A small RNA that cooperatively senses two stacked metabolites in one pocket for gene control

Riboswitches are structured non-coding RNAs often located upstream of essential genes in bacterial messenger RNAs. Such RNAs regulate expression of downstream genes by recognizing a specific cellular effector. Although nearly 50 riboswitch classes are known, only a handful recognize multiple effectors. Here, we report the 2.60-Å resolution co-crystal structure of a class I type I preQ1-sensing riboswitch that reveals two effectors stacked atop one another in a single binding pocket. These effectors bind with positive cooperativity in vitro and both molecules are necessary for gene regulation in bacterial cells. Stacked effector recognition appears to be a hallmark of the largest subgroup of preQ1 riboswitches, including those from pathogens such as Neisseria gonorrhoeae. We postulate that binding to stacked effectors arose in the RNA World to closely position two substrates for RNA-mediated catalysis. These findings expand known effector recognition capabilities of riboswitches and have implications for antimicrobial development.

Novel effector recognition capacity engineered into a paired NLR complex

The Arabidopsis RRS1-R Resistance gene confers recognition of the bacterial acetyltransferase PopP2 and another bacterial effector, AvrRps4. The RRS1-S allele recognizes AvrRps4 but not PopP2. RRS1-R/RRS1-S heterozygotes cannot recognize PopP2. RRS1-R and RRS1-S also suppress the constitutive RPS4-dependent autoactivity of RRS1-Rslh1. Phytoplasmas cause important plant diseases, and their effectors can cause degradation of specific host proteins. We tested whether attaching a pathogen effector-dependent degron to RRS1-R, enabling its degradation by phytoplasma effector SAP05, could derepress RRS1-Rslh1 autoactivity, resulting in SAP05-dependent resistance. In transient assays in tobacco, RRS1-R-derived constructs can confer a hypersensitive response (HR) to SAP05. However, phytoplasma infection assays in transgenic Arabidopsis resulted in delayed disease symptoms but not full resistance. We provide a proof-of-concept strategy utilizing the recessiveness of a plant immune receptor gene to engineer recognition of a pathogen effector that promotes degradation of a specific host protein.

The Sw5a gene confers resistance to ToLCNDV and triggers an HR response after direct AC4 effector recognition

Several attempts have been made to identify antiviral genes against Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus (ToLCNDV) and related viruses. This has led to the recognition of Ty genes (Ty1-Ty6), which have been successful in developing virus-resistant crops to some extent. Owing to the regular appearance of resistance-breaking strains of these viruses, it is important to identify genes related to resistance. In the present study, we identified a ToLCNDV resistance (R) gene, SlSw5a, in a ToLCNDV-resistant tomato cultivar, H-88-78-1, which lacks the known Ty genes. The expression of SlSw5a is controlled by the transcription factor SlMyb33, which in turn is regulated by microRNA159 (sly-miR159). Virus-induced gene silencing of either SlSw5a or SlMyb33 severely increases the disease symptoms and viral titer in leaves of resistant cultivar. Moreover, in SlMyb33-silenced plants, the relative messenger RNA level of SlSw5a was reduced, suggesting SlSw5a is downstream of the sly-miR159-SlMyb33 module. We also demonstrate that SlSw5a interacts physically with ToLCNDV-AC4 (viral suppressor of RNA silencing) to trigger a hypersensitive response (HR) and generate reactive oxygen species at infection sites to limit the spread of the virus. The “RTSK” motif in the AC4 C terminus is important for the interaction, and its mutation completely abolishes the interaction with Sw5a and HR elicitation. Overall, our research reports an R gene against ToLCNDV and establishes a connection between the upstream miR159-Myb33 module and its downstream target Sw5a to activate HR in the tomato, resulting in geminivirus resistance.

Pathogen effector recognition-dependent association of NRG1 with EDS1 and SAG101 in TNL receptor immunity

Plants utilise intracellular nucleotide-binding, leucine-rich repeat (NLR) immune receptors to detect pathogen effectors and activate local and systemic defence. NRG1 and ADR1 “helper” NLRs (RNLs) cooperate with enhanced disease susceptibility 1 (EDS1), senescence-associated gene 101 (SAG101) and phytoalexin-deficient 4 (PAD4) lipase-like proteins to mediate signalling from TIR domain NLR receptors (TNLs). The mechanism of RNL/EDS1 family protein cooperation is not understood. Here, we present genetic and molecular evidence for exclusive EDS1/SAG101/NRG1 and EDS1/PAD4/ADR1 co-functions in TNL immunity. Using immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry, we show effector recognition-dependent interaction of NRG1 with EDS1 and SAG101, but not PAD4. An EDS1-SAG101 complex interacts with NRG1, and EDS1-PAD4 with ADR1, in an immune-activated state. NRG1 requires an intact nucleotide-binding P-loop motif, and EDS1 a functional EP domain and its partner SAG101, for induced association and immunity. Thus, two distinct modules (NRG1/EDS1/SAG101 and ADR1/EDS1/PAD4) mediate TNL receptor defence signalling.

Recent Advances in Effector-Triggered Immunity in Plants: New Pieces in the Puzzle Create a Different Paradigm

Plants rely on multiple immune systems to protect themselves from pathogens. When pattern-triggered immunity (PTI)—the first layer of the immune response—is no longer effective as a result of pathogenic effectors, effector-triggered immunity (ETI) often provides resistance. In ETI, host plants directly or indirectly perceive pathogen effectors via resistance proteins and launch a more robust and rapid defense response. Resistance proteins are typically found in the form of nucleotide-binding and leucine-rich-repeat-containing receptors (NLRs). Upon effector recognition, an NLR undergoes structural change and associates with other NLRs. The dimerization or oligomerization of NLRs signals to downstream components, activates “helper” NLRs, and culminates in the ETI response. Originally, PTI was thought to contribute little to ETI. However, most recent studies revealed crosstalk and cooperation between ETI and PTI. Here, we summarize recent advancements in our understanding of the ETI response and its components, as well as how these components cooperate in the innate immune signaling pathways. Based on up-to-date accumulated knowledge, this review provides our current perspective of potential engineering strategies for crop protection.

Design of a new effector recognition specificity in a plant NLR immune receptor by molecular engineering of its integrated decoy domain

SUMMARYPlant nucleotide-binding and leucine-rich repeat domain proteins (NLRs) are immune sensors that specifically recognize pathogen effectors and induce immune responses. Designing artificial NLRs with new effector recognition specificities is a promising prospect for sustainable, knowledge-driven crop protection. However, such strategies are hampered by the complexity of NLR function. Here, we tested whether molecular engineering of the integrated decoy domain (ID) of an NLR could extend its recognition spectrum to a new effector. To this aim, we relied on the detailed molecular knowledge of the recognition of distinct Magnaporthe oryzae MAX (Magnaporthe AVRs and ToxB-like) effectors by the rice NLRs RGA5 and Pikp-1. For both NLRs, effector recognition involves physical binding to their HMA (Heavy Metal-Associated) IDs. However, AVR-PikD, the effector recognized by Pikp-1, binds to a completely different surface of the HMA domain compared to AVR-Pia and AVR1-CO39, recognized by RGA5. By introducing into the HMA domain of RGA5 the residues of the Pikp-1 HMA domain involved in AVR-PikD binding, we created a high-affinity binding surface for this new effector. In the Nicotiana benthamiana heterologous system, RGA5 variants carrying this engineered binding surface still recognize AVR-Pia and AVR1-CO39, but also perceive the new ligand, AVR-PikD, resulting in the activation of immune responses. Therefore, our study provides a proof of concept for the design of new effector recognition specificities in NLRs through molecular engineering of IDs. However, it pinpoints significant knowledge gaps that limit the full deployment of this NLR-ID engineering strategy and provides hypotheses for future research on this topic.

Structural basis for a bacterial Pip system plant effector recognition protein

A number of plant-associated proteobacteria have LuxR family transcription factors that we refer to as PipR subfamily members. PipR proteins play roles in interactions between bacteria and their plant hosts, and some are important for bacterial virulence of plants. We identified an ethanolamine derivative, N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-(2-hydroxyethylamino) acetamide (HEHEAA), as a potent effector of PipR-mediated gene regulation in the plant endophyte Pseudomonas GM79. HEHEAA-dependent PipR activity requires an ATP-binding cassette-type active transport system, and the periplasmic substrate-binding protein (SBP) of that system binds HEHEAA. To begin to understand the molecular basis of PipR system responses to plant factors we crystallized a HEHEAA-responsive SBP in the free- and HEHEAA-bound forms. The SBP, which is similar to peptide-binding SBPs, was in a closed conformation. A narrow cavity at the interface of its two lobes is wide enough to bind HEHEAA, but it cannot accommodate peptides with side chains. The polar atoms of HEHEAA are recognized by hydrogen-bonding interactions, and additional SBP residues contribute to the binding site. This binding mode was confirmed by a structure-based mutational analysis. We also show that a closely related SBP from the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 does not recognize HEHEAA. However, a single amino acid substitution in the presumed effector-binding pocket of the P. syringae SBP converted it to a weak HEHEAA-binding protein. The P. syringae PipR depends on a plant effector for activity, and our findings imply that different PipR-associated SBPs bind different effectors.

Allelic variants of the NLR protein Rpi-chc1 differentially recognise members of the Phytophthora infestans PexRD12/31 effector superfamily through the leucine-rich repeat domain

SummaryPhytophthora infestans is a pathogenic oomycete that causes the infamous potato late blight disease. Resistance (R) genes from diverse Solanum species encode intracellular receptors that recognize P. infestans RXLR effector proteins and provide effective defence responses. To deploy these R genes in a durable fashion in agriculture, we need to understand the mechanism of effector recognition and the way the pathogen evades recognition.We cloned sixteen allelic variants of the Rpi-chc1 gene from Solanum chacoense and other Solanum species, and identified the cognate P. infestans RXLR effectors. These tools were used to study receptor-ligand interactions and co-evolution.Functional and non-functional alleles of Rpi-chc1 encode Coiled-Coil-Nucleotide Binding-Leucine-Rich-Repeat (CNL) proteins. Rpi-chc1.1 recognised multiple PexRD12 (AVRchc1.1) proteins while Rpi-chc1.2 recognised multiple PexRD31 (AVRchc1.2) proteins, both from the PexRD12/31 superfamily. Domain swaps between Rpi-chc1.1 and Rpi-chc1.2 revealed that overlapping subdomains in the LRR were responsible for the difference in effector recognition.This study showed that Rpi-chc1.1 and Rpi-chc1.2, evolved to recognize distinct members of the same PexRD12/31 effector family via the LRR domain. The biased distribution of polymorphisms suggests that exchange of LRRs during host-pathogen co-evolution can lead to novel recognition specificities. These insights will help future strategies to breed for durable resistant varieties.

Pathogen effector recognition-dependent association of NRG1 with EDS1 and SAG101 in TNL receptor immunity

Plants utilise intracellular nucleotide-binding, leucine-rich repeat (NLR) immune receptors to detect pathogen effectors and activate local and systemic defence. NRG1 and ADR1 "helper" NLRs (RNLs), cooperate with enhanced disease susceptibility 1 (EDS1), senescence-associated gene 101 (SAG101) and phytoalexin-deficient 4 (PAD4) lipase-like proteins to mediate signalling from TIR domain NLR receptors (TNLs). However, the mechanism of RNL/ EDS1 family protein cooperation is poorly understood. Here, we provide genetic and molecular evidence for exclusive EDS1/SAG101/NRG1 and EDS1/PAD4/ADR1 co-functions in TNL immunity. Using immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry, we show effector recognition dependent association of NRG1 with EDS1 and SAG101, but not PAD4. An EDS1-SAG101 complex associates with NRG1, and EDS1-PAD4 associates with ADR1, only in an immune-activated state. NRG1 requires an intact nucleotide-binding P-loop motif, and EDS1 a functional EP domain and its partner SAG101, for induced association and immunity. Thus, two distinct modules (NRG1/EDS1/SAG101 and ADR1/EDS1/PAD4) are required to execute TNL receptor defence signalling.

Direct pathogen-induced assembly of an NLR immune receptor complex to form a holoenzyme

Direct or indirect recognition of pathogen-derived effectors by plant nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (LRR) receptors (NLRs) initiates innate immune responses. The Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis effector ATR1 activates the N-terminal Toll–interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain of Arabidopsis NLR RPP1. We report a cryo–electron microscopy structure of RPP1 bound by ATR1. The structure reveals a C-terminal jelly roll/Ig-like domain (C-JID) for specific ATR1 recognition. Biochemical and functional analyses show that ATR1 binds to the C-JID and the LRRs to induce an RPP1 tetrameric assembly required for nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide hydrolase (NADase) activity. RPP1 tetramerization creates two potential active sites, each formed by an asymmetric TIR homodimer. Our data define the mechanism of direct effector recognition by a plant NLR leading to formation of a signaling-active holoenzyme.