scholarly journals Kajian Hukum Kualifkasi Sanksi Kebiri Kimia Sebagai Sanksi Tindakan dalam Hukum Pidana di Indonesia

Wajah Hukum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Tantimin Tantimin
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Information Use ◽  
Problem Formulation ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Sexual Crimes ◽  
Legal Information ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Basic Ideas ◽  
Research Show

Castration is an action given to perpetrators of sexual crimes against children, in addition to imprisonment and fines. The purpose of this article is to find out the basic differences between criminal sanctions and action sanctions, to know the position of castration as an action sanction in criminal law and to analyze the castration penalty does not apply to children as perpetrators of sexual crimes. This research uses doctrinal legal research. Sources of legal information use primary legal materials (regulations and relevant documents) for further qualitative analysis. The approach used is statutory, conceptual, and analysis to help solve the problem formulation. The results of the research show that, at first glance, criminal sanctions and sanctions are often vague to distinguish, but at the level of basic ideas, there are very clear differences between the two types of sanctions. The reactive nature of an act is contained in the criminal sanction which connotes giving an affliction, while the anticipatory nature of the perpetrator of the act is contained in the sanction of action which connotes giving a remedy. The position of castration in the criminal system in Indonesia is not a principal, additional or a burden, but includes a sanction of action. Actions in the form of chemical castration are exempted for child offenders.

scholarly journals An Analysis of The Imposition of Criminal Sanction to COVID-19 Vaccination Objectors Through the Lens of Criminal Law and Qiyas Shafi’i Mazhab in Indonesia

2022 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaki Priambudi ◽  
Sendy Pratama ◽  
Ramdhan Prawira Mulya Iskandar ◽  
Namira Hilda Papuani ◽  
Natasha Intania Sabila
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Health Needs ◽  
Public Order ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Common Interests ◽  
Individual Human

<table width="595" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" width="387"><p><em>This article aims to answer whether vaccination is a right or an obligation and how criminal law and Qiyas Shafi’i Mazhab views the basic provisions of criminal law against vaccination objectors. By combining doctrinal and socio-legal research method, this article concludes that vaccination is an obligation because a person's personal right to choose health services, especially COVID-19 vaccination has turned into a public right. Vaccination is the government's obligation to protect public health as part of meeting health needs, following the mandate of the constitution and human rights. According to the relative punishment theory, the application of criminal sanctions is an effort made to maintain public order and peace of society, not as a means of repaying the perpetrator's mistakes. Thus, the sanctions imposed on the perpetrator are solely to provide fear so that they do not repeat their actions and other people do not follow them. There are three main objectives of relative theory, namely prevention, prevention, and reform. Whereas Qiyas Shafi'i Mazhab puts forward the application of qiyas as a justification for imposing criminal sanctions against vaccination objectors. Because a person is prohibited from doing something that endangers himself and others, punishment according to the Qiyas Shafi'i Mazhab can be applied. There are similarities between criminal law and Qiyas Shafi'i Mazhab to a view of the obligation to vaccinate, that is, both allow the reduction of individual human rights for the sake of common interests. Ultimately, this article recommends the need to regulate the handling of COVID-19 vaccination objectors through act so that vaccination and law enforcement can run comprehensively, not partially </em></p></td></tr></tbody></table>

KEBIJAKAN KRIMINALISASI DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG DI BIDANG POLITIK

Jurnal Hukum ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 1592
Author(s):  
Hanafi Amrani
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Moral Values ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law

AbstrakArtikel ini membahas dua permasalahan pokok: pertama, kriteria yang digunakan oleh pembentuk undang-undang di bidang politik dalam menetapkan suatu perbuatan sebagai perbuatan pidana (kriminalisasi); dan kedua, fungsi sanksi pidana dalam undang-undang di bidang politik. Terkait dengan kriminalisasi, undang-undang di bidang politik yang termasuk ke dalam hukum administrasi, maka pertimbangan dari pembuat undang-undang tentu saja tidak sekedar kriminalisasi sebagaimana diatur dalam ketentuan hukum pidana dalam arti sebenarnya. Hal tersebut disebabkan adanya pertimbangan-pertimbangan tertentu. Pertama, perbuatan yang dilarang dalam hukum pidana administrasi lebih berorientasi pada perbuatan yang bersifat mala prohibita, sedangkan dalam ketentuan hukum pidana yang sesungguhnya berorientasi pada perbuatan yang bersifat mala in se. Kedua, sebagai konsekuensi dari adanya penggolongan dua kategori kejahatan tersebut, maka pertimbangan yang dijadikan acuan juga akan berbeda. Untuk yang pertama (mala prohibita), sanksi pidana itu dibutuhkan untuk menjamin ditegakkannya hukum administrasi tersebut. Dalam hal ini sanksi pidana berfungsi sebagai pengendali dan pengontrol tingkah laku individu untuk mencapai suatu keadaan yang diinginkan. Sedangkan untuk yang kedua (mala in se), fungsi hukum pidana dan sanksi pidana lebih berorientasi pada melindungi dan mempertahankan nilai-nilai moral yang tertanam di masyarakat tempat di mana hukum itu diberlakukan atau ditegakkan. Kata Kunci: Kebijakan, Kriminalisasi, Undang-Undang PolitikThis article discusses two main problems: firstly, the criteria used by the legislators in the field of politics in determining an act as a criminal act (criminalization); secondly, the function of criminal sanctions in legislation in the field of politics. Associated with criminalization, legislation in the field of politics that is included in administrative law, the consideration of the legislators of course not just criminalization as stipulated in the provisions of criminal law in the true sense. This is due to certain considerations. Firstly, the act which is forbidden in the administration of criminal law is more oriented to act is malum prohibitum offences, whereas in actual criminal law provisions in the act are mala in se offences. Secondly, as a consequence of the existence of two categories of classification of the crime, then consideration will also vary as a reference. For the first (mala prohibita), criminal sanctions are needed to ensure the enforcement of the administrative law. In this case the criminal sanction serves as controller and controlling the behavior of individuals to achieve a desired state. As for the second (mala in se), the function of criminal law and criminal sanctions is more oriented to protect and maintain the moral values that are embedded in a society where the law was enacted or enforced.

scholarly journals URGENSI PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PIDANA DALAM KASUS KEJAHATAN KESUSILAAN: KAJIAN TENTANG SANKSI PIDANA BAGI PELAKU KEJAHATAN KESUSILAAN PADA ANAK

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Subaidah Ratna Juita
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Child Victims ◽  
Sexual Crimes ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Second Amendment ◽  
Penal Law

<p>Penjatuhan sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku kejahatan kesusilaan pada anak di Indonesia belum seimbang dengan dampak yang ditimbulkannya. Adapun anak sebagai korban dari kejahatan kesusilaan tentu mengalami trauma yang berkepanjangan hingga dewasa bahkan seumur hidupnya. Salah satu upaya yang dapat ditempuh dalam menghadapi problematika penegakan hukum adalah dengan cara pembenahan sistem hukum. Oleh karna itu perlu adanya pembaharuan sanksi pidana bagi pelaku kejahatan kesusilaan sebagai bagian dari sistem hukum. Pembaharuan ini perlu dilakukan karena sanksi pidana yang ada saat ini tidak memberikan efek jera bagi pelaku. Upaya pembaruan hukum pidana yang berkaitan dengan sanksi pidana dalam kasus kejahatan kesusilaan pada anak dapat ditelusuri berdasarkan perumusan sanksi pidana berdasarkan KUHP, UU Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak, UU Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang perubahan pertama atas UU Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak, dan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang (Perppu) No. 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak. Dengan demikian tulisan ini secara fokus mengkaji urgensi pembaharuan hukum pidana, khususnya hukum pidana materiil tentang sanksi pidana bagi pelaku kejahatan seksual dalam rangka untuk memberikan perlindungan pada anak korban kejahatan seksual.</p><p><em>The imposition of criminal sanctions against the perpetrators of morality in children in Indonesia has not been balanced by its impact. As for the child as a victim of crime decency certainly traumatized prolonged until adulthood even a lifetime. One effort that can be taken in dealing with the problem of law enforcement is to reform the legal system. By because it is necessary to reform criminal sanctions for the perpetrators of decency as part of the legal system. These reforms need to be done because there is a criminal sanction which does not currently provide a deterrent effect on perpetrators. Efforts to reform the criminal law relating to criminal sanctions in cases of crimes of morality in children can be traced by the formulation of criminal sanctions under the penal law, Law No. 23 of 2002 on Child Protection, Law No. 35 of 2014 on the First Amendment of Law No. 23 of 2002 on Child Protection, and Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perppu) Number 1 Year 2016 Concerning Second Amendment Act No. 23 of 2002 about Child Protection. So this paper examines the urgency updates operating focus criminal law, especially criminal law substantive about criminal sanctions for dader of sexual crimes in order to provide protection for child victims of sexual crimes.</em></p><p> </p>

scholarly journals Islamic Law Analysis of Criminal Sanctions for Abortion in the Criminal Code: A Call for Reform

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 5398-5407
Author(s):  
Ishaq, Maratun Saadah
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
Legal Sanctions

This study aims to contribute to Islamic law regarding the criminal sanction of abortion in the Criminal Code (KUHP) as an effort to reform Indonesian criminal law. The method used is comparison, with data collection carried out by library research, by studying Islamic legal literature, interpretation of the Quran (tafsir), hadith, Criminal Code, and the Draft of Criminal Code. The sanctions for abortion in articles 346, 347, 348 and 349 of the Criminal Code are only imprisonment, not accompanied by fines. According to Islamic law these sanctions are not sufficient, because they tend to make the perpetrators not deterred, as a result the purpose of punishment is not achieved. Therefore, it needs to be updated by including the value of Islamic legal sanctions in the form of fines (diat), so that the purpose of punishment can be achieved.

scholarly journals Traditional Criminal Law Existence in the Settlement of Criminal Action in the Environmental Field in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1467-1478
Author(s):  
Mohamad Syarhan, Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya, Bambang Hartono
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Judicial System ◽  
Illegal Logging ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Management Tools ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Fish Poisoning ◽  
Fish Poison

Many cases of environmental pollution and illegal logging have caused alarming damage to the environment. In the Law regarding Environmental Protection and Management, tools to protect the environment have been regulated. One of which is the application of criminal sanctions, but in Indonesia, some laws live in society, one of which is customary criminal law which can also solve criminal acts in the environmental sector. This research aims to analyze the existence of customary criminal law in the settlement of crimes in the environmental sector. This research is legal research with normative juridical research. The results of this study will be presented in descriptive form. The results showed that Hulsman said the criminal justice system had caused suffering because it could not work according to its objectives and did not carry out the principle of accountability. This judicial system had innate defects. In settlement of criminal acts in the environmental sector, examples of customary criminal law are the settlement of fish poisoning cases committed by some Paya Village Village residents. They use fish poison from plants (tuba), Lannet in the form of flour, Bistox in liquid, and Decis, which is liquid.

scholarly journals Kajian Yuridis Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Ayah Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan Menurut Qanun Nomor 6 Tahun 2014

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Liza Agnesta Krisna
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Scientific Papers ◽  
Sociological Method ◽  
The Law

The purpose of this study was to determine the sanction of criminal law to the father as the perpetrator of rape according to Law No. 35 of 2014 on the Amendment of Act No. 23 of 2002 and Qanun No. 6 of 2014 on the Law Jinayat and analysis of Court Decision shar ' Yeah Langsa No. 05 / JN / 2016 / MS. The method used in this research is the analysis of the content or the content analysis, which uses secondary data research that is in-depth discussion of the content of a written document from the book and other scientific papers relevant to criminal law arrangements. But in this study also used the sociological method / empirical to do an interview to one Syar'iyah Court judges. The conclusion is that there is a difference writings criminal sanctions in Law No. 35 of 2014, with Qanun No. 6 of 2014. The criminal sanction in Qanun No. 6 of 2014 was lower than in Act No. 35 of 2014 which is the legal umbrella of safeguards against child.<br /><br /><br />

scholarly journals REKOMENDASI BADAN PEMERIKSA KEUANGAN UNTUK PENGUATAN TATA KELOLA KEUANGAN NEGARA YANG BAIK

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 153
Author(s):  
Djatu Apriellia
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Public Officials ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Financial Governance ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Administrative Sanctions ◽  
Research Show

The audit board of the republic of Indonesia (BPK) examination results in recommendations that must be followed by the public officials. Recommendations are needed for improvements in the management of financial governance. This research is normative as for the issues discussed in this research are first the follow-up monitoring arrangements on BPK recommendations and the sanctions if the recommendation is not followed by the audited entity. This legal research was conducted by examining the primary legal materials and secondary law. The results of this research show that normatively monitoring arrangements follow up on BPK recommendations currently using Peraturan BPK Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 which will use the information system so that the implementation of the follow-up monitoring of the audit board recommendations will be faster, more accurate, and efficient. Furthermore, if the public officials did not discharge the audit board recommendation then will be subject to administrative sanctions and criminal sanctions, but BPK has not had mechanisms and procedures for reporting to the police departement if the recommendation that has not been or is not acted upon by the audited entity. Hasil pemeriksaan BPK menghasilkan rekomendasi yang wajib ditindaklanjuti oleh pejabat. Rekomendasi diperlukan untuk perbaikan-perbaikan manajemen dalam menciptakan tata kelola keuangan negara yang lebih baik. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif adapun permasalahan yang dibahas dalam penelitian ini adalah pertama pengaturan pemantauan tindak lanjut rekomendasi hasil pemeriksaan BPK saat ini dan kedua sanksi apabila rekomendasi BPK tidak ditindaklanjuti oleh entitas yang diperiksa. Penelitian hukum ini dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa secara normatif pengaturan pemantauan tindak lanjut rekomendasi hasil pemeriksaan BPK saat ini menggunakan Peraturan BPK Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 yang akan menggunakan sistem informasi pemantauan tindak lanjut sehingga pelaksanaan pemantauan tindak lanjut rekomendasi BPK akan lebih cepat, akurat, dan efisien. Selanjutnya apabila pejabat tidak melaksanakan rekomendasi BPK maka akan dikenai sanksi administratif maupun sanksi pidana, namun BPK belum memiliki mekanisme dan prosedur pelaporan kepada pihak kepolisian apabila rekomendasi BPK yang belum atau tidak ditindaklanjuti oleh entitas yang diperiksa.

FIXING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CONCEPT OF CRIME: THE CHALLENGE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS

2005 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 719-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audrey Guinchard
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Basic Feature ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Standard Of Proof ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Common ◽  
Substantive Law

In England and Wales, as elsewhere, criminal law stands in sharp contrast to other systems of social control. Criminal offences and their related penalties are clearly distinguishable from civil wrongs and their associated (civil) sanctions. And because the term ‘civil law’ refers not only to the domain of torts, but also encompasses administrative law, criminal penalties are, in addition, distinguished from the administrative or regulatory sanctions. This ‘distinction between criminal and civil justice has been such a basic feature of the common law’1that it shapes not only substantive law but also the organization of the courts into civil, criminal and sometimes administrative chambers or divisions. More importantly, the distinction between civil and criminal sanctions will lead to the application of different procedural rules: civil proceedings, used for the imposition of civil sanctions, are less stringent that their criminal counterpart applied when the offender faces a criminal sanction. This more gentle approach can be detected in both the burden and standard of proof.

scholarly journals The Challenges of Water Pollution: Enforcement of Water Pollution Control

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 81
Author(s):  
I Made Arya Utama ◽  
I Nengah Suharta
Keyword(s):  
Water Pollution ◽  
Water Resources ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Pollution Control ◽  
Water Demand ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Sanction ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Legal Sanctions

Water demand continues to increase, while its availability was increasingly limited due to pollution. Therefore, the issue of legal sanction in the management of water resources was interesting to be examined because of the void of norm related to the sanction of administrative, civil and criminal sanction in Article 87-120 of Act Number 32 of 2009. So, this research was qualified into normative legal research with legal material from result of library research. The type of administrative legal sanctions were more effectively applied to protect water resources from pollution. Administrative Legal Sanction was not implemented through the judges, more easily and quickly implemented in providing protection against water resources, compared with sanctions of Criminal Law and Civil Law.

scholarly journals Sanksi Pidana oleh Tindak Pidana Mengedarkan Simpanan Farmasi Kosmetika Tanpa Izin Edar (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar No. Perkara 491/Pid.Sus/2018/PN DPS)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 218-222
Author(s):  
Rafael Aza Pramesuari ◽  
I Nyoman Sujana ◽  
Diah Gayatri Sudibya
Keyword(s):  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Legal Argument ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Case Number

This study aims to identify and explain criminal sanctions for cosmetic producers or sellers who do not have this distribution license. The type of research used is normative legal research by analysing cases using the Denpasar District Court Decision Case Number 491/Pid.Sus /2018/ PN DPS. This study uses a statutory approach by examining all laws related to this case, conceptually by combining the opinions of experts so that it becomes the author's legal argument, and the case approach is by using a court decision. The results of the study show that there must be elements that indicate that a person has committed a criminal act, and in this writing there are 3 (three) elements that explain that the defendant committed a criminal act. Imposition by the criminal sanction of distributing cosmetic pharmaceutical deposits that do not obtain a distribution permit as regulated in Law Number 36 of 2009 concerning health is regulated in articles 197-201. In this case, the Panel of Judges considered Article 197, namely a maximum imprisonment of 10 (ten) years and a maximum fine of 1,000,000,000 (one billion rupiah). However, the defendant here does not need to undergo the sentence unless later there is another order from the Judge's decision that he has been guilty of committing a criminal act during the probation period has not ended.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document