scholarly journals TINJAUAN TEORITIS KEADILAN DAN KEPASTIAN DALAM HUKUM DI INDONESIA (The Theoretical Review of Justice and Legal Certainty in Indonesia)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-158
Author(s):  
Kania Dewi Andhika Putri ◽  
Ridwan Arifin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Human Behavior ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Process ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Important Thing ◽  
Real Nature ◽  
The World ◽  
The Law

Law is a tool used to regulate human behavior and living order so that it is in accordance with applicable values ​​and norms, in the law there is a sanction. These sanctions have a strict and real nature so that sanctions cannot be contested by anyone. Someone if you break the law, you will get a sanction. Completion of a law is carried out by law enforcement agencies in Indonesia. In the law there are actions that are used to resolve a case. We often understand these actions as a legal process. The running of a legal process must be in accordance with the applicable provisions, cannot be arbitrary because the legal process is the most important thing in the world of law. The legal process is a reflection of the success or failure of a legal settlement. In a law, it must apply the aspects used to settle the case before the law. These aspects are things that must be applied for the continuity of a judiciary and law in the world and in Indonesia. Namely justice and legal certainty in the continuity of the law. Justice and legal certainty are at the same time the foundation in the law that must be applied and must be reflected in the law. Because without justice and legal certainty a legal process cannot work properly. If justice and legal certainty are not applied in the world of law, then the continuity of a law cannot be fair. As a result of not implementing justice and legal certainty, there arises an imbalance between rights and obligations in the law. The settlement of a matter must be fair between the rights and obligations of one party must be the same between the rights and obligations of the other party. So if you have applied justice in the law, you can achieve legal certainty. Legal certainty must be mutually beneficial for the parties concerned. Legal certainty cannot harm various parties. So that legal certainty must be balanced. So the case can be justified by the law.   Hukum merupakan alat yang digunakan untuk mengatur tingkah laku manusia dan tata kehidupan agar sesuai dengan nilai maupun norma yang berlaku, didalam hukum terdapat suatu sanksi. Sanksi tersebut mempunyai sifat tegas dan nyata sehingga sanksi tidak dapat diganggu gugat oleh pihak siapapun. Seseorang jika telah melanggar hukum, maka akan mendapatkan suatu sanksi. Penyelesaian suatu hukum dilakukan oleh aparat-aparat hukum di Indonesia. Didalam hukum terdapat suatu tindakan-tindakan yang digunakan untuk menyelesaikan suatu perkara. Tindakan-tindakan tersebut sering kita pahami adalah suatu proses hukum. Berjalannya suatu proses hukum haruslah sesuai dengan ketentuan yang berlaku, tidak dapat sewenang-wenang karena proses hukum hal yang paling penting dalam dunia hukum. Proses hukum merupakan pencerminan dari berhasil atau tidaknya suatu penyelesaian perkara di dalam hukum. Di dalam suatu hukum harus menerapkan aspek-aspek yang di gunakan untuk penyelesaian perkara di depan hukum. Aspek tersebut merupakan hal yang harus di terapkan untuk kelangsungan suatu peradilan dan hukum di dunia maupun di Indonesia. Yaitu keadilan dan kepastian hukum di dalam kelangsungan hukum. Keadilan dan kepastian hukum merupakan pokok sekaligus landasan dalam hukum yang harus diterapkan dan harus di cerminkan dalam hukum. Karena tanpa keadilan dan kepastian hukum suatu proses hukum tidak dapat berjalan sebagaimana mestinya. Jika keadilan dan kepastian hukum tidak diterapkan dalam dunia hukum, maka kelangsungan suatu hukum tidak dapat berjalan degan adil. Akibat dari tidak diterapkannya keadilan dan kepastian hukum timbul suatu ketidak seimbangan antara hak dan kewajiban di dalam hukum. Penyelesaian suatu perkara harus adil antara hak dan kewajiban satu pihak harus sama antara hak dan kewajiban pihak yang lainnya. Sehingga jika sudah menerapkan keadilan di dalam hukum, maka dapat tercapainya suatu kepastian hukum. Kepastian hukum harus saling menguntungkan bagi pihak-pihak yang terkait. Kepastian hukum tidak dapat merugikan berbagai pihak-pihak. Sehingga kepastian hukum harus seimbang.  Sehingga perkara tersebut dapat dipertanggungjawabkan hukumnya

scholarly journals Reconstruction of Corruption Law Enforcement in the Anti Rasuah Institution "Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK)” (Based on Approach “Berani Jujur Pecat” (Dare Honest Fired)”

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-325
Author(s):  
Adi Mansar
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Special Function ◽  
State Institution ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
The People ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Law

Changes to the law are a necessity in accordance with the development of society, whether one law is revised or in the form of reconstruction or deconstruction by changing all existing laws, especially in one state institution that has a special function, for example the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) must follow development? What is the Institutional and Personal Position of the KPK after the status transfer to State Civil Apparatus? How effective is the KPK in eradicating corruption after it has been reconstructed? The reconstruction of the KPK institution is expected to bring the KPK to be better, more optimal and remain a supervisory institution for other law enforcement agencies that are able to bring order and legal certainty and justice to the people of Indonesia. The change in the status of KPK employees to State Civil Apparatus is a form of generalizing KPK personnel without making distinctions like so far, so it is feared that there will be no more competition and contestation between the investigative teams who work professionally. The existence of the KPK institution is re-examined with the enactment of Law Number 19 of 2019 concerning the KPK, hopefully the stigma of the superbody institution will remain attached to the KPK will not turn into a super executive institution that works at the request of certain parties and hopefully the KPK will maintain the psychology of the people who hope that the KPK must continue to exist even if fired for doing "HONEST" and the truth.

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTASI RECHTSVINDING YANG BERKARAKTERISTIK HUKUM PROGRESIF

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 227
Author(s):  
Muh Ridha Hakim
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Ultimate Truth ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Enforcement Officer ◽  
Law Enforcement Officer ◽  
The Law

The fundamental purpose of law is to create justice, legal certainty and utility. The contradiction between justice and legal certainty are dilemmatic for law enforcement officer. The legal certainty side is easier to be applied so that it neglect the justice itself. The law principle is unhierarchical, thus there is no superior principle which can ignore the other principle. The relevance of the application of legal principles is based on the situation in legal issues. Responding to these challenges appear paradigm of progressive law that the law is a scheme that is not final, it continues to move, to change, it follows the dynamics of human life. Therefore, the law is not seen as something that lives in a stagnation. Law is born from provision living in the society (ibi societas ibi ius). On that basis, the law must continue to be dissected and explored through progressive efforts to reach the ultimate truth for the sake of justice.Keywords : Rechtsvinding, Progressive Law

Penerapan Hukum Wakaf Uang di Indonesia Perspektif Legal System Theory

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masdar Masdar
Keyword(s):  
System Theory ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Muslim Society ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

Cash waqf in Indonesia has been long enough implemented based on some rules enacted by government and other rules defined by The Waqf Board of Indonesia (BWI). However, the implementation of cash waqf has not reached the level of success. Therefore, this article studies the application of cash waqf law in Indonesia according to Friedman’s legal system theory. The legal system theory of Friedman firstly looks at the substance of the law, which is the rules or regulations; and secondly it examines the structure of the law, encompassing the law enforcement agencies, such as judge, prosecutor, police and legal counselors. And lastly the theory examines the element of legal culture, which is a response from Muslim society. The first two examinations indicate that there is nothing to be a problem. But from the last examination there is a problem regarding the trust from Muslim society. From the legal culture point of view, the implementation of cash waqf by the government, which is performed by BWI, needs attracting society’s credentials in order to improve and maximize the performance of cash waqf in Indonesia.

Consciousness, law of nature, and nomological determinism

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyang Yu
Keyword(s):  
Free Will ◽  
Important Thing ◽  
Law Of Nature ◽  
The World ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Brain

Nomological determinism does not mean everything is predictable. It just means everything follows the law of nature. And the most important thing Is that the brain and consciousness follow the law of nature. In other words, there is no free will. Without life, brain and consciousness, the world follows law of nature, that is clear. The life and brain are also part of nature, and they follow the law of nature. This is due to scientific findings. There are not enough scientific findings for consciousness yet. But I think that the consciousness is a nature phenomenon, and it also follows the law of nature.

Who Will Keep the Public Healthy? Assuring a Legally Prepared Workforce

2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (S4) ◽  
pp. 81-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Anne Viverette ◽  
Jennifer Leaning ◽  
Susan K. Steeg ◽  
Kristine M. Gebbie ◽  
Maureen Litchveld
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
International Association ◽  
Department Of Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Rigorous Evaluation ◽  
The Public ◽  
Chiefs Of Police ◽  
The Law ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Evaluation Techniques

The Commission on the Accreditation of Law Enforcement (CALEA) employs rigorous evaluation techniques. Objective accreditation, such as made possible by CALEA, is important from the public’s perspective and in the national community of law enforcement.To counteract a general distrust of law enforcement agencies, the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA) developed a grant to develop standards by which the quality and performance of law enforcement could be measured. LEAA developed 107 standards and, though well received by the law enforcement community, no single group or agency took the initiative to begin a program to evaluate and implement the standards. In 1979, the Department of Justice established an additional grant that effectively organized the four major law enforcement groups: the International Association of Chiefs of Police, the National Sheriff’s Association, the National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives, and the Police Executive Research Forum.

scholarly journals Certainty and Uncertainty in Tax Law: Do Opposites Attract?

Laws ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Alexander V. Demin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Everyday Life ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
The Other ◽  
Tax Law ◽  
General Requirement ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
The One ◽  
Effective Channel

The principle of certainty of taxation is the dimension of a general requirement of certainty in the legal system. The purpose of this article is to argue the thesis that uncertainty in tax law is not always an absolute evil, sometimes it acts as a means of the most optimal (and in some cases the only possible) settlement of relations in the field of taxes. On the contrary, uncertainty and fragmentation in tax law are colossal problems subject to overcome by the efforts of scientists, legislators, judges, and practicing lawyers. Uncertainty in tax law is manifested in two ways: on the one hand, negatively—as a defect (omission) of the legislator and, on the other hand, positively—as a set of specific legal means and technologies that are purposefully used in lawmaking and law enforcement. In this context, relatively determined legal tools are an effective channel for transition from uncertainty to certainty in the field of taxation. A tendency towards increased use of relatively determined legal tools in lawmaking processes (for example, principles, evaluative concepts, judicial doctrines, standards of good faith and reasonableness, discretion, open-ended lists, recommendations, framework laws, silence of the law, presumptive taxation, analogy, etc.), and involving various actors (courts, law enforcement agencies and officials, international organizations, citizens, organizations and their associations) allow making tax laws more dynamic flexible, and adequate to changing realities of everyday life.

scholarly journals Tools and Methods of Work of Law Enforcement Agencies in the Sphere of Economic Law Infringements

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 606-618
Author(s):  
Olena Kozynets ◽  
Alla Nitchenko ◽  
Andrii Kholostenko ◽  
Petro Zhovtan ◽  
Larysa Luhosh
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Information Technologies ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Economic Law ◽  
Academic Paper ◽  
Money Transfer ◽  
The Law ◽  
Analysis System ◽  
Tools And Methods

The global transformations of the economy through the system of information technologies have led to the spread of new manifestations of crime, mainly in the areas of money transfer, foreign exchange transactions, international logistics schemes. Consequently, there is a need to develop highly effective tools and methods of law enforcement agencies in the sphere of economic law infringements. The purpose of the research is to investigate modern tools and methods used in the activities of law enforcement agencies in order to prevent economic law infringements. The research methods are as follows: systematization, generalization, analysis of the regulatory framework, the method of comparative analysis; system and logical analysis, method of information synthesis; quantitative method. Results. The means and methods of work of law enforcement agencies in the field of economic law infringements have been analyzed in the academic paper. A comparative analysis of the application of tools and methods of law enforcement agencies in the field of economic law infringements in European countries has been conducted. It has been noted that they have been experiencing significant structural and technological changes, which makes it possible to more effectively identify economic violations of the law and prevent their implementation in various spheres of economic activity. The necessity of introducing modern information and technological methods of work of law enforcement agencies in order to overcome the growing number of economic law infringements has been proved. The concept of modern tools and methods of counteraction to economic law infringements has been considered and the further development of system of means and methods of counteraction to economic law infringements has been offered. The results of the research can be used to study trends in the development of tools and methods of law enforcement agencies in the field of economic violations of the law.

scholarly journals SUATU KAJIAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM KEJAHATAN CYBER DALAM SISTEM PENEGAKAN HUKUM

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-25
Author(s):  
Ni Made Trisna Dewi,Reido Lardiza Fahrial
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Electronic Evidence ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Law ◽  
Witness Statements ◽  
And Function

Abuse in the electronic transaction because it is formed from an electronic process, so the object changes, the goods become electronic data and the evidence is electronic.  Referring to the provisions of positive law in Indonesia, there are several laws and regulations that have set about electronic evidence as legal evidence before the court but there is still debate between the usefulness and function of the electronic evidence itself, from that background in  The following problems can be formulated, How do law enforcement from investigations, prosecutions to criminal case decisions in cybercrimes and How is the use of electronic evidence in criminal case investigations in cybercrimes This research uses normative research methods that are moving from the existence of norm conflicts between the Criminal Procedure Code and  ITE Law Number 19 Year 2016 in the use of evidence.  The law enforcement process of the investigator, the prosecution until the court's decision cannot run in accordance with the provisions of ITE Law Number 19 of 2016, because in interpreting the use of electronic evidence still refers to Article 184 paragraph (1) KUHAP of the Criminal Procedure Code stated that the evidence used  Legitimate are: witness statements, expert statements, letters, instructions and statements of the accused so that the application of the ITE Law cannot be applied effectively The conclusion of this research is that law enforcement using electronic evidence in cyber crime cannot stand alone because the application of the Act  - ITE Law Number 19 Year 2016 still refers to the Criminal Code so that the evidence that is clear before the trial still refers to article 184 paragraph (1) KUHAP of the Criminal Procedure Code and the strength of proof of electronic evidence depends on the law enforcement agencies interpreting it because all electronic evidence is classified into  in evidence in the form of objects as  so there is a need for confidence from the legal apparatus in order to determine the position and truth of the electronic evidence.   Penyalahgunaan didalam transaksi elektronik tersebut karena terbentuk dari suatu proses elektronik, sehingga objeknya pun berubah, barang menjadi data elektronik dan alat buktinya pun bersifat elektronik. Mengacu pada ketentuan hukum positif di Indonesia, ada beberapa peraturan perundang-undangan yang telah mengatur mengenai alat bukti elektronik sebagai alat bukti yang sah di muka pengadilan tetapi tetap masih ada perdebatan antara kegunaan dan fungsi dari alat bukti elektronik itu sendiri, dari latar belakang tersebut di atas dapat dirumuskan masalah sebagai berikut, Bagaimana penegakkan hukum dari penyidikan, penuntutan sampai putusan perkara pidana dalam kejahatan cyber dan Bagaimanakah penggunaan bukti elektronik dalam pemeriksaan perkara pidana dalam kejahatan cyber Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif yakni beranjak dari adanya konflik norma antara KUHAP dengan Undang-undang ITE Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 dalam penggunaan alat bukti. Proses penegakkan hukum dari penyidik, penuntutan sampai pada putusan pengadilan tidak dapat berjalan sesuai dengan ketentuan Undang-undang ITE Nomor 19 Tahun 2016, karena dalam melakukan penafsiran terhadap penggunaan alat bukti Elektronik masih mengacu pada Pasal 184 ayat (1) KUHAP disebutkan bahwa alat bukti yang sah adalah: keterangan saksi, keterangan ahli, surat, petunjuk dan keterangan terdakwa. sehingga penerapan Undang-undang ITE tidak dapat diterapkan secara efektiv. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah penegakan hukum dengan menggunakan alat bukti elektronik dalam kejahatan cyber tidak bisa berdiri sendiri karena penerapan Undang-Undang ITE Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tetap merujuk kepada KUHP sehingga alat bukti yang sah di muka persidangan tetap mengacu pada pasal 184 ayat (1) KUHAP dan Kekuatan pembuktian alat bukti elektronik tersebut tergantung dari aparat hukum dalam menafsirkannya karena semua alat bukti elektronik tersebut digolongkan ke dalam alat bukti berupa benda sebagai petunjuk sehingga diperlukan juga keyakinan dari aparat hukum agar bisa menentukan posisi dan kebenaran dari alat bukti elektronik tersebut.

THE ROLE OF THE PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE OF UKRAINE IN THE CONTEXT OF ENSURING GUARANTEES OF THE INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGES AND THE AUTHORITY OF THE JUDICIARY

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasyl Khmyz ◽  
◽  
Ruslan Skrynkovskyy ◽  
Tetiana Protsiuk ◽  
Mariana Khmyz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Professional Activities ◽  
Administration Of Justice ◽  
The Status ◽  
Legislative Framework ◽  
The Law

The article reveals the role of the prosecutor's office of Ukraine in the process and in order to ensure guarantees of the independence of judges and the authority of the judiciary. A study of the legislative framework of Ukraine proves that the role of the prosecutor's office in the process of ensuring guarantees of the independence of judges and the authority of justice is regulated by the provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine, the Law of Ukraine «On the Prosecutor's Office», the Law of Ukraine «On the Judicial System and the Status of Judges», the Code of Professional Ethics and Conduct of Prosecutors, the Criminal Procedure Code Of Ukraine, the Criminal Code of Ukraine, as well as other regulatory documents. It was found that the judge, performing professional activities in the direction of the administration of justice, is independent of the various influences, pressure or interference, which are illegal. The legislation of Ukraine determines that the principle of the independence of the judge indicates that the judge is not obliged to provide explanations regarding the nature and content of the cases being pending, with the exception of cases established by law. State authorities, local self- government bodies, officials and officials of these bodies, individuals and legal entities and associations of such persons should respect the independence of judges and in no case should encroach on it. It was determined that one of the principles on the basis of which the professional activities of the prosecution authorities are based is the principle of respect for the independence of judges. It has been proved that the High Council of Justice always adheres to the position of unconditionally ensuring the independence of judges and establishing this direction as a priority type of activity for law enforcement agencies, in particular, for the prosecutor's office. Fast and quality investigation of crimes related to the professional activities of judges will, first of all, contribute to the observance of constitutional law regarding the principle of access to justice.. It is noted that the prospects for further research in this direction are the study of the legal basis for the observance of the principle of the rule of law and legality by the judiciary in the context of performing professional activities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document