scholarly journals Definition, Purpose and Types of Juvenile Criminal Sanctions in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina / Pojam, svrha i vrste maloljetničkih krivičnih sankcija u Federaciji Bosne i Hercegovine

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 150
Author(s):  
Marina M. Simović ◽  
Vladimir M. Simović
Keyword(s):  
Bosnia And Herzegovina ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
General Purpose ◽  
Social Response ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Time Period

Juvenile sanctions are legally prescribed measures and proceedings of social response to juvenile perpetrators of criminal acts. The purpose of juvenile criminal sanctions is within the overall purpose of criminal sanctions. That represents preventive influence on others to respect legal system without committing criminal acts. It also means preventing perpetrators to commit another criminal act and encouraging its upbringing. In essence, general purpose of juvenile criminal sanctions is to fight all types, forms and aspects of crime through special and general prevention. When pronouncing these sanctions court cannot know nor predict how the process of education, discipline and therapy will develop. It also cannot know what time period will be necessary to realize the purpose of its pronouncement. Every adolescent is an individual for itself therefore has a different reaction to pronounced sanction. Interest i.e. wellbeing of an adolescent always comes first when deciding on criminal sanction. The Juvenile Criminal Law in Bosnia and Herzegovina prescribes three basic types of juvenile criminal sanctions. In essence, they are not of repressive character. Basically, the only juvenile criminal sanction of repressive character in the true sense of the word is juvenile imprisonment (detention).

KEBIJAKAN KRIMINALISASI DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG DI BIDANG POLITIK

Jurnal Hukum ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 1592
Author(s):  
Hanafi Amrani
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Moral Values ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law

AbstrakArtikel ini membahas dua permasalahan pokok: pertama, kriteria yang digunakan oleh pembentuk undang-undang di bidang politik dalam menetapkan suatu perbuatan sebagai perbuatan pidana (kriminalisasi); dan kedua, fungsi sanksi pidana dalam undang-undang di bidang politik. Terkait dengan kriminalisasi, undang-undang di bidang politik yang termasuk ke dalam hukum administrasi, maka pertimbangan dari pembuat undang-undang tentu saja tidak sekedar kriminalisasi sebagaimana diatur dalam ketentuan hukum pidana dalam arti sebenarnya. Hal tersebut disebabkan adanya pertimbangan-pertimbangan tertentu. Pertama, perbuatan yang dilarang dalam hukum pidana administrasi lebih berorientasi pada perbuatan yang bersifat mala prohibita, sedangkan dalam ketentuan hukum pidana yang sesungguhnya berorientasi pada perbuatan yang bersifat mala in se. Kedua, sebagai konsekuensi dari adanya penggolongan dua kategori kejahatan tersebut, maka pertimbangan yang dijadikan acuan juga akan berbeda. Untuk yang pertama (mala prohibita), sanksi pidana itu dibutuhkan untuk menjamin ditegakkannya hukum administrasi tersebut. Dalam hal ini sanksi pidana berfungsi sebagai pengendali dan pengontrol tingkah laku individu untuk mencapai suatu keadaan yang diinginkan. Sedangkan untuk yang kedua (mala in se), fungsi hukum pidana dan sanksi pidana lebih berorientasi pada melindungi dan mempertahankan nilai-nilai moral yang tertanam di masyarakat tempat di mana hukum itu diberlakukan atau ditegakkan. Kata Kunci: Kebijakan, Kriminalisasi, Undang-Undang PolitikThis article discusses two main problems: firstly, the criteria used by the legislators in the field of politics in determining an act as a criminal act (criminalization); secondly, the function of criminal sanctions in legislation in the field of politics. Associated with criminalization, legislation in the field of politics that is included in administrative law, the consideration of the legislators of course not just criminalization as stipulated in the provisions of criminal law in the true sense. This is due to certain considerations. Firstly, the act which is forbidden in the administration of criminal law is more oriented to act is malum prohibitum offences, whereas in actual criminal law provisions in the act are mala in se offences. Secondly, as a consequence of the existence of two categories of classification of the crime, then consideration will also vary as a reference. For the first (mala prohibita), criminal sanctions are needed to ensure the enforcement of the administrative law. In this case the criminal sanction serves as controller and controlling the behavior of individuals to achieve a desired state. As for the second (mala in se), the function of criminal law and criminal sanctions is more oriented to protect and maintain the moral values that are embedded in a society where the law was enacted or enforced.

scholarly journals URGENSI PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PIDANA DALAM KASUS KEJAHATAN KESUSILAAN: KAJIAN TENTANG SANKSI PIDANA BAGI PELAKU KEJAHATAN KESUSILAAN PADA ANAK

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Subaidah Ratna Juita
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Child Victims ◽  
Sexual Crimes ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Second Amendment ◽  
Penal Law

<p>Penjatuhan sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku kejahatan kesusilaan pada anak di Indonesia belum seimbang dengan dampak yang ditimbulkannya. Adapun anak sebagai korban dari kejahatan kesusilaan tentu mengalami trauma yang berkepanjangan hingga dewasa bahkan seumur hidupnya. Salah satu upaya yang dapat ditempuh dalam menghadapi problematika penegakan hukum adalah dengan cara pembenahan sistem hukum. Oleh karna itu perlu adanya pembaharuan sanksi pidana bagi pelaku kejahatan kesusilaan sebagai bagian dari sistem hukum. Pembaharuan ini perlu dilakukan karena sanksi pidana yang ada saat ini tidak memberikan efek jera bagi pelaku. Upaya pembaruan hukum pidana yang berkaitan dengan sanksi pidana dalam kasus kejahatan kesusilaan pada anak dapat ditelusuri berdasarkan perumusan sanksi pidana berdasarkan KUHP, UU Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak, UU Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang perubahan pertama atas UU Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak, dan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang (Perppu) No. 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak. Dengan demikian tulisan ini secara fokus mengkaji urgensi pembaharuan hukum pidana, khususnya hukum pidana materiil tentang sanksi pidana bagi pelaku kejahatan seksual dalam rangka untuk memberikan perlindungan pada anak korban kejahatan seksual.</p><p><em>The imposition of criminal sanctions against the perpetrators of morality in children in Indonesia has not been balanced by its impact. As for the child as a victim of crime decency certainly traumatized prolonged until adulthood even a lifetime. One effort that can be taken in dealing with the problem of law enforcement is to reform the legal system. By because it is necessary to reform criminal sanctions for the perpetrators of decency as part of the legal system. These reforms need to be done because there is a criminal sanction which does not currently provide a deterrent effect on perpetrators. Efforts to reform the criminal law relating to criminal sanctions in cases of crimes of morality in children can be traced by the formulation of criminal sanctions under the penal law, Law No. 23 of 2002 on Child Protection, Law No. 35 of 2014 on the First Amendment of Law No. 23 of 2002 on Child Protection, and Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perppu) Number 1 Year 2016 Concerning Second Amendment Act No. 23 of 2002 about Child Protection. So this paper examines the urgency updates operating focus criminal law, especially criminal law substantive about criminal sanctions for dader of sexual crimes in order to provide protection for child victims of sexual crimes.</em></p><p> </p>

scholarly journals Islamic Law Analysis of Criminal Sanctions for Abortion in the Criminal Code: A Call for Reform

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 5398-5407
Author(s):  
Ishaq, Maratun Saadah
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
Legal Sanctions

This study aims to contribute to Islamic law regarding the criminal sanction of abortion in the Criminal Code (KUHP) as an effort to reform Indonesian criminal law. The method used is comparison, with data collection carried out by library research, by studying Islamic legal literature, interpretation of the Quran (tafsir), hadith, Criminal Code, and the Draft of Criminal Code. The sanctions for abortion in articles 346, 347, 348 and 349 of the Criminal Code are only imprisonment, not accompanied by fines. According to Islamic law these sanctions are not sufficient, because they tend to make the perpetrators not deterred, as a result the purpose of punishment is not achieved. Therefore, it needs to be updated by including the value of Islamic legal sanctions in the form of fines (diat), so that the purpose of punishment can be achieved.

scholarly journals Kajian Yuridis Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Ayah Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan Menurut Qanun Nomor 6 Tahun 2014

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Liza Agnesta Krisna
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Scientific Papers ◽  
Sociological Method ◽  
The Law

The purpose of this study was to determine the sanction of criminal law to the father as the perpetrator of rape according to Law No. 35 of 2014 on the Amendment of Act No. 23 of 2002 and Qanun No. 6 of 2014 on the Law Jinayat and analysis of Court Decision shar ' Yeah Langsa No. 05 / JN / 2016 / MS. The method used in this research is the analysis of the content or the content analysis, which uses secondary data research that is in-depth discussion of the content of a written document from the book and other scientific papers relevant to criminal law arrangements. But in this study also used the sociological method / empirical to do an interview to one Syar'iyah Court judges. The conclusion is that there is a difference writings criminal sanctions in Law No. 35 of 2014, with Qanun No. 6 of 2014. The criminal sanction in Qanun No. 6 of 2014 was lower than in Act No. 35 of 2014 which is the legal umbrella of safeguards against child.<br /><br /><br />

FIXING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CONCEPT OF CRIME: THE CHALLENGE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS

2005 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 719-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audrey Guinchard
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Basic Feature ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Standard Of Proof ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Common ◽  
Substantive Law

In England and Wales, as elsewhere, criminal law stands in sharp contrast to other systems of social control. Criminal offences and their related penalties are clearly distinguishable from civil wrongs and their associated (civil) sanctions. And because the term ‘civil law’ refers not only to the domain of torts, but also encompasses administrative law, criminal penalties are, in addition, distinguished from the administrative or regulatory sanctions. This ‘distinction between criminal and civil justice has been such a basic feature of the common law’1that it shapes not only substantive law but also the organization of the courts into civil, criminal and sometimes administrative chambers or divisions. More importantly, the distinction between civil and criminal sanctions will lead to the application of different procedural rules: civil proceedings, used for the imposition of civil sanctions, are less stringent that their criminal counterpart applied when the offender faces a criminal sanction. This more gentle approach can be detected in both the burden and standard of proof.

scholarly journals Kajian Hukum Kualifkasi Sanksi Kebiri Kimia Sebagai Sanksi Tindakan dalam Hukum Pidana di Indonesia

Wajah Hukum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Tantimin Tantimin
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Information Use ◽  
Problem Formulation ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Sexual Crimes ◽  
Legal Information ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Basic Ideas ◽  
Research Show

Castration is an action given to perpetrators of sexual crimes against children, in addition to imprisonment and fines. The purpose of this article is to find out the basic differences between criminal sanctions and action sanctions, to know the position of castration as an action sanction in criminal law and to analyze the castration penalty does not apply to children as perpetrators of sexual crimes. This research uses doctrinal legal research. Sources of legal information use primary legal materials (regulations and relevant documents) for further qualitative analysis. The approach used is statutory, conceptual, and analysis to help solve the problem formulation. The results of the research show that, at first glance, criminal sanctions and sanctions are often vague to distinguish, but at the level of basic ideas, there are very clear differences between the two types of sanctions. The reactive nature of an act is contained in the criminal sanction which connotes giving an affliction, while the anticipatory nature of the perpetrator of the act is contained in the sanction of action which connotes giving a remedy. The position of castration in the criminal system in Indonesia is not a principal, additional or a burden, but includes a sanction of action. Actions in the form of chemical castration are exempted for child offenders.

scholarly journals RELEVANSI ANTARA PEMIDANAAN INDONESIA DAN SANKSI PIDANA ISLAM

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-134
Author(s):  
Abdul Syatar
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Right

Abstract: Positive crimes and Islamic crimes are the same in terms of determining a crime and violation. The difference lies in the aspect of punishment which is known as punishment. Although there is an element of difference between the two, it has a point of relevance of objectives between Indonesian criminal sanctions and Islamic criminal sanctions. This is especially related to the divine value between Islamic criminal sanctions and Indonesian criminal sanctions. The right of Allah swt. contained in the application of Islamic criminal sanctions is one of the teachings of Islam. However, in the application of punishment in the Indonesian legal system it still included divine elements because the source of Indonesian law, namely Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution, accommodated the divine spirit. Indonesian Criminal Law has Islamic legal values ??in the form of divine value, education and maintaining stability in society. Thus, the peak of relevance between Islamic criminal sanctions and Indonesian criminal sanctions together requires the issue of maintaining stability in society. It is time for Muslims to unite in terms of discussing the inclusion of Islamic criminal law sanctions into the renewal of Indonesian criminal and criminal prosecution.   Abstrak: Pidana positif dan pidana Islam sama dalam hal menentukan sebuah kejahatan dan pelanggaran. Perbedaan terletak pada aspek pemberian hukuman yang dikenal dengan pemidanaan. Walaupun ada unsur perbedaan dari keduanya, tetapi memiliki titik relevansi tujuan antara pemidanaan Indonesia dan sanksi pidana Islam. Hal yang terkait terutama dalam nilai ilahiyah antara sanksi pidana Islam dan pemidanaan Indonesia. Hak Allah swt. yang termuat dalam keberlakuan sanksi pidana Islam merupakan salah satu ajaran Islam. Akan tetapi, dalam keberlakuan pemidanaan dalam sistem hukum Indonesia pun masih memasukkan unsur ilahiyah karena sumber hukum Indonesia yaitu Pancasila dan UUD 1945 mengakomodir spirit ketuhanan. Pemidanaan Indonesia memiliki nilai-nilai hukum Islam berupa nilai ilahiyah, pendidikan dan menjaga stabilitas dalam masyarakat.. Dengan demikian, puncak relevansi antara sanksi pidana Islam dan pemidanaan Indonesia sama-sama menghendaki persoalan menjaga stablitas dalam masyarakat. Sudah saatnya umat Islam bersatu dalam hal mewacanakan untuk memasukkan sanksi hukum pidana Islam ke dalam pembaharuan pemidanaan dan pidana Indonesia.

scholarly journals MEMAHAMI SECARA KRITIS PEMIDANAAN DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG PERBANKAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 2002-2014
Author(s):  
Faisal Faisal
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
General Purpose ◽  
Criminal Sanctions

General Purpose of punishment in criminal law at least can be divided into two : first ,this goal patterned conceptual gave basis of criminal sanctions, the type and form of criminal sanction. Second, the purpose of criminal sanctions against those who violate the criminal law. In the banking law, not explicitly mentioned purpose of criminal sanctions in specific meaning. But can be seen in the banking law has only a more general purpose .

scholarly journals Certain contentious issues related to the suspended sentence

Crimen ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-254
Author(s):  
Veljko Delibašić ◽  
Tijana Kostić
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Code ◽  
General Purpose ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Limiting Factor ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Material Conditions ◽  
Adherence Monitoring ◽  
A Minor

This paper addresses the issue of suspended sentence since it is a criminal sanction frequently applied in Serbia and statutory provisions regulating suspended sentence are also subject to frequent modification which altogether emphasizes the need of its continuous study. Within the general purpose of criminal sanctions, the purpose of a suspended sentence is to avoid imposing the sentence on an offender for a minor offence in cases when it can be reasonably expected that a warning with a threatened sentence shall suffice to prevent the offender from perpetrating other crimes. Suspended sentence can be granted only when the offender has been sentenced to less than two years imprisonment, however, on condition (which was tightened in 2019) that the crime does not fall within the category of criminal offences for which an eight-year prison sentence (before it was 10 years) or longer can be delivered. Subjective reasons due to which suspended sentence cannot be granted have been also extended, so therefore, suspended sentence can be granted only if more than five years have elapsed from the time the judgment became final by which the offender was sentenced either to imprisonment or was pronounced a suspended sentence for a crime with premeditated intent. In view of the fact that a fine is still a form of punishment and, accordingly, a stricter criminal sanction than suspended sentence which is a non-custodial measure meaning a more lenient sanction, it would be quite acceptable if the legislator, as a limiting factor, also envisaged a fine for a crime with premediated intent. As regards a five year term calculated from the finality of judgment, a better solution would be that the period be calculated from the day of the sentence being served, prescribed or the day a pardon has been granted, i.e. from the day when the adherence monitoring period to probation conditions has expired. Furthermore, recently introduced statutory solutions would result in decrease in the number of suspended sentences in criminal sanctions structure. When it comes to suspended sentence supervision order, as it is rarely applied, it is necessary that minimum effort be invested in providing material conditions and human resources for carrying out this sanction which was found to be effective in many countries. A serious omission of legislators is that the Criminal Procedure Code, when defining the institution of hearing for pronouncing a criminal sanction, leaves an option to the public prosecutor to propose passing of a suspended sentence with determining fine, which is contrary to the Criminal Code. This omission should be corrected by giving priority to the Criminal Code i.e. by excluding the option for the public prosecutor to propose such a sanction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document