odor sensitivity
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

51
(FIVE YEARS 10)

H-INDEX

17
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Foods ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 3122
Author(s):  
Sharon Puleo ◽  
Ada Braghieri ◽  
Corrado Pacelli ◽  
Alessandra Bendini ◽  
Tullia Gallina Toschi ◽  
...  

Smell, which allows us to gather information about the hedonic value of an odor, is affected by many factors. This study aimed to assess the relationship among individual factors, odor sensitivity, and enjoyment, and to evaluate how overall flavor perception and liking in actual food samples are affected by odor sensitivity. A total of 749 subjects, from four different Italian regions, participated in the study. The olfactory capabilities test on four odors (anise, banana, mint, and pine), as well as PROP (6-n-prpyl-2-thiouracil) status and food neophobia were assessed. The subjects were clustered into three groups of odor sensitivity, based on the perceived intensity of anise. The liking and intensity of the overall flavor were evaluated for four chocolate puddings with increasing sweetness (C1, C2, C3, and C4). The individual variables significantly affected the perceived intensity and liking of the odors. Even if all of the odor sensitivity groups perceived the more intensely flavored samples as the C1 and C4 chocolate puddings, the high-sensitivity group scored the global flavor of all of the samples as more intense than the low-sensitivity group. The low-sensitive subjects evaluated the liking of the sweeter samples with higher scores than the moderate-sensitive subjects, whereas the high-sensitive subjects gave intermediate scores. In conclusion, odor sensitivity plays a pivotal role in the perception and liking of real food products; this has to be taken into account in the formulation of new products, suitable for particular categories with reduced olfactory abilities.


Author(s):  
Małgorzata Okrasa ◽  
Justyna Szulc ◽  
Agnieszka Brochocka ◽  
Beata Gutarowska

Filtering facepiece respirators (FFR) with anti-odor properties are used to reduce odor nuisance occurring both in everyday life and at workplaces. Unfortunately, there are no standardized methods to measure the efficiency of odor reduction of such personal protective devices. This paper aims to determine whether olfactometric-based methods, commonly used in environmental studies, can be employed for this purpose. The proposed procedure is based on the detection of n-butanol by study participants, and it consists of three subsequent stages: (i) defining the individual levels of odor sensitivity of each study participant; (ii) determining THE odor detection level while using FFRs with varying anti-odor properties; and (iii) completing a questionnaire concerning the subjective perceptions of study participants. As a measure of odor reduction efficiency, a coefficient W, defined as a quotient of the degree of odor reduction by the FFR, and the individual odor sensitivity of the subject, was proposed. The experimental results showed the ability of our measure to differentiate the effectiveness of odor reduction of tested FFRs. This indicates that it can be potentially employed as the assessment tool to confirm the effectiveness of such respiratory protective devices as a control measure mitigating the adverse effects of malodors on workers’ health, cognition, and behavior.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Wise ◽  
Steven Rowe ◽  
Pamela Dalton

Modern natural gas (NG) has little or no odor, so other compounds, usually mercaptans and thiols, are added as warning odorants. Federal regulations state that NG must be odorized so that it is readily detectable by people with normal senses of smell at one fifth the lower explosive limit, but regulations don't define "readily detectable" or "normal senses of smell." Methods to measure human odor detection have been available for decades. However, most previous work on NG odorants has underestimated human sensitivity, and measurements need to be repeated using the latest methods. More work is also needed to determine how odor sensitivity measured under optimal laboratory conditions is affected by real-world factors such as distraction and exposure to other odors in the environment. Regarding a "normal sense of smell," healthy people vary over orders of magnitude in the concentrations they can detect, so samples of subjects should be chosen to reflect the range of differences in the population.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Pellegrino ◽  
Joel D Mainland ◽  
Christine E Kelly ◽  
Jane K Parker ◽  
Thomas Hummel

Among those many individuals who suffer from a reduced odor sensitivity (hyposmia/anosmia) some individuals also experience disorders that lead to odor distortion, such as parosmia (i.e., distorted odor with a known source), or odor phantoms (i.e., odor sensation without an odor source). We surveyed a large population with at least one olfactory disorder (N = 2031) and found that odor distortions were common (46%), with respondents reporting either parosmia (19%), phantosmia (11%), or both (16%). In comparison to respondents with hyposmia or anosmia, respondents with parosmia were more likely to be female, young, and suffered from post-viral olfactory loss (p < 0.001), while phantosmia occurred most frequently in middle-aged respondents (p < 0.01) and was more likely to be caused by head trauma than parosmia (p < 0.01). A higher prevalence of odor distortion was observed 3 months to a year after their olfactory symptom onset (p < 0.001), which coincides with the timeline of physiological recovery. Additionally, we observed that the frequency and duration of distortions negatively affects quality of life, with parosmia showing a higher range of severity than phantosmia (p < 0.001). Previous research often grouped these distortions together, but our results show that they have distinct patterns of demographics, medical history, and loss in quality of life.


Author(s):  
Jesse K Siegel ◽  
Xiandao Yuan ◽  
Kristen E Wroblewski ◽  
Martha K McClintock ◽  
Jayant M Pinto

Abstract Background Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is a common, underdiagnosed condition in older adults with major health consequences, including disrupted central nervous system functioning. Whether SDB may affect sensory function is unclear. We sought to address this question by comparing 2 forms of olfactory testing which measure peripheral and central olfactory processing. Methods We assessed SDB (survey-reported snoring frequency, nighttime apneic events, or diagnosis of sleep apnea) in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project, a nationally representative sample of older U.S. adults. Odor sensitivity (peripheral) and odor identification (central) were assessed with validated instruments. Logistic regression was used to test the relationship between SDB and olfaction, accounting for relevant covariates, including demographics, cognition, and comorbidity. Results Twenty-nine percent of older U.S. adults reported symptoms of SDB (apneic events or nightly snoring). Of these, only 32% had been diagnosed with sleep apnea. Older adults with SDB (those who reported symptoms or have been diagnosed with sleep apnea) were significantly more likely to have impaired odor identification (odds ratio 2.13, 95% confidence interval 1.19–3.83, p = .012) in analyses that accounted for age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, cognition, comorbidities (including depression), and body mass index. Presence of SDB was not associated with impaired odor sensitivity (odds ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.75–1.43, p = .84). Conclusion SDB is highly prevalent but underdiagnosed in older U.S. adults and is associated with impaired odor identification but not odor sensitivity. These data support the concept that SDB affects pathways in the central nervous system which involve chemosensory processing.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 121-122
Author(s):  
Marjana Sarker ◽  
Scott Leiser

Abstract Recent studies support the deterioration of the sense of smell as an important biomarker for cognitive impairment diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease. The model organism C. elegans has a well-studied olfactory system, which provides an ideal platform to measure loss of smell with aging. The goal of our project is to use the short lifespan and olfactory changes observed in nematodes to identify mechanisms to slow aging and treat age-related diseases. Our approach is to utilize worms at various times of their healthy adult lifespan and to test for their sensitivity to known attractants such as benzaldehyde. These odorants are largely detected by the main AWC olfactory neurons. It is well documented that the responsiveness of AWC decreases with age. Our paradigm is to briefly fast worms to increase motivation before testing their ability to discriminate odors. Our results show that younger worms actively move toward the attractant and show preference for specific attractants. However, older worms frequently do not respond to attractive odors and remain near the point of origin, regardless of motility. These results indicate a decreased odor response with age. Our current work focuses on identifying genes and compounds that positively affect this odor response in older animals. The resulting data can then be tested for their efficacy to improve other aspects of healthspan and potentially longevity.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Pellegrino ◽  
Thomas Hörberg ◽  
Jonas Olofsson ◽  
Curtis Luckett

Olfactory research in humans has largely focused on odors perceived via sniffing, orthonasal olfaction, while ignoring odors perceived from the mouth, or retronasal perception. Prior work on retronasally presented odors use animal models and focus mainly on odor sensitivity, but little is known about retronasal olfactory perception and cognition in humans. In this study, we compared orthonasal and retronasal routes of odor presentation to investigate differences in odor descriptions. Thirty-six individuals participated in a within-subjects study using twelve odors (varying in pleasantness and edibility) in perceptual and semantic tasks. As expected, we found route-dependent differences in perceptual odor quality (pleasantness, edibility, and familiarity ratings), and a better ability to identify odors during orthonasal presentation. Additionally, more concrete (and source-based) language was used when describing odors presented orthonasally. Interestingly, sensitivity and intensity did not explain these observed route-dependent differences in descriptor usage, suggesting two different central processing mechanisms among the two routes of odor presentation. Our results have implications for the study of food perception, where retronasal olfaction is predominant.


Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 2201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Poessel ◽  
Jessica Freiherr ◽  
Kathleen Wiencke ◽  
Arno Villringer ◽  
Annette Horstmann

The worldwide obesity epidemic is a major health problem driven by the modern food environment. Recently, it has been shown that smell perception plays a key role in eating behavior and is altered in obesity. However, the underlying mechanisms of this phenomenon are not well understood yet. Since the olfactory system is closely linked to the endocrine system, we hypothesized that hormonal shifts in obesity might explain this relationship. In a within-subject, repeated-measures design, we investigated sensitivity to a food and a non-food odor in the hungry and sated state in 75 young healthy (26 normal weight, 25 overweight, and 24 obese) participants (37 women). To determine metabolic health status and hormonal reactivity in response to food intake, we assessed pre- and postprandial levels of insulin, leptin, glucose, and ghrelin. Odor sensitivity did not directly depend on body weight status/body mass index (BMI) or hunger state. However, we could establish a strong negative mediating effect of insulin resistance on the relationship between BMI/waist-hip ratio and olfactory sensitivity for the food odor. These findings indicate an impact of metabolic health status on sensitivity to food odors. Our results contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms behind altered smell perception in obesity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-330
Author(s):  
Lucy Xu ◽  
Jia Liu ◽  
Kristen E Wroblewski ◽  
Martha K McClintock ◽  
Jayant M Pinto

Abstract The ability to identify odors predicts morbidity, mortality, and quality of life. It varies by age, gender, and race and is used in the vast majority of survey and clinical literature. However, odor identification relies heavily on cognition. Other facets of olfaction, such as odor sensitivity, have a smaller cognitive component. Whether odor sensitivity also varies by these factors has not been definitively answered. We analyzed data from the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project, a nationally representative study of older US adults (n = 2081). Odor identification was measured using 5 validated odors presented with Sniffin’ Stick pens as was odor sensitivity in a 6-dilution n-butanol constant stimuli detection test. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression modeled relationships between olfaction and age, gender, race, cognition, education, socioeconomic status, social network characteristics, and physical and mental health. Odor sensitivity was worse in older adults (P &lt; 0.01), without gender (P = 0.56) or race (P = 0.79) differences. Odor identification was also worse in older adults, particularly men (both P ≤ 0.01), without differences by race. Decreased cognitive function was associated with worse odor identification (P ≤ 0.01) but this relationship was weaker for odor sensitivity (P = 0.02) in analyses that adjusted for other covariates. Odor sensitivity was less strongly correlated with cognitive ability than odor identification, confirming that it may be a more specific measure of peripheral olfactory processing. Investigators interested in associations between olfaction and health should consider both odor sensitivity and identification when attempting to understand underlying neurosensory mechanisms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document