420 PROSTVAC in combination with nivolumab enhanced immune cell infiltration in prostate cancer

BackgroundProstate cancer (PC) is the most common non-cutaneous diagnosed cancer among men in USA.1 Although clinical outcomes are favorable for patients with localized disease, 20–30% of patients will develop metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) and have poor prognosis. Immunotherapy, as a single agent, provides benefit to a small subset of PC patients, which is thought to be partially due to its known cold tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Combination studies are needed to enhance benefit.2 Prostvac is a therapeutic cancer vaccine engineered to activate an immune response against prostate-specific Antigen (PSA).3 Prostvac alone could induce systemic immune response by increasing immune-cell infiltrates in and around the tumor.4 In this study, we are exploring the effect of Prostvac in combination with nivolumab in TIME in prostate cancer.MethodsWe treated locally advanced prostate cancer patients (n=6) undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) with neoadjuvant Prostvac in combination with nivolumab, an immune checkpoint PD-1 inhibitor. Dynamic changes in TIME before and after treatment were studied using multiplex immunofluorescence (Opal Method). Formalin fixed paraffin-embedded sections from matched pre-treated prostate biopsies and post-treated RP samples were stained with a validated T cell panel (DAPI, CD4, CD8, FOXP3, Ki67, Pan CK and PD-L1). To analyze the data, TIME was segmented into 3 compartments: intratumoral, invasive margin and benign.ResultsCombination immunotherapy significantly increased CD4+ T cell density in the invasive margin (mean 211.5 cells/mm2 vs 592.2 cells/mm2, p<0.05), with similar trend in the intratumoral and the benign compartments. CD8+ T cell density increased after treatment in the invasive margin (mean 47.25 cells/mm2 vs 157cells/mm2) and the benign compartment. 5/6 and 4/6 patients showed more than 2-fold increase of CD4 and CD8 T cells in the TIME, respectively, in at least one of the three compartments. Increased proliferative indices in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were also seen after treatment. Tregs were present in low frequencies in TIME (maximum of 12 cells/mm2) with no significant changes. Moreover, a significant drop in tumor cell Ki67 after treatment (mean 252.8 cells/mm2 vs 100.5 cells/332, p<0.05) suggests that the combination may control tumor growth.ConclusionsThe combination of Neoadjuvant Prostvac and nivolumab was associated with increased immune cell infiltration in a cohort of early prostate cancer patients. A broader examination of the TIME and the role immune cells undertake to control tumor growth is on-going.Trial RegistrationNCT02933255ReferencesSiegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin (Internet) 2020;70:7–3Zhao SG, Lehrer J, Chang SL, et al. The immune landscape of prostate cancer and nomination of PD-L2 as a potential therapeutic target. J Natl Cancer Inst 2018;111:301–10.Madan RA, Arlen PM, Mohebtash M, et al. Prostvac-VF: a vectorbased vaccine targeting PSA in prostate cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2009;18:1001–11Abdul Sater H, Marté JL, Donahue RN, et al. Neoadjuvant PROSTVAC prior to radical prostatectomy enhances T-cell infiltration into the tumor immune microenvironment in men with prostate cancer. J Immunother Cancer 2020;8(1):655–64Ethics ApprovalThis study was performed in compliance with ethical standard and was approved by the NIH IRB, 17C-0007. All patients participating in this study gave an informed consent before taking part.

895 Discovery of a safer 4–1BB agonist by targeting a membrane-proximal epitope combined with bispecific-mediated cross-bridging

BackgroundCheckpoint inhibitors towards cytotoxic T-lymphocyte protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) have paved the way for a new frontier of anti-cancer therapies that modulate our pre-existing immune system to fight against malignancies. 4-1BB is a tumor-necrosis superfamily member expressed on NK and T cells, that acts as a co-stimulatory receptor to improve effector/memory responses towards tumors. Early efforts have focused on the generation of agonist antibodies towards 4-1BB that relied on Fc-mediated cross-linking to cluster and induce receptor downstream signaling, but has led to liver- and immune-related toxicities. We have discovered a PD-L1 x 4-1BB bispecific that exhibits conditional agonist activity in the presence of PD-L1 with better safety features.Methods vHH binders to PD-L1 and 4-1BB were generated from immune libraries derived from camelids and selected via yeast display. Antibody screening was carried out by protein-protein interaction analysis and cell-based binding. Target-related activity was confirmed using luciferase reporter assays. Primary immune cells were also tested for T cell activation via the detection of IL-2 and IFNg secretion. PD-L1-mediated 4-1BB activation via cross-bridging was carried out using target cells expressing PD-L1 co-cultured with effector cells. X-ray crystallography was conducted to resolve the binding sites of both the anti-PD-L1 and anti-4-1BB vHHs. Both tumor efficacy and safety assessment were tested in human knockin mice.ResultsThe 4-1BB binder of PM1003 was found to interact with the CRD4 domain of 4-1BB, as determined by X-ray crystallography. Binding to this domain does not affect the binding between 4-1BB and its ligand 4-1BBL. The anti-PD-L1 vHH binds to an epitope on PD-L1 that overlaps with the binding region of PD-1, and is thus effective in disrupting the interaction between PD-1 and PD-L1. Using luciferase reporter assays and primary cell assays we found the PM1003 could activate 4-1BB in the context of PD-L1-mediated cross-bridging. Data from human 4-1BB and PD-L1 knockin mice also showed that PM1003 could effectively control tumor growth without observing any toxicity signals.ConclusionsPM1003 is a safe and efficacious bispecific antibody that blocks PD-L1 and concurrently activates 4-1BB receptor. An antibody with mild activity was selected directed against the CRD4 domain of 4-1BB to elicit effective potency while minimizing potential toxicity issues. This was reflected in our results. Thus, PM1003 is a potential next generation therapeutic antibody in the IO space that combines and synergizes two independent signaling pathways to control tumor growth.

The promise and perils of immunotherapy

Advances in understanding the ways in which the immune system fails to control tumor growth or prevent autoimmunity have led to the development of powerful therapeutic strategies to treat these diseases. In contrast to conventional therapies that have a broadly suppressive effect, immunotherapies are more akin to targeted therapies because they are mechanistically driven and are typically developed with the goal of “drugging” a specific underlying pathway or phenotype. This means that their effects and toxicities are, at least in theory, more straightforward to anticipate. The development of functionalized antibodies, genetically engineered T cells, and immune checkpoint inhibitors continues to accelerate, illuminating new biology and bringing new treatment to patients. In the following sections, we provide an overview of immunotherapeutic concepts, highlight recent advances in the field of immunotherapies, and discuss controversies and future directions, particularly as these pertain to hematologic oncology or blood-related diseases. We conclude by illustrating how original research published in this journal fits into and contributes to the overall framework of advances in immunotherapy.

Optimization of New Catalytic Topoisomerase II Inhibitors as an Anti-Cancer Therapy

Clinically used topoisomerase II (TOP2) inhibitors are poison inhibitors that induce DNA damage to cause cancer cell death. However, they can also destroy benign cells and thereby show serious side effects, including cardiotoxicity and drug-induced secondary malignancy. New TOP2 inhibitors with a different mechanism of action (MOA), such as catalytic TOP2 inhibitors, are needed to more effectively control tumor growth. We have applied computer-aided drug design to develop a new group of small molecule inhibitors that are derivatives of our previously identified lead compound T60. Particularly, the compound T638 has shown improved solubility and microsomal stability. It is a catalytic TOP2 inhibitor that potently suppresses TOP2 activity. T638 has a novel MOA by which it binds TOP2 proteins and blocks TOP2–DNA interaction. T638 strongly inhibits cancer cell growth, but exhibits limited genotoxicity to cells. These results indicate that T638 is a promising drug candidate that warrants further development into clinically used anticancer drugs.

VLM catecholaminergic neurons control tumor growth by regulating CD8+ T cells

It is known that tumor growth can be influenced by the nervous system. It is not known, however, if tumors communicate directly with the central nervous system (CNS) or if such interactions may impact tumor growth. Here, we report that ventrolateral medulla (VLM) catecholaminergic (CA) neurons in the mouse brain are activated in tumor-bearing mice and the activity of these neurons significantly alter tumor growth in multiple syngeneic and spontaneous mouse tumor models. Specific ablation of VLM CA neurons by a dopamine-β-hydroxylase (DBH) promotor-activated apoptosis-promoting caspase-3 in Dbh-Cre mice as well as inhibition of these neurons by a chemogenetic method slowed tumor progression. Consistently, chemogenetic activation of VLM CA neurons promoted tumor growth. The tumor inhibition effect of VLM CA neuron ablation is mitigated in Dbh-Cre;Rag1−/− mice, indicating that this regulatory effect is mediated by the adaptive immune system. Specific depletion of CD8+ T cells using an anti-CD8+ antibody also mitigated the tumor suppression resulting from the VLM CA neuron ablation. Finally, we showed that the VLM CA neuronal ablation had an additive antitumor effect with paclitaxel treatment. Collectively, our study uncovered the role of VLM CA neurons in the mouse brain in controlling tumor growth in the mouse body.

Sequence of αPD-1 relative to local tumor irradiation determines the induction of abscopal antitumor immune responses

Although radiotherapy has been used for over a century to locally control tumor growth, alone it rarely induces an abscopal response or systemic antitumor immunity capable of inhibiting distal tumors outside of the irradiation field. Results from recent studies suggest that combining immune checkpoint blockades to radiotherapy may enhance abscopal activity. However, the treatment conditions and underlying immune mechanisms that consistently drive an abscopal response during radiation therapy combinations remain unknown. Here, we analyzed the antitumor responses at primary and distal tumor sites, demonstrating that the timing of αPD-1 antibody administration relative to radiotherapy determined the potency of the induced abscopal response. Blockade of the PD-1 pathway after local tumor irradiation resulted in the expansion of polyfunctional intratumoral CD8+ T cells, a decrease in intratumoral dysfunctional CD8+ T cells, expansion of reprogrammable CD8+ T cells, and induction of potent abscopal responses. However, administration of αPD-1 before irradiation almost completely abrogated systemic immunity, which associated with increased radiosensitivity and death of CD8+ T cells. The subsequent reduction of polyfunctional effector CD8+ T cells at the irradiated tumor site generated a suboptimal systemic antitumor response and the loss of abscopal responses. Therefore, this report maximizes the potential synergy between radiotherapy and αPD-1 immunotherapy, information that will benefit clinical combinations of radiotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade.

Clinical Activity of an hTERT-Specific Cancer Vaccine (Vx-001) in “Immune Desert” NSCLC

Background: Tumors can be separated into immunogenic/hot and non-immunogenic/cold on the basis of the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), the expression of PD-L1 and the tumor mutation burden (TMB). In immunogenic tumors, TILs become unable to control tumor growth because their activity is suppressed by different inhibitory pathways, including PD-1/PD-L1. We hypothesized that tumor vaccines may not be active in the immunosuppressive microenvironment of immunogenic/hot tumors while they could be efficient in the immune naïve microenvironment of non-immunogenic/cold tumors. Methods: The randomized phase II Vx-001-201 study investigated the effect of the Vx-001 vaccine as maintenance treatment in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Biopsies from 131 (68 placebo and 63 Vx-001) patients were retrospectively analyzed for PD-L1 expression and TIL infiltration. TILs were measured as tumor-associated immune cells (TAICs), CD3-TILs, CD8-TILs and granzyme B-producing TILs (GZMB-TILs). Patients were distinguished into PD-L1(+) and PD-L1(-) and into TIL high and TIL low. Findings: There was no correlation between PD-L1 expression and Vx-001 clinical activity. In contrast, Vx-001 showed a significant improvement of overall survival (OS) vs. placebo in TAIC low (21 vs. 8.1 months, p = 0.003, HR = 0.404, 95% CI 0.219–0.745), CD3-TIL low (21.6 vs. 6.6 months, p < 0.001, HR = 0.279, 95% CI 0.131–0.595), CD8-TIL low (21 vs. 6.6 months, p < 0.001; HR = 0.240, 95% CI 0.11–0.522) and GZMB-TIL low (20.7 vs. 11.1 months, p = 0.011, HR = 0.490, 95% CI 0.278–0.863). Vx-001 did not offer any clinical benefit in patients with TAIC high, CD3-TIL high, CD8-TIL high or GZMB-TIL high tumors. CD3-TIL, CD8-TIL and GZMB-TIL were independent predictive factors of Vx-001 efficacy. Conclusions: These results support the hypothesis that Vx-001 may be efficient in patients with non-immunogenic/cold but not with immunogenic/hot tumors.

Discipline in Stages: Regulating CD8+ Resident Memory T Cells

Resident memory CD8+ T (TRM) cells are a lymphocyte lineage distinct from circulating memory CD8+ T cells. TRM lodge within peripheral tissues and secondary lymphoid organs where they provide rapid, local protection from pathogens and control tumor growth. However, dysregulation of CD8+ TRM formation and/or activation may contribute to the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Intrinsic mechanisms, including transcriptional networks and inhibitory checkpoint receptors control TRM differentiation and response. Additionally, extrinsic stimuli such as cytokines, cognate antigen, fatty acids, and damage signals regulate TRM formation, maintenance, and expansion. In this review, we will summarize knowledge of CD8+ TRM generation and highlight mechanisms that regulate the persistence and responses of heterogeneous TRM populations in different tissues and distinct microenvironments.

EXTH-43. GENERATION OF A B-CELL-BASED VACCINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF GLIOBLASTOMA

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of many tumors. However, most glioblastoma (GBM) patients have not, so far, benefited from such successes. With the goal of exploring ways to boost anti-GBM immunity, we developed a B-cell-based vaccine (BVax) that consists of 4-1BBL+ B cells activated with CD40 agonism and IFNg stimulation. BVaxmigrate to key secondary lymphoid organs and are proficient at antigen cross-presentation, which promotes both the survival and functionality of CD8+ T cells. A combination of radiation, BVax, and PD-L1 blockade conferred tumor eradication in 80% of treated tumor-bearing animals. This treatment elicited immunologic memory that prevented the growth of new tumors upon subsequent re-injection in cured mice. GBM patient-derived BVax were successful in activating autologous CD8+ T cells; these T cells showed a strong ability to kill autologous glioma cells. In addition to the role in activating CD8+ T cells, BVax produce tumor-specific antibodies able to control tumor growth via antibody-mediated cell cytotoxicity. In conclusion, BVax tackles GBM immunosurveillance escape by using both cellular (CD8+ T-cell activation) and humoral (anti-tumor antibody production) immunity. Our study provides an efficient alternative to current immunotherapeutic approaches that can be readily translated to the clinic.