIF ANATOMI KONTRAK BISNIS

ALQALAM ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 193
Author(s):  
Jaih Mubarok
Keyword(s):  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Financial Institution ◽  
The State ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Business Unit ◽  
The Third ◽  
Arbitration Board ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Third Party

AI-Ijarah al-Muntahiyyah bi al-Tamlik (IMBT) is conceptually almost the same as leasing which is conducted by world financial institutions, including those of in Indonesia. IMBT is a service product of syari'a financial institution which is transparant and is able to involve the third party whenever it is necessary. In the context of Indonesia, economic syari'a is culturally designed and run by the Coumil of Indonesian Ulama (MUI). In order to regulate the bussiness in the syari'a system, MUI forms the Council of National Syari'a (DSN) issuing the fatwas; in order to give monitoring, DSN places The Board ef Syari'a Controller (DPS) in every business unit which uses syari'a system; in order to solve the syari'a business disputation, MUI forms the Arbitration Board of National Syari'a (Basyarnas). Moreover, The State has structurally accomodated the system of syari'a business in law and regulation. Therefore, The openess characteristics (the principle of free based contract) which is also practiced in the contract of IMBT is restricted by the law and regulation and considered appropriate in syari'a point of view based on DSN-MUI fatwas.

scholarly journals Islam-osmanli state law in Serbia

2006 ◽  
pp. 271-286
Author(s):  
Miroljub Jevtic
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
State Law ◽  
Normal Functioning ◽  
Basic Goal ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Moment ◽  
State Functions

Every state functions through its legal order and that legal order shows the nature of every state. From that point of view, the nature of the state and the authority which functioned in the regions of the Serbian lands from the moment of the Osmanli conquests till the end of that rule was best reflected through the law which regulated social relations. If one views the state which ruled in the regions of the Serbian lands in that way, one can clearly state that it, in its nature, had the basic goal to realize Islamic doctrine. All legal acts which the administration in Constantinople passed to ensure its normal functioning had the Islamic character. As most of these acts had been created long before the birth of the Osmanli state, they cannot be called Osmanli, because they were not such by their origin or their essence. It is specially important that their intention was not to maintain the Turkish national idea, as it could be concluded from a large number of historical syntheses which discuss that part of our history, but the triumph of Islam. Therefore, it is most correct to call that law Islamic-Osmanli law because its largest part had been created before the appearance of the Osmanli state and had as a goal the triumph of Islam; it is an Osmanli law because it was implemented in the territories ruled by the Osmanli dynasty.

Political Science and the Juristic Point of View

1928 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 553-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
George H. Sabine
Keyword(s):  
Political Theory ◽  
Political Science ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
The State ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Moral Sentiment ◽  
Modern Theory ◽  
Legal Validity ◽  
Legal Competence ◽  
The Law

In the August, 1926, number of this journal, Professor W. W. Willoughby presented some conclusions regarding the conception of sovereignty and the range of its applicability in political science, together with some interesting suggestions for the clarification of political theory. His article is devoted primarily to an exposition and criticism of the juristic theories of Professor H. Krabbe, and the gist of his criticism is that Krabbe, in common with the translators of his Modern Theory of the State and with Duguit, fails to distinguish between ethical and legal validity. Krabbe's attack upon the conception of sovereignty is therefore due to a confusion: The legal supremacy which the analytical jurist attributes to the state for purely legal purposes is taken as including also an assertion of moral supremacy. Accordingly, the fact that a legally valid law may be criticized as opposed to moral sentiment or to public interest is turned into an objection against the view that the state, for juristic purposes, may be regarded as a legally sovereign will. Professor Willoughby implies that clarity can be introduced into the whole discussion simply by avoiding this confusion. The justice or utility of a law is a wholly proper question for the moralist, but it is quite irrelevant to the juristic problem, which concerns merely the legal competence of the agency enacting or enforcing the law. “We find in Krabbe, and also in his translators, …. that same mistaken idea which is to be discovered in Duguit, that an inquiry into the idealistic or utilitarian validity of law, as determined by its substantive provisions and purposes sought to be achieved by its enforcement, has a relevancy to, and that its conclusions can affect, the validity and usefulness of the purely formalistic concepts which the positive or analytic jurist employs.”

scholarly journals Komparasi Hukuman Pidana Masyarakat Pinggiran dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-27
Author(s):  
Al Juraimy
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
The People ◽  
Displaced Children ◽  
The Law

Abstract Islamic law strongly holds the principles of fairness in deciding a case. As the author described above that the person who stole because of compulsion or for fulfilling his life there is no punishment for him. Because the above cases are small cases that befall the people whose notables are not economically capable. Then what should be done to those fringe peoples? In the context of Islam, if they can not meet the daily needs (needs to eat or continue to live) then they will be dependent on the Baitul Maal or other languages that are responsible for themselves by following article 34 UUD 45 is poor and the displaced children are maintained by the state. This article will present a point of view on some criminal cases above from two different laws, namely Islamic law and the law in Indonesia.    

scholarly journals Relevance Of Magna Carta To Rights Of Victims Of Abuse Of Power

SEEU Review ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-58
Author(s):  
Besa Arifi
Keyword(s):  
Due Process ◽  
The State ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
List Type ◽  
Abuse Of Power ◽  
Comparative Aspect ◽  
Magna Carta ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

AbstractMagna Carta Libertatum is one of the few documents that continuously imply thorough discussions about fundamental principles of the law. In 2011,Lord McNelly, Justice Minister of UK at the time, has emphasized the core and everlasting principles that derived from this document:᠅ that the power of the state is not absolute᠅ that whoever governs the state must obey the law᠅ and that whoever governs the state must take account of the views of those who are governed (McNally, 2011).These are the fundamental principles of any government that strives to be distinguished as democratic, these are the self-evident truths that have been developed in the theory of social contract that established the modern day democracies.It is very common that article 39 of Magna Carta that provides for the right to due process, as well as article 40 that provides for the right to access to justice and justice itself, to be usually analyzed from the point of view of the rights of the person accused of a crime. However, it must be taken into consideration, that failure to guarantee these two very important human rights makes the accused person a victim of abuse of power.This article aims to analyze the relevance of Magna Carta in the rise of the concept of rights of victims of abuse of power. Although it is a concept developed later in history, the clauses of Magna Carta that remain in power can be directly linked to this category of victims.The thirteenth century provides a very important perspective on the position of the victim of crime and can be analyzed in a comparative aspect regarding the Common Law and the Civil Law historical development. The article will briefly explain the evolution of the concept of victims’ rights throughout these eight centuries to the modern times when these rights have become a crucial part of the national legislations of Western Balkan countries.

scholarly journals Intrusion of international law into the national legal system

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-57
Author(s):  
V. F. Anisimov ◽  
Yu. V. Truntsevskiy
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
International Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
The State ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Legal Systems ◽  
Foreign Law ◽  
National Legal System ◽  
International Obligations ◽  
The Law

The subject of the research is the peculiarities of the implementation of international law in national legal systems, the law enforcement practice of the implementation of international legal obligations of the state, doctrinal approaches to the interaction of the norms of international and domestic law. The purpose of the article is to confirm or disprove the hypothesis that the limits, forms and methods of the ex-ante intrusion of international law into the national legal system are determined not only as a result of the agreed will of States, but also against such will, under the influence of the interests of individual States or their political blocs that occupy a dominant position in an international organization. Methodology. The authors use such general theoretical and specific scientific methods as comparative analysis, generalization, interpretation and classification as well as systemic analysis and formal logical methods. The main results. The forms and methods of intrusion of international law into the legal systems are diversified. International law is not limited to interstate relations. Global processes require the development of new scientific approaches to understanding the processes of intrusion of international law into the legal systems of States. These processes require the study of the forms and methods of the impact of international law and international institutions on the national legal order. States are sometimes forced to implement measures developed in the international implementation mechanism (due to the need for international financial assistance as well as the inability to single-handedly defeat internal corruption, create a favorable international image, etc.). The international legal invasion exist already ex – post through the decisions of international judicial bodies or the assertive recommendations of international organizations. Their demands are made not just to comply with international obligations, but to change national legislation. The implementation of the norms of international law in national legal systems should be carried out at the domestic level just as much as it is necessary to fulfill these international obligations. The law enforcement practice in the state is based solely on national principles of law, and it is unacceptable to comply with the requirements from the outside to change them from the point of view of the independence of the state. It is the exclusive right of each State to determine the content of acts of interpretation of international bodies in relation to the decisions and actions of specific States from the point of view of their national interests. We prove that every state has the important right to determine the limits of the invasion of international law in their national legal system: the contents of implementing legislation; the completeness of implementation of the decisions and recommendations of international bodies and courts; the recognition of the extraterritorial validity of foreign law and forms of its implementation. Conclusions. The fundamental principle of international law- pacta sunt servanda – is transforming into a practical imperative – national legislation must change. This is due to the recognition of the jurisdiction of international judicial bodies. This is due to the extraterritorial effect of foreign law; it is connected with the transnational character of the law of international integration entities. This is due to the inability of individual States to resist exponential corruption. The continuous nature of the intrusion of international law into national legal systems is reflected in the various methods of such interference. The article proves the importance of each state having the right to independently determine the limits of the intrusion of international law into their national legal system.

scholarly journals ORGANIZATIONAL AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF PROBATION FUNCTIONING IN UKRAINE: CONCEPTUAL INNOVATIONS

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inna A. Hamburh ◽  
Keyword(s):  
State Institution ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
The State ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Major Step ◽  
The Status ◽  
Probation Service ◽  
The Law ◽  
Human Rights Standards

The article is devoted to the definition of innovations in scientific approaches and legal regulations on the organizational and legal framework for the functioning of probation in Ukraine, taking into account international experience and national specifics, the formulation of proposals for further development. It is established that with the help of European projects that contribute to the implementation of an effective probation system in Ukraine, our country is on the way to building its own perfect model of probation service as a major step towards global human rights standards. In addressing the issue of priority, turning criminals into law-abiding citizens or protecting society from recidivism, it seems to be a search for a balance (for example, between considering probation as a form of social work with criminals and as a form of alternative punishment). It is determined that the most optimal organization is the system enshrined in the Law of Ukraine �On Probation�, according to which the probation body is directly subordinated to the State Institution �Probation Center�. The probation body is formed by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine in the administrative-territorial units of Ukraine to ensure the implementation of the tasks of the State Penitentiary Service of Ukraine. The activities of the Probation Center are directed and coordinated by the Deputy Ministry of Justice of Ukraine in accordance with the division of responsibilities. However, there are many inconsistencies and inaccuracies in the law. Therefore, a prerequisite for the effective operation of the probation service in Ukraine and the achievement of its goals is the following: first, amendments to the current law and adjustment or complete change of regulations, directly instructions governing the activities of the penitentiary inspections; secondly, the continuation of the holding. It is concluded that from the organizational and legal point of view, probation bodies should acquire the status of bodies that receive unlimited influence on a person, from the moment of initiating criminal proceedings to deciding the further fate of the convict during his execution and after release. Such an approach extends criminal enforcement activities far beyond criminal enforcement relationships, in fact trying to link their emergence with legal facts that are the basis for the existence of relations of a completely different type and nature. This, it seems, corresponds to the path chosen by Ukraine to build a legal, democratic, social state.

scholarly journals Constitutional regulation of the principle of equality of rights and freedoms of man and citizen in Ukraine and the countries of continental Europe: comparative legal analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 7-15
Author(s):  
Yuriy Kyrychenko ◽  
Viktor Kyrychenko
Keyword(s):  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Full Range ◽  
The State ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Equal Rights ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Formal Equality ◽  
The Law

The article considers the principle of equality, which is discussed in Part 4 of Art. 13; st.st.21, 24; Part 2 of Art.38; Part 2 of Art.43; Part 1 of Art.51; Part 1 of Art.52; Part 1 of Art.71; Part 2 of Art. 129 of the Constitution of Ukraine and is mentioned in most constitutions of European states, and it is proved that it is not only a principle of constitutional law, but also one of the fundamental principles on which human rights and freedoms are exercised and their place in society and state is determined. It is noted that the terms «equality» and «equality», although used interchangeably to denote the full range of rights and freedoms, are not identical. Equality is a broader concept than equality and includes the latter. It is proved that in Art. 24 of the Constitution of Ukraine identifies three main aspects of this principle: 1) equality of citizens in rights; 2) equality of citizens before the law; 3) equality of rights of women and men, and it is emphasized that the state provides only legal, formal equality between people. That is, there is no and cannot be actual equality between people, because everyone differs in their individual abilities. Therefore, the analyzed principle legally justifies the actual inequality between people. It is substantiated that the provision, which is enshrined in Part 1 of Art. 24 of the Constitution of Ukraine guarantees only the equality of citizens before the law and their equal rights and freedoms. At the same time, there are examples that this principle applies to every person who is enshrined in the constitutions of continental Europe by the term «all», «all people» or a term meaning nationality (Belgians, Greeks, Spaniards, Luxembourgers, Monegasques). In this regard, it is proposed to replace the term «citizens» in the analyzed part with the term «all people», as well as to remove the word «constitutional» from the terminological phrase «constitutional rights and freedoms». It is emphasized that there can be no privileges or restrictions on the grounds listed in Part 2 of Art. 24 of the Constitution of Ukraine (eleven in total). The same and other similar features are enshrined in the constitutional market in 25 of the 42 European states belonging to the Romano-Germanic system of law. It is concluded that it is necessary to strengthen the wording of this part through the establishment of guarantees by the state. In Part 3 of Art. 24 of the Constitution of Ukraine reflected the provision, which separately emphasizes the equality of women's and men's rights through the consolidation of requirements, conditions and benefits, ie proposed a wording that does not have the vast majority of continental Europe. And therefore it is offered to state this part in other way. The expediency from the point of view of logic and legal technique, and also taking into account the constitutional practice of foreign countries and researches of domestic scientists of statement of Art. 24 of the Constitution of Ukraine in a new edition, which will give it the opportunity to have a more perfect look.

TAKING OMNIBUS LAW SERIOUSLY

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Diah Imaningrum Susanti
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
Sustainable Development Goals ◽  
Job Creation ◽  
The State ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Material Object ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Development Goals ◽  
The Law

Abstract:This article tries to understand the Omnibus Law on Job Creation and its relation to the Sustainable Development Goals/ SDGs as an aspect of the protection of human rights as the responsibility of the state.  The research approach is a normative legal research using a hermeneutical circle analysis. The main object (material object) is the norms in UUCK and related statutes which have been amended, added, or substituted by the Law on Job Creation. The norms studied are stated in the articles of the Law on Job Creation, especially norms that deal with environment and sustainable development. Hermeneutical analysis, from the linguistic and phenomenological point of view,  isused in order to  find the meaning of law from the linguistic and historical point of view, and the nature of the State as the protector of citizens’ human right. The findings are divided into 3 points. First, in terms of the process, this law is a tactical and political response from decision makers to complex and dynamic situations that can in fact lead to complicated derivative problems if the responses are not based on a framework based on the principles and basic values of the state. Dealing with the growth agenda in SDGs, the Law on Job Creation still calls into question whether the Law enshrines the easiness of business and full employment and decent work as human rights obligations of the state, or merely as benefits of economic growth. So it still presents both opportunities for human rights monitoring and accountability.   Keywords: Omnibus Law, Job Creation, Sustainable Development Goals   Abstrak:Tulisan ini mencoba untuk memahami Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja dalam kaitannya dengan Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan (Sustainable Goals/SDGs) sebagai suatu aspek dari perlindungan HAM yang merupakan tanggung jawab negara. Penelitian dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan penelitian ilmu hukum normatif menggunakan analisa lingkar hermeneutika. Obyek utamanya adalah norma dalam Undang-undang Cipta Kerja dan peraturan perundang-undangan terkait yang telah diubah, ditambahkan atau digantikan oleh undang-undang ini. Norma yang dikaji dimuat dalam pasal-pasal Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja, khususnya aturan-aturan mengenai lingkungan hidup dan pembangunan berkelanjutan. Analisa hermeneutika dari sudut pandang bahasa dan fenomologi, digunakan dengan maksud untuk menemukan makna hukum dari aspek linguistik dan sejarah, serta hakekat Negara sebagai pelindung HAM warga negaranya. Hasil temuan dalam kajian ini dibagi dalam tiga poin. Pertama, dalam hal proses, undang-undang ini merupakan respon penentu kebijakan yang bersifat taktis dan politis terhadap situasi yang kompleks dan dinamis yang pada kenyataannya justru membawa pada permasalahan derifativ yang kompleks jika  tindakan pemerintah tersebut tidak didasarkan pada kerangka kerja yang menjadi prinsip-prinsip dan nilai-nilai fundamental Negara. Mengacu pada agenda SDGs, Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja perlu untuk dikaji lebih dalam apakah aturan-aturan di dalamnya memperkuat kemudahan usaha dan kewajiban negara menjamin hak asasi pekerja secara penuh, atau hanya bermanfaat untuk pertumbuhan ekonomi. Hal ini masih memberikan kesempatan untuk pengawasan HAM dan akuntabilitas. Kata Kunci: Omnibus Law, Cipta Kerja, Sustainable Development Goals

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document